|
This isn't surprising at all. Nigerians have openly expressed their appreciation for BTC and other popular cryptocurrencies on many occasions.
I observed that countries which have severe economic issues usually tend to depend more on cryptocurrencies. Examples include Nigeria, Venezuela etc. This does make sense considering the anonymous and digital nature of cryptocurrencies.
|
|
|
|
|
I like the name and design of your site op. Reminds me of Clixsense where games and earning opportunities are available at one place. Are these offers divided based on geographical location?
Am curious because this is how they are usually distributed in my experience. Also, what is the house edge on your games op? FAQ section needs to be added.
|
|
|
|
This kind of survey/pool can be manipulated easily so there is no points of seeing the final result.
Manipulation here may come from 2 side, first the admin(the one who create the pool/survey) and secondly from the voters as one person may fill the survey many times and give a site higher score/rate.
I do not mean to say that OP is going to do that, but I have never used such survey/pool as a reference to choose a gambling site.
It all comes down to the sample-size at the end of the day. Majority tend to trust surveys with larger sample sizes basically since smaller sample-size surveys are easier to manipulate. However, this doesn't necessarily imply that small sample-size should be ignored. Other factors need to be taken into consideration. This particular survey by op could be manipulated by him, but the voters cannot since they can only fill it out once. It prevents duplicate entries basically. |
|
|
|
|
Completed the short survey. I chose Roobet since it's my favorite crypto casino currently since I find it reliable and the bonus system is great. The design of the site looks trendy too in my opinion.
My 2nd favorite is Stake. Also, I agree with the posters above regarding Bitstarz which should be omitted from the list due to its negative reputation.
|
|
|
|
At this point, I don't think you will receive any portion of your funds op which is why I feel it's best for you to learn from this situation and move on. Self exclusion is not same as casino exclusion. We do not have policy for casino exclusion that was only option for our sportsbook players that wanted to clear the clutter with casino and games and only be able to play on sportsbook because that is what they came for on stake.
You clearly stated you do not want your account banned.
What you are stating here makes no sense. If there was no possibility of a complete casino ban, you should have explained that to the gambler properly and you shouldn't have granted his wish. You should have clearly warned him regarding this issue early on. Stake is wrong here for these reasons while Dancpats is wrong due to his inability to control his gambling addiction. |
|
|
|
|
For clarity sake, can you mention how much you exactly withdrew op? Am curious about this since I will be more careful with Betnomi(based on what the posters above suggested) at present.
I regularly place bets there which is why this information could be helpful to me and others. Coming to your withdrawal, if the TX doesn't get confirmed automatically, it is upto the site to resolve this one way or another.
|
|
|
|
Nope you cannot consider them Young because they have been here for years now and proven their legitimacy .
I guess he was highlighting the sports betting section on Stake which was recently introduced which is why I agree him in this case. There have been a lot of mentions of it through the gambling section and I think you've missed it. They're very known not just in crypto gambling but in the mainstream who's been into sports betting for a long time. Anyone can switch and use them if they want to.
I've seen some of the forum members who have experience in using them.
Am a Pinnacle user myself for sometime now and have pointed out on many occasions that it is easily one of the best sharp sportsbooks out there. The only con related to it is the KYC part in my opinion. |
|
|
|
They could have made a good faith offer of a small percent of the casino losses back, both sides admitting some responsibility and mistakes and they still would have profited an obscene amount off of this ordeal , but no.
In the end I’m powerless. But I honestly expected way more from stake and the people behind it.
It's disappointing to see one of the top Stake gamblers being treated like this despite the proof that you provided. I expected them to return a portion of your funds at the very least, but I was wrong clearly. I still like Stake, but this case made me lose a good deal of respect for them. I advise you not to trust gambling sites regarding anything blindly. Instead, focus on trying to control your own gambling addiction. |
|
|
|
|
I sympathize with op here. Stake is clearly at fault here based on the proof that op provided. It's like the casino ripped off a drunk customer and aren't claiming responsibility.
This is really unfortunate for op considering the fact that he lost huge amounts overall. I feel that he should be reimbursed the entire amount since it's Stake's fault. Next best option is to reimburse 50-75% of the amount.
Either way, op isn't at fault here. I hope Stake looks into this matter seriously and rectifies it by providing an appropriate solution asap.
|
|
|
|
By the way. Me getting 3% of each prize as a fee leads us to one interesting thing.
I'm not making any money until you do. And I think, this is also fair.
Please be polite, mate. I still see your post of how you're calling me drunk (not sober) and it harms my dignity very well.
I was joking about you being drunk(not serious) since the thread title didn't make any sense and the ANN presentation itself was poor. Also, you didn't address my earlier query properly. I still don't see any benefit in taking extra risks with your site. 3% commission on top of all this further amplifies my criticism. If you can clarify these queries, I might invest in your site. |
|
|
|
This means, that you need like $6 additional to your $2 bet to play at least once.
And I can't do anything about it. This is just how ethereum works.
Gamblers already need to deal with several risks and your excuse regarding the ETH fees makes things worse since we stand to lose more in the long-term. Why would anyone be remotely interested in taking extra risks and dealing with issues like gas fees etc when all of that can be avoided through popular crypto gambling sites op? Can you answer this query? |
|
|
|
|
Spectacular performance by India in literally every single department. What an amazing comeback. Ashwin deserves man of the match for his all-round performance. Wonder what excuse Vaughan will come up with next.
In my opinion, England are over-dependent on Root in the batting department in tests though I don't see any issues with their bowling department.
|
|
|
|
|
The biggest issue related to BTC and cryptocurrencies in general for newbies is the learning curve. Initially, everything seems complicated and tough to understand even though there are plenty of guides and tutorial videos out there.
This deters newbies from learning more about the cryptocurrency world and they quit in order to avoid such complications.
Other issues like scammers, hackers, TX times and fees etc also deter newbies, but they aren't as problematic as the learning curve involved in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Ashwin is having the best time with bat and bowl and will be the player of the match unless England produce some miracle in batting and happens to win the test match from here. England performance might be other way around if they would have won the toss and bat first. Might be India would be under pressure in such situation just like now how England is in pressure of losing it.
England winning at this stage? I doubt it. India have pretty much claimed this one by outperforming England in literally every single department. I have no idea why they decided to replace Anderson whose reverse swing helped a lot. Also, the toss doesn't always decide the outcome of the match. If that were the case, I would probably earn millions by placing live bets after viewing the toss result. It all comes down to luck and performances at the end of the day. |
|
|
|
|
Are you affiliated with Honest99? Do you honestly expect anyone to be remotely interested in the site that you are advertising thanks to the poor ANN presentation and the nonsensical title op? Were you even sober when you created this thread?
The title of the site needs to be renamed to Dishonest99 instead for accuracy sake. This is basically pointless advertising overall.
|
|
|
|
If these people that are listed on the leaderboard are playing at least two hours daily the traffic should be 900k or even higher, the site looks like newly launch, there is an issue with transparency here
Didn't notice this earlier until you guys pointed this out. Op had ample time to address these queries, but chose not to. He is selectively addressing the queries which he feels comfortable answering based on what I observed. He ignored the queries which I posted earlier regarding the provably fair system and house edge. This puts the site in bad light and makes it look shady. Until he clears up these queries conclusively, I suggest avoiding this site currently since there are far better legitimate alternatives out there. |
|
|
|
|
Had a great time participating in this campaign for the complete 6 weeks duration. Received all payments without any delay. I wish Nakitcoins success in their future endeavours.
|
|
|
|
|
The design of your site is bland and simple and can use improvement in order to attract more gamblers. I liked the name of the site. Couldn't find any FAQ section which is something that needs to be added asap in order to address important queries.
Can you share more details about your provably fair system? Also, what is the house edge on your crash game op?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
