They might be brand-new but they have been in business for 7 years and have dozens of positive feedback to their name despite launching just a few days ago.

But, but, they give you a letter of guarantee when you mix with them. They guarantee that everything will be OK LoyceV. It's more than saying I swear to God! What can possible go wrong if you have an official letter of guarantee?    

Yeah, that's it. Some of them probably remember the good old days and expect those days will return, you just have to stay patient and keep posting those social media links. If you live in a third-world country where an extra $10 a month makes a big difference to your economic status, you can understand why some people do it. Multiple accounts signed up in dozens of bounty campaigns. If 99% of them scam, there will always be that one that will pay those $5-10 and people are satisfied with it. Even if none of them pay, there is always next month and the one after that...

Hello Neodice,

Your fake claims are still visible on your forum page. "Licensed in UK" can still be found in the website field. Feel free to remove it in absolute silence without explaining to the community you expect to use your services why you are making such claims or why you are outright lying.



Since you can't be bothered to tell the truth or be honest if you made a mistake, I can only share Jawhead999's concerns that players can surely find better casinos elsewhere.

But the thing is, you have nothing to gain from downloading the material but a lot of things to lose. Watching it or reading it won't help you to learn anything. Let's say there is proof that social media/YouTube influencers are just paid shillers who will work with anyone ready to pay their fees and that they are deliberately misguiding their followers. Having confirmation and proof that things like that are true won't do you any good if you are already suspicious of their activities and distrust anything they advertise and say. 

I can see that other users already answered this, so no need for me to repeat what has already been said. But I would like to draw your attention to the post Z-tight wrote and the quote from theymos that he/she shared. If I understand the quote properly, tagged scammers (with this I assume he means users who have negative feedback) can't create self-moderated threads. Since you have two negative feedback to your name, I guess you belong to that group and it might not be possible for you to create self-moderated threads unless that functionality is now available to all forum members.

Here is the quote one more time:

Many people are talking about reviews and I agree that reviews can't be trusted. Not because they are a complete lie, but because they are painting a different picture from what the reality is. They leave out the negatives and highlight the positives. That's not a lie, but it is a biased review.
The thing with paid reviews is that even if the site doesn't tell you to specifically write only nice things about them, the person getting paid feels a certain gratitude and obligation to do that anyway. That's why most reviews are positive and focus on the good things.  

Your kids are too young to understand the importance of keeping family matters private. You experienced it yourself when they started talking about how wealthy their father is. At a young age, they are still too innocent, naïve, and honest. You can slowly introduce them to Bitcoin, but it's not necessary for them to see and know how much you have in your portfolio. If they don't know, they can't brag to their friends. And even if they brag, they have only seen a small part of your stash. Something not worth to worry about. I would even go as far as creating a separate wallet with just a little bit of BTC that you can use for your education.   

The bigger lesson here is teaching them that things that concern their family shouldn't be discussed with the outside world. It's better if they disclose less information than too much.

That's not income. It's pennies. In some parts of the word, those pennies can make a significant difference due to the general poverty of the region. It's sad, but that's the way it is.   

What is a success cryptocurrency man exactly? You can call yourself successful if you built and created something and reached certain goals with your own hard work, not because you submitted your crypto address somewhere and wrote a tweet. That's charity. Even airdrops are no longer airdrops because you are selling your ID and your identity for those pennies. That's data that will be collected, leaked, or sold elsewhere. Then your successful cryptocurrency endeavors can come back and bite you in the ass. 

I don't see it as a weakness of the forum, it's a weakness of the users doing that. Bitcointalk allows you to take part in any activities you want as long as they don't break any forum rules. If you want to read and learn about Bitcoin, you have many ways to do that. If you want to join bounty campaigns just because they promise they will pay bounty hunters $10 million worth of unlisted and non-existing bounty tokens based on a price the developers have set in their heads, but will never be achieved, you can do that too. If you didn't learn the lesson after the first time, maybe you will after the 2nd or 10th.   

Malware can in some cases infect your device as soon as you download it without requiring you to open or run anything. Besides, if you aren't planning to check out the "evidence", why download it in the first place?

---

I would be careful trusting random people on social media making big claims. If they wanted to post some proof, they can do that already. Post a few screenshots to prove that they have the data they claim they have. Anyone thinking about downloading and inspecting the files should probably do so on a virtual machine and a secondary device that you could simply reformat without fear of losing anything of importance.

Self-moderated threads in the gambling section are allowed. However, you shouldn't open such threads if the topic of discussion is someone's reputation or matters related to money. Also deleting legit posts that you don't agree with makes you look bad. Besides, everything that is posted on Bitcointalk will get picked up by Ninjastic.space and LoyceV's scrapper, so deleting it won't get rid of the post entirely. Moderating a thread to prevent the truth from coming out isn't going to get you anywhere.

Judging by your trust feedback, I assume this is going to be a self-modded thread about FortuneJack. 

I was thinking more along the lines of bot-like activity. They come online just to bump the thread and post some new announcement. I just looked through the thread a bit to check their behavior and although most of their recent posts are just announcements and new updates, they do take the time to respond to questions and comments made by other users from time to time. There is no reasons for me to believe they haven't seen OP's posts about his withdrawal problem.

Be careful with this one.
Brand-new site created just two days ago > https://whois.domaintools.com/easymixer.ru.
Neither Google nor DuckDuckGo have indexed the website and there are no search results when you run the name through their search engines.

ChipMixer requires no cuts and the users pay no fees except the donations they want to send.
Not to mention that this platform only works with legacy addresses and doesn't even support nested segwit, let alone native segwit.

I guess you have no other choice than to wait for those couple of weeks to pass. "Couple of weeks" can mean anything. 2 weeks but also 10 weeks. I have had withdrawals be checked and usually it takes a couple of hours to a day. Never seen something like a month of doing security checks.   

Try sending a PM to the Fairspin casino representative on the forum. You posted in their ANN, but just in case they are completely retarded or have eyes in the back of their heads, send them a PM making them aware of this scam accusation and the fact that they have been red-tagged because of the way they are (not) handling this case.

Someone asked about KYC.

UK gambling licenses require that casinos verify the identity of their customers and request KYC when a player creates an account and not when they win or request a withdrawal. That's actually the way many crypto casinos operate.

Source: https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/reminder-to-operators-new-licence-condition-on-customer-identity

The OP claims the casino owns a UK license, but if we check the Business and Personal license register on the official site of the UK Gambling Commission, there is no information about Neodice. There is no information about that Vulkan site either. Try searching for other established UK bookies such as bet365 or Ladbrokes and the site will bring up their profiles.

https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/public-register/personal/results?personal-search=neodice
https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/public-register/businesses/results?business-search=neodice

Unless proven otherwise, Neodice does not hold a license with the UK Gambling Commission!

You could actually deposit some funds into his account that he could use just for that testing purpose. That wouldn't be money he can ever withdraw. Once the testing is done, you take it back or give it to him as a reward for finding a bug. That way OP doesn't have to use his own money if his trust in your platform has been shaken by the things that happened.

But would Quel be interested in something like that?

Sooner or later, that 1x campaign will end and the casino might get tired of throwing money on people who aren't capable of reading and writing properly. The consequence is that no other reputable project, campaign manager, or forum member will want to do business with them anymore. Of all the streets in the city, they can only walk on one while you can walk on all of them.

The delay is bigger than what you think. You can check that yourself if you know someone who lives next to a stadium and if a game is televised live. If you sit in the apartment and you hear the cheers from the fans after their team scores, pay attention to how long it takes for the goal to be seen on TV. Analog transmission is the fastest. Cable and satellite depends on the TV station. And then you have to consider SD and HD channels. SD are faster most of the time, but not always.

Even if the game is televised on multiple channels, each one of them have different delays. You usually wouldn't notice it unless you have access to multiple sports packages and transmission sources such as cable and satellite. Not to mention IPTV that can be 40-50 seconds behind and even more if you are getting it from the worst kind of service providers.

Based on the screenshot you provided, I can see that you have withdrawn from Fairspin in the past. Did you change anything in your gaming habits that could make the suspicious? The use of VPN, multiple accounts, accessing the site from a different country? Did you maybe play any new games from a provider that restricts players from your country?

I see that they ignored you in their ANN thread. Try asking the support to point you to the rule in their TOS that explains how long they have the right to hold your funds due to "security" or other checks, and when a final decision has to be made?

Super bi bilo da je tako ali ja baš mislim da će se desiti suprotno i da ćemo imati pad cijene. Nema više rudarenja i kupovanja skupih minera. Samim time će se isplatiti prodavati ether po nižim cijenama.

Ako rudariš Bitcoin, nema te nigdje ako taj svoj Bitcoin bacaš na tržište po cijeni od $10-20k. Kako će to biti sa ethereom, vidjećemo.