Nakon mjesecne analize fokusirane na nas dio, vrijeme je i za one usporedne chartove da se vidi kakvi smo u uspredbi sa ostalim lokalnim boardovima
<cut>
Nije loše što se tiće broja postova. Vjerujem da ćemo se vratiti na >1200 vrijednosti nakon ljetne 'stanke'. Koliko vidim, skoro svi aktivni članovi su u kampanjama pa vjerojatno i to doprinosi općenitoj aktivnosti. Šteta što smo i dalje prilično loši po pitanju podjeljenih merita i merit/post odnosa. Mislim da nam je lokal prilično dobar i rasprave su kvalitetne te nemamo problema sa serijskim spamerima kao neki drugi boardovi... |
|
|
|
I am having problems accessing old ETH address created with Ledger Nano S and MEW a few years ago. I assume it is because of an exotic derivation path I used back then. Is there any way (or tool) to determine the derivation path from a provided ETH address? Unfortunately, the problem still exists. Is there anyone here who can answer that question for me? Is it possible to deduce from a given Ethereum address which Derivation Path it was created with? Thanks a lot! I'm sorry, but I don't think it's possible to determine a derivation path based on a given ETH address alone. There is nothing encoded in the public key to indicate how it was generated or whether the derivation path was used at all. |
|
|
|
How is it that before that player won so much I lost way more than I should based on the percentage of the bankroll that I had yesterday? It’s like if other investors divested just before that gambler started winning, leaving me “exposed” to the player. And then, after they have stopped winning, they invest.
These were not 'other investors' but the player who won big himself. He is probably divesting - playing with big stakes - and reinvesting profits. The only thing I don't understand is how someone can have so much luck for several days in a row.
[...] Ethan, you should edit this section of the site to reflect the new changes:  |
|
|
|
Ajmo biti malo aktivni i tamo, da se vidi kako smo najaktivniji na forumu i bez moderatora  Javljam kad otvore naš lokalni forum. OK, Slažem se. Nisam još imao vremena proći kroz sve kategorije i teme. Je li rasprava tamo isključivo u vezi novog softvera i prijave bug-ova ili se može pisati o bilo čemu? |
|
|
|
dakle coinbistro je samo nekakav test koji ce biti implementiran pod bitcointalk ili je novi forum koji ce nastaviti biti aktivan kao takav?
Kada (ako) se novi softver implementira pod bitcointalk.org domenu, importirat će se cijela baza (korisnici, postovi, kategorije ...) iz trenutnog foruma. Zato se i kopiraju pojedini postovi sa bitcointalk-a na coinbistro da se vidi da li se sve ispravno prikazuje. Što će biti sa coinbistro forumom i postovima na njemu, nemam pojma. Pretpostavljam da bi mogao ostati kao nekakva testna platforma za Epochtalk ili nešto slično. |
|
|
|
Krenula je nova sig. kampanja; [OPEN] OWNR wallet | Full EOS Support Party | Signature Campaign | Full Member +Manager je sujonali1819 i traže minimalno 20 postova tjedno. Na žalost, lokalni board-ovi i neki drugi se ne računaju. Payouts & Positions:
5x Full Members - $10 BTC/Week
10x Senior Members - $15 BTC/Week
10X Hero/Legendary Members - $30 BTC/Week
Nije baš neka lova ali ako ste bez kampanje... Bolje išta nego ništa.  |
|
|
|
|
406,000,001
Username: FatFok
|
|
|
|
dodatno, vazno obavestenje, ukoliko pravite nalog najbolje da ne koristite isti username, a svakako ne istu kombinaciju username/password kao ovde, jer ima par scam test verzija, verujem da to i sami znate, ali ja nisam odmah pomislio na to, a mogli biste ostati bez BTT naloga
Da, svakako nikada ne koristiti isti (niti sličan) password za registraciju. To valjda svi već dobro znaju. Što se tiče korisničkog imena, mislim da tu nema problema koristiti isti. Taj podatak je svakako javno dostupan i vidljiv na trenutnom forumu. Jedino što ćete dodatno otkriti administratorima na novom forumu je vaša IP adresa odnosno vezu između određenog korisničkog imena i IP adrese. Ali opet, niti oni ne mogu biti sigurni da se radi o istom korisniku kao na ovom forumu osim ako uz to ne potpišete i BTC adresu koju ste koristili ovdje. |
|
|
|
A je li to softver kojeg je razvila ekipa kojoj je Theymos platio ili je to neki sasvim drugi softver?
Da, to je taj softver. Epochtalk - https://github.com/epochtalk/epochtalkNe znam. Čudno mi je da to toliko dugo traje, pogotovo kada uzmemo u obzir koliko je love uloženo. I, ne razumijem odluku da se krene u razvoj potpuno novog softvera 'from scratch' kada postoji toliko već gotovih open source rješenja. Što fali, recimo, NodeBB softveru? |
|
|
|
|
Yes, reptilians do exist and are all around us! That's a fitting name for all those people who unscrupulously trample everything in front of them, without any emotion, empathy or remorse.
Regardless of the consequences, they don't give up on their goals.
|
|
|
|
For now this is just speculation but I am more than sure...
OK, now it's just speculation. I thought you said that some 'experts' say it's a done deal. I must have misunderstood something. BTW, don't be so sure! |
|
|
|
According to various rumors, Bitcoin is closely following Ethereum's results.
<cut>
Dude, you are mistaken! If even there are such rumors (which I doubt) then they are false. Your reference quotes a man from almost a year ago (maybe he has changed his mind in the meantime...) who has nothing to do with bitcoin core development. Who are the experts you mention? I did not find that in the article. I suggest you clean up your act and sort out your sources. |
|
|
|
Just did - now it is telling me: unable to broadcast and missing inputs. This is irritating me.
You can find the transaction ID on the history tab. Right click on the relevant transaction and select 'details'. EDIT: OK, I see now that you've already solved it. |
|
|
|
Ne znam ništa o tome. Je li to službena testna verzija za bitcointalk.org ili nešto nevezano? Epochtalk je open source pa ga bilo tko može besplatno koristiti, zar ne? Doduše, vidim da je Cyrus jedan od moderatora... ako je to 'naš' Cyrus. |
|
|
|
In addition to the above, this user advertises his HYIP script 'business' in multiple boards which is, I believe, against the forum rules. I hope the moderators will react and nuke him for all time. All topics for reference: |
|
|
|
Criminals trying hard to create the following sites to continue with scamming.
Excellent find, Beofeng! Here is another one that's not on the list yet. http://archive.is/hKfd6Come on @dkbit98, get up, quit your stalling!  |
|
|
|
Zgodno. Bilo bi još zgodnije da je nešto takvo ugrađeno u forum editor, imho... Možda će neki reći da ga sada cjepidlačim ali stvarno imam već dovoljno ekstenzija i dodataka u pregledniku i ne želim si dodatno komplicirati život sa tampermonkey-em i sličnim [keep it simple stupid] samo da bih si uštedio sekundu-dvije vremena pri pisanju postova, |
|
|
|
I am a little bit puzzled with regards to your jackpot. I was puzzled about the formula, f is the minimum bet amount which is a little bit understandable.
But what I want to know is whether the Jackpot is available to anyone? or it has a certain rules to be able to participate in it like the minimum bet that
are present in the formula.
Yes, the jackpot is available to anyone. Any bet that hits the jackpot with bet amount less than indicated by f will win only a portion of the jackpot. The exact amount of jackpot winnings is calculated using the above formula. f is the minimum bet amount to win the whole jackpot and varies for each cryptocurrency. For example: If you hit the jackpot with a bet amount of 1 LTC you will win the whole jackpot. If you hit the jackpot with a bet amount of 0.5 LTC you will win 50% of the jackpot amount. |
|
|
|
This is not a revival. Just using the same name.
The swap on oiriginal chain means the old NGIN will be converted to the new NGIN.
[...]
If this is not a revival then why are you going to do the conversion of old coins? It just sounds to me like you're contradicting yourself. |
|
|
|
|
400,411,110
Username: FatFork
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
