A customer service representative has replied back to my email where I asked them if a developer or other team representative would be interested in taking part in this discussion. They have turned down the offer, saying they are grateful for the interest, bla, bla, but because they get many similar requests from other people they can unfortunately not fulfill them.   

The new (good) ones have to be better than those they are trying to replace. In every sense of the world. If it's a combination of good and bad, most people will just continue using the sites they are comfortable with. Unfortunately, it mostly boils down to how much money/crypto will eventually end up in someone's pocket or wallet. You are not going to get to most people telling them how decentralized exchanges are better and explaining the reasons why that is, when all they see is that the centralized one gives them $50.000/coin, while the best offer on the decentralized one is only $49.200.   

Then there is the issue with marketing. Have you ever seen an ad or commercial for Bisq? Me neither. But if you watch sports, you can see centralized exchanges in the biggest sports competitions nowadays. Money buys new customers.

That's much better, thanks.

I am looking at your in-play tennis markets and noticed you don't display the result anywhere. For example, here is a match being played right now: https://app.betfamous.com/cdb/markets/13096343 but we can't see the score anywhere. Another thing is that the odds don't update in real-time. You have to refresh the page to get the newest odds.

I think that the score should also be visible for all in-play matches even before clicking on an individual event.
There are no scores here https://app.betfamous.com/cdb/events.

Ajde malo da promjenimo temu. Bitcoin je mrtav (opet) i to je to.

---

Naletio sam slučajno na post u kojem se spominje jedna stranica koja sadrži listu i mnoštvo informacija o kripto mjenačnicama (kako centraliziranim tako i decentraliziranim). Sjećam je se nekad od prije ali nisam je zapamtio niti bookmark-ovao.

Naš dkbit98 je prije par godina otvorio temu o njoj:
NO KYC Exchanges kycnot

Vjerujem da ima mnogih koji ne vole KYC, tako da ovo može poslužiti da se pronađe odgovarajuća burza gdje KYC još uvijek nije obavezan. Osim mjenačnica, ima i lista različitih usluga gdje se može plačati sa Bitcoinom anonimno.

Bookmarkujte, može poslužiti: https://kycnot.me/

Even if you do legit business with a gambling platform that doesn't involve gambling, your coins can be dirty money in the eyes of centralized exchanges. Maybe you are a translator, content creator, developer, maybe you designed some artwork, a logo, found a bug in their systems... and you got compensated and rewarded for your work. Deposit those coins to a centralized exchange and you might be in for a nasty surprise.

HitBTC and Yobit are scam exchanges. Just check out what kind of threads you will come across when you search for "site:bitcointalk.org Yobit" or "site:bitcointalk.org HitBTC". HitBTC makes it easy to deposit, almost impossible to withdraw. I remember they used to have the biggest withdrawal fees on the market.   

witcher_sense mentioned EtherDelta, but I think that one is dead already. ForkDelta was often mentioned as its successor. But I can't help you regarding the token names. It is true that you could trade tokens on those platforms even before they got listed anywhere else. 

That's right. Right now, there are about 2.000-2.200 unconfirmed transactions in the mempool according to Mempool.space. That isn't a lot. Two blocks in quick succession will bring this number down to around 0.

It's the other way around. Bitcoin is a successful use case of blockchain technology. The blockchain is just a public database of information.   
 
Bitcoin has mining fees. Miners get paid for the computational work they provide to the network. They earn block rewards (newly created bitcoins) and the mining fees from transactions that get included in their blocks. Because of its public ledger, Bitcoin is only pseudo-anonymous. There are ways to deanonymize you if you use centralized crypto service providers where you have verified your identity, or if you connect your real name to Bitcoin addresses. You can still be hacked and exploited in many ways: Phishing, keylogging, being infected with malware that changes a copied Bitcoin address to that of a hacker, etc.    

Great initiative to bring Bitcoin closer to the younger generations!

A few comments:

- You should teach the kids to never search for Bitcoin wallets on Google Play Store or via the Google search engine. Neither of the two services care and they will gladly advertise scam and phishing wallets. Your recommendation of Trust Wallet is also not the best. First of all, it's a closed-source multicurrency wallet. You don't need that for Bitcoin. Stick with a community-trusted open source Bitcoin-only client like Electrum if you want a light wallet or Bitcoin Core as a full node.

This hasn't been updated for some time, but it's still a good place to start:
[General] Bitcoin Wallets - Which, what, why?

- Bitcoin won't become the world's #1 currency. Those in power won't allow it. But that doesn't stop any of us to use it. It is and will remain a viable alternative that will be developed alongside the traditional financial systems.

- When you describe P2P markets, mention Bisq as a great alternative to centralized exchanges who make up their own rules of who can and can't use their services.

Yeah, those are some of the tasks. Social media campaigns require the hunters to like, tweet, post, retweet, follow, comment, etc., etc. But you also have things like article writing, translation campaigns, making YouTube videos, artwork, and so on. Not really sure what else they have come up with in the meantime. maybe Telegram and reddit posting considering that the two are quite popular in the crypto space.

Best thing of all, there are no guarantees you will ever get paid. You work for stakes and it all depends on how well the crowdfunding/ICO/ITO/whatever it is now goes. So in theory, your "work" can be rewarded with $1, $10, or $1000. Although, it's highly unlikely you will get anything close to $1000.

I think some bounty manager require that the bounty allocation is paid into their address and then they post an address where the community can check it. But there is no traditional escrow as far as I know.

I was interested to check what kind of betting contests are live on the website, but unfortunately it can't be seen without creating an account first. I have come across a few casinos like that and I don't really like it. I would like to see first what you have and then make up my mind if I should register an account or not. Could you change that?

Your home page (https://www.betfamous.com/en) reminds me more of a blog than a casino.
Best of luck even though I immediately lost interest because of the requirement to register.

The merit system prevents the worst kind of spammers from ranking up. So that part is solved. Unless they already have high-ranked accounts, they will never rank up in genuine ways. Everything else is up the bounty managers who manage the campaigns. You really shouldn't expect too much from a campaign manager who has no standards and accepts just about anyone. If that is the case with the campaigns you participate in, maybe you should stop wasting your time with those bounty managers (or all bounty campaigns in general) and focus on something else.
 
The bounty section is like that ugly part of the town where all the junkies go to get their daily fix. We all know it's there, but almost no one goes there anymore.

I guess it depends on which sub-boards those members are active in. I like being in the technical Bitcoin boards. And in those boards you have maybe 20 regulars you can come across almost every day. We all receive and send merits (merit sources or not), and very often you end up meriting the same people. There are a few reasons for that. They are the ones who know what they are talking about and how to solve technical problems, and low-ranked users are hard to come by in those boards. And those who are there, usually have problems and and ask how to solve them. They aren't the ones doing the solving.

So if you are a merit source very active in technical Bitcoin boards, you will often come across quality and merit-worthy posts of other merit sources and high-ranked users. Usually, a high rank and being a merit source goes hand in hand.

I saw it earlier today and wrote the following post in it:

Since OP didn't like what I wrote and doesn't prefer the truth, he deleted my post lol. But the thread isn't even gambling related, it's about a reputation issue and because of that it shouldn't even be posted in that sub-board.   

People are finally seeing Bitcoin as the ponzi scheme it is, or something along those lines is something I saw when the whole Celsius circus began. I don't really pay attention to mass media headlines but you see them anyways one way or the other. They are just trying to sell whatever can be sold and right now it's Bitcoin crashing and destroying everything in its path.

Is it better to be uninformed or misinformed, that's the real question?

The correct answer is you can't check and verify that you received a transaction without an internet connection. Let's not talk about Blockstream Satellite. Whether its a watch-only or a regular hot wallet, it needs to communicate and receive transaction info from the servers, so an internet connection is a must.

I don't see how that is relevant. Especially because you are asking if a tool can be created to find and post about Ethereum-based projects, not improvements to Bitcoin's codebase. I could google it if I wanted to or check what Bitcoin contributors are doing on GitHub.

Unless I was the one who introduced them to gambling, I don't see why I should blame myself for their addiction. I could be blamed for not helping them to recover, but that's it. The majority of gamblers who don't pay attention to their wins and losses are probably losing long-term. But if you are betting on sports and games that aren't exclusively luck-based, it's possible to maintain a healthy profit if you have patience and a professional attitude to only play when you are confident of the outcome. Not just to play for the sake of playing and risking your money unnecessarily.

I know a few guys who were successful athletes in their sports. Some of them are even coaches or ex-coaches. They have a very healthy attitude towards sports gambling and only gamble on the events whose teams they are familiar with. They understand local rivalries, they can get to information about injuries or out of form players that isn't always public, and know stuff like which teams and players don't like paying at a certain venue or under particular weather conditions. They make bets based on that and come out with decent profits. But that's not your average gambler nor do they have such a mindset.   

He isn't the one who created the flag. Apocollapse did, but he isn't supporting it anymore. There are still 3 users who support it, including icopress who is in DT.

Maybe they haven't seen your posts yet. You know because of "pre-moderated" posts.

Could take 20 or maybe 23 days before the pre-moderation stage ends. Who knows. After that, they will surely see it. Pre-moderation is a real bitch sometimes.

But we all know this isn't going to happen. Or it will take a long time before centralized exchanges notice a significant drop in user activity to the point they start worrying about their profits and maybe change their ways just a little bit. Incentivizing users with some free money, decreased trading fees, and in the future maybe giving them an NFT (with promises that it's going to be worth a lot soon) will still be enough for most to forget about all the negatives.

Od kako je SISAR napisao ovaj post i malo izreklamirao Internet Computer Protokol, zanimalo me je da vidim o čemu se tu tačno radi. Pročačkao sam malo po njihovim objavama na društvenim mrežama, pogledao par YouTube prezentacija gdje objašnjavaju integraciju ICP blockchaina i Bitcoina, i pokrenuo raspravu Bitcoin’s Integration with The ICP Blockchain.

Iako mi je u početku izgledalo obečavajuće, ne sviđa mi se šta vidim pogotovo nakon analiza koje je pisao franky. Za one koji su aktivni u Bitcoin tehničkim podforumima znaju možda da franky može biti strašno iritantan i ne odustaje ni sekunde od svojih teorija. Ali u isto vrijeme i zna dosta o Bitcoinu. Između ostalog je zbog tih svojih stavova banovan da piše u tim istim tehničkim podforumima. Ali može da piše u Bitcoin Discussion forumu gdje se ova moja tema i nalazi. Ako SISAR ili netko drugi zna malo više ICP-u, nek uskoči u raspravu.