As you already know, the campaign was already not sustainable to run for the another period. I'm not quite sure that the owners might agree to paying for something(double the amount) for something that was clearly not their fault.
Lastly, I'm only acting as the person who manages the details of the campaign, post counts, users who should be accepted etc. The payments was escrow's responsibility.
THEY (or you) trusted the escrow. It is THEIR problem when the escrow fucks them over. I dont see any reason to get this over with on the backs of the users in the campaign. Sustanable or not, get out with a clean record. |
|
|
|
As he was the only person who had access to the campaign funds, I'm sorry to say that the campaign will be discontinuing with no payments for the last month.
In case the new owner of the "master-p" account returns and refunds(highly unlikely), everyone will be paid out.
Putting being scammed by the escrow aside, shouldn't the person behind the campaign step foreward and pay the participants himself? The users in this campaign did nothing wrong. I think it would put ecoin in a bad light if you wouldn't honor the work they did, no matter whether or not paster-p returns the escrowed funds. I can see why you would want to end the campaign, but dont go out with outstanding payments. At least partly pay the participants for the days that already have passed. Anything else would be below you! |
|
|
|
As he was the only person who had access to the campaign funds, I'm sorry to say that the campaign will be discontinuing with no payments for the last period.
Putting being scammed by the escrow aside, shouldn't the person behind the campaign step foreward and pay the last period himself? The users in this campaign did nothing wrong. I think it would put ecoin in a bad light if you wouldn't honor the work they did. I can see why you would want to end the campaign, but dont go out with uncredited outstanding payments. Thats below you! |
|
|
|
already did thank you very much.
Added to the table in the first reply. Payment received. Thank you so much. I am pleased to take part again.
You don't have to make another enrollment post, if I include it in my pm, you're automatically re-enrolled for the next period. Last week you said i can join from the next Round that's why i came back.I am unable to understand your thoughts.
Regards
I said you could reapply and I would consider it. That you did, I considered it and came to the conclusion that I can't enroll you for this week, I'm sorry, but I already filled up all available spots. |
|
|
|
You should add carra23 and hilariousandco. You need to add yahoo.How did you forget yahoo? Though he doesn't accept me in his campaigns but he is a good manager.Do add him currently managing 3 campaigns i suppose.
Everyone listed here requested to be listed himself, I'm sure OP will list all those guys once they fill the form and request to be added. |
|
|
|
Worst: Crypto-Games.net
> I never leave my coins on their site. After every game i make sure to withdraw my coins.
Sounds like you come back again and again. So we have to make something right  |
|
|
|
Sorry, but I have to decline you for this round. Hey luptin just wondering if you can enrolled me. Twitter account: https://twitter.com/lovedeewanaFollowers: 5K+ Audit score: 85% Payment address: 1HYQUDv144gkGHUgeKQRnodjB9otJQatmv Thank you. Enrolled, as discussed via pm, once you got the tweet pinned. Yes, you are. Enrolled once you pin our tweet. |
|
|
|
Sorry, but I have to decline you for this round. |
|
|
|
Surprised to see my account worth as much as it is yet alone anything lol.
Post Quality = Very Poor.
I am curious as to what the algorithm is for determining that. Definitely interesting. ^^
You could have read the OP The algorithm is as follow: 0.0004[btc]/activity
0.0002[btc]/epa (extra potential activity)
epa = potential activity - activity
bp (base price) = 0.0004 * activity + 0.0003 * epa
final price = bp * pqm * tm
pqm (post quality multiplier) determined by ratio of good posts (>75 characters excluding quoted text) to bad posts (<75 characters excluding quotes)
excellent post quality (90%) = 1.05 (+5%)
good (80%) = 1.025 (+2.5%)
fair (70%) = 1.00 (+0%)
poor (50%) = -1.025 (-2.5%)
very poor (<50%) = -1.05 (-5%)
tm (trust multiplier)
positive light green trust = 1.10 (+10%)
positive dark green trust = 1.20 (+20%)
neutral trust = 1.00 (+0%)
negative trust = -0.15 (-85%)
pqm (post quality multiplier) determined by ratio of good posts (>75 characters excluding quoted text) to bad posts (<75 characters excluding quotes)
excellent post quality (90%) = 1.05 (+5%)
good (80%) = 1.025 (+2.5%)
fair (70%) = 1.00 (+0%)
poor (50%) = -1.025 (-2.5%)
very poor (<50%) = -1.05 (-5%) |
|
|
|
Payout will be based on the following table:The tweet of the week is: https://twitter.com/ChodingWi/status/678283684642881536crypto-games.net presents Winter Lottery Free #Bitcoin #Lotto Tickets to All of Us!
Check this Joy Gift: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1295543.msg13296585#msg13296585 … NOW! And its paid:
|
|
|
|
I request Mitchell to add Betcoin.tm in the list in OP.
-snip
Read above, already pointed out by elite3000 and included in the latest pastebin. Lutpin, we both know that kingaltcoins needs to make crappy posts to get paid more. People like that don't give a shit what others think and how relevant their post is.  Oh yeah, I forgot about how the YoBit campaign works for a minute... |
|
|
|
-snip-
Can I integrate Apache Tomcat with XAAMP and run it on an offline server? And do I need to wait for 10 minutes like the online version ?
You will need to access bitcointalk.org, Im not sure how you would do this from an offline system. Maybe I just misunderstand something here? I'm not telling him that bro. I'm asking for the files which is hosted on his site. I want to make my own site like him on my computer offline. Because I have to wait for 5 minutes if I do this on his site all the time. The word you are searching for is local. You want to download the code, to compile and run it on your local system, not on an offline one (that would be a system without access to any networks/the internet). |
|
|
|
This contest has been credited.
Congtatulations to the winners
Spread the holiday spirit, good luck and as always:
See you on!
|
|
|
|
And here's a little poster: It's been an incredible fun, I hope you all had as much fun with the games and the event overall as we had. Today, the 200 million bet milestone will also fall, so don't move away just yet. Have fun, and as always: See you on! |
|
|
|
seems interesting. Lutpin ( Profile) ( Send him message) Rank: Full Member Payment methods: BTCPayment periods: Weekly | Monthly Minimum: No minimum Maximum: 100 members / campaign HF: Depending on the size and type of the campaign, up to negotiation. Escrow: Yes, he could escrow the funds for the campaigns. Past experience? Yes, one of the manager of crypto-games.net campaign, supported several other campaigns with co-management. Max budget(monthly) you/he have had experienced with? Crypto-Games.net currently pays out cca. 2 BTC a month |
|
|
|
CryptoTotal is done for. Due to the rather unsuccessful campaign, despite having spent hundreds of dollars on payouts in the first week,
the staff has decided to cancel this campaign for the time being and focus on traditional advertising sources (AdWords, etc.) instead.
This forum is unfortunately only an effective advertising platform for gambling-related businesses.
We thank everyone who participated in this very short-lived signature campaign. It might be revived in the future. Removed CryptoTotal Added Betcoin.TM -> http://pastebin.com/8CweErUy |
|
|
|
Lotto is soon, is the "round leader" still a thing for this lotto draw?
Yes it was, I just credited those aswell as the signature campaign bonus tickets I've been promising to give. Ticket sales are now stopped, we will be processing the draw soon and inform everyone about the winners. |
|
|
|
Crypto-games has some awesome promotions going on if you check out the chat on their website. they're giving free BTC to active members in the chat. No strings attached, meaning no need to bet it a gazillion times  Yep, we at crypto-games have been giving some tickets for our draw tomorrow all week. But it's not yet too late to join. You can read more about it hereCurrently, the pool stands at about 0.17 BTC |
|
|
|
You can be banned for spam regardless whether or not you are enrolled into a signature campaign.But if a mod thinks you are spaming, they don't care whether or not you are in a campaign.
No you won't be banned unless the 'paying signature concept' is involved in your posting.There are some rare cases but the whole problem of Spam is because of signature's and not just low quality posts. Users are constantly being banned for spam (with or without signatures) though we have been a little lax about it recently and it has built up to crazy levels due to a couple of badly run campaigns but some people are trying to get on top of it and these mass bannings are needed and long-overdue as people have got away with it for far too long. [...]
Great list. Just a question staff, do you guys judge harsher against people with signatures than people without? I've been watching a few people who have been posting frequently without a signature, but as soon as they applied the signature, they haven't posted since... Banned, maybe?
Not really, but if you've got a signature you're often motivated to post more with less quality and the longer they go on getting paid the number of posts increases and the quality decreases so they get easier to spot. People often try farm accounts without signatures as well and they shoduldn't get away with posting crap just because they haven't got a signature. Please, tell me more. EDIT: You didn't get my point ,read it again and it looks like you are excluding the bolded part ?
Maybe you didn't get mine. I agree that some campaigns are encouraging spam, but at the end of the day, spam stays spam, whether you got a paid signature below it or not. |
|
|
|
Hi, just wondering, just got a pm regarding the yobit campaign stating that all the participants who didn't up the quality of their posts would've been kicked from the campaign and possibly banned from the forum? Can i be banned just because of that? I'm not very active, and enrolled with yobit because they pay on a daily basis, although i'm just gonna quit if i'm risking a ban.
Even though it's not really on-topic, let me answer this: You can be banned for spam regardless whether or not you are enrolled into a signature campaign. If you are wearing a paid signature people are easier to believe you are only spaming for the payments. But if a mod thinks you are spaming, they don't care whether or not you are in a campaign. For the pm, that was probably hilariousandco, he's been taking over management of the yobit campaign. No they can't. You can get banned for bad posts, but only if the staff thinks so, not because a campaign manager says so.
Well, in this case, with hilarious, staff and the campaign manager are the same person. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
