Don't lie! You know perfectly well that I am the real owner of that wallet. I made a newer screenshot as proof.   |
|
|
|
Nope! You're missing some transactions there.  Let's try again. i have sold only 1 copy...if you are interesting please contact in telegram
So someone could have already cracked the password and accessed the funds while we’re talking here? |
|
|
|
|
Can you show us a new screenshot of your wallet? How long have you been selling that wallet.dat and how many copies have you sold so far?
|
|
|
|
LOL! Look at these suckers scrambling around. TradeKax has been exposed for plagiarism long ago. [Warning] Tradekax exchange plagiarized whitepaperthis is the first i use bitcoin talk. plagiarism not mean scam project. this is miss take from content writer. thank for report. I will report to boss to upgrade all. thank. @TradeKax have you fixed that miss take yet? |
|
|
|
Rikafip, you can add the following ANN thread to your list: TimeCoinProtocol - decentralized sharing economy protocolNewbie accounts bumping this thread: thannwhetemsols - Date Registered: January 24, 2018 - 2 posts buckprotfuti - Date Registered: January 24, 2018 - 3 posts ticoncterli - Date Registered: January 24, 2018 - 3 posts sunilnisha3 - Date Registered: October 29, 2019 - 3 posts RGhozi - Date Registered: October 31, 2019 - 2 posts clearanerca - Date Registered: January 23, 2018 - 2 posts nitaccacen - Date Registered: January 24, 2018 - 2 posts niaprejcilli - Date Registered: January 23, 2018 - 2 posts olsurtepach - Date Registered: January 23, 2018 - 2 posts weioumeng4 - Date Registered: November 02, 2019 - 2 posts Gungh0 - Date Registered: October 23, 2019 - 2 posts Explanation by the OP of the ANN thread: ... It is likely that these new accounts are users who came for us from other social networks. We made an announcement and told our community about what we now have on bitcointalk. We are sure that over time they will get used to this forum.
... I am sure that all these people came to support us after we told them that we are now on this forum. I don’t think they’ve conceived anything bad.
I'm not buying it, though. |
|
|
|
That's correct and I gave every user I punish a go ahead to create a thread if he feels I made the wrong call as highlighted in this reply of mine; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088858.msg54684735#msg54684735. The user in question isn't been labeled a shit poster entirely by me but he didn't make enough post to my standard to make the cut of recieving reward for last week payment that started on 05/07 12:00PM and ended on 12/07 11:59AM. First of all, I appreciate your taking the time to reply to this topic. Fatfork made around 25 post for the week but most of them were just one line comments and (some in section post count aren't welcomed) which is something I don't welcome, I might overlook it sometime but when you're on my radar (gotten a previous warning for been inactive, I apply extra attention to make sure that I don't give a second chance to users who're barely making enough quality post to retain their slots in the campaign.
This is somewhat true and I agree that some of my posts were just one-line comments (although I disagree with the statement 'most of them'). This is a forum where people have open discussions, not a bloging platform and, after all, the quality of a discussion should not be measured by the number of words written. I believe all of my posts were on topic and in the context of a discussion and not just random blather to meet some quotas. Any post that does not comply with the campaign requirements or is against the forum rules should be denied. I understand that, but which sections are not welcome and why is this not stated in the campaign terms? Do understand that before last two weeks I have been counting and rewarding your post weekly but without much research looking at your posting record for the last two week I haven't been impressed. We all learn daily so don't take my decision wrongly but consider it to be a constructive criticism for you to work on yourself.
I totally accept constructive criticism and I don’t mind being on your radar, moreover, I support it. This is also one of the reasons why I started this thread. I want the opinion of other members as well so that I can improve my appearance and thrive in this community. What bothered me the most was the fact that, according to your response to PM, you ranked me as a spammer and punished me as if I were the worst shit poster on the forum. Don't go pointing fingers as that doesn't make it any easier for you.
This I don't understand. Shouldn't all forum members react if they spot spammers and shit posters whose only goal is to make money from sig. campaigns and don't contribute anything to the quality of the discussions? You too, like all other campaign managers, have a great responsibility towards the entire bitcointalk community because, as far as I can see, signature campaigns are the biggest source of spam on this forum. Why does the merit system have no impact in campaigns? Do you really enjoy reading posts like this: Airdrops are now more scammed so it's very difficult to earn cryptocurrency from them Free cryptocurrencies are available from freebitco.combut it'll depend upon luck That's why I feel we will get cryptocurrency through bounty or blog.
or this: Many people believe in this magic but I think it is a myth that it is only for the entertainment of the people Reality is everything that exists From the very beginning of civilization people have a keen interest in magic and sorcery. Magic is basically the science of subduing the supernatural and natural forces But nowadays most people do not believe in this magic and everyone sees it as a means of entertainment.
Both of these members are on the 'Tier A' list of the BitVest campaign and are appropriately rewarded for each of their 'quality' posts. Work on yourself and you'll be rewarded weekly, your participation in the campaign is highly appreciate and welcomed.
I will definitely do that. Especially now that I have received support from other members as well. I must be doing something right here, after all. |
|
|
|
https://www.walletexplorer.comSamo pazi na fake positive rezultate tipa walleti od mjenjačnica, kasina, inače, čisto sumnjam da ćeš u novim adresama naći povezanost, probaj sa starim btc adresama, eth walletima itd... Thanks! Da, provjerio sam. Obje adrese dijele isti wallet... kao i milion drugih adresa. Vjerojatno je u pitanju mjenjačnica ili kasino. |
|
|
|
Da bilo je neke drame oko abusanja pravila, pa sada kao trenira strogocu a u Tier A mu pisu klasicni shitposteri koji garant ne znaju beknut engleski. Ali glavno da se bezumno roka 60 postova tjedno a to sto im se postovi redovno nadju u onoj hall of shame temi, to nema veze.
Da. Ali nešto gledam, previše mi ovi sa vrha liste slično pišu pa mi se čini da onaj busting povezanih alt računa baš i nije sve počistio. Pošto si ti puno iskusniji u scam busting-u, znaš li kako se može provjeriti povezanost nekih btc adresa (npr. ako pripadaju istom hd wallet-u)? Na Bitvest treba gledati kao na svojevrsnu placeholder kampanju cisto dok nesto bolje na naidje, jer je bas frustrirajuce gledat kako shitposteri dobiju x4-x5 vise od tebe i tako iz tjedna u tjedan. Samo jebat ga, kad si nizi rank, onda ne mozes bas puno ni birati.
Uh, nadam se da ću uskoro skupiti dovoljno merita pa da barem malo napredujem sa rankom... Vidim da ih ti imaš viška, posudiš mi koji? (šala, šala ) |
|
|
|
|
My guess: 284,898,00
Username: fatfork
|
|
|
|
Zapravo, krivo sam se izrazio... Koliko sam vidio u tablici, FatFork je tri tjedna pisao po 15-16 postova (sasvim po pravilima), a nakon toga ima dva tjedna da nije bio aktivan, odnosno nisu mu priznati postovi. Ne znam zbog čega mu nisu priznati postovi, ali po pravilima dva tjedna neaktivnosti rezultiraju smanjenjem Tiera.
Točno. Gotovo svaki tjedan sam imao 15-20 priznatih postova (sve po pravilima a meni dovoljno...). Predprošli tjedan nisam ispunio kvotu (mislim da sam napisao ukupno 13-14 postova, nebitno) i javio sam se manageru da me izostavi sa liste za plaćanje. Prošli tjedan sam se potrudio malo više pa sam napravio ukupno 24 posta (ne računajući postove u 'Games and rounds' koji se možda ne računaju, nisam siguran) i za njih dobio 8-9 merita da bih od Brainboss-a dobio 🖕 i 'quality standards' stav... Čuj ovog FatFork-a, rekli mu da shitposta okolo po forumu pa došao u svađaonu shitpostat.
A daj, fuck of! Nemoj mi sada još i ti ni džigericu sjedat! Nego, bolje odi tamo u temu i napiši nešto lijepo kad svakako voliš pisati na 'Reputation' sekciji |
|
|
|
Na žalost ti ne radiš za bitvest, već za managera koji te zbog nekog razloga "ne voli", možda mu ova dvojica vraćaju pola love od kampanje svaki tjedan a možda mu se stvarno ne sviđaju tvoji postovi. Po meni ne možeš profititrati od svađe s managerom, već ti je pametnije nastaviti po svome i tražiti kampanju koja će te cijeniti ovakvog kakav jesi i uz put raditi na sebi i razvijati se u smjeru koji ti je zanimljiv.
A, što je tu je. Javno ću iznijeti svoja stajališta jer mislim da to i je bit svakog javnog foruma pa neka me izbaci iz kampanje potpuno ako tako odluči. Mislim da je Bitvest kampanja gdje nije bitno kako pišeš nego da napišeš što više postova.
Nažalost, izgleda da si ovdje u pravu. Samo, šta onda sere sa 'standardima kvalitete' i sličnim glupostima... Kažem, nemam vremena proučavati koliko si postova napisao u pojedinom tjednu ali ako si pisao po 15-16 postova onda stvarno izgleda kao da si čuvaš mjesto, a netko tko piše više postova zbog tebe čeka u nižem Tieru.
OK, razumijem što želiš reći. Isto kao što meni 'smetaju' članovi koji su iznad mene a, po mojem mišjenju, trebali bi biti izbačeni, ne samo iz kampanje nego sa cijelog foruma. Ali pravila kampanje su jasna - minimalno 15 postova tjedno. Kao što sam već pisao gore, ako žele više postova onda neka to stave u uvjete kampanje. Meni odgovara manje jer ne mogu svaki tjedan odvojiti potrebno vrijeme za pisanje... |
|
|
|
Was it me? That definitely sounds like something I'd say LOL. And some cynical old fart like me could also say that you created this thread to fish for merit  LOL! No, it wasn't you. And no, this isn't fishing for merits. Trust me, I had a hard time forcing myself to open a topic like this. But it doesn't really matter that much what some random "senior member" says or thinks. Lots of people and opinions here and you know the saying about opinions. As long as you actually contribute to the forum what you want to contribute, and are not hopelessly illiterate - it will all work out. Trouble starts when people try to pretend to be someone they aren't (e.g. comment on topics they have no idea about), try to fill some quotas and treat posting here as a "job", try to ignore or fight moderators telling them to get their shit together, etc. It doesn't look like you fall into any of these categories even if some cranky "senior member" said otherwise.
Okay, so you just happened to guess exactly my sentiment. I don't want to engage in discussions on topics I have no idea about or write nonsense just to fill some quotas. I tend to leave comments only where they can contribute to the discussion with a new and original opinion. @FatFork why you did not post initial accusation from this senior member and his explanation about his attitude?
...
You are in Bitvest signature campaign, which is a campaign with lowerest payments rate on the forum. Low payment rate, it certainly brings a slightly poorer quality of posts and a lot of spam comes from there.
The thing is, our campaign manager, Brainboss, thinks my posts don't meet 'quality standards' and has demoted me to a lower rank in the bitvest campaign. I took a brief look at the posts of some other members from the list of participants and was disappointed to see that certain members are rewarded every week and I am punished and compared to spammers and shitposters. Brainboss knows who I'm talking about and it's easy to find them on the spreadsheet. Don't get me wrong now, I have nothing against these members and I don't want to tell anyone how to do their job but yes, I find spamming a big issue on this forum. If that's the condition, to produce 50-60 pointless posts a week like on an assembly line, then I never want to reach that 'quality standard' and I don't want to have anything to do with the Bitvest campaign anymore. I opened this topic as requested by Brainboss and I would really like to hear his opinion as well. |
|
|
|
Ajde malo objasni tu situaciju. Šta ti je smanjio lovu od kampanje zato jer mu se ne sviđaju tvoji postovi? Kao što sam napisao u temi koju si otvorio ti definitvno nisi shitposter ali s druge strane manageri kampanja imaju pravo birati/plaćati reklamu u djelu foruma koji procjene važnijim. Dosta tvojih postova zbog scam busting tendecije završi u temama koje možda kampanjama nisu interesantne i tu leži tvoj pravi problem ako sam dobro shvatio. FatFork, mislim da se nepotrebno nerviras 😀
Campaign manageri imaju jako " veliku slobodu " i u odabiru članova kampanje a i u biranju tema i postova koje plaćaju i uglavnom to ne moraju nikome objašnjavati ili se opravdavati.
Srećom, kampanja ima koliko hoćeš pa ako ti jedna kampanja ne "odgovara " zbog kriterija i odluka njezinog managera prijavi se u drugu 😁
Nije problem u tome da mi je smanjio lovu ili odbio poneki post u ukupnom broju ako mu se ne sviđa ili ne zadovoljava uvjete kampanje već u činjenici da me je degradirao u niži rang zbog toga što, po njegovim riječima, većina mojih postova od prošlog tjedna ne zadovoljavaju 'quality standards'. Nakon mojeg upita na PM, samo s jednom rečenicom me je uputio na njegov post u bitvest kampanji gdje objašnjava da neki članovi kampanje, da bi zadržali svoje mjesto na listi, pišu minimalni broj postova tjedno koji su uglavnom 'meaningless replies or generic posts' tj. spam. Jasno mi je da sve kampanje imaju svoje uvjete i da manageri imaju slobodu odabira sudionika kampanje ali mi smeta da me netko degradira i proziva spamerom zato što ne štancam 50-60 postova tjedno. Ako žele da pišemo 20 (ili 30, ili 50...) postova tjedno, neka to stave u uvjete kampanje a na nama je odluka hoćemo li se priključiti takvoj kampanji ili ne. Osim toga, pogledao sam malo po tablici sudionika kampanje i otvorio nekoliko profila npr. Negotiation ili Subbir koji su nagrađeni 'Tier A' statusom i svaki tjedan štancaju po 50-60 postova koji im se uredno isplaćuju. Nemam ja ništa protiv tih članova, ali molio sam ga da mi objasni je li to 'quality standard' o kojem je govorio? Jer ako je to uvjet onda ha ne želim više imati ikakve veze s bitvest kampanjom. Na to mi nije ništa odgovorio a u postu je naveo da, ako se ne slažemo s njegovom odlukom, otvorimo temu u 'Reputation'. Volio bih da sam bolji s engleskim i da mogu jasnije izraziti svoje mišljenje tamo iako ne vjerujem da će to bilo što promijeniti. |
|
|
|
This is embarrassing but did anyone take a snapshot of total wagers at the right time? I was certain it was in ~20 minutes but it seems it was 40 minutes ago.. I'm sorry!
Please reach out if you took a time stamped screenshot
I'm sorry, Hhampuz. I can't help you with a time stamped screenshot. If it helps, these are predictions that could be closest to the actual result. Maybe you can eliminate some given the information you have. 281,000,000 Cryptpogz1 281,304,127 frmracc 281,409,131 Betwrong 281,456,154 Luzin |
|
|
|
Looking at your post history, I've definitely seen worse. You look like a real user to me, so keep going That's right, I'm 'a real living boy'! I can't read several of those posts. The last link was your topic, that linkdump was clearly insubstantial. But if you learn from having it deleted, you'll be fine.
I made that post two days after my registration on the forum, so yes, maybe at the time I wasn’t fully aware of all the rules on the forum. Most of the other deleted posts were in the local, Croatian section and since we don't have a local moderator I think the global moderator was a bit too strict with the 'off-topic' rule. For some other posts, like the one about forking Electrum wallet I honestly don’t know why they were deleted. I've been accussed of being a signature spammer on several occasions. Anyone can have their opinion I've had posts deleted too. Some deserved, some because I forgot an old bump (which is still deserved). Thank you very much for your opinion. I appreciate it. |
|
|
|
Hej ekipa! Nije striktno za svađaonu ali, kako se trenutno osjećam, rado bih se posvađao s nekim. Budući da me je naš CM Brainboss degradirao u bitvest kampanji otvorio sam temu u 'Reputation' sekciji pa vas molim za vašu podršku ovdje: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5261859.0Svako dobronamjerno mišljenje (bilo pozitivno ili negativno) je dobrodošlo. |
|
|
|
|
Since a senior member recently accused me that most of my posts are meaningless replies or generic posts, I would like to hear the opinion from other members of this community as well.
I admit I am not a man of many words and English is not my primary language, but each of my posts is written thoughtfully and I try my best to contribute to this forum. I actively participate in exposing scammers and fighting spam and plagiarism on the forum (I've reported 193 posts so far with 99% accuracy), so such accusations hurt me even more.
All of my received merits are, imho, well deserved and most of them are from respectable DT members like OgNasty, LoyceV, xandry, nutildah, marlboroza, Coolcryptovator, NeuroticFish, dkbit98, DdmrDdmr, Daniel91, examplens, stompix, Rikafip, and many others.
But it’s hard to be your own judge so I created this topic for discussion. Please take a look at my recent posting history and give your honest opinion. Am I a good member of this community or just another shitposter from the crowd?
|
|
|
|
Take your pick. If it's lengthy then it's been written by someone else somewhere.
Maybe the short ones have been too. Can't be arsed to check.
Yeah. The short ones too. Blatant plagiarist ... There is no way to answer this 100% . It all depends on what is going on with said coin. Altcoins USD or EUR price is determined from the BTC price of the coin. When investing in altcoins that are purchasable via bitcoin, you want to take a look at the btc price of that coin.. That is going to give you more information vs. checking the USD or EUR price.
source: https://www.quora.com/Why-do-all-Cryptocurrencies-seen-to-rise-and-fall-at-the-same-time-but-can%E2%80%99t-be-a-bit-opposite/answer/Robert-Yanero
Ultimately, cash may in fact disappear. But it’s mostly a question of where and when. While it may disappear in some countries, it might remain in others. And if it ultimately happens in 50 or 100 or more years, it won’t matter much to anyone who’s alive today.
source: https://www.moneyunder30.com/what-is-the-future-of-cash |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Price is now hovering around 9200 on 10 July 2020.... I will be happy to come back here in a month, 6 months, 1 Year, and give credit to whoever is proven right Why haven't you done it yet? You keep talking bullshit here, for how long now? A year? Two years? Can you ever admit that you were wrong? Will you be man enough to show up here and admit you were wrong if price goes down ?
Will you be... oh, wait! Looks like we already know the answer to that one. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
