Apple, Uber, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Charlie Shrem, Mike Bloomberg, Barack Obama... su također hakirani. Na BTC adresi hakera se već skupilo preko 11 BTC! Nemogu vjerovati koliko su ljudi naivni (pohlepni)glupi...  Vidim da si greskom krivo napisao, pa sam te ispravio... Da, htio sam biti fin... hehe! Evo, konačno se i twitter oglasio.  |
|
|
|
Finally some twitter reaction. |
|
|
|
I doubt their accounts were hacked directly.
Somebody either breached some third-party API posting service or the cell carrier these people used, hence resetting their 2FA methods.
Logically, if something was breached on Twitter's side, they would have just shut the whole site down rather than risk the fallout that's currently occuring.
Twitter shares have down 5% ATM despite doing well earlier today, so I guess investors aren't happy either way.
A lot of unconfirmed rumors that a twitter employee with access to the user management panel was hacked. But I find that hard to believe. I guess we’ll just have to wait for official announcements. |
|
|
|
Apple, Uber, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Charlie Shrem, Mike Bloomberg, Barack Obama... su također hakirani. Na BTC adresi hakera se već skupilo preko 11 BTC! Nemogu vjerovati koliko su ljudi naivni (pohlepni)... |
|
|
|
Ma ja sam imao malo veći dio portfolia tamo tako da mi nije bilo svejedno. U najgorem slučaju ću izgubiti nešto sitno na fee. Znam da nije isto hakirati Binance i Twitter ali ipak... Nije ni Twitter baš neka usrana stranica bez ikakve sigurnosti pa su ga uspjeli hakirati.
Hakiranje je možda ipak prejaka riječ. U ovakvim slučajevima se najčešće radi o ljudskom faktoru. Vjerojatno je riječ o nekakvom neopreznom korisniku, curenju informacija ili možda socijalnom inženjeringu... |
|
|
|
What I actually meant to ask was, what would be the actual finalized selling price (not an estimate), including when the scheduled flights would be posted and listed (not a time frame only) instead.
Actually, you can go to 'thespaceperspective' official website and 'Reserve your seat'. I am sure that their sales representatives will contact you soon so you can ask them.  |
|
|
|
Don't get on my nerves, if I decide not to count your one line comments, I can be justified. Over your time in the campaign I have pin pointed you as one of the users that merely make the minimum number of required post just to stay in the campaign. I do read your post which obviously had some quality in them which is why you're still a member of this campaign.
Okay, it wasn't my intention to get on your nerves. I consider you a valued member of this community (especially considering your humanitarian work) and I generally support your work as a campaign manager. What you’ve noticed from my posting history is not my way to 'keep a place in the campaign’ but, simply, my engagement here that I’m comfortable with. As you can see, my number of posts per week is more or less constant and depends on the number of topics I participate in. If nothing else, this should be an indication that I am not here to make money from sig. campaigns and I don't treat this forum as a job. Like I said, you're not the first to get demoted neither would you be the last, in fact most users marked inactive since my announcement had been users trying to outsmart the inactivity rules to stay in the campaign like this user (semobo) who was demoted few weeks back to give room to the current tier A members
Alrighty then. As long as the same rules apply to all participants equally, I have nothing against them. I felt hurt because I got the impression that I was the only one sanctioned under the new campaign rules and, to paraphrase your words, I wasn't impressed when I looked at the posts of some other members from the spreadsheet. I hope you'll pay more attention to this and don’t allow some participants to 'outsmart the rules' by making the max number of posts each week just so they don’t get under the radar. Speaking of quoting random people from the forum, here’s another one I think is appropriate here: I like that good forum members can make money, especially when said forum members are in poorer countries and this is a major opportunity for them. I very much do not want to destroy the sig-ad/airdrop/bounty "industry". But I am not going to tolerate people posting garbage upon garbage. If the merit system completely fails and I can't think of anything else to replace it, then my next step will probably be to completely remove all ways for forum users to make money from posting (eg. removing signatures entirely).
I think this was published a few weeks after the merit system was introduced. Moreover, this is a good read for all forum members and especially bounty managers because they have a great responsibility to the whole community: Since 2018, what did you contribute to prevent signature ads removed globally?Stop pointing fingers and work on yourself buddy;
One doesn't have to exclude the other.
Update: since it became clear this is about being accepted in a signature campaign: my statement above doesn't mean I would accept you in a campaign. There's a long way to go from "not a spammer so I can Merit you" to "wanting to encourage you financially to continue what you're doing".
I hear you. Nor would I, if I were a manager, accept myself into a campaign that has a limited number of spots given that there are so many more deserving members here.  But, let's cross that bridge when we get to it. I still have a long way to go in this community and, hopefully, by then I will be a somewhat more acceptable member.
@UmerIdrees, @lucifer_8 Don't worry guys about me. What bad can happen to anyone for expressing their opinion in public? Oh, wait... Shit!  |
|
|
|
|
289,189,089
username:fatfork
|
|
|
|
Ali onda ocito vec treba imat mozga da shvatis da ustvari kazes da sam imas sidu ako dajes taj feedback...  Ahahaha! Daa, nisam se toga sjetio. 'Rugao se lonac loncu...' |
|
|
|
Jel zna netko da li se nešto specijalno događa na bitcoin mreži trenutno? Upravo sam sa coinomi walleta slao transakciju i platio je dosta 0.6$ što i nije tako čudno. Kad sam kliknuo send coinomi se zablesio i srušio. Kad sam ponovno pokrenuo pola minute kasnije tranasakcija je već prošla i imala dvije konfirmacije. Budući da je blok vrijeme obično oko 10 minuta ovo me malo zbunilo. Nemam nikakvih problema, lova je sretno stigla i sve ok ali me čisto zanima kako je to moguće.
Pa, blok vrijeme od 10 minuta nije pravilo i vidio sam i prije blokova koji su se izvršavali u istoj minuti. Što se tiće mreže, osobno, nisam primjetio ništa čudno. Imao sam nekih transakcija jutros i sve su mi potvrđene u prihvatljivom vremenu. |
|
|
|
I have already aired my view on this topic before don't get what you want me here for again. Any user who think barely meeting up the minimum post requirements with just one line, generic or absolute spam comments who recieve additional attention from me and will definitely get punished. You're not the first and won't be the last. I have demoted users from Teir A and B on different occasions as those users you point figure weren't even in the top tiers when I took over campaign, also when users make more than 60 post even though some got denied I don't have to update the spreadsheet with that since they already met the maximum posts requirements.
So it's all about quantity, not quality? And, in fact, there is no 'quality standard' you were talking about. You basically say that if I make 60 or more (useless) posts a week, I will never get on your radar or get punished? Isn’t that obvious support for forum spamming? When you post username or participant in some weekly draws (game) on the game and round boards, do you expect me to count that towards your weekly eligible posts count? You had about 3 or more of such comment from the 25 you made, others that got your eligible post reduced were one line comments.
I never counted those three posts in my weekly eligible posts count. You should check your facts before making such allegations. And, as for your second remark, what’s so bad in one line comments if they’re on topic and not generic or absolute spam? - Short replies are not always bad and long ones are not always good. Sometimes all that is required is a simple one word yes or no response, but stretching out an answer just to appear constructive usually has the opposite effect.
Improve on your post delivery that's all I have to say don't forget before last two week you got your post counted and pay for correctly. Very active users promoting the project in the best way they can and in the best interest of the campaign and forum are waiting patiently to rank up, I can't denied them of that opportunity when it present itself, we're only in search of very active users of the community, if you can't meet up, you're free to use the door.
PS: This is my last contribute on this thread.
I may be wrong, but as far as I know you have never demoted anyone before for not meeting the 'quality standard' but only for inactivity for two weeks in a row. It is clear that these members were selected before you took over the campaign but it is your job to actively monitor and warn participants when needed. Have you ever warned any of obvious signature spammers? Instead, you continue to promote and reward them. How is this in the best interest of the BitVest campaign and the forum? I'm sure @lightlord would agree with this too. Posts 1079 (Rank >1000 )
Posts deleted by moderators: 94
Posts made per post deleted: 11
Merit received in the last 120 days: 0 Posts 1927 (Rank >1000 )
Posts deleted by moderators: 125
Posts made per post deleted: 15
Merit received in the last 120 days: 1 I agree that I can (and should) still work on improving the quality of my posts and I am sure that will be the case as I gain more knowledge and experience on this forum. But, as I mentioned before, if forum spamming is a preferred condition for advancing in the BitVest campaign then I don’t even want to participate in it. Feel free to kick me out whenever you want if you disagree with me and if you prefer the quantity of posts over the fight against spam. |
|
|
|
The REAL question, is at what one PRICE POINT do you throw in the towel, and sell your BitCoin ?? $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $100.00 $1.00
Well, it depends. What color is the towel? For example, I personally just hate brightly colored towels. I would throw them in right away. |
|
|
|
...u drugom mi je neko karo ženu i ona dobila sidu, valjda i ja isto:
A, jebiga! Dešava se to i pametnijima od tebe. Ali ne brini se, kažu ljudi da se danas i sa sidom može živjeti potpuno normalno. |
|
|
|
|
I would still like CryptopreneurBrainboss to clarify which sections aren't welcomed (because that's not stated in the campaign terms) and by what criteria he rejected most of my 25 posts even though they weren't just one line comments or spam.
But yes, you’re probably right and I’ll lock the topic if he doesn’t respond in a day or two.
|
|
|
|
there are many owners then
<snip>
So, you are one of the suckers who bought this? LOL! |
|
|
|
Thanks I didn't know for how long i can keep him trying to convince me.
Damn! I messed up. Sorry... But I doubt he will give up so easily. |
|
|
|
Don't lie! You know perfectly well that I am the real owner of that wallet. I made a newer screenshot as proof.  |
|
|
|
Nope! You're missing some transactions there. Let's try again. i have sold only 1 copy...if you are interesting please contact in telegram
So someone could have already cracked the password and accessed the funds while we’re talking here? |
|
|
|
|
Can you show us a new screenshot of your wallet? How long have you been selling that wallet.dat and how many copies have you sold so far?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
