|
I am so sick and tired of people's fears pushing them to change Bitcoin into a different Alt coin. Let Bitcoin remain the way it was created as a TESTament to Satoshi. SATOSHI wanted 1 MB blocks, not 2MB or unlimited block-size.
Let's see how Bitcoin performs against all the Alt coins many years later.
If people start using another coin for micro transactions SO WHAT! Everything has its place.
|
|
|
|
|
Hard Fork, Soft Fork, It doesn't matter. Bitcoin is useful and accepted almost everywhere. People are buying Alts to make a profit ONLY and not for their usefulness in day-to-day transactions.
Bitcoin Block-size is NOT a problem. You can get a confirmation in less than 20 minutes for 30 cent fee. You pay $3 fee to get $20 out of an ATM! You can use 3rd party wallets for dust transactions if that's your thing.
Can't wait to see the jaws drop when the price hits $2000.
Bitcoin Unlimited is an Alt coin and nothing else. I'll speculate in it if there is a hard fork, but it's as good as Dogecoin to me.
|
|
|
|
|
It's unbelievable all the people that think they have the magical solution to "Bitcoin" when they could easily make an alt-coin with Seg-wit, unlimited blocks, etc. Look, if Satoshi wanted the Blocksize to be 2mb he would have made it that.
Bitcoin is supposed to be a digital store of value, not some micro-transaction dust coin.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be cool if they mass produced usb flash drives with an older version of Core so everyone could plug and play.
|
|
|
|
|
It will rebound people were ready to dump and make a small profit.
|
|
|
|
As discussed furtherbelow, the Commission is disapproving this proposed rule change
because it does not find the proposal to be consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act,
which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices and to protect investors and the public
interest. https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/batsbzx/2017/34-80206.pdf |
|
|
|
|
Are they waiting till after the markets close because the answer is a 'YES' ? Rejecting the ETF won't affect markets much, but approval just might cause a ripple.
|
|
|
|
Would be interesting if the COIN ETF became the first approved by default by no decision from SEC.  |
|
|
|
|
It would be absolutely disastrous to sell right now. Even if the price drops due to an ETF rejection, it will rebound eventually.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you missed a whole lot other than Block-reward halving.
|
|
|
|
|
Quantum Computing is Science-Fiction and nothing else! One value cannot be two values simultaneously (or switch between the two)! It defies all logic, observable reality and deep down you all know it!
|
|
|
|
|
Flippa is the best IMO, but your site needs Revenue to be considered by most buyers. You can usually get 10-15X monthly revenue for a standard blog, with custom sites fetching more. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
The price shot up over a thousand months before most people even knew about the ETF. What makes you think it will make a difference?
If it's not approved, whales will dump and price will drop... but the panic sellers will send it further. Just HODL. $10k is not far away.
|
|
|
|
|
$10k is a good short-time price imo, I think by 2020 we could be seeing ridiculous numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like they are gone for good now. 5 Digits here we come!
|
|
|
|
|
They can play their games but if everyone buys they can't stop the boom.
|
|
|
|
|
If confirmation times and fees made any difference, then people would choose one of the many alt coins available.
Block Space should be Expensive. And Fees should go to Miners.
|
|
|
|
|
My theory is Zuckerberg has been secretly selling Facebook stock to fuel his Bitcoin addiction. I think he has been acquiring Bitcoins since the Winklevoss twin's have been getting so much publicity. When news breaks that Zuckerberg has 1 million BTC, the price will skyrocket!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
