I suppose you are thinking that if I want people to believe my predictions of a Bitcoin low price this Spring, then a raging bull market after that, then I need credibility?

Have you ever considered that I don't really care if fools want to lose their money. I offer information for serious people. Fools will do what ever they want to do. It is not my job to make my credibility perfectly politically correct so that fools won't be fools. You wish for the implausible, as any good socialist does.


My signature line has my former usernames.

Again perfect credibility is implausible and when it seems to appear, it is the lie of the politician that says everything everyone wants to hear, i.e. socialism and promising the implausible. Remember Ethereum?

Did you know that Ethereum was basically hatched by Charles Hoskinson. Do you know who he was recruiting to be the lead developer after he split with Daniel Larimer and before he found Vitalik Buterin. Yes he was talking to me in Skype. But I told him my ideas weren't yet well formed enough and I could sense he wanted to create a bloated financial structure, so I declined and after that he found Vitalik. He asked me to look at Vitalik's white paper for his early version of a proof-of-work hash function and I told him frankly it wouldn't be resistant to parallelization. Later Vitalik realized I was correct.


Incorrect. Armstrong's model is a statistical and structural A.I. model of chaos. This is science. And no he is never wrong about the major trends.

And no we are not wrong about the dollar. Fools again will choose to not believe us and again they will lose. Just like when we told them back in 2011 that was the peak in gold and they rode the damn thing all the way down. And we are still telling them the coming lows are below $850 (< $700 likely) and for Bitcoin below $150 ($100 likely). Just like when oil was $100 in 2014, and Armstrong predicted the closing price for 2014 at $54, which ended up being exactly the case. No one else saw that one coming. Or for example how in May of this year when Bitcoin was in the low $200s, I said the summer high would be $315 and then it would head back down for the coming lows under $150. Or just like my silver prediction in 2010:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article23786.html

Please I don't have time for the fools. I can't write a refutation every time they spout off their foolish mouths. They will be wrong yet again.

FUD.

Watch and learn idiot. I already explained to you why mining won't be profitable and you didn't get it. Oh well. It will be explained in great technical detail at the appropriate time.


FUD.

If the market cap has been spent on an ecosystem, the use of the coin will be growing exponentially and thus also the market cap in a virtuous upward spiral.

It is really boring speaking to someone with about 30 lower IQ points than myself.


Idiot, I am paid my compensation for my services. All investors need to know is if the services I have delivered are consumerate with my compensation. Given what I've already produced is worth 1000X what I have been paid by the controlling group, I estimate our one angel investor got the investment of a lifetime. And he is going to laughing at you with his big fat bank account.

You and no one has any right to know what I spend my compensation on in my personal life. Are you insane? Every business in the world pays someone a compensation and does not ask them what they spend their compensation on in their home life.


I didn't ask you to trust me. I do demand you don't libel me by accusing me of being a scammer when you have no evidence I am a scammer.

Everyone can see what you are trying to do here to discredit me. The more you make a fool of yourself, the clearer it becomes you are just a bunch of jealous b-listers that should be ignored by those of us who are serious.


I did produce them. They are not available to you at this time, because there is no public coin yet, you are not a developer nor an angel investor.

I hope you done with this nonsense. I think it is time to just ignore you. It is very clear you are not worthy.

I won't be posting about ion in any thread other than that one and the one that I have moderated. So I can delete their nonsense if they bring it my thread. And hopefully that other thread will soon be such a mess that it can just be ignored and die off.

No. I will repeat for the 10th time, that I am not going to reveal the intellectual property to non-developers of the coin before launch. Why should we give away our secrets to our competition. Duh.

I believe the controlling group is fairly certain it will distribute some coins via trickle ICOs post launch as specific development assignments are tasked to build the ecosystem. And it will distribute the rest of the coins via proof-of-work to the users of the coin. Mining will be unprofitable if we achieve that technical design goal. Only users that send transactions or who don't count their insignificant electricity cost will mine.

Project costs will be as high as we can find ecosystem projects to fund and the market cap can bear. Because that is a virtuous upward spiral.

I assume all these specifics will be set by launch.


Are you deaf, dumb, and blind? Did I not tell you we had nearly $75,000 of angel funding lined up and ready to go. We haven't availed of it but it is there. And I haven't even included my friend rpietila in that.

I told you that the latest plan is trickle ICO after launch for continued funding.

Miners won't be selling. Who would bother selling a few $ of value. Instead they will be spending the coins in the ecosystem as microtransactions, driving the velocity of money higher, driving the prices of the coin higher.

Did I mention I am going to kick your ass. And you should just watch and learn some new tricks.


How I spend my personal funds is none of your business.

Why the fuck are you trying to control my life? What is wrong you people?


You were told earlier in the same post and that was a test of your reading comprehension.


Did I not write already that the Smoothie's libel is accusing me of being a scammer and having no evidence that I am a scammer.

Have I not explained to you that I am not promoting any coin. I am here in the Altcoin Discussion forum and was discussing the idea for a name of the coin I am in development on and soliciting discussion on the development and potential developers. This is a normal mode of open source development.

Open source development is not scamming.

You guys have some serious retardation with reading comprehension and definitions of words.

You are too damn lazy to do your research properly and then you libel me as a result.

You've got all the facts wrong. First you have the chronology wrong. Back in July or August, we entertained some potential angel investors via our controlling group. I also made a series of posts over in the Economic Totalitarianism thread for those who were asking me to help fix problems in cryptoland, explaining about how we might go about distributing coins and raising money in the future at some unknown future launch date. This was all hypothetical discussion about what may or may not take place. It was to help those who might want to be angel investors make some decision about whether they wanted to be in contact with our controlling group. However, the controlling group did not raise any money from them. There was communication with about a dozen individuals in private and only communication.

There is one angel investor (apologies I misspoke earlier and said I have two, meaning there is another one ready to invest at any time) who funded my controlling group and the controlling group has provided me some operating funds, i.e. paid for my services on developing the coin and doing public communication. So far, I have written two earth shattering white papers, ported the I2P EdDSA code to Scala, ported my Javascript implementation of Blake2 to Scala. If I wasn't here answering you, I'd be coding right now.

After all that, I made a thread here in the Altcoin Discussion to get some feedback on the name and potentially solicit interest from other developers that might want to work on the project. That is not 'promotion' of a coin nor is about raising funds, because we don't need any funds. I have another angel investor willing to give the controlling group $25,000 any time I ask. There are a dozen other angel investors potentially interested in investing $3 - 5K each, although you assholes probably scared them away, but it doesn't matter because I have enough cash to pay my expenses until I finish the coin.


If you tell me what to do again, I am going to purposefully not do what you instructed. Stop talking down to me. I don't take commands from you.

Obviously we could pay developers from angel funds, future coins, or work for free in exchange for higher salary after launch. All of these possibilities have been discussed. For now I am the only developer, and I am taking the minimum financial assistance to pay my very low living expenses since I live in the Philippines. For example, my rent is only $350 per month. I also have some funds locked up at precious metal dealer for the past couple of years and still hoping he will give me my money. I think I may receive the last installment soon so then I am self-funded.


I am not handling angel investor funds directly. The one angel investor coursed the funds through the controlling group and I was paid for services rendered.

I did do some consultation work (on anonymity designs) for one of the other developers in Cryptoland and received some income for that recently.

You should note that the controlling group has already paid 4 BTC to the author of Compact Confidential Transactions to hold an exclusive over all discussions we had in private. I fixed that design and also extended it to hide values, payer, and payee.

Believe it or not, I am going to shock you.

First of all, if you had bothered to read further in the Economic Totalitarianism thread that Smoothie quoted, you would see I made a statement that the proposed ICO plan was unteneable because the controlling group could borrow money and buy its own ICO and then pay the loan back. So I said that plan had been scrapped and we'd have to come up with a new one. We did not announce any new plan.

Also I made it clear that if ever I am involved with a coin and even the lead developer, then I won't be the controlling group. I will be paid by the controlling group for my services. So you'll need to ask my controlling group. I think at this time they are not yet ready to come public because there is no coin and no announcement of any coin.

I do hope you are able to discern the distinction between the Altcoin Announcements and the Altcoin Discussion threads. I realize you seem to be a bit challenged by big words. But I am hopeful a dictionary can help you to learn.


I don't remember any mention of raising a $million dollars now. I think you may be referring to some hopes of what could maybe be raised if the coin was launched and some money was raised in an ICO to fund further developments. The latest internal proposal I saw from the controlling group was to raise funds in very small amounts for specific tasks that need to be funded, i.e. a trickle ICO.

Given that it will be open source, these developments can only help everyone in cryptoland. With a trickle ICO, then there comes some proof of results before money is raised again. Therefor one would assume the price would increase. And yes of course once coins are sold, then there must be an exchange and a market price.

Perhaps the coins would be sold on the exchange in a trickle after announcing the sale or perhaps in a transparent bid auction.

But none of that applies in the here and now. That was all hypothetical discussion about what might happen if we ever launch the coin.

Also there is still the option of distributing all coins in PoW and not raising any funds at all. But I don't know why anyone would develop the coin in this case.

Of course many coins will be distributed by PoW. It is absolutely necessary because the users will be the miners in this design. And they will need coins to avail of the microtransaction ecosystem (think new social networks, dating sites, etc). Thus the small morsels they mine will mean big time features they can avail of. They will perceive a much higher value.

You think I am joking when I say I am going to kick your loser ass.


Smooth you see I told you the bullies would try to attack with the SEC. It is always like that. They are such assholes. They only know how to destroy cryptoland. Btw, the SEC has no jurisdiction of non-USA persons and controlling groups.

First of all, you are conflating. I said I might raise some angel investor funds to go to Australia to get a fecal transplant. The SEC has nothing to do with angel investment via the controlling group which pays to me for my services rendered. The talk about raising money at an ICO was future looking and has nothing to do with my current health needs.

Also since that time, my research revealed that the doctor in Australia likes to use high doses of antibiotics pre-FMT and I believe high dose antibiotics is one of the factors that caused my gut dysbiosis and resultant M.S.. Thus I was preparing for a self-administered fecal transplant locally here in the Philippines using my gf's sister as the donor and putting her on a strict diet before hand. But since I've had some success treating myself with an all vegan diet (after a 10 fasting in late August) coupled with Kombucha tea, I have for the moment put the self-administered fecal transplant on hold.

You are so cruel. You rub salt into the wound of a severely ill person with a disability. I'll be sure I remember this when you have some bad luck.


You bullies are searching for any means possible to try to scare investors and discredit my work. It is so obvious.


Watch and learn.

I realize I only bolded 4 of your words and perhaps your IQ is really challenged by 4 words, but I am not 'promoting'. I asked for a vote on the name and discussion that could help me spur other developers to help me code. This is what open source is all about you fucking idiot.

Open source is not about programming by yourself in a cave as you bullies would force me to do.


We'll let a judge decide if your posting of abusive images is stalking or not, especially after I have stated numerous times to stop abusing me.


Harrassment is a form of bullying and defamation, especially to the extreme degree you are going with it. And especially coupling it with lies and libel.


Why do you force me to repeat myself by lying about my upthread statements.

I am not unhappy about "feedback" in the normal use of the forums. That is why we are here is to discuss matters.

I have already warned Smoothie that he has abused the trust system out of revenge and libeled me, and unilaterally abused the fact that he appears in the obscure notion of Default Trust which is buried from most readers' awareness, to place an accusation that I am a scammer on my user profile.

He has not provided evidence that I am scammer. This is serious libel and he will pay for it one day.

Sounds like the person who asked the following question was one my readers. Also Armstrong's answer is interesting in that he thinks perhaps government won't tax capital gains initially, but in Europe they will. So what happens to Europeans who move their capital gains to the USA? Does that mean Europe won't take their capital gains. Any way, I think Armstrong might end up being wrong and government may trap those capital gains also. Let's see...

http://www.armstrongeconomics.com/archives/37041

Lie. Warning you've just libeled me.

I made it very clear in my thread that I was only interested in a poll on the name and potentially recruiting developers.

You have just entered the realm of legal culpability.


Again you continue to try to be my mother. You have not yet learned to be mature and understand what mutual respect means.

Mutual respect means respecting that people have their own choices and to respect their choices for as long as their choices do not hurt you.

You are trying to force your will down my throat and accusing me of a victimless crime and in fact even lying about my actions.

Despicable.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking

---

Smooth, I know how to deal with these asshole bullies. Watch and observe how I shut them up. Truth is on my side. I have done nothing wrong. Watch them squirm as they've never faced someone like me before who won't back down to their bullying.

The name discussion is in my thread. I stated my logic there. You are welcome to post any serious logic there.

Your prior post was trolling. You offer a name which is some b-lister attack on my personality.

Cryptoshekel is for gold bugs, biblical followers, and crypto enthusiasts. Somewhat interesting, but I am trying to create a coin for the masses.

I already explained that I am targetting microtransactions, thus ions.

I don't keep calm because it is isn't my nature. I have always been a high energy guy (except for that damn M.S.).

One of the signs of maturity is learning about the diversities of personalities in the world.

And to stop expecting (and forcing down others throats that) everyone must have the same attitude as yourself. Not the same race, not the same skin color, not the same energy level and philosophical outlook, etc..

Mutual respect is something I think many of you have yet to learn.

Maybe one day you will mature.

Any more underhanded libel and passive aggressive b-lister childish melodrama crap today?

(you guys are pitifully childish. Look how much time and effort you have wasted in this thread)

When are you going to get it in your thick, stubborn skulls that I am not going to back down to your attempts to corral me, cut me down, drag me down and control me.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+7

I'll watch the videos, but Berwick is no match for Armstrong. I've spoken to those guys over at DollarVigilante.com. Don't idol drunks who are having fun goofing off with Doug Casey in Argentina. They sometimes have something interesting to say. But for the most part, I've watched Casey et al be wrong on just about everything important over the past few years.

His main claims to fame were Stockhouse.com and recommended buying BTC at $3. He also pushed the failed concept of Bitcoin atms.

Edit: I am at the 9min point in the first video and his reasoning is all wrong. More nonsense which Armstrong has refuted numerous times. US dollar will grow stronger, not weaker for the reasons I have detailed upthread. The Shemitah debt defaults will cause the dollar to go stronger, not weaker because the defaults will be outside the USA due to the huge dollar shorts caused by the egress of $9 trillion of QE which will now ingress back to the USA.

There are bugs in everything. It is called software. You apparently ignored my upthread quote stating there are more exploits discovered annually in the browsers than in the Java web applet. And for banking software running on servers, we are not even referring to the applet sandbox, but rather to bugs in Java libraries.

Crypto code should not be using libraries. It should be using tightly well combed code.

And everyone said I was a kook in 2013 when I said FATCA was the framework that would lead to a global taxation cooperation. The Europeans in this forum were particularly upbeat at that time  


Now they attack the messenger again. When will these fools ever learn?

What do you think I am doing today.


They have been dealt with. And quite well I might add.

Stop with your condescending, childish self-flagellation. Don't you have any work to do?

I already stated clearly that the actions taken by Smoothie are culpable under the law. If he chooses to risk it, he can face the consequences.

Stop trying to tell me what to do. You are not my mother. Mutual respect begins with understanding I am 50 years old and I don't need your childish concepts of how I should be if only I could meet your expectations. I am perfectly capable of running my own life.

Apparently you do not understand what the phrase "mutual respect" means. When dealing with childish boys who don't understand this, the only way to teach them is to defeat them. Then they start to learn.

It has been a long time since you boys have met a man who will tell you frankly when you are abusive and it is not acceptable.

That is what Bitcointalk is. Guys masturbating and enjoying to tear each other down. All I see all day is bickering.

No one actually working and no one actually trying to act sane with mutual respect and focus on working together.

Blame it all on me. Yeah that will work. 

Stay there in your fishbowl. There is enough entertainment and fist fucking to get your daily fixes.

I am not interested in being a role model. I am not interested in your Western crap ideals of socialism and utopia.

I am interested in creating software and not having to deal with childish idiots who attack and throw hissy fits as Smoothie did when I didn't give away my intellectual property on demand.

You can think all you want that my attitude sucks, and I think the same of your attitudes.

I originally tried for mutual respect, but it is clear that can not be obtained here, so I have abandoned any desire for mutual respect. I now know what Bitcointalk is.

Come-from-beyond, someone kindly informed me that I typoed your username upthread as come-from-behind. I apologize that wasn't intentional. I will correct it.

I can see I made the correct decision to get harsh on you all, because at least now the childish noise has stopped. And I can get back to work.

P.S. I am not interested in your condescending advices (in public and in private). You are not welcome in my thread. All of those who have treated me poorly do not even bother to post or participate in my thread, as your posts will be deleted.