Thanks for translating. I can't read Chinese chicken scratch, only 한글 and Engrish.

Frankly speaking, you're right on for thinking that way. Ideas are a dime a dozen, and most people don't have what it takes to make ideas actually work (nothing against them, sometimes they're just not in the right position/situation/circumstances) and yet human greed causes them to think the idea is their "baby" so that even if they give it away one day to someone who can make it work, they feel entitled to suing said person later on down the road.

In that sense, Ideas are worth less than a dime a dozen because they can cost you more than they are worth.

@Original chinese authors: And?

I really don't understand or appreciate the "there are lots of other things to see in town too!" arguments. Fuck everything else in town, no one is going for a sightseeing expedition of a town, they're going to a convention/conference.

Site isn't letting me add anything.

Good point. That was rather braindead of me.

In that case, anything that can be construed as intending violence against others should be illegal (as it already is in the USA) and only followed up with judgement when an actual crime occurs.

This. And it's not really different than break beats have always been. People are so dumb.

This is interesting, although I don't quite see any appropriate choice (nor do I fully understand the poll) so I'll post my thoughts here instead.

Freedom of speech allows for this in the US at least, and I don't think this level of opinion should ever be stifled under any circumstances.

At least in the US, this kind of wording is called "bad journalism" and doesn't include any citations or evidence to show proof of the claim. If it negatively affects a group, that group could be legally obliged to file a law suit. Typically though, it's just bad journalism and people stop listening to the author. This, not the topics being discussed or conspiracies to shut them down, is often the same reason why small-time hyper-political and activist voices, programs, channels etc never make it mainstream-- because they're reckless and unprofessional with their wording.

At least in the US, this kind of wording is called "bad journalism" and doesn't include any citations or evidence to show proof of the claim. If it negatively affects a group, that group could be legally obliged to file a law suit. Typically though, it's just bad journalism and people stop listening to the author. This, not the topics being discussed or conspiracies to shut them down, is often the same reason why small-time hyper-political and activist voices, programs, channels etc never make it mainstream-- because they're reckless and unprofessional with their wording.

Freedom of speech allows for this in the US at least, and I don't think this level of opinion should ever be stifled under any circumstances. It may not win you any friends (except equally ignorant ones) but it does not elaborate on any plans to take action, just expresses a feeling.

Freedom of speech allows for this in the US at least, and I don't think this level of opinion should ever be stifled under any circumstances. It may not win you any friends (except equally ignorant ones) but it does not elaborate on any plans to take action, just expresses a feeling.

Proving approval is the first step to establishing intent and it is dangerous to speak this way regarding illegal activities. Until there actually is a crime committed however, it is considered Freedom of speech and it is allowed in the US at least. I don't think approval of things should ever cause judgments to be passed on individuals who do not take part, unless their un-action in fact aids the illegal act (e.g. not helping a person because they were black and letting them die could be  accomplice in a racial hate crime, although proving intent would be next to impossible without statements like this having been made publicly beforehand).

This is downright inciting violence and although in the US it is covered under Freedom of speech, that stops the moment a crime actually occurs as a direct result of it. I personally make jokes like this all the time with friends and society as a whole understands this. Saying "I'm gonna kill you!" should never be punishable unless you actually kill the person or incited the actions that led to their death.

If intent is not proven, this can be covered by Freedom of speech (at least in the US). If intent is found and/or the act is carried out with, it is a clean cut case of a contracted murder should be punished for the action, not the words.


Despite what I said above, I personally feel that people need to be allowed the space to make mistakes (hit someone and realize it wasn't right, steal something and realize they are hurting someone, etc) in order to grow in society. When murder is the mistake however, we have to be a bit more careful. That said, none of the above should be illegal to merely "say". They should be illegal to act upon, and even then, they are nothing more than evidence towards plausible intent.

Freedoms get trampled on when "I don't like people with blue eyes." becomes intent for murder.

OP is just excited probably because of all the annoyance caused by the individual and just wants to hurt them in some way emotionally. There is nothing of value in these dox though, except of course to reinforce the long debated assumption that nerds are in fact nerds.

Traditionally, doxxing is used to uncover lies, deception and fraud purported by individuals, like when SA goons found out about Bruce's previous history as a scammer, or when they thought that the school I ran was fake. The problem is, documents don't always tell the full story, so a lot of the time all you get is shock value which may be entertaining but not really useful.

This does nothing but embarrass the guy. I won't pass judgment on this since I don't know what's going on, and I do understand that doxxing is a process (it doesn't stop until it strikes gold) but sometimes, you never strike gold, and that's when it starts feeling like you're beating a dead cat with a stick.

Let's see where it leads since anyone can look up his public court records etc now, find his profiles and accounts on other sites, etc. Who knows. Maybe he's a kiddy fiddler, a gun runner (haha...runner...) or in the witness protection program for witnessing a cop shoot another cop in an Amish village.

As someone who posts their birth certificate on imgur whenever there is nothing better to do, doxxing seems only worthwhile if you can uncover something like with Bold Funding. Hacking in general is fun, as is rummaging through other people's private things like a child explores his new surroundings. Most moralfags don't want to admit it, but invading privacy is one of the quickest ways to educating oneself on society (although obviously works the opposite direction for actual social skills).

Oh hey, imagine that, the losing side is full of losers.   All alt-coins need to be destroyed, not just the ones you don't like, such is the nature of competition.



There's nothing wrong with being a keyboard warrior when your cause is great and you have nothing to hide. Too bad that isn't the case here. Anyone who removes what they post because people "get too close" never believed in what they were doing in the first place, or just weren't ready to pay the price for it.

I'll add this quote to the video page for clarity. Thanks!

This is how to communicate. Welcome to the human race brother.

Not sarcasm, but what's false? Can we start a new thread about it and clarify?

I love it when newbies show themselves by talking like veterans. It really blows their cover so bad.

This video explains how it all happened. [Dated]

I THIKN I NOE U

Approved!

It is a different culture indeed, and as I've pointed out numerous times, I truly believe that Bitcoin is essentially useless to Koreans for example who can wire transfer over their cell phone in the same amount of time it would take to send bitcoins, all from a secured, locked down, government backed and insured bank of 100+ years history without incurring any fees at all.

That right there though only works in a country as small as Korea for legal reasons alone. Having something like that in the USA would be a nightmare for legal and financial reasons. And that is exactly my point. America hasn't been the "leader" in technology in a long, long time. Right now it's the anvil of the technology world-- solid, but weighing everything else down.

Sure is! And even Silicon Valley itself sucks balls compared to Japan, Korea, Taiwan and China.

EDIT: Americans are really good at standardizing things. Asians are really good at getting them out the door, that's why there are more lawsuits and safety issues against Asian products than even US products. You sir, are in the wrong country to be talking about imaginary ideas that need to be made and tried before they can work. America is more about proving something can work before it does.

That's because you live in the armpit of assland Texas. Try coming to Asia where we make everything you get 6 years before you get it. I use my phone to pay for everything. Please step aside and let the adults talk.

Facepalms don't do OP justice. This calls for a facefuck.