|
hm might mine.... any bounties?
cool name.
|
|
|
|
who is beaverslayer1.
I am, the beaverslayer1 is actually my reddit name... can you update us better then mr1quicky did? thanks Well, I am not the one building the wallet, I'm the one the wallet builders have to keep in contact with and deliver the wallet to to collect the said bounties. But all that aside, as soon as anything new arises, this will be the first place I'll post to. Each day I will also update the amount of the bounties as more people donate to the cause. so mr1quicky still at it, or other devs. |
|
|
|
who is beaverslayer1.
I am, the beaverslayer1 is actually my reddit name... can you update us better then mr1quicky did? thanks |
|
|
|
|
thats what holds me back as well to have a shot at it. mr1quicky. details?
|
|
|
|
the wallet should be opensource. period. i will ONLY donate if opensource and i can check it.
i agree, wallet must be opensource so it can be checked and improved. what is the progress on it btw? |
|
|
|
Update on the potential security issues mentioned earlier.
As a cautionary measure and since MINT does not really need PoW, we have decided to get rid of the PoW. We don't want to take any security risk.
And since our ego is less important than your hard earned money, we won't have any problem to be thankful to another coin dev if it appears he has helped to increase MintCoin's security.
If it appears? What a joke. Dishonest dev, dishonest community. yes it should have been worded/said differently. agree. English isn't the dudes first language. He thanked him. that was what i was thinking... thats why i did not go full berserk on that statement. okay finished, move on. |
|
|
|
Update on the potential security issues mentioned earlier.
As a cautionary measure and since MINT does not really need PoW, we have decided to get rid of the PoW. We don't want to take any security risk.
And since our ego is less important than your hard earned money, we won't have any problem to be thankful to another coin dev if it appears he has helped to increase MintCoin's security.
If it appears? What a joke. Dishonest dev, dishonest community. yes it should have been worded/said differently. agree. |
|
|
|
this is already happening a lot.
hackability and exploitability of any coin is bad.
thats why something new, radical, will be invented one day to replace this all.
bank goverments can steal your money with taxes fees and you can do anything about it with crypto you are free from banks and governments. Where moeny are there allways will be problems becouse of people greed and other factors. You wont run away from it unless you will be homeless ^^ i think there are problems in crypto as well, regarding to greed  ps. good job on the fix. thank you. |
|
|
|
sure |
|
|
|
|
this is already happening a lot.
hackability and exploitability of any coin is bad.
thats why something new, radical, will be invented one day to replace this all.
|
|
|
|
|
always test. +1 million
and yes, smart move to copy bc's lead to remove pow.
|
|
|
|
|
ehm... i certainly do hope they test it on a testnet first.
|
|
|
|
|
yes, and the "attack", and the lack of response from devs. all small merchants. wordpress merchants.
and and and.
|
|
|
|
|
lol whatever. good luck with this coin. at least i expect the devs to verify this and come with an explanation about the 1hr strange blocks.
also, all these merchant sites are launched by devs themselves. all wordpress. maybe 1 or 2 actual ones.
what value do these have?
|
|
|
|
|
i dont care even the slightest bit partyhard. stick head in sand.
|
|
|
|
|
looks like merchant sites are launched by mintcoin devs themself and are all wordpress sites?
so what value do these merchants have? none imho
|
|
|
|
|
i would strongly advise to do a full blown attack to see if it can be destroyed ( testnet? ).
if it happens. then you all would be saying:
oops. we should have listened.
and even more pressure on mints devs.
i think it is at least interesting to see that there were no pos blocks during that time.
1 hour is not normal.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
