Yes, the ToshiDesk owners are due for a quarterly distribution of 180K MTR.
Each owner will receive 60K MTR, and will be able to do as they wish with them.
This will be our 2nd quarterly distribution and this will continue for the next 4.5 years.
I will be selling some of my share here in this thread to take care of some general overhead like, server payments, renew the SSL certs, split $500 invoice for NewsWire to launch our joint marketing campaign with ETNA, pay Cointelegraph for our explainer video creation along with our personalized marketing campaign with them as well.
Est timeframe please. I guess it will affect market price a lot, so you should put a clear statement about date of this distribution. Otherwise it's kinda insider info and this situation is very uncomfortable for other investors Also why there is no real schedule here at all. Your updates are repeating of same buzzwords, meaningless for both end-user and market. I know that in the next "update" you will tell us again about ETNA integration. Again and again. Awesome update, yeah. It's because no real schedule and no real plan. So you produce random bloat and call it an update. You do it wrong! BTW just to remind you, in Q4 you said about releasing Toshidesk 2.0. Q4 has just begun. There's still no Toshidesk 1.0 and you are out of money. |
|
|
|
|
Dev still gone?
I am receiving messages from frustrated investors about community takeover. Bittrex is about to delist MTR, Cryptsy MTR wallet is broken, network is vulnerable...
We need real dev ASAP! Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
My withdraw on cryptsy also still not there , and tickets they dont replay fuck craptsy
I think they staking and dump each day
Some advice. If I were you I would have spent some more time building up taint analysis MIS on chainz.cryptoid. You can then easily see what exchanges are doing, where the stakes come from etc. There is limited MIS available currently on the MTR blockchain (unless it exists somewhere else) and it is difficult to see exactly where the issues are and to refute certain claims or speculations. Pic1Pic2Pic3You must be joking. Spending more time building up taint analysis. Good joke. Noone fuckin care, people got their transactions stuck and because of shills like you so many people here were silent for months. Dev (masteretarder777) lies constantly about his influence to exchanges. Now dev is gone, people are angry and you dare talk about chainz.cryptoid. You should better tell your friend masteretarder777 to wake up and see people being angry here. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
The problem is that you can't get automated exchange like ShapeShift working predictable without reasonable liquidity on classic exchanges. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
ShapeShift is 100% transparent and reliable, i dont see the reasoning behind your so called statement you just made. What is the point of stating that unless you have some kind of past with them personally...
People are often quite critical around here and I can say that I appreciate seeing a company that prides itself on being professional and open.
Was that addressed to me? Well, I am not critical about Shapeshift at all, I am critical to coin developers who do not understand that such service (ShapeShift) requires reasonable volume and buy/sell support to offer stable prices. In case of MTR coin it used to be 0.3 BTC to -90% and 1 BTC to +900% so it would be very hard offer reliable and stable such service for MTR. That's all. |
|
|
|
|
One exchange is going to delist MTR, other exchange has broken wallet, Dev gone. Where is he?
|
|
|
|
Not too worried about Trex delisting either. With at least one major exchange we are good.
Yeah, I agree MTR does not need Bittrex or rather Bittrex does not need MTR without volume. At least our dev will not have to refund lost coins anymore. We win! |
|
|
|
My withdraw from Cryptsy is still "on hold" or something ....
It's FUCKING 14 days now since i put the ticket that NOONE wants to answer. I reopened several other tickets only to be closed saying that i already have a ticket open, which noone answers though.
If someone can help please so. This is truely unheard off to be ignored like this by an exchange. Ticket number is #206343
mastertrader777 could you please take care of this? |
|
|
|
ADD MTR!!!!
My people cant stop asking for this service!
You do not understand how Shapeshift works. MTR has very tiny orderbook and virtually no volume so it's almost impossible to exchange more than .1 BTC without crashing your market thus calculating a price would be extremely difficult. So I recommend you working on userbase first. Cheers |
|
|
|
icm needs only 2 minutes of work and crave is dead.
only action he needs to do is start wallet and send the code.
That days ICM also could destroy the chain. So just stop spreading FUD and do something constructive. Can someone explain exactly how that would destroy the coin? All my research only shows that it could potentially disable some RPC commands until an ignore alert flag is added to the config file. Is it something different with the masternode/staking code? Anyone using RPC commands has (should have) enough experience to do this in 30 second. So what if he sends a key-compromised alert? Does this mean that satoshi, Gavin, and thyemos can all kill the bitcoin core if they wanted? I highly doubt that is the case. JJ yes it is issue with bitcoin too, who to trust. as already said they say btc has a failsafe system if one of devs will go mad. what ever their failsafe system is, dont know Nope. There's no centralized checkpointing in bitcoin. Here it's derrived from ppc. why are you talking about checkpointing? it has nothing to do with this. I don't know c++ very well at all, but I literally can find no technical explanation for how the alert keys can kill the coin. Until someone can explain it in technical detail, I have to consider it an incorrect assumption. This is just cisahasa looking for a fame. |
|
|
|
Thanks for "update", ATH tommorow?  |
|
|
|
Not bad considering everything he has to do to make this possible. Transforming CMS HumHub Source to work with a public front end dashboard isn't just your normal walk in the park job, because the HumHub source runs on user id's and he has to work around and configure it in a way that is acceptable and secure. I'm 100% confident in his abilities and know he will be able to make this happen.
This is probably most stupid paragraph I have read this week. What the hell are you talking about? Do you know that just after you made yourself a cryptocurrencies technical idiot you do the same with web & cms development? Since it has been revealed that there's no mastertradercoin dev team and it's just one(non-technical)man project it's time to face the truth. You either do not understand what your "outsourced" workers tell you or they just give you a shit what you accept and follow. In this thread I have seen few technical folks eg chrysophylax, you should better pick them to the board to translate technical language to regular language otherwise current trouble will be nothing comparing to what will happen. Just to remind you - you have collected few thousands dollars (and you still try to!) in bitcoins from people here and if you fail to return those funds you might expect a visit from FBI because at this moment you run regular scam. |
|
|
|
PSI WILL BE OFFICIALLY TAKEN OVER BY COMMUNITY ON Sep 25
THANK YOU PREVIOUS DEV, WE APPRECIATE YOUR HARD WORK
NEW THREAD WILL BE ANNOUNCED TODAY
hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe just kidding
|
|
|
|
Not good. More tips then: TxId's can be sent to the exchange during this sort of situation and some get picked up and some don't...
TxId is transaction ID. You cannot send it to exchange. You can send transaction. Transaction has it's ID. This is TxId. Now, just because exchange (like any other node) see transaction does not mean it really cares. Transactions go to block. Block is something interesting. Exchanges see blocks and count next blocks after that first one with that transaction. Number of next blocks is called number of confirmations. With blockchain hung you see no new blocks. So no confirmations. So exchange will not let user spend coins deposited without certain number of confirmations. This not "some get picked up and some don't". This is simple math, not random thing. Sometimes my main wallets go unopened for a few weeks...I like to build up stake weight.
So you like it... This is actually how network has been attacked. I browsed MTR github, MTR PoS has coin age crap. This is vulnerability, not something to like. I don't centralize any staking power and I truly don't wish to continue entertaining you.
Shall we analyze staking rewards history and compare it your, dcgirl, (who else?) addresses? Also you have said Basically we had all staking stop on the network for several mins.
MTR being a 100% POS coin, the network requires several wallets online staking to keep the chain moving.
So who are those "all" who had stopped staking? |
|
|
|
That's correct.
Someone purposely sent coins to Bittrex after noticing MTR network had a hickup, and effectivley mixed coins within Bittrex while that wallet was out of sync.
After this (1) person did this, the transactions that took place during that time were not valid after the Bittrex wallet resynced.
You do not understand how blockchains work. Scenario you have described is impossible if Bittrex wallet was stuck on certain block. Why? Once wallet got stuck it does not see blockchain moving thefore you cannot send any coins to it. Yes, you can send those coins to address on this wallet, but wallet will not see them. So you cannot deposit coins on wallet that is stuck. What had actually happened was a fork. Richie said that. Fork happened because you centralized staking power and once your wallets went offline network became pretty insecure. Once your staking power came back it invalidated new chain with longer own one. However, it was too late - meanwhile double spend had been executed. That being said, you are guilty of this situation because you have intentionally centralized staking power. Many times you have shown your focus on number of connections on "super" node instead of number of nodes. It has negative impact especially on PoS coins, however even in PoW world (Bitcoin) nodes having hundreds of connections are considered harmful because they centralize network. I strongly recommend you reading original Satoshi whitepaper and learning coding ASAP (what you have declared) as it will let you circumvent many mistakes caused by lack of deep tech knowledge. |
|
|
|
I am not sure why do you call my serious questions and observations a FUD. Am I who manipulate price? Am I who keep BIDs so thin? Am I who made lat github commit in March? Am I who launch yet-another-IPO scam every two months? And many, many more. I don't care about Mastertrader777 much, the fact is I have lost a money in this scam so I can't sham nothing has happened and this coin is legit. It is not. Shills like you tries to legitimize this scam. This is bad. BTW I have asked for "Hacked Bittrex story" in Bittrex thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=463202.msg12479165#msg12479165Let's see if mastertrader777 tells truth. I'm answering this on this thread and not on our main one since this is coin specific. Your question doesn't make sense. If your question is, is Bittrex vulnerable to a double spend attack? The answer is yes. Anything that relies on blockchains are vulnerable when a fork happens. Was Bittrex hacked? No. richie@bittrex I am referring to
This was more of an exchange attack...not so much MTR network attack.
( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=954240.msg12476780#msg12476780) Also all the time here mastertrader777 claims that network is safe, it simply hung what can be fixed by resync of blockchain. He made no single word about successful double spend attack that was made. We did not know about double spend, instead we have been told that it was "an exchange attack not so much network attack". That's why my question made sense from that point of view. Now we when we know about successful double spend things are clear. MTR network is not safe. |
|
|
|
I will continue to reach out to other dev teams and experts in the space to improve on my own project. Outsourcing is how I got this project so far, and one of the main reasons I get so many partnerships  We all know that I could do alot here, but won't work for free, and tech isn't free either.
And now we know that <MasterTrader777> and I don't have alot of money to throw at this project anymore..I already spent over $20K in development of MTR and ToshiDesk.
How you gonna pay for outsourcing since you'r outta cash? How's your Mastersaver scam? Anyone joined it? LOL At this moment all I wonder is who will start dumping first - you, your shills or investors? Besides BIDs in orderbook are so tiny. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
