yes a video interview with Mihai Manolache would be nice, hope we will see later more big names how Aubrey de Grey.
I guess within the next weeks we will be able to see videos of some more team members. Although their videos aren't the most fanciest I actually like them and the chance to get to know the team a bit, like their motivation or their field of work. The more we know about the team members especially through the videos, the more confidence we will get. That is good for the future of ehealth project. Yeah, promotional stuff is really necessary. They should aggressively work on the marketing department. marketing is vital for any project to get of the ground. especially for this one with such a long roadmap. |
|
|
|
There is no clear information regarding the main sale period and I am afraid this could give a bad impact to the project.
It's in early stage. The team must be busy with project preparation . Let's wait for big news update more patience and waiting, clear and detail information will come out before the ICO. Looking forward to it Patience is always good yes, but whatever busy devs are, there should always be time to update the ann thread. If that's not possible, someone has to be hired. This is not openeing a small local business, this is usually an ICO that deals with millions. So we can expect to be informed as potential investor, thats it. I agree, there should a social media person that handles this sort of thing. keeping your investors updated is paramount to the success of the project. |
|
|
|
maybe is better if they will apply different prices based on the country where they operate, based on fact that even 1$ can be a lot in certain countries
This is certain. For different countries there should be different prices. Since a person will prefer a pirated film than pay a large price for it. I think the intention was also to focus on low income countries first. And i believe this is smart, that is a market that can probably use a streaming/Netflix type service, but can't really afford Netflix. The only risk in here is they have low income and they barely afford food and etc. So will they pay cryptoflix for streaming? Or can they pay? guys netflix is not that expensive, if they can't afford a subscription, the can't affect internet as well. |
|
|
|
Wrap up of the week's crypto and exchange news. One Euro bank developing a wallet, one country now has crypto as legal tender, infographic about source of future bitcoin attacks, and more!  An excellent news compilation! Thank you for keeping us informed about last crypto news! Thanks for this article, it contains all relevant information - as we can see the cryptocurrency is becoming more popular, and its legitimization is normalized every day. it will happen sooner than anyone anticipates. bitcoin has taken the world by storm in just a few years and will drag with it all altcoins |
|
|
|
The voting system will probably be about non critical preferences the user can vote on. Its quite common nowadays.
There is a reason why the board of management,not the shareholders, decide important matters of a company. I fear token holders would always vote for short sighted profit. this is why I'm skeptical. Actually, I think such voting system is good but not really necessary. Suggestions from the community should be taken into consideration instead.  Yes, thats what Iam missing in many projects. Community makes suggestions or warns against dangers and dev often ignore them. This happens more often as I thought before I've dealt with crypto. it doesn't just happen with crypto. happens in every industry that has fans. and it's probably for the better. fans are never pleased and often ask the impossible. |
|
|
|
Its nice see blockchain projects such as REPU are making possible the integration of important technologies such as AI to make business and individuals more transparent and effective and reliable in doing everyday transactions. The future is now
Before integrating AI they should first complete the platform. yeah, the AI bit will come later as it's really complicated to figure out. |
|
|
|
As far as I know there's no subscription on Cryptoflix, you'll only pay when you watch something (video on demand model)
then the price has to be really low for it to compete with Netflix. Unless we're talking higher prices for newer releases. |
|
|
|
I think only missing thing for this Project a 1-2 minute summary video.
Investors should read the whitepaper but a summary video always a good first glance at a project.
A video is in the works even as we speak, so stay tuned! An infographic introductory videos is good for those who don't like to go through pages of whitepaper. Waiting for it  Yes, video for most people is the easiest way to learn something. I prefer it as well and I am waiting for more videos from biotron. Sure, a video can be a good summary that presents the key aspects of a project but if you wanna learn more about the project there is no other way than reading the whitepaper. also a few AMA videos would be very beneficial. I've seen other projects doing them and it worked out fine. |
|
|
|
A voting system for ehf token holder can be a good system I think, community always like to be listened, and the sucess of a crypto currencies is also due to the community behind it. EHF can build something around that I think.
What kind of votes do you want to let the community participate here? A voting system like NXT, if you check out NXT wallet they have a voting system built in the wallet. It cost NXT to make votes Yes, but for what purpose? For what do you want to vote in this project? I don't really see a use for community votings here. I've seen NAV community vote to successfully reduce the staking rewards from 5% to 4% so that the saved amount can be used for other critical purpose beneficial to the project. This works. EHF community can also vote on certain strategic matters that will directly affect the stakeholders - this helps the community feel involved and give opportunities for the devs to get things done without too much fuss from the community. they would still need to find reasons for the vote to happen. what would we be voting on? |
|
|
|
The closed round will end in a day or so, when public sale is expected and how long will it last? Could not find this information..
As far as I know they still haven't announce a date for pre-ICO/ICO. But start of pre-ICO is scheduled for March so they should come with the exact date soon. well thank you! You mean a Demo App or something ? an MVP
hardly a demo, they will release it later in Q2 or Q3 They should have made that demo before. The demo will be available after ico and it won't help the sales in ico. I think it is a mistiming, unfortunately. they should've pushed the ICO date and not have it now. but business decisions are just that. |
|
|
|
TV service from international providers can be good. specially fro sports. I know there are some competition in institutional content but can be lead with providing quality. Some partnerships with content providers can boost confidence.
That is why I like that CRYPTOFLIX is focusing on starting on a specific market - asia for this matter. This will help them to pool resource and energy in acquiring rights and working on the tech. As far as I understand, they will need servers installed all over to ensure quality is maintained and to avoid outage. Actually cryptoflix is the competitor here netflix can easily transcend to blockchain if they want to, having a good program to air eve now and then is a must if they can produce a title that can beat Game of thrones in terms of rating then its a game changer i guess. I am not so sure if Netflix could >so< easily switch over to blockchain. Well, they could probably implement a payment methode for crypto, but implementing more then payment would be a lot to do as they have a running system already and would have to change a lot probably. If netflix wanted to switch to blockchain, they could do it couple years ago. For me, netflix isn't a competitor. of course it's a competitor. they provide the same service , blockchain or not. they have the same audience. If netflix wanted to switch to blockchain, they could do it couple years ago. For me, netflix isn't a competitor. |
|
|
|
It seems personal data storage is one of the most prominent blockchain application around. In which is this project different from many of them around?
All project has competitions, Even including personal data storage like Biotron. Depends on how well the team performs and the market choose which project to succeed. Even the worse project gets more support than their better competitions Competition is good for the market and brings out the best for customers. The fact that there is competition means that it's a valid idea. |
|
|
|
I saw this tweet yesterday, it may interest somebody Dear friends, we would like to tell you that the token holders mays receive dividends from some investments and operations, in accordance with appropriate decisions of EHF company. If you want to know more information, follow our web-site https://t.co/UU7bomiLya https://t.co/PEom2FecA0That'll be cool if they implement it. This like an airdrop for token holders if I am interpreted correctly. It is already a good project but a dividend can bring it to the next level. I hope they implement this. I'm curious about the implementation of this . also doesn't this bring in the SEC on their heads? |
|
|
|
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
second opinion is a must. I heard many cases where a particular doctor gets greedy and opt the patient for unnecessary surgeries which eventually leads to degradation of health rather than betterment. That's a good point. eHealth could show the patients different ways of treatment. Doctors might try to talk patients into the most profitable treatment for themselves. Implementing this feature to ehealth can give a little boost to project, I think they should focus on what they planned in the first place, as far as i can see they have so much to do. that may be, but I'm sure word travels around and maybe a rating system will be in place. so you don't have to go to a bad doctor. also, second opinions will be possible right? |
|
|
|
Time will tell! But as supporter of ehealth project, I have to believe that the team will do their best to make the project success. So far so good!
I am sure that as the project progresses, they will be showing progress. Although seeing the deadlines of the project we will have to be patient. Its quite boring actually, because we wont see the development progress before the ICO finish, still only about the idea/concept and marketing. I think a simple regular news updates would suffice for the community. Communication is very important for every project. It doesn’t have to be often, even monthly would be good during periods with no major updates. Newsletters are great ways to provide updates. Yeah, and more rare informative news are much better that the rabbish that some people are often trying to sell as good news. The devs are expected just to show the audience that everything is going according to the initial plan, that some improvements are made etc. If nothing else, people can forget about the ICO if there are no regular news out there. You need to keep your potential investors updated in any case thats how they feel in touch with your project. that's why a media presence is so important. it's gets eyeballs on the project. |
|
|
|
Why only Ethereum, even if they want to do tokens there are other smart contracts blockchain out there
The number of smart contract blockchains are large. ETH is usually the go-to one because it is well established because it's the most popular one and that's where the investors are. |
|
|
|
I could easily argue that that not hitting the hard cap is a good thing. As long as they raise more than the softcap. After all it means the team had a good assessment of what they need, yet there is still room for growth.
I can't agree more. I always love projects reach soft cap not hard cap. Market cap is the most important thing for me and i always choose it to be lower at start. But doesn't it mean the development of the project is slowed down if raised amount is lower than hardcap? Probably still depends on how much is raised, but still. From my perspective, most icos are very ambitious with the targeted amounts of funds raised. Even if they don’t get all that they are aiming for, it is likely that they can continue on with the project In certain cases, some projects' devs seem to not have calculated the needed amount at all, therefore, their caps could be set very high, unreasonably high. Here, these things are more clear and transparent. sometimes there are projects that do not count the required amount but there are also projects that will extend the ico period if a certain amount is not earned can be drawn conclusions better all done transparently so all can know. the soft/hard cap discussion is old and neverending. some projects get it right some not. it depends on the team really. it's good to have a clear number that you intend to raise. |
|
|
|
The Demo, the beta demo will starts after ICO and investors can participate in the beta testing.
that is going to be available at some point after March, it said Q2 Very good that Repu already has something to present in Q2, is the most requested so far, will be a differential and so much for the project, and certainly something that will help eliminate many doubts about the functionality of the Platform and its possibilities of application I would've hoped that they have a beta before the ICO to advertise better, but I'll take what I can get. |
|
|
|
Nice they are getting all these publications, hopefully more people will become aware of the project, instead of investing in ICO that add no value at all. Yes, it is a good thing to cover all the publication houses as token market is growing day by day. it's about time they get some attention from sites. hopefully this is a trend. |
|
|
|
About no bounty decision of the team i am supporting %100.
Most of the bounties are overpaid and without reason. I only invest projects with no bounties. If they tell themselves without bounties it is the best for investors.
bounties are a great way to draw attention to your project man. it promotes it to the general public. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
