This is a gentlemen's club.  Emotional pollution from wahmen is not permitted.

I haven't seen this many crying children since tranny storytime.

Bitcoin is priced to perfection where the market somehow assumes it scales to infinity.  Once everyone finds out Lightning Network is a complete garbage, exact recreation of the already existing banking system, permissioned ledger scam that nobody will ever use, and on-chain scaling is also garbage, the price in any reality based world should completely implode.  With 'efficient market hypothesis', it already even should have done so.  So you can tell what I say about this entire thing being one big fucking scam propped up by a single entity using Bitfinex and Tethers to rig the price being true.

Next stop is Marcus of Tel Aviv bankrupted after failing to fool the goyim into switching from physical metals to imaginary, valueless, govt tracking system tokens.

Good job being a blind fool when this already exists in China and (((Larry Summers))) of Digital Currency Group Bitcoin and all the other kikes tell you they want to bring it here.  Good job also pretending it's not stupidly easily to accomplish this task using Bitcoin itself:

1)  Simply pass a law all Bitcoin transactions must be manually routed through a domestic transaction validator and all of these ASIC warehouses are required by law to perform AML/KYC.  Then you have your biometric, cashless society slavery system by default just passing a single law.  Attempting to route through others will be charged with laundering.

2)  You can think of Bitcoin as a 2/3rds complete software release.  What is the last 1/3rd?  An alias wrapper to link your one time addresses to a single account.  You can call it MIT chain anchor, you can call it what Bitshares already does by default, you can call it anything you want, but the fact it's very easy to do means it will be done and they'll just pass a law requiring you to use it or be charged with criminal laundering.

3)  It's 100% impossible to create a decentralized digital currency in the first place, so you're all retarded scammers.  'Proof of work' is not work.  It's deploying an ASIC that operates on cruise control with no input from you and you collect the equivalent of interest, then parlay the profits into more interest generating boxes.  It works virtually the same as any compound interest system - complete centralization.  PoW has always been a scam.  The only way it wouldn't be is if everyone was forced to manually solve captchas in a race for blocks because you can't parallelize that or put it on cruise control to generate interest, but that would easily be gamed by weak AI.  

Physical metals are money, digital shitcoins are nothing more than govt surveillance system scams.

It's called the evil cult of Judaism attempting to force people into digital only, cashless, Chinese social credit score systems.  Aka valueless digital scams like Bitcoin where transaction validators are designed to centralize into permissioned ledger, AML/KYC hubs and every non-fungible slave token is tracked in real-time instead of physical metals, the only monetary system of free men.  Boycott everything digital or be enslaved by Jews.

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/penn-state-prof-social-credit-will-shift-law-west-constitution-analytics-and-algorithm

LOL.  They are real desperate to try and scam people into the LN permissioned ledger scam (an exact replica of the already existing banking system) typing shit like that.  Claiming people should use it because "the cryptography is secure" is like claiming Dogecoin should be the world reserve currency solely because the encryption functions.  Hey, JayJuanGee's emails are encrypted.  Maybe JayJuanGee's emails are money also?

Conmen don't like having their con exposed.  One of the worst parts about digital shitcoin scams like Bitcoin - besides the fact it's designed to centralize, has built-in, rent seeking middlemen, doesn't remove counterparty risk, and other things - is the fact that if the monetary system does go bust, it would NEVER just be Bitcoin that existed as the only digital currency (thanks to digital shitcoins having no valid Schelling point).  Govts and corporations everywhere would have their own and attempt to force people into them.

This means you generally have to boycott and reject all of them and demand the use of only physical metals as money to prevent govt and corporations from getting their foot into the door of controlling the money supply.  Most of you shitcoiners are dumb as a sack of potatoes, so you don't understand that cheerleading for one artificial, synthetic, Keynesian currency scam is inadvertently shilling for all of them.  Hell, you're even shilling for the US dollar by claiming the monetary supply can be composed of imaginary widgets instead of money required to be a physical commodity as Aristotle discovered thousands of years ago.

It's also amusing how shitcoiners are Keynesians and lie claiming not to be.  If the prime mover of a system is completely synthetic and arbitrary in nature, it's always Keynesian.  There's no difference from a central banker manually adjusting a lever every few intervals of time to divy out some units of whatever or doing it by automatic script.  Zero.  Scripting Keynesianism doesn't make it not Keynesianism.  All currencies as opposed to physical commodity money are Keynesian schemes.

Have you heard the - I wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory, because it's something the bankers would actually do, but it's pretty out there idea - that the NYSE and commodity markets mostly utilize TWO 'holding companies' for legal ownership of the underlying product, and supposedly if the economic system blows up, all assets are then transferred to these two holding companies and you no longer have a claim on them.  'Who' gets all this 'stuff', hell if I know. But I assume everything would just be plundered by govt and banks in some sort of continuity of govt program.  The only question is the degree of severity in which they can attempt to do this nonsense of literally stealing everything.

No smart money takes out debts to expand to service new customers if the customers don't exist due to peak, 1st world, population demographics.  And you can't expand forever on a finite planet so it had to happen at some point. Flooding the country with 3rd world invader baboons that aren't even capable of building or living in a 1st world civilization is the equivalent of trying to power your car by putting bananas in the gas tank.  

Since it's not possible to nigger rig an infinite growth paradigm out of thin air, the debt based currency system that requires infinite growth to exist implodes in massive deflation.  Instead of the banks ceasing to exist from all their loans going bad, the govt just hands them free money to bail them out and keep their balance sheet at non-implosion levels.  The real economy numerical values are still experiencing stagflation or deflation, but the bank bailouts prevents asset prices from deflating to where they should go so nobody can actually afford anything.

Since there's a wage + asset price mismatch, the system and banks then just implode all over again seeking it's previous, natural trajectory of deflation.  People noticed that bailing out banks does absolutely nothing without giving free money to the general population spenders as well to make both parties move in the same direction at once, so now they want to do that.  But giving people free money makes them less productive (assuming the money maintains any actual purchasing power), which then causes the number of goods to decrease making it a seller's market and causing rise in asset prices possibly to hyperinflation levels.  

Anything related to Keynesianism is a dysfunctional joke of unintended consequences and it will all eventually implode in some manner no matter what you do.  There's a reason the coinage act of 1792 states the penalty for debasing the currency is death.  As for Bitcoin, the amount of coins lost per year would always be enormous due to things like strong encryption and death, so all loans denominated in Bitcoin would go bad and you'd have the same deflationary armageddon collapse as the paper fiat situation above, while most physical metals are recovered.  With the exception the bankers have rigged the price of silver too low that causes too much of it to be wasted in applications it shouldn't be and none of it recycled.  The drop in supply will just cause price to skyrocket back to where it should be (several hundred in purchasing power) where it's not wasted and is recycled more like gold.

And no, you cannot force a 'gold only' monetary system like FOA claims and artificially prevent the monetization, price rising, and people using both silver and copper as well.  You have extreme problems with lack of granularity and counterparty risk in a gold only system.  It would never happen.  After the fiat system implodes, people will demand ability to remove counterparty risk and are not going to use some crap like Peter Schiff and George Soros' "Goldmoney" to add granularity to gold by letting them hold it for you and inadvertently be forced into a digital only system.  When metals are used, it's always going to be gold, silver, and copper all at the same time.

Boomers are an integral part of the Jewish matrix that will blindly follow orders passed down to them by an (((agent Smith))) from the television.  But what happens when the evil cult of Judaism attempts to launch an attack after running out of boomers?

Destroyer of international Jewry.

Why I'm not particularly a fan of the "Wall Observer" hand sign.  To make a long story short, the sign existed before the "alt-right".  The alt-right was a govt op to try and classify and demonize a large swathe of the population - the "bitter clingers", nationalists and such in the vein of the OKC bombing false flag.  Unlike the OKC bombing, the alt-right op backfired spectacularly and calling someone a Nazi actually became a compliment instead of demonization.

So, while the alt-right narrative ran completely out of govt control and backfired on them, it's unknown just who the prime mover was attempting to integrate this hand sign into the alt-right; whether the first mover was just some random fool and it's all coincidence or the Jew world order establishment themselves.  Because the existence of this hand sign pre-alt-right appears to be entirely Jew world order and non-coincidental:







Obvious govt false flag Brenton Tarrant whose mission was to demonize the "alt-right" after the govt failed 5000 times before:





The amount of false flags that occurred under Trump's watch so far is VASTLY higher than any president in history and he makes 0 effort to arrest them or people like Soros:



You even have evil cult of Judaism members doing it who clearly believe it symbolizes something:

Those fingers do not appear very dexterous.  Very sausage-like.  How are you supposed to compete typing against JayJuanGee with fingers like that.

And immediately after the kike (((Larry Summers))) and friends at Digital Currency Group release that propaganda trying to trick the goyim into a digital only, cashless society slavery system where everyone is tracked and monitored, the price of metals immediately goes up right after they tell you to sell it.  Funny how that works, isn't it?

Alexa, place JayJuanGee in the camp with the Jews.

Oh yes, he now says all the same things I do about Bitcoin, so that means because he's not attempting to promote the pump and dump scam for JayJuanGee to profit on from fraud, he must have zero credibility and be a complete nutjob:

There were plenty of people making money long on Enron and Pets.com just like Bitcoin.  The main issue I have is the people who make the claim that anyone who exited and made money before any of these scams blows up is somehow "smart money".  Smart money is based on fundamentals, not gambling, fraud, or being a partner to defrauding others.  That would just be...fraud, not 'investing'. 

You pretend I'm some type of outlier for saying it's not even possible to create a decentralized digital currency, and that Bitcoin is a designed to centralize scam with built-in, rent seeking middlemen, and doesn't remove counterparty risk, useless compared to physical metals.  Yet, this guy, who also started saying similar things long after I began saying them, seems to agree: