Don't rely on others to tell you what to buy. That's especially true for Youtubers and so-called crypto influencers who are paid for shilling different projects for money. That's paid advertising and they will make any cryptocurrency look good if you buy them enough.

What is the reason you bought what you bought?
What use case does the coin have and what problems are solved with it?
Did you make any research and analysis before you bought it?

The answers to these questions are probably you don't know and none, am I right?
A good project is supposed draw you in with the strength of its technology not the promises of how quick you will get rich and buy a lambo.
In reality, most altcoins are created to make the team around it rich, not you and me.

In what sense are any of those three coins considered stable? Not that long ago, Bitcoin was worth $4.000, its price then went up to almost $70.000, and the value today is $30.000. You have similar ups and downs for the other two as well.

---

This one is unlisted and appears as such on CMC.

MetaUFO is listed on PancakeSwap apparently. You should be able to sell it there.

Metawar is also listed on PancakeSwap.

How did you by these tokens?

I don't know really. Do you know the real name of the alleged casino owner? This Andrew TTR that you keep mentioning. He is a streamer or a gamer if I remember correctly. What if Andrew is not in Portugal at all? You can say and write whatever you want on the Internet? Andrew is also not a Russian name. Maybe his real name is Andrei or it could be totally made up - an alias.

That means that the staff are checking the reports, they just don't agree with your point of view. They only agree when you report posts to be merged, but not not the off-topic cases. I didn't pay too much attention to what he wrote about Russia's occupation of Ukraine because I couldn't care less what he thinks about it. But it seems the staff don't mind it, for whatever reason. But that plagiarism that o_e_l_e_o found definitely needs to be addressed. 

Unless the UK government where OP lives prohibits playing on crypto gambling platforms that are unlicensed or are not licensed by the UK Gambling Commission, the player has every right to use his crypto to make bets. Taxable events occur when the crypto is exchanged for other digital assets or fiat currencies, which wasn't the case here. I seriously doubt he was breaking any laws. But I also don't think UK authorities can investigate a Russian citizen (if the owner is Russian) who operates an anonymous crypto casino. That's out of their jurisdiction.     

Mislim da si na kraju dana dosta sreće imao. Možda ćeš reč sve je to sreća ali i ovaj trenutni blagi oporavak LUNA-e je mogao da se uopšte ne desi da su developeri jednostavno digli ruke od svega i rekli jebaji ga, pokušali smo i nismo uspjeli. Tad bi i ova cijena od skoro $6 bila vrh vrhova. 

Jedino malo Ethera imam, ostalo je manje više oko 90% Bitcoin kad je kripto u pitanju. Kad je SISAR neki dan napisao onu jednu zanimljivost za Internet Protocol projekt, svidjelo mi se to što sam pročitao pa možda nešto malo tog coina kupim čisto da vidim kako će se sve to razvijati. Ako ne, stari dobri Bitcoin je i dalje broj 1.

You can't with your current newbie rank. It's a forum restriction. You will have to become a Jr. Member at least before your posted images will become publicly visible. There is a way around that and that is to purchase a copper membership. Read about it here.

Sometimes if the images are essential to the thread and a higher ranked member feels they should be visible, they will quote your post to display them.

Terra UST was a stablecoin and it was safe until one day it suddenly wasn't. Something similar can maybe happen to DAI tomorrow or Tether. Centralized or decentralized, they might still get de-pegged.

Anchor Protocol was a big factor in the UST fiasco. Waaaay too much money was locked in the platform where interest rates of 20% were being offered. Unsustainable interest rates that started dropping after a while. When that happened, people lost interest in UST. That tells you that for 80% of the investors (that was reported as the percentage of the total allocation locked in Anchor Protocol), USTs only use case was to earn those 20% extra rewards. And that's it. Take away or lower their rewards and the system falls apart.

He increases the forum's post count no matter what the quality of those posts is.
People should create self-moderated threads more often, especially in boards with high amounts of spam such as P&S, Bitcoin Discussion, B&H, Gambling...
In my experience, the mods are rather quick to delete off-topic spam when I report it. I am not an active reporter but I do report things from time to time when I believe they shouldn't be there, and it gets handled.   

How does a report of yours look like for a post of his that should be deleted? What do you write there? Do the same type of reports you make get handled in other forum boards?

Share a few of those links here...

Sir isn't needed in any way. No one here is a "sir". We are random internet users that have gathered on a forum to discuss Bitcoin.

"Sir" was something I often encountered working with people from Asia and Africa (not as common as in Asia though). It's part of Asian culture not to look you directly into the eyes as a sign of respect. But in Europe, it's the exact opposite. It's disrespectful not to look at the person you talk to. You have a conflict of cultures there.

I was called "sir" quite a lot by Asians and noticed that's how they address white people most of the time. It honestly made me uncomfortable because you are putting yourself down in the process. If we are all equal, why are you giving my a title because I am white and you make it sound like I am better than you? The non-eye contact was also hard for me to get used to. From far away, I imagined it looked like the big and strong white man was barking orders at the less important Asian person.   

If you enter an invalid Bitcoin address in Ledger Live, the next/continue button won't be clickable, so it's not possible to send to a non-existent address. I will check it again a bit later today just to see if something didn't change in the newer versions. I doubt it has.

---

@jerry0
From the way you explain it, that casino doesn't work with Bitcoin, as in you are not gambling and wagering Bitcoin. They tell you how much you need to deposit in crypto and then convert the coins into fiat using a payment processor(USD or whatever you selected in the settings). That's why you have a limited amount of time to make the deposit. Same thing would happen during withdrawals as well. 

There was a similar discussion started in September 2021 > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5361261.0.
The OP of that thread was arguing that Bitcoin shouldn't be called an "an experimental digital currency".

achow101, a Bitcoin Core Developer and Contributor said the following:

Also, regarding the version number change from 0.21.0 to 22.0, achow101 said:

Who says they are even investigating? There isn't a shred of evidence to prove that LTC Casino even approached and got in contact with SoftSwiss. We only have a post by a casino representative saying SoftSwiss is involved. That same casino representative has promised to make all player data public once their investigation is concluded. That was a lie and they didn't. They claimed OP was playing 16 hours without any breaks between the rounds. That was also a lie. If I am given a choice to trust the words of someone who has already lied multiple times or not to trust them, I choose not to.

I am in no way justifying the services OP is offering or saying they are legit and that he will hold up his part of the deal, but it seems to me that many didn't understanding what is being offered here. First of all, OP isn't asking you to send him any money. You are not paying him to receive information about an alleged fixed match. You are supposed to tell him about such matches only if you have such information. If you can't make the bet yourself because you don't want to, you are scared to do it, or for any other reason, OP claims he will do it for you. He will bet with his own money and the two of you agree how to split the profits.

At least that's how I understood the offer. This doesn't mean that it's not a scam but also not that it is.
I personally don't like what I see and don't trust him, but everyone should make up their own mind.

Taraz played a match yesterday at 14:00 CET. They won 3:0 and were leading 2:0 at halftime. OP posted that tip of his at 12:49 forum time, that's 14:49 CET, which means that the match was already at halftime when the prediction was posted. The prediction is therefore not worth anything since the first half already ended or was close to end when the post was made.

Social media advertisements can be targeted to groups and individuals who are likely to be interested in seeing them. You can configure them to be shown to followers or friends of certain gambling communities, users who like certain brands, and have interests that suits what is being advertised. Whether or not Facebook allows gambling ads, that's a different topic of discussion. My point is, they can be configured to your taste.

If you were sending to a payment processor in order to make a purchase of some goods or services, it would make sense that there is a timer that you have to respect and send the correct amount before the clock goes down to 0. If it does and you haven't send the requested amount, the rates change and you might be asked to send more. I have never seen such a system on a gambling site and I don't see the logic why it's there.  

That also makes no sense. You can't cancel Bitcoin transactions in that way. If the transaction has been broadcasted (which obviously didn't happen in your case), you can't cancel it on the receivers end. It's not like a garage door you close so no one can enter. You can send Bitcoin to any valid address and the recipient can't prevent you from doing that. If I know one of your Bitcoin addresses, I could initiate new transactions to it 50 times a day if I wanted to. How are you planning to stop me from doing that?

I am curious, can you tell me the name of that gambling site? 

That's not a question anyone here can answer.

There were certainly some who did that, but there is another way to look at it. At least they learned to sign a message and one day they might realize that bounty hunting is a dead end and not worth it. When that happens, they might look at those merits as some sort of incentive to start learning and focusing more on Bitcoin.   

Exactly. Even if some tried to abuse it or succeeded doing so, I would rather look at the positive side and on those who are today contributing forum members and maybe became such because of the positive experience they had with OgNasty. 

If you don't know someone's gender, you don't use "it", you use "they". That's a singular "they". "It" refers to objects and things. We might not know if satoshi is male or female, but we know he isn't a thing. I prefer referring to satoshi as "he" simply because it's a male Japanese name. If he used the username "Frank" I would also refer to Frank as a "he" despite not knowing his real gender. Satoshi is a "he" to me until proven otherwise.

Is that a fan fact or a fun fact because it could be both.

Not necessary because the singular "they" isn't gender specific, so you don't need the he/she pronouns, which are gender specific.

Why am I not surprised that one AI recognized a different AI?!

If Bitcoin Core developers still consider their software experimental and it still says that on the About Bitcoin Core tab, why should the information on Bitcointalk be different from official claims? I say leave it as it is until those who work on it decide to change the experimental prefix. It would be interesting to ask them via GitHub and see why exactly that is and what needs to happen for Bitcoin Core to no longer be experimental?

There is also this blog post by Ledger where they state that they no longer allow unconfirmed transactions to be used for new transactions by default. This particular setting can be changed, but honestly, I don't see Jerry changing any of the standard settings without asking multiple times how many other Ledger users in the world have also done it.


That blog post is older than the source you linked to, so maybe the information is no longer correct.   

I used Windows 7 in the past and after upgrading to Windows 10, there were absolutely no issues with incompatible software or bugs with the applications I work with. I have never had Windows 8. If you are worried you might mess something up, just save all your important files on a clean USB that you can recover from in case of OS difficulties. I am still on Windows 10 despite being offered a free upgrade to Win 11. I am not in a hurry to start using the newest OS because Windows 10 still receives all important security updates. Windows 8 is outdated though and you should abandon it.