~
Totally foolish i would say on the time that you would really be expecting on something which it isnt realistic at all or something that we can say that it cant really be happening at all no matter how hard you do try or how hard you do push it. Consistent winning on gambling is never been that possible, yes, you might really be able to get some consecutive wins for some time but come to mind that it wont really be that just easy as it sounds or looks on which its never been that possible because thats not how this system or reality works. Gambling is for entertainment and house do always win in the end and there's no way that for someone could have that consistent win. If you do bare up on mind and really be that thinking that you are really that able to hit that kind of goal then for sure you would be molding up yourself on becoming an addict.Why? you would be pursuing on things which it isnt really that possible Gambling is a game of chance and we know that luck isnt on our side as always. Are we actualy defending the notion of gambling with borrowed money, even if theres a backup plan? Sure, we all need a plan B in life. Thats just common sense! But taking a loan to gamble isnt just walking on thin ice; it's jumping up and down on it! Listen, Im not denying the existence of lucky streaks, but let's get real. A winning streak in gambling is as stable as a house of cards in a storm. Yeah, someone might get lucky once, twice, even thrice. But expecting that luck to stick around is like expecting rain in the Sahara. Not gonna hapen, mate! A plan B won't save you if youre digging your own grave. You can't just gamble your way to prosperity. And if you think you can...well, as they say, theres a sucker born every minute! |
|
|
|
Charles never fails to keep your excitement up all through out the game. Even when Charles is down there he still manages to throws elbow and hammer fist to Dariush making him think twice of his plans. When Dariush got the head kick and saw Charles right close to him, he panics right away.
Nunes is too intimidating for Aldana, she just watch Nunes do her thing. At 35 and with two belts still with her, I think its also a good time for Nunes to retire.
Charles truly deserves commendation? His unyielding resolve is truly admirable. In spite of finding himself on the ropes, he strategically forced Dariush to reassess his tactics with the deployment of his calculated elbow and hammer fist techniques. It certainly illustrates his unparalleled dedication, doesn't it? Turning our attention to Nunes, her devotion is seemingly in a class of its own. She handles her twin championships with the tenderness of a mother. Yet, everyone deserves respite. Perhaps the moment has arrived for Nunes to transition from boxing gloves to the comfort of leisure footwear. One could argue that retirement would aptly crown her illustrious career, right? As we look towards the future, what lies in store for Charles and Nunes? Will they persist in their athletic competition, or is it time for them to yield the stage to the forthcoming generation? |
|
|
|
Who is actually going to stop Verstappen in the future? Last season was of little use, and this season has never been exciting, has it? Maybe we should hope for a resurrection of Mercedes who might open the box of tricks somewhere and make the battle for the championship exciting again? In terms of technique it is of course nice to watch Verstappen, he gives it his all every race, but the best battle was the last race in the championship 2 seasons ago. Then the championship was decided in the last race.
I'm still saying Hamilton as an answer to that question. Because the only reason why there is no competition between these drivers from now on is the huge gap between the cars. Red Bull have got far ahead of Mercedes and Mercedes are newly trying to close this gap slowly. The same thing happened to Verstappen in the past seasons as well. That season with a legendary competition between Verstappen and Hamilton was amazing. Mercedes need to develop their car to that level and it should be enough for a fair competition. Hamilton and Verstappen are the most skilled drivers on the grid right now so I don't see any other driver who can compete with Verstappen as much as Hamilton. The Red Bull automobile's formidable prowess has certainly forced Mercedes into a chase. Nonetheless, let's remember the multitude of talents lining the grid, which due to a lack of sufficiently equipped vehicles, remain underexplored. Ponder this, with an optimum automobile, Alonso, Perez, and others could stand neck-and-neck with Verstappen. Hamilton and Verstappen are undoubtedly proficient drivers, yet we shouldn't overlook other skilled contenders. Much like a prudently biding pack of wolves, they merely require the right juncture to leap into action! Is the prospect of a sequel to the Hamilton versus Verstappen duel truly desirable? |
|
|
|
Good fight for Lopez and he surely did what he is supposed to do. And it just shows that style makes fight. Kambosos beat him soundly, even have him in the canvass, but Kambosos lost to Haney twice. Josh Taylor used to dominate this weight class with his counter but he is not effective against Lopez as he is beat to the punch. And even majority of us wrote-off Lopez, but he just shows tonight that he still has it.
Now Lopez is a 2 division champ, and it open a lot of opportunity for him. Let's see if Haney is going to move up in 140 lbs soonest and go and fight Lopez. Again, it's a clash of style and with that, it's going to be another great fight. Let Lopez though enjoy his win and the start of his reign as WBO champion.
Isn't it undeniable that the boxing match was exceptionally thrilling? Lopez demonstrated that his skill is far from waning. However, allow me to introduce a note of skepticism here. Did you observe Taylor refraining from engaging in clinches? That is his forte. The departure from his usual strategy was a tad perplexing, wouldn't you agree? It seemed as if the referee was prohibiting Taylor from his tactical game as early as the first round, and this did not bode well for him. The situation gave the impression that the referee was manipulating the match to favor Lopez. Lopez was thus relieved from the strenuous task of outmuscling and maintaining clinches to hinder Taylor's inside combat strategy. Hence, does the victory genuinely belong to Lopez, or did the referee's intercession shift the balance of the competition? |
|
|
|
Meme coins have been gaining significant attention and popularity lately, capturing the imagination of many investors. While projects like Shiba Inu and Floki Inu have received significant attention and traction, their long-term prospects remain uncertain. Factors such as the project roadmap, team expertise, utility and adoption rate must be carefully examined to make the right investment decision.
My reasons First, meme coins, by nature, often do not have a clear underlying purpose and why meme coins are popular. Their success is heavily dependent on community involvement and the sentiment around them. Therefore, the volatility and risk associated with meme coins can be much higher compared to more established cryptocurrencies. Second, the meme coin market is extremely saturated, with many projects entering the space regularly. This level of competition increases the difficulty of identifying meme coins that have genuine potential for long-term success and sustainability.
Meme coins, while comical, are risky business, heavily dependent on the whims of the community and a lackluster strategy. Think of them as an investment in a star's fame—fluctuating with public mood. With the meme coin market flooded, identifying a standout is a mammoth task. Therefore, navigate these treacherous waters with caution. It's not just chasing the hype, but safeguarding your economic destiny! |
|
|
|
To invest in crypto we must know the science. It is important to learn about how cryptocurrencies work. This can help us determine which coins are good for investing.
have you implemented it all? and does it work? Investing in crypto is not easy because there are many risks that will occur. In theory it can be executed well, but in reality there are many predictions on the market that are not appropriate and market conditions are unpredictable. Besides having to learn the basics of investing in crypto, train mentally and be ready with everything that has to be done. it's useless if you're mentally unprepared and always down when your predictions don't match. there are many things that need to be learned also in cryptocurrencies. Indeed, the man's onto something valuable—comprehending the science of crypto before investing is non-negotiable. It's akin to buying a car—you'd check under the hood, wouldn't you? Yet, has he put his understanding to work? That's the Bitcoin question! Crypto investment resembles a tightrope walk—requiring balance and focus. Certainly, theory and reality may clash in this volatile crypto space, but isn't that true for all investments? His words, "Train mentally and be ready," resonate profoundly. Grasping the market is just part of the game. Mental fortitude, resilience, and patience are key. Knowledge alone is futile if courage is lacking. |
|
|
|
I hold Algorand and not sure if I should buy these low prices or just hold and accept its over ??
It is currently at its lowest price in 3 years and almost at its all time low.
The SEC labelling it a security has put a lot of fear into everyone.
Does it have a future or is it over?
The SEC is just a government agency with jurisdiction on the US. It won't have any effect on other regions such as the EU or Asia. Crypto is all about decentralization, so it should be able to emerge stronger in the long run. As far as Algorand is concerned, I think it will survive as long as developers keep innovating on the project. The price for ALGO is going down because of the extended bear market. Most altcoins are in the same train, especially when all of the attention is on BTC right now. For ALGO to rise in price, BTC needs to go all the way to the moon. But that is if Algorand captures the attention of mainstream traders and investors alike. There are so many competitors that have greater adoption than Algorand itself. So if demand is low, so will the market price for the cryptocurrency. You'd have to do your own research to determine if Algorand will have a future or not. Crypto land often behaves in many strange and bizarre ways, so expect the unexpected. Just my opinion  An all-time low price, the SECs ominous shadow looming over it, its enough to make any investor break into a cold sweat! While its true that the SEC only directly controls the US market, its influence cannot be underestimated. Markets worldwide pay attention to their decisions, so an SEC security label could indeed send shockwaves far beyond US borders. You posit that cryptos' decentralized nature is its saving grace. While that is fundamentally true, remember that the real-world effectivenes of a coin goes far beyond the principle of decentralization. It boils down to the strength of the underlying technology, the utility of the coin, and the faith of its user community. Suggesting that ALGO's success is entirely hitched to BTC moon mission is somewhat reductionist. It's a complex ecosystem out there, and myriad factors play into a coin's success or failure. So tread carefully and arm yourself with knowlege |
|
|
|
Exactly. That's the real issue here. But there's nothing we can do about it, especially if we want to encourage openess on the Blockchain. Otherwise, we'd be going back to the era of censorship. Given the fact that most Blockchains have scaling issues, all of these worthless ERC-20, BRC-20, and NFTs will ultimately clog the network with high fees and slow confirmation times. The market will ultimately decide the ideal fee rates for the benefit of all. If we feel fees are too high, then we can simply move to another chain or use an off-chain (L2) scaling solution. Hype doesn't last forever, so I'm hopeful this will be all over soon. I don't think that hype needs to end, eth just needs to scale more for handling anything people are hyped about. Meanwhile i'll stick to sending eth via L2. L2 would be fine as long as it is used by other projects, but getting in and out really bothers me, that's still a lot of money that you are spending so it doesn't really work in the end. I had the same thing a project that used ETH but also allowed matic during, and that meant that I would get in once and pay a lot of gas fee, and get out once and pay a lot of gas fee, aside from that I didn't do anything, those were it and nothing more. In the end, what happened? I ended up with so little profit for using it that the gas fee I spent was nearly the same as my profit of 2 weeks, I spent 2 weeks of my life just for gas fee, it wasn't worth it. So l2 is still quite a long way to go, it can be a good alternative, but it needs to grow bigger. Despite their potential, L2 solutions aren't a silver bullet, considering migration costs and scanty profits for smaller entities. Ethereum 2.0, promising reduced fees and less traffic, is on the way. Layer 2, though imperfect, is our current bridge to a better system. The big question remains: do we weather the storm or seek an alternative haven? |
|
|
|
Ethereum is currently known for its expensive gas fee, even though in 2018 Ethereum became the top no. 1 blockchain platform,
but after BSC appeared, of course BSC is more attractive and cheaper.
I hope that the gas fee on Ethereum can overcome the problem because live is very dependent on it.
it could be said that the very reason ethereum could have this massive gas is because it is no.1 smart contract blockchain platform right now. so many meme coins getting deployed added with the fact that there are some NFT being deployed into the platform, and not to mention the airdrops mechanism nowadays that got implemented quite literally just boost the burden on the blockchain, i think there's most certainly long way to go until things gets resolved for this blockchain to get the lowest fee there is, because if not for the value that's quite high. i'm sure the fee is relatively low, 13 gwei is normal back then but ethereum price just keep growing and growing making it seem really expensive. Isn't it evident? Ethereum's gas fees are now unpredictable. Its leading position in smart contracts is advantageous, but it's a double bind. Increased popularity has brought about higher traffic, leading to soaring gas costs. Ethereum is more a casualty of its own triumph, isn't it? As for BSC, despite being affordable, it's centralized. Ethereum is genuinely decentralized. It's quite a predicament. |
|
|
|
Volatile is a problem in cryptocurrency. I think FIAT money will still be the first choice. Making POLYGON the national currency is a long matter that must be thought through properly. I see that the world has not yet found out how to legislate on cryptocurrencies to avoid disasters such as the collapse of the LUNA project.
depending on some random altcoin for a country's economy is definitely a mistake. even the fact that polygon itself is highly volatile is already such a red flag for it to be used for something that directly affect the country's well being. it's just really bad decision making if some country ever make this altcoin namely polygon as their means of payment and something like that. at best it's only good for money transfer that competes with the like of bank transfers and many more which usually impose quite high fee. but for it to be used as a national currency, seemed silly idea to me. this thing just doesn't work for that. Cryptocurrencies as national currencies? That calls for measured deliberation! Doubts about unstable cryptos like Polygon becoming a national standard are reasonable. In an economic landscape, stability reigns - isnt the volatility of cryptos risky? Still, should we judge all crypto projects by LUNA's failure? Each blockchain endeavor is unique, and while one may stumble, another may thrive. Considering cryptocurrencies for global transactions due to their efficiency and affordability is tempting. But as a national standard? Let's proceed cautiously! Can we bet our economy on the erratic crypto market? |
|
|
|
Projects that are seen as active can end up being scams like big projects that are scams, yes, you all know Terra LUNA!,
Previously, LUNA had a community, very active developers, and their CEO was also very kind.
however it all just disappeared after one problem appeared, that's how terrible the crypto world is, and you know what to do
luna is another different thing, yes this is very active project but the disaster was brought by the very founder of luna himself, in which destroy the entire coin. i still think that investing in active project is much of essence, basically one of many reasons that these project could be considered good, just because the project is quite active and not only for short time but long time like having continuous development in general. Isnt it unjust to condemn all active endeavours because of one unfortunate incident? Terra LUNA's downfall was indeed a shocker, considering its lively community and robust development. Is it then rash to categorize the whole crypto sphere as dreadful based on this single mishap? Following this reasoning, all stock investments would be precarious due to unexpected corporate colapses. On a positive note, many active projects demonstrate potential through consistent innovation. Despite the inherent risks, aren't these still a more prudent bet than dead projects? The crypto world isn't all gloomy—its simply a steep learning journey. |
|
|
|
Seeing how minting competition in BRC was going on is pretty much the same like seeing how people were massively joining in the meme coin trend. BRC is prety much the same like meme coin trend and it's only disrupting the bitcoin.
There's no useful project. all of them were exist only for money and no more.
You're right about that. BRC-20 tokens are nothing but pure cash grabs. They don't provide any real use cases to the world. With Bitcoin Core developers planning to block Ordinals inscriptions, you can say goodbye to the BRC-20 craze soon. I think Stably should focus on other chains with built-in smart contract features. But with competitors such as USDT and USDC, I highly doubt it will survive in the long run. With BRC-20 tokens out of the way, Bitcoin users can finally enjoy low fees and decent confirmation times. That is if the community agrees to take down Ordinals for good. Miners are too greedy to let this all go to waste, so time will tell us what path BTC will take. As long as decentralization wins, we should have nothing to worry about. Just my thoughts  Intriguing perspective on the BRC-20 situation! These tokens, are they not fleeting capitalist ventures? Yet, can we dismiss them, given their technological roots? And while some are quick money schemes, isnt it premature to discount them all? The idea of Stably expanding is noteworthy. Still, considering the behemoths of stablecoins, USDT and USDC, is it feasible? Bitcoins fees and confirmation times pose significant problems. The fall of Ordinals would indeed be a twist, but how would miners respond? With decentralization as our mantra, we await the outcome. |
|
|
|
~~~~
On our current time, websites such as casino are fullt optimized that it can be run on mobile based browser. Big casino surely focused on improving the casino website rather than on making a whole new application given that it can pose hazards such as possible application exploits, cloning their app by hackers, and google playstore and app store surely won't list them on their platforms. Gamblers finds that it's ok to use a mobile browser to do casino gambling even back then. I've tried a casino app before and I don't think it's worth that much using it since it offers almost the same function and it consumes my memory space on my phone. Online casinos don't really need a dedicated app, right? I mean, youve pointed out the issues of potential exploits, clone apps, and the memory drain. Thats some sharp thinking! Most, if not all, casinos have mobile-friendly websites. So why splurge time and resources into app development? Even our folks over at Google and Apple probably wont give em a slot on their stores. Plus, the added headache of keeping the app updated with all the bells and whistles… ain't nobody got time for that! Desktops for heavy-duty gaming, mobiles for a quick spin at the casino. Sounds like a decent plan, doesnt it? But heres a twist! What if someone could optimize a casino app to consume less power? Would that change the game? |
|
|
|
Not only by checking their reputation but also their TOS if they are requiring KYC in any form , because some sites mentioned about not having this security rules but suddenly upon withdrawal they will pretend to be checking your legitimacy so need to pass details.
things that what I love in Honest casino that they already indicate profiling even before you decide to create account.
with those rules then we will decide if to continue or not.
A lot of cases Ive seen here and out the forum about the players surprised of the team verifying them after they won or if they wanted to take their funds out.
for me this is dishonesty and deserve a negative record for tha said casino , why not being truth from the beginning? this will end me think that their main intention is to fool people and nothing more.
hoping that the casinos for the future will never do such stupidity because this will record to their own names in the end.
I've seen people complaining about the same thing as well where the casino preached to be KYC-free but then asked for KYC, but that case is different because if a casino isn't saying anything about KYC and then asks you to verify yourself, it means that they have it in their terms and conditions but you didn't read them, a lot of people don't like reading terms and conditions because they find it boring or tiring which is why they get in trouble later on. One should read the rules, terms and conditions, and frequently asked questions before they go ahead and make a deposit at a casino, if they are not satisfied with the rules of the platform, they should not gamble with them at all instead of complaining later. There are many such gamblers who do not read the terms and conditions of gambling platform before registration. But when they face any kind of problems at the end of gambling, they have complaints about various things. Which is considered baseless in most cases. A gambler is not interested in reading the terms and conditions of his gambling platform where the problems are created. KYC is mandatory or not that is well mentioned in every casino. When a gambler does not follow those terms and instead brings up his complaints to the casino platform support, those issues are reported to him. Then he realized what was wrong. If every gambler tries to carefully read the terms and conditions before registration then KYC issues will be solved properly. You've touched on a common trap—we often breeze through T&Cs as if they're foreign hieroglyphics, more keen on the game than comprehending the guidelines. Isn't that paradoxical? Addressing the biggie here—KYC. It may seem dull but it's crucial, and more so, it's spelled out in the T&Cs. Why feign shock when required to comply? We need a shift in perception—T&Cs are allies, not obstacles. They're our shields, not snares! Isn't it time to shed our indifference? |
|
|
|
I also don't want to use AI in gambling because I haven't found out how or seen anyone who has won bets using AI. But if someday there are people who manage to win that bet using AI, perhaps I'll try it and see the results. The use of AI will depend on us. If we can use it well, we can benefit from AI. But if not, AI will not give any results and might have an effect that is not good for us. But this can make us lazy to look for more information because AI has provided everything, so we only need to decide.
It is absolutely difficult to win a bet with the use of Artificial Intelligence bot to gamble because there can't give an accurate analysis of current events unless those that are encoded into them, there have not been a recordinging of AI usage in gambling since AI is A new development that is just making waves and this thread was created just to discuss the possibility AI usage in gaming. I also think that the casino will not be ok with that idea since it will look as if the gambler wants to cheat the casino by the use of a bot since some casino disallow the use of bot. Can AI predict the outcome of a gamble with 100% accuracy? Highly doubtful! Gambling, at its core, is unpredictable - that's the thrill of it! Its true that AI hasnt exactly set the gambling world on fire yet. But is it because AI can't be of help, or is it because we havent figured out how to fully harness its potential yet? That's the million-dollar question. I agree that casinos wouldnt be thrilled about AI, considering it could potentially give the gambler an unfair edge. But isn't it similar to counting cards, which although frowned upon, isn't technically cheating? While I share your apprehension, I also believe in the endless potential of AI. If harnessed correctly, who knows? Maybe it could revolutionize the way we gamble! |
|
|
|
The ToS is always very long and usually no one reads it, until for some reason your account is closed or your bets are void. Users should approve a simpler and more understandable text when signing up. When too many procedures and details are involved, no one reads that article, and at the end of this, the website owner can use ToS as he wishes. Important details should always be underlined so that the user knows what they are dealing with.
I don't think there will be a change in this direction because this situation is in the interest of website owners.
Most sites issue warning text when ToS changes. I don't think anyone is reading this though. Habits are not easily changed. A user who has been playing on a site for a long time will not switch to another site because the ToS has changed.
These ToS are nothing more than a sly gambit by companies. They obfuscate important details beneath legalese, and us users? We're left in the dark, aren't we? The call for concise and clear ToS is loud, yet it seems to fall on deaf ears. Why? As you rightly pointed out, it serves their interests! They can mold and manipulate the ToS to their liking, can't they? Warnings about ToS changes are mere formalities, just another hoop for them to jump through. Who actually takes the time to read those lengthy documents? And why would seasoned users abandon a familiar platform because of a ToS change? These questions remain unanswered. In this tech-driven age, it's high time companies stepped up and prioritized transparency. Only then can we move towards a fairer digital landscape! |
|
|
|
Hi we are changing the reward system and we would like to have some feedback before launch the new system
What kind of rewards/bonuses do you like ?
Welcome bonuses , cashback , freespins etc ?
or what kind of rewards would you like to see in an online casino ?
Thanks
Hmmm.. most of the time this kind of bonus doesnt really matter since to win you need to gamble so you need to deposit money or cryptocurrency anyway that higher the risk the higher the reward as well and your winning would depend on your luck I guess. But who doesnt love bonuses if you could get it right? I think cashback will be a great bonus maybe if you reach a certain betting amount you could get a percentage cashback of that money, which could also be a good thing since it encourages players to play more since they will be getting a cashback if they right an amount. Also, freespin is also a great bonus but in my experience, free Spin doesnt really win, if your lucky you might just win a small money of reward on your free spin. A referral system is also a great addition and you're going to get a small percentage every time your referral deposit money, it wasn't a big amount but it could stack up if you have a lot of invites. Everything would really be depending with luck since you couldn't really be able to reach up that wagering requirement but all of your bankroll or balance had already blown up which is something that very usual thing to happen specially when you are trying to cope up and trying out to clear up that requirement which is something that very common thing to be done by most gamblers who had activated the bonus. This is why for those who are old and been wary on how these bonuses works and on what are the strings attached then it wouldn't really be looking to be interesting if you do ask me. We do know that there are indeed certain times that we do really see this to be an interesting stuff because it do really widens up our bankroll or could really make our gambling sessions way more longers on which means that we do have in mind or really having that stimulation that we could be able to do this on which we would really be mainly thinking that it would really be that so simple on reaching up those requirements but on the time that you are still midway you would be able to realize that it wasnt or never been that easy in the first place. You would be finding out that these pesky bonuses are really just slowing you down on making a withdrawal compared into those players who havent activated the bonus. Just like on what most people been saying on here that rakebacks or cashbacks would really be definitely worth to look on for. Bonuses, though linked with deposits, stage an intriguing risk-reward couple. Do they lose their allure because of this? I challenge that! They season the game, notwithstanding any underlying 'snag'. Cashback? It's like an extra life in the game, yet a trivial consolation for substantial investments. A bit of a conundrum! Free spins, referral bonuses - while seemingly insignificant, these can aggregate into a noteworthy amount with smart play. Bonuses might distract and decelerate withdrawals, but they bring excitement and longevity. The crux? It's all in how you maneuver the game! |
|
|
|
Regarding referral bonuses, I had experience with this site BC.GAME . I had shared the link via social media only one time and totally forgot about it . Six month's ago when I checked I saw that my total referral commission rewards shown as $30,900 . Without any difficulty I had withdrawn all the money. Neither their was wager restriction nor any question. You may say this site has changed my life.
I can tell that you are lie by telling any sloth's naive dreams about this website wants to earn tens of thousands of dollars, the only thing you do is share a referral link once every six months. Also, I can say that this website can change the life of anyone who uses their services or sends money to their account, but these changes are unlikely to please anyone later. @bhanu31 story is too implausible because of the laudatory reviews and the story of easy referral money. I can also say that it looks like a badly hidden advertisement for this website and I just don't believe all these stories with easy enrichment without any effort. I also think that the guy has just made up a story to promote the site. I don't think that anyone could get around $30k by just sharing a link on social media and leaving it for months, and once they check it again they have earned $30k without even knowing that. That's totally made up story and the poster should learn fictional writing because he can generate more income by telling fictional lies rather than promoting such sites. He's directly promoting that website with the help of a simple made up story, and who knows many people might join that site as referrals after falling to his story. I'm 100% sure that earning referral income without doing proper marketing is close to impossible and anyone who claim such rewards is just misguiding the users. Honestly, this tale spun by @bhanu31 leaves a bad taste in my mouth. It's all very well to talk of referral links turning into money fountains, but seriously, who are we kidding here? Its like saying, "Plant this bean and tomorrow you may find a tall beanstalk filled with money." The blatant ad-in-disguise is distasteful, to say the least. Has subtlety and sincerity taken a backseat in the digital age? Are we expected to swallow such tall tales of instant wealth without even a pinch of skepticism? Im compelled to draw attention to the real world here - the world where referral incomes don't drop from the sky but result from consistent effort, strategic marketing, and building genuine connections |
|
|
|
Now there are a lot of casinos that make sticky bonuses and maximum withdrawal deposit bonuses. Therefore, be careful before making a deposit and taking a bonus.
Isn't that just a usual thing already? To say be careful is like you considered that as a trap. Not exactly though. It's just common to see decent deposit bonuses or promotions where the required turnover or wagering requirement is not that difficult to achieved although in return, you can only withdraw a maximum required amount. At most cases, the application for that is not automatic therefore users are free to ignore that bonus and instead, use the nornal deposit so they can withdraw anytime if target profits or being satisfied have been reach. A simple practice if you don't want to get stuck when trying to withdraw your money, you always have the option to ignore those offers and just do the usual gambling practices, deposit and withdraw when you feel that you need to get your money out from the house. Wagering requirements when you activated the promotional offers most of the time is the cause of issues with your deposit funds, without reading the rules and regualtions regarding to that bonuses. You will find yourself stuck with your money, and most of the time, instead of enjoying the perks you ended up losing everything when trying to wager the amount. Even on simply having that deposit would already be requiring some wagering requirement, how much more on deposit bonuses or some sort of promotions or add ups? They cant really just give out bonuses without those terms which it is really that understandable on this way on which it would really be that just right that they would be giving out those kind of terms considering that it is really that a business and they cant really just give out any bonuses without having those criteria before you could be able to pull it out. People should really be wary about these terms because you would really be finding out yourself on having those complaints but ending up on making yourself look like a fool yet this had been the typical stuff or requirement before you could be able to pull out whether your deposit or deposit+bonus. There's always those wagering or roll over which it is really just that in default. Indeed, its not simple. Promotions and bonuses can be enticing, yet they often serve as gilded lures for the unwary. Its apparent that the house invariably has some cunning strategies tucked away! Why would they willingly facilitate your money withdrawal? It's a commercial venture, after all! However, it's not entirely a bleak picture. There exist genuine gambling platforms with equitable wagering requisites. It primarily boils down to identifying the correct one! The key lies in maintaining heightened vigilance and a keen intellect, doesnt it? Regarding the wagering prerequisites for deposit bonuses, undoubtedly, they're a bothersome hurdle. Yet, why would the house distribute giveaways devoid of conditions? |
|
|
|
But be careful with this site. It appears that they are affiliated with the 1xBET parent company, which has a bit of a reputation in the gambling community for being involved in some pretty shady practices and selective scamming. If you ever face any issues and the casino decides to confiscate your funds, don't expect much help or an explanation from their customer support or security department. So, be cautious if you decide to engage with them.
Hey. It is a pity to read something like this considering the fact that, if you review scam accusations about MegaPari - you will see that they all very banned with the same reason of unfair gambling activity. Moreover, they were banned in other casinos as well, which can be traced by their activity on the forum. With MegaPari, opportunities are unlimited if you gamble fair and have nothing to hide. If you ever were banned on other platforms with a suspicion of fraudulent actions, you will be probably banned on other platforms, bc security depts are in touch with each other. MegaPari may have similar design with other platforms - we were established in the same year as many other brands, such design was a trand then. 1xbet are our comptetors, by the way, but we believe we can do better c; Having 1xbet as your competitors give you and edge over them here in the forum, since most forum members believe that 1xbet is being run by the same syndicate who operate 1xbit whose image here in the forum is very bad. With their long qque of unresolved accusations against them and their deliberate and systematically scamming tactic. So if you do better as you mentioned than you will have a free market since 1xbet won't attract anyone here and as a competitor that make it easy for you to defeat them in any ways. To be clear here, All casino with sportsbook feature is enough to be considered as 1xbet competitors besides there are a lot of existing reputable sportsbook in the forum that is worth competing for customers rather than 1xbet. The premise of the competition mentioned by the megapari team is to exclude them from being connected to that said casino by means of their being a competitor. I understand the point of @fatfork here, The last time a casino was accused to be connected to 1xbet such as coinplay become a scam at some point in their journey here in the forum. The only thing that makes me believe that Megapari is a different casino is that they have multiple nominations for casino awards which 1xbet family doesn't pursue. But it's worthy to still keep an eye with this note. it is important to note the intricate interplay of reputation and competition within the online casino community. Isnt it intriguing that 1xbet's perceived connection to a syndicate, real or imagined, can provide their competitors with an advantage?Are we not dealing with a mulifaceted market with numerous potential competitors beyond 1xbet? After all, any sportsbook-based casino may be viewed as a rival. The essence of competition is not purely about distancing oneself from unfavorable associations, is it not? We've seen the repercussions of these affiliations, as with the unfortunate case of Coinplay. Is it not premature to cast aspersions on Megapari simply due to speculative affiliations? Their multiple nominations for casino awards provide a counter-narrative, do they not? Yet, it would indeed be prudent to mantain vigilance. We mustn't be caught off guard, should history decide to repeat itself |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
