|
Let's focus on Darkcoin here.
|
|
|
|
Cool ! ("Nice !", then "Cool !" next will be "Great !"  )  You want good news??
Bitfinex just decided to trade Darkcoin. |
|
|
|
You are deflecting again... If you are happy with your coin keep it. Future will tell. I'm out of here. |
|
|
|
Puts the gun back in the holster.
About that IP Obfuscation question I asked earlier.
Anyone have any good sources for IP tracking research linked to bitcoin traffic? Putting together some notes on the relevant issues for the upcoming new features.
thanks.
An interesting thread on the subject : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=134925.0 |
|
|
|
Holy shit, you have to be kidding. I've seen idiots drinking Kool Aid but now this guy owns a REIT? LOLOLOL
He doesn't own it moron, he is a CONSULTANT, read his Linkedin. Oh if it's written on Linkedin it can only be true ! /sarcasm Except the dev never even posted his Linkedin information, it was initial skeptics who doxed him based off details on the forum and figured it out. I was the biggest skeptic of XC myself until his identity was revealed and at this point I think he is more qualified to accomplish what he has set out to do than all these 20 year-old kids running around making logo coins. That's like a fairy tale : the mysterious dev turns out to be a prolific dev with a long resume. They "found" him. right. |
|
|
|
Holy shit, you have to be kidding. I've seen idiots drinking Kool Aid but now this guy owns a REIT? LOLOLOL
He doesn't own it moron, he is a CONSULTANT, read his Linkedin. Oh if it's written on Linkedin it can only be true ! /sarcasm |
|
|
|
What the fuck do you want? For the DRK community leaders to stop spreading FUD on twitter, consider firing InternetApe from his position and stop raiding the XC thread with FUD, is that too much to ask? omg dump coming in !!!!!
Do as I say not as I do ...  |
|
|
|
Maybe DRK should open up some of its code for a 3rd party to take a peek at too, or is peeking behind that magician's curtain unacceptable? What does it matter? You've made your choices in life. Great. Best of luck to you. Bye. When he says a third party that means him or the XC dev  |
|
|
|
[...]
"As Dev of Cinni I stake my reputation that atcsecure is who he claims to be". And who are you ? I'm supposed to trust you because ... ? This smell like a long con. |
|
|
|
Hi, guys, I need some help. My wallet is sinking... Latest stable 0.9.4.11 but does not sync.
Delete everything except wallet.dat in the Darkcoin folder, run the wallet and let it syncs, it may take a while. |
|
|
|
An Evan Duffield was registered with FINRA as a registered employee in AZ. You can do a simple Broker Check on FINRA's website. In order to get this you need to provide legit ID and be fingerprinted.
Evan is legit. XC is not. Please leave, son.
I know Evan is real but i'm just proving how easy it is to throw bullsh-t around. The idea there is no Dan Metcalf is the most pathetic amount of FUD i've ever seen. Quoted for future reference.  |
|
|
|
[...]
If your a DRK fan (applies to this thread) go 70% DRK, 20/10 Monero / XC. If your an XC fan go 70% XC, 20% DRK 10 Monero etc.
[...]
I have a 100% DRK portfolio. You can only smooth the risk with less risky investments, and those coins (Monero / XC) are IMO more risky investments. I would suggest instead to keep some bitcoins if you have some DRK. I have >99% of my net worth invested in DRK (true story). I'm having issues paying my rent in a few days. I'll ask my landlady if I can pay in DRK. I hope that the value grows exponentially, so you can buy the whole building. Hope or know? I think we both know we will all be millionaires in about 2 months. I don't know, I have a good feeling but that's me (maybe not in 2 months, but we never know with a good media coverage)  |
|
|
|
[...]
If your a DRK fan (applies to this thread) go 70% DRK, 20/10 Monero / XC. If your an XC fan go 70% XC, 20% DRK 10 Monero etc.
[...]
I have a 100% DRK portfolio. You can only smooth the risk with less risky investments, and those coins (Monero / XC) are IMO more risky investments. I would suggest instead to keep some bitcoins if you have some DRK. I have >99% of my net worth invested in DRK (true story). I'm having issues paying my rent in a few days. I'll ask my landlady if I can pay in DRK. I hope that the value grows exponentially, so you can buy the whole building. |
|
|
|
[...]
If your a DRK fan (applies to this thread) go 70% DRK, 20/10 Monero / XC. If your an XC fan go 70% XC, 20% DRK 10 Monero etc.
[...]
I have a 100% DRK portfolio. You can only smooth the risk with less risky investments, and those coins (Monero / XC) are IMO more risky investments. I would suggest instead to keep some bitcoins if you have some DRK. |
|
|
|
Not DarkSend, Masternode list syncing prob.
Good morning ~
(I hav 00:23)
|
|
|
|
outbreak to the positive side.
that might indicate the end of the down trend
that would be great ... but I fear it will go below 1 M  Yeah right ... an unbiased opinion Darkcoin is dead !!!  Here we go ...  |
|
|
|
I don't think anonymity is a fad. It's a requirement for digital cash.
+1. As businesses get into using cryptocurrency, they will make it an automatic requirement. No company is going to want to open its books to competitors, but that is what will potentially happen every time an accounting employee goes from Company A to Company B (or simply sells out for cash). That was a "light bulb" moment for me regarding anonymity - ALL SERIOUS ALTCOINS MUST HAVE IT going forward. How does the lack of anonymity open the doors for competitors? Because now they can see how much a company is earning? Congrats; that does absolutely nothing. Anonymity only serves to thwart the governments, which is what will lead to stronger regulation. You can't be serious, it's a joke right ? You don't see the issue for a company to let its competitors see its income, when it sells the most/the less, how much it receives per transaction in average etc. You're going to have to spell this out to me. We know how much Microsoft earns. We know how much they spend. We know where they source things from. Same with Apple. Same with Blizzard. Same with Exxon. How is ANY of this going to matter? And if it's so important, why is it all public information anyways? Basically you want to anonymize data that is already publicly displayed. That's asinine. You talk about turnover, I talk about account details, transactions in real time, how the money is used, how much did they pay a supplier etc. sensitive informations. You are either dumb or naive. Please tell me how are you gonna tell how many bitcoins someone owns if he uses a different address for each customer/transaction and doesn't move them to a concentrating address. That's a lot of if, you seriously think that companies will not (want to) consolidate those addresses at one point ? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
