You were likely banned for spam. If it weren't enough, you also admit that you have had multiple accounts?

The only plausible thing to infer is that you were spamming the forum with all of your accounts and thus have already faced bans previously. Since you did not learn your lesson, you were punished for it. Permanently.

When you're posting every 2 minutes, then there's a problem. (6 posts within 12 minutes, seen on knowhow's post history [Archive]) When you were able to post 20 posts in an hour, there's a problem.

---

Care to list the alts for us, by the way?

Hey, hey, hey! Where have I seen these before? Freshly-made account? Moderately-sized loan request (given history or lack thereof)? No details whatsoever and just a single address?

Wow, impressive! You've managed to avoid including: a repayment amount, a reason for the loan, a way you intend to repay the loan, and lastly and most importantly, any collateral whatsoever!

Here you go - this is exactly what you need! Hopefully next time you'll learn your lesson and help us all by adding in some information.
https://blockchain.info/tx/6bbf0ee303a9d1957d2bcbb8b8a3ec4237afa5de70959eae7ce174dc6a1f3373

Enjoying your negative feedback now? Hopefully next time you'll learn your lesson. No more loan defaulting and ponzi-running.

---

I received my 0.01. I'm pretty happy.

actmyname
b: 3,712,102,693
roll: 85

Impossible? You mean... 2FA is only possible with logins but not withdrawals? Where have you been, mate? It's not risking their reputation -- in fact, it would further establish it. If BitDice were in the position to be able to allow players to log into an account where they could see the balance but not do anything with it, then that would surely show off their security - more than this current thread.

Of course, such a demonstration would require the implementation of a few things: restriction on betting, restriction on tipping, restriction on withdrawals
Betting restrictions could be time-based or toggled with 2FA along with tipping, and withdrawals can require an authentication (via Google Authenticator or SMS)

[though if really necessary the server could just simply ignore all withdrawal/tip/bet requests from that specific account, acting as if it were secure]

---

Again, not harming if they do it correctly. And it's not really a "promo" per se since it's to show off their new "security" which is just a simple email authentication (from foreign ips or otherwise).

But what would be the point of keeping the 1 BTC there? Nobody would know if they removed it.

Are you getting notices via the Watchlist page or via emails? If so then try clicking the "notify" button - watch and notify are separate things.

Someone... like an admin?

Just because the account was tipped doesn't mean the funds are static in there - they may have just as easily been transferred to a "safer" place. Though, if anyone did have enough luck to break into the email, they would probably be using their resources somewhere else - somewhere more profitable.


But we'll never know the result of the bet. And there's always the possibility of foul play


What are you talking about?

Lots of sites (that are deserving of security, not your online farmville crapsites) have email authentication on foreign IPs. Lots of sites have 2FA, and some sites/programs offer their own authenticator service - there's LastPass and Microsoft programs for example.

actmyname
b: 3,670,567,946
roll: 63

There still isn't any indication that those codes were correct, do you understand?

The only thing you've now included are (possibly) codes that you still can't prove were valid.

We're at an impasse where neither side can show that they are the victim - such is the problem with selling gift codes and other similar items that can only be proven to be legitimate after they are claimed.


and thus that is why my question was asked; since there is nothing else to really work with.

Most likely scenario: there isn't any problem whatsoever.

This is just a PR thing to introduce their security implementations - that's all. I'm willing to bet that on the account, there isn't even 1 BTC anymore - likely given to the account solely for this post and then released - however it is an interesting way of marketing the site. What would be more interesting to see is perhaps authorization on withdrawals - allowing players to enter the account yet preventing them from withdrawing the 1 BTC funds.

actmyname
b: 3,655,432,800
roll: 4

In light of the fact that the minimum investment time is 24 hours, I will say this:

My previous calculation was, in fact, wrong due to this.

If the amount that is returned is 0.5% of the original deposit, and one continually invests in the business, then that would be (1.005^365) = 617.47% APR.

That's pretty high.

It's fine, guys. It's a freshly-made account with pretty useless collateral (that's also trying to be sold right now in Digital goods) asking for a relatively high loan, but I think I'm going to take a gamble! Always keep this holiday message deep within your hearts: https://blockchain.info/tx/35adb7862a09145c35d9ff32403f8bf03856c2d3f1806ead532abca76c213d24

Option #3:

God's an asshole. No one is going to heaven.

If we consider the fact that there's a posting quota for signature campaigns, then we can consider that over all the campaigns, the posting quality in general for the user is inversely proportional to the amount of alts that are registered in campaigns. Say you have 50 posts to make in the month vs 500 posts to make in the month. Do you really think that someone replying will be able to pump out such a massive amount with the same amount of post quality (given that it was high) as a user who would only need to post 50 times?


Slightly different but it doesn't change much - the user is still participating in signature campaigns with multiple accounts and the post quality declines accordingly. It matters not whether it affects a single campaign or multiple campaigns (in fact you would prefer for it to be a single campaign since you could source all the spam to it and request them to be stricter) since the overall quality of the forum still goes down.

Perhaps so, but if they have that amount of time, then they can actually contribute to the discussion with useful information instead of recycled bullshit like in the spam megathreads with 40+ pages of quotes and agreement quotes.

ex.

yes I agree with <general statement> because <same thing as was quoted; worded slightly differently>

How so? What does one phrase explain about a person? How can you possibly derive any significant amount of knowledge from one insignificant sentence uttered? Usually when you run out of arguments, you try to attack the opposition or change the subject - and then at that point, your arguments are not based on logic anymore.


You're better than atheists for what reason? Why does believing in god have anything to do with the characteristics of someone?

Would you instantly think of me in a better light if I were to suddenly believe in... let's say unicorns as a god rather than not? If so, then why do you state believers > atheists?

Do you think of people who believe in Christianity as being better than atheists? How about Judaism? Or Scientology? Or Pastafarianism? Or the Invisible Pink Unicorn? What about believing that there's a teapot in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter?

If you are willing to pass the later ones by as being "foolish" then I ask of you - what makes your religion not foolish? Do you deny the fact that a large number of people in the past have believed religiously in Valhalla, in gods upon Mt. Olympus, in Osiris and Ra and all sorts of gods to explain things that they did not understand? What makes yours more reasonable than any other ones?

Damn, is your god actually Cthulhu? Now I understand why you're so fervent about spreading the good word about your god: the Great Dreamer, Sleeper of R'lyeh, High Priest of the Great Old Ones, Cthulhu - the octopus with wings.

(Looking at Cthulhu drives one insane)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dDySMB2lsOIIkUXuax2rXL30gv656E4xTsFcC2zQHkg/pubhtml

Here are the activity update times. It will be in 3 days, so you can look forward to posting during that period. Remember that you need to have made at least one post within the (almost) fortnight timeframe to be eligible for the activity.

Some users may not be eligible - it could be worth posting, given that there is the chance that there are enough uneligible posts or replies that are not direct participation in the giveaway but rather things like


as I'm sure you already know.

Spammers as of now are probably unlikely to change their posting habits - they will still be spam, whether they have 1 account or 70. If you usually create constructive posts and go on to create a second account, is it really likely that you will start posting shit and littering up the forum? Not very.


Nothing should be shared, even if you are family. This only makes trying to prove that there are distinct individuals involved more difficult if not impossible. If you are pooling together resources, what's the big deal with using different wallets? Sure, there's an additional transaction fee per individual if you're all trying to exchange your collected amounts at the end of the month, but then consider it tax - it's much better than being accused of having alts, cheating campaigns, and then being unable to prove it with your only evidence being words - "that was my aunt".

Nobody can believe that. Different accounts, different wallets. If you're sharing the same IP, then it encourages EVERYBODY to post at a higher quality lest all of the accounts be banned... but then again, most IPs that have multiple accounts are not the cause of families but rather a single person.