|
If the sacred stones don't work, there's always Elliott wave theory
|
|
|
|
|
Why is this false equivalency and Bcash lol shilling getting so desperate. Is it because bcash lol is 0.11 BTC and falling ? Surely you can stay above 0.10 for a bit longer ?
|
|
|
|
Note the up-thread post edit. This will be another post I will delete. Very tiresome to keep up with all the FUD turds you guys smear all over yourselves. […] You have convinced me. I need to run the version from November 2010 when Satoshi was still involved. What version was that? Because that’s obviously the one true Bitcoin.
Sorry guys any transactions after 2010 are invalid. Anyone that says otherwise is just a Core shill.
You fail to comprehend my prior post. Those later versions of Satoshi’s protocol do not add any ANYONECANSPEND transactions, and thus even if you run an earlier version, your node will NOT accept as donations any transactions created with a later version of Satoshi’s client. You’re trolling because you lack technological understanding of the issue at hand. Also you fail to assimilate the many details I have articulated. The reason that the Satoshi protocol is the one true Bitcoin is because it is the Schelling point with the most security. Until the hardforkoff of Core, Core is insecure because SegWit is ANYONECANSPEND. After the hardfork, Core is still insecure because all legacy addresses spent to non-legacy even after the hardfork can be taken as donations on the Satoshi chain. And the En-light ening networks crap is going to make Core chain more insecure. I had already explained why up-thread. Keep pooping all over your thread. It’s becoming quite funny to watch. Are you suggesting that pulling random versions from the past and proclaiming them to be the “one true Bitcoin” is a bit unhinged? |
|
|
|
|
You have convinced me. I need to run the version from November 2010 when Satoshi was still involved. What version was that? Because that’s obviously the one true Bitcoin.
Sorry guys any transactions after 2010 are invalid. Anyone that says otherwise is just a Core shill.
|
|
|
|
|
I changed my mind. 0.5.1 is the one true Bitcoin. All transactions and transfers after 0.5.1 are invalid.
|
|
|
|
I will delete this post.
We've been waiting on you to delete all your posts. Followed by your account too. Delete your account anunymint. I dont want to see anymore any of your shilling on this thread. I bought $3M worth of bitcoin recently and I am waiting for the next bull run. If what you want is for us to lose our investment by scaremongering then we cant be on this same thread. What exactly is he shilling? This real Bitcoin he is talking about is simply a slightly altered version of Bitcoin Core 0.5.3. (They call their version 0.5.4) Those that are running that software as a node are still following the same chain as Bitcoin Core 16.0.1. But version 0.5.2 is the one true Bitcoin. Anyone that upgrades to 0.5.3 or 0.5.4 will lose all their coins. |
|
|
|
|
It’s projection. The preferred tool of bad actors everywhere. Because when they are later found to have committed misdeeds, then they can claim that both sides are just the same.
|
|
|
|
|
We would all be saddened if the level of discourse lowered further by you exiting your bcash lol troll self elsewhere.
It must be hard work being on the wrong side of history. Every morning you wake up and think, what can I get wrong today?
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Rizun has about as much credibility as Dorian Nakamoto
|
|
|
|
To be honest all I want to do today is drink beer, smoke weed, watch the World Cup & post $7000 meme’s.
That’s a good synopsis of Western civilization at this juncture. The Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, and Vietnamese are not idle. Nope. They are working all night making me a new iPhone. |
|
|
|
|
If you are going to be a bcash lol shill, at least be entertaining.
|
|
|
|
|
Volume is comparatively piss weak
|
|
|
|
Well, if we're destined to spend another year together we ought to really try to make something of it this time around. Maybe we should try to solve some longstanding math problems. The Yang–Mills existence and mass gap seems straight-forward enough, and there's a prize.  Maybe we should aim a bit lower. We could crowd source a children's book. |
|
|
|
Did a quick and nasty chart to see how things would look if the pattern repeated 2013-2015. If the worst is that we hit a low of $4k and we're back at new highs next year then it's not that bad at all.  I’m thinking the low point will be around Feb - August 2019. So really just another 12 months to run. |
|
|
|
Ok. Admittedly I know nothing about IOTA. Shitty algorithm that can get clogged for free which was shittily pumped with propaganda. It's Obviously The Asshole of the top 10. That’s a bold statement. There’s a lot of Ass in the top 10. |
|
|
|
STAWP. THERE AINT NO CHAIN IN THAT THERE SIDE CHANNEL.
Fair enough. I was pulling myself into the weeds on semantics there. Can we settle on a side-abacus for LN, then ? Yeah. And then we can tokenize the beans. Decentralized, deconstructed Abaci. |
|
|
|
 what's the blue line?
I was thinking it was either 'blockchain hype' or 'App-based tokenization' lol It’s the adoption curve, being innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority etc. we are still well left of the blue peak. |
|
|
|
sidechains Bob. he said sidechains
* rabble rabble rabble * LN is technically a side chain * grumble grumble grumble * * BobLawblaw begins to enter a rage-state |
|
|
|
This shit is headed towards 4k and possibly under $3k.
Next 2 years will be very painful.
We have all done it before and we can all do it again. |
|
|
|
The bitcoins gods are angry. We must sacrifice more!
I'm all out of Bcash to sacrifice. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
