My argue is about the printing(mining) the digital money, if there is no outside force(protocol) to pressure the rules into the system then that system is a central point of deciding whether or not to mine empty blocks and keep growing the chain(securing previous blocks only) or take the extra money users paying as fee, but if processing transactions has a risk of an invalid or an orphan block then it's in their best broader interest to ignore TXs because 1or 1.5BTC extra earned by fees is not worth to lose 12.5BTC.

I always thought that the transactions actually produce(introduce) the mathematical challenge to the miners but now I see that miners can keep mining even for years without a single TX being in mempool.

While no one else is going to process users TXs since there is no central bank to have it's branches to do that only miners can transfer the funds in a sense but if they have been given the option to refuse then only the honest miners wanting bitcoin to thrive and stay operational will include TXs to the maximum limit size of the block and hostile miners would keep mining empty blocks to hurt the network (from users perspective) and care nothing for the end users and only wants to take their share of the market.

There is no more 1 CPU 1 vote because there is no CPU to begin with.

---

For being on topic, dude wtf are you talking about? this is not the perfect world where the masses work together all with one mind and heart to stop doing transactions without exception just for testing sake. you can keep your coins but you should know that you'll never be able to convince every body else doing the same. fortunately bitcoin is not like paper money like if you burn cash it's gone for ever but with btc you will always have the coins in the system.

I was wondering if pools actually interested to share some of the fees they get with individuals running full nodes relaying and supporting their pool?
Or doing that brings any benefit for them at all?

If miners can continue mining no matter if there are any transactions then what's the difference between central banks and miners.
And most importantly why bitcoin was designed in a way that many of miners do the work but only 1 wins and the works of others goes to waste?

If I linked an address containing 100k btc then I can still link the same address the next round or I'll need to move my bitcoins into another address and then link for new round?
Every round there is no need for me to link new coins right?

Search "Tillkoeln" a legendary member with red trust, he'll create develop and launch all at the same time with lowest fees in the world, however you might wake up one day and see that he closed the source code .

I want to know whether or not Satoshi attempted to advertise about bitcoin in other forums like developers are doing with their altcoins here?
Paying money to spread the words about bitcoin? or the coding enthusiasts were attracted like a magnet to metal?
I believe altcoins are fake metal painted as metal but fake that is why they spend large amounts that at investors expense.
According to the most community members it's OK if they're scamming people by insta mining or large premined amounts or forging a false market support as long as they can invest in ICO's and have a profit they don't really care about the rest.

Bitcoin is the only genuine and pure cryptocurrency while other coins developers are lurking behind their monitors waiting to grab money from greedy and retarded[1] people.



[1]-they purposely help to hurt the community while neglecting they're the ones getting hurt at the end.

Why do we need to keep our linked bitcoins in our wallets and not being able to spending them?

Trusted members, how are they trusted in the first place? by other trusted members. having green trust means nothing as I can see they're getting away with ignoring payments to some members.
If you try to be an escrow they'll tag you saying that you have no trust or past experience, yeah I tried to have experience but no body accepted my deals.
Results are in this forum only exclusive members(inner circle) are trusted.

I wasn't pointing fingers at you Lauda, I was reading a few of previous posts and other threads as well, I'm talking about all the managers.
Are you managers giving any chance to anyone before banning them and adding them to your lists?
I want to understand what is happening in your minds, clearly you have been bombarded with account farmers and alts that you feel saturated with bullshit.

When you talk about improvements and expect members to go for some time and improve their quality indicates that they need to either wear a signature for free in said time period or join another(non smas) campaign or post without a signature, that's not a proper way of dealing with this situation. if you first give a heads up and warn a member and then see no changes in their quality and posting behavior then you should add them to your lists and ban/deny them.

I want to give an example that is more understandable for a manager, what happens if someone asks you to manage their campaign but in the middle of the campaign tells you they will not paying you any more until you improve your skills and methods of managing? wouldn't you ask yourself well wtf give me a campaign to manage first to see if I'm improved or not?

Dash holders are also killing civilians around the world. DASH=ISIS.

5 years from now quantum computers will successfully collide any keys hashed using SHA-256.

Triple posting, check_ Nash's fan, check_ cult member, check_ illuminati, check_ selfish & self centered, check_.

- Ideal money means when you say pay me $100 then I will give back $100 and you actually do it, now our honest words of mouth has turned into a digital form, when you have 1 bitcoin the entire network after (hearing) seeing your proof says yes you have 1 bitcoin and unlike when we pass a sentence ear to ear after 50 people doing that the last person will literally tell you something completely different, so there goes your ideal money and bitcoin still standing without even changing a bit.

From ancient times a powerful tribe were attacking other territories and took their lands, life stocks, food, girls and women, and everything valuable including natural resources. exactly what any governments around the world is doing, they are just like those tribes taking everything by force and intimidation.
Now we have something of a great value without it's quality diminished and reduced like when a data file or video file does after being copied so many times, and politician or doctor or rich or any level of community you'll have to do the same work and even work harder and harder as time passes to have access to this thing we call bitcoin which has a value that is determined in a consensus network of users/miners/nodes.

Bitcoin is not anything, there is nothing like it, you can not compare it to anything whatsoever because bitcoin is unique one and only of a kind.
Nash or hash or whatever you like to be a fan of, the secret recipe is out so bad for the creator if he was drunk and uploaded it to open source community and now is too late for providing with fixes he should've thought about it before donating the code.

This is superb, missing or rather ignoring my post but accepting a Sr. member with 65 posts, I know he missed a zero and you missed a hero me.

Just noticed after sunsilk in the sheet there are already more than 15 applicants before me but I'll leave my application just in case any spot became available.

Username: digaran (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=806776)

Rank: Sr. member

Post count: 1260

Wearing avatar: Yes

Bitcoin address: 18Gykh4jE6fuyARzbC3XEzrALuKWFNHra4

I need to mention that I was banned 10 days ago from Lauda's managed signature campaign reason: post bursting apparently, but were given 1-2 weeks to improve or whatever that means.
If not accepted I completely understand.

A nude lady and $5000 asking for membership, I believe this thread alone got the exposure .

This is only 20% of the tree chart of your transaction forward, intense really!!!



And this is the tree chart with address cluster:

I'll be damned! a freaking idiot without proper grammar and typing skills posting hack links! with other accounts as well.
DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES CLICK ON ANY LINKS IN THIS THREAD IF YOU WANT TO BE SAFE FROM MALWARE AND VIRUSES.

I believe price is continually increasing due to the fact that the same BIG BOYS and government's dependent private sector are secretly and slowly accumulating, if I was an investor the first thing I wanted to make sure was to completely be assured when I invest for example $200m and some day next week when I wake up my investment has grown and not destroyed by some third party involvement.
Good thing about bitcoin those third parties (miners and full nodes) want nothing other than the success and prosperity of my investment(bitcoins).

Why people think mixing coins requires intensive coding? it's not about being open source or whatever, it's about whether you can trust a mixer with thousands of coins or not. they take your coins and give you some other coins to an address of your choice after fees deducted.
When it comes to mixing all that matters is trust nothing else really matters.

I understand that cloud mining is a risk(legit and trusted ones) but if you invest a large amount in those trusted services and keep your coins instead of selling them immediately after mining you could get a nice profit when price goes up.