This is kind of a hidden thing in the pool, but when it says HEALTH_DOWN and you are still pool mining, it actually means GENERATED_BLOCK_IS_STALE. Ill be fixing that over the next 24 hours so you know the pool is not really down.
|
|
|
I noticed my linux miner seems to dissapear from the pool 10-60 minutes after restarting it, but it still says poolmining true
I do run the linux machine at 32 threads, is there still a thread limit on the pool? Ill double check the debug.log but I think last time I checked nothing popped out at me.
My miners are disappearing from the pool since two days ago with even only 4 threads and it's still like that. I just set up an automatic restarting of the daemon every 20 minutes with this command: watch -n 1200 "./biblepay-cli stop && sleep 10 && ./biblepayd -daemon" Ok for those dropping from the pool, I just sent out 1.0.3.5 (Non-Mandatory) as a pre-release. Please test it and we can burn in overnight then release tomorrow. Regarding the error Happy reported Im still looking at that, it seems to be going away, so Im still trying to get a true root cause.
|
|
|
I noticed my linux miner seems to dissapear from the pool 10-60 minutes after restarting it, but it still says poolmining true
I do run the linux machine at 32 threads, is there still a thread limit on the pool? Ill double check the debug.log but I think last time I checked nothing popped out at me.
My miners are disappearing from the pool since two days ago with even only 4 threads and it's still like that. I just set up an automatic restarting of the daemon every 20 minutes with this command: watch -n 1200 "./biblepay-cli stop && sleep 10 && ./biblepayd -daemon" I found the root cause of this - basically the biblepayd miner is relying on the cached credentials too much; I made the cached credentials get cleared every 6 minutes (IE the server must report to the pool and get new credentials at least every 6 minutes), so the difference is - instead of seeing "RMC" which means "READY TO MINE WITH CACHE", You will see ONE "RM" and many "RMC" like you do when you do a fresh boot- Ill have a version out that you can test in about 15 minutes, let me know if successful and if so tonight I will release it as the next version.
|
|
|
@DEV
Can you please explain what is Amount and Rounds? I'd appreciate. Thanks
Those will be explained in testnet soon, for now they are not used.
|
|
|
@Bible_pay
Regarding the inability to save the letters to the kiddos...could it be my account? I am unable to save letters and I have tried at least 4 different kids. I save them, log out / in, and paste and still cannot save. I have tried Chromium, Fox, and Opera.
Thank you- m4tsby is acct.
Let me try to reproduce as you, one minute. I was able to write a letter as you and save it (I deleted it of course) - ive only tested Chrome and IE. I see you were able to save other pages, such as your default withdraw address. Those use the exact same type of save method. Interesting that Save a letter wont work. When you click Save on the letter it should immediately take you to the orphan outgoing letter weblist. When you click save what error do you get? Can you try going into Chrome, click f12 (developer console), paste the letter and see if you find any Web alert javascript errors? Also you can try to disable any plugins (suchas yahoo toolbar, chat, etc). You can also try to go to Account | Account Settings, change your withdraw address to something like Test, click save, and tell us if that sheds any different light on the problem? Thanks.
|
|
|
@Bible_pay
Regarding the inability to save the letters to the kiddos...could it be my account? I am unable to save letters and I have tried at least 4 different kids. I save them, log out / in, and paste and still cannot save. I have tried Chromium, Fox, and Opera.
Thank you- m4tsby is acct.
Let me try to reproduce as you, one minute.
|
|
|
I noticed my linux miner seems to dissapear from the pool 10-60 minutes after restarting it, but it still says poolmining true
I do run the linux machine at 32 threads, is there still a thread limit on the pool? Ill double check the debug.log but I think last time I checked nothing popped out at me.
Yeah, I read inblue's post this morning, and have been trying to reproduce this issue (with dissapearing linux miners). For some reason my windows miners (tiny, tiny chickens) stay in but finally, I can see my vultr-4proc is dissapearing regularly now. Alright, Ill figure out whats wrong...
|
|
|
so maybe it's good point to put pool open-source ?
If it will be a open-source I will put it online on good hardware and DataCenter in Central Europe
Yes, its definitely going to be open source, but I think I want to burn it in on Wests system first, until we get to the point that it is not changing every day, then we will expose the link on github. The specs right now : it requires Windows 2008r2 server, 4 processors, 8 gig ram, Static IP, IIS7, Windows 2016 SQL Server, .NET 4.5 framework, Biblepayd running on the server, and anti-ddos at the ISP. You can run one for $55 a month at vultr. This server will probably handle 1000 users. After that as you can see it slows down. I think with Wests running, and me running two pools (I plan on opening up a 2nd pool hooked to the same database soon just as a backup pool) I think we could then handle 3000 biblepay users. Right now we have about 1000. Yes that would be great if you cover Europe.
|
|
|
What is the difference between Hashes Per Second and Hashes Per Second2
@bible_pay Is Hashes Per Second2 just a pool thing? Or is that a variable in the wallet/miner? I only see hashps with getmininginfo command HPS2 is just a pool thing: Its roughly 500*SharesSolvedInCurrentRound*ShareAgeDecayFactor Its what is currently being used for payments, and also to prevent any cheating- it was getting a little hard to manage the original pool code that created a Synthetically measured HPS in the pool and I was getting afraid that someone who starts pool2 would pollute it or cheat themselves so I think this is the fairest way to do it, for what we are doing.
|
|
|
Have you guys looked at the block distribution? There are 3 miners with and excess of thirty workers each and one with about 14. I would say that is slightly ridiculous. What is the point of resistant coin if this happens? Honestly all these guys wanna do is sell off for btc or eth or something. But that is my opinion. If that is not the case then I apologize.
P.S.
I have no objection if you have five i7 or i5 pcs. I object to 30 of them.
Right, I sort of feel you. The thing is, if they go through the expense of buying a Full node and mining by the rules then they get the equal reward. However, I might consider limiting the miner count to 20 workers per user address, so we dont break the pool. I'm afraid you can't fight this . what prevents them from creating 10 accounts 20 CPUs each ? I agree, not trying to stop them from mining. Just trying to stop them from polluting all the reports, in specific, the Stats column in block_distribution. Also, technically if I did add the limit of 20 workers per account, they would have to manage 5 accounts, which is cumbersome, and would definitely slow the pace of the expansion down. Not sure yet; Im also considering just grouping large accounts by minerid and letting them run rampant. Its a tough one. I don't think managing 5 accounts will be cumbersome, because all they need to do is changing the worker id in the biblepay.conf file. The only problem is login to different pool's account for stats and reports. I think it is better to have more pools, I know someone is waiting to setup a new pool for biblepay It is cumbersome, to maintain 5 passwords, 5 withdraw addresses and 5 sets of workers.
|
|
|
Have you guys looked at the block distribution? There are 3 miners with and excess of thirty workers each and one with about 14. I would say that is slightly ridiculous. What is the point of resistant coin if this happens? Honestly all these guys wanna do is sell off for btc or eth or something. But that is my opinion. If that is not the case then I apologize.
P.S.
I have no objection if you have five i7 or i5 pcs. I object to 30 of them.
Right, I sort of feel you. The thing is, if they go through the expense of buying a Full node and mining by the rules then they get the equal reward. However, I might consider limiting the miner count to 20 workers per user address, so we dont break the pool. I'm afraid you can't fight this . what prevents them from creating 10 accounts 20 CPUs each ? I agree, not trying to stop them from mining. Just trying to stop them from polluting all the reports, in specific, the Stats column in block_distribution. Also, technically if I did add the limit of 20 workers per account, they would have to manage 5 accounts, which is cumbersome, and would definitely slow the pace of the expansion down. Not sure yet; Im also considering just grouping large accounts by minerid and letting them run rampant. Its a tough one.
|
|
|
Just catching up on the thread. Installed the new biblepay on my workers, all working now. Great work dev.
Biblepay is probably the most interesting coin I follow. Not a typical clone of another coin, biblehash is genuinely interesting, dev is communicative and actually knows what they're doing. 👍
Wasn't aware of public beta-testing on the main chain. Will definitely volunteer next time you put the call out.
Thanks a lot for the comments! Yeah, I definitely did not intend to publically beta test on the main chain, LOL, its absolutely horrible. We have a new testnet thread at forum.biblepay.org, and we "thought" we tested F7000, but we didnt catch this issue, so we were forced to fix it in prod. I guarantee we are going to test the sanctuaries inside and outside in testnet and add the web governance software before we move it to prod! Also, we will have a slack team soon, so that should be exciting, bringing on more devs, etc.
|
|
|
Some of my miners still crash / stop reporting to pool with this: 2017-09-14 03:15:32 ProcessMessages(version, 109 bytes) FAILED peer=527 2017-09-14 03:15:41 peer=528 using obsolete version 70707; disconnecting 2017-09-14 03:15:41 ProcessMessages(version, 109 bytes) FAILED peer=528 2017-09-14 03:15:42 peer=529 using obsolete version 70707; disconnecting 2017-09- 2017-09-14 03:18:20 peer=551 using obsolete version 70707; disconnecting 2017-09-14 03:18:20 ProcessMessages(version, 109 bytes) FAILED peer=551 This problem will resolve itself over the next 2 days as people upgrade, but if necessary I can move these messages to Debug only, lets see if they go away, weve got 44% upgraded according to 'run versionreport'
|
|
|
Unfortunately I have removed all of my miners. They will mine for an hour or so and then crash with previous posted errors. I have completely installed from scratch, including removing the profile folder with same results. Hope to mine again when these issues are solved.
Here is something that worked for me, I had a similar problem. Try creating a subsdir in %appdata%\biblepaycore, called Trash, and Move your blocks,chainstate and database in Trash. Then restart the wallet and try to mine again. EDIT: It seems to be something that is hidden and locked in chainstate, that I could not get rid of, some type of berkeleydb .lock file.
|
|
|
Great concept! Where can I fing info about bounty?
Subsidy schedule is on biblepay.org. Its about 19,000 BBP per block right now.
|
|
|
I tried to withdraw again some coins from pool and got this message: Sorry, Invalid Destination Address (Code: 65002)
Double-check that you have correctly pasted the address to send to, and that there are no spaces before or after. Also, as others have said, there seems to be some problems with the pool currently. Be patient and wait until we have heard from bible_pay. Pool biblepayd went down around that time (at least it lasted all night til 7am so its on a stretch after the mishap) anyway try withdraw again. Looking at the error, on the bright side it looks like we are down to one distinct error the one everyone reported early this morning.
|
|
|
Have you guys looked at the block distribution? There are 3 miners with and excess of thirty workers each and one with about 14. I would say that is slightly ridiculous. What is the point of resistant coin if this happens? Honestly all these guys wanna do is sell off for btc or eth or something. But that is my opinion. If that is not the case then I apologize.
P.S.
I have no objection if you have five i7 or i5 pcs. I object to 30 of them.
Right, I sort of feel you. The thing is, if they go through the expense of buying a Full node and mining by the rules then they get the equal reward. However, I might consider limiting the miner count to 20 workers per user address, so we dont break the pool.
|
|
|
all your coins is gone pool is heavy loaded....... wthell is this for mining? 2core got better hashrate like 8core Ryzen..... bible_pay without response .... chinese idiots killing all ... not exists marketplace time to go to hell with all of this Please stop posting derogatory things here - this way you wont be banned.
|
|
|
Hahaha, we have some comedians here. Gave me a good chuckle. Yes, I noticed it last night. It is funny, but Please, please do not abuse the prayer feature. Right now it is available for very serious prayers, what if someone has cancer or has a serious illness and needs us to pray? They are not going to be very happy when its littered with trash. This is a serious instrument designed to get our community to pray for others who really need it. And I think right now in the world with the instability its more of a necessity than ever to have it available and be responsible. If people do abuse it we will have no choice but to put admin tools around it making it hard for anyone to just send a valid prayer in. Thanks.
|
|
|
Ubuntu miners dropped from pool still happen. Any clue? I believe that was just before the pool upgraded to 1.0.3.4. Should be good now.
|
|
|
|