nexus 6 asked me to provide my escrow services. So everyone that wants an escrow can use my service. See my signature for details.

Thanks!

No answer. Not cool when in need of cash.

The time intervall between crossing can be very high but the longer the time the higher the chance of breaking the line. So if i see the current chart i fear that i will soon lose a big part of my investment (i invested a lot more now) since its inevitable that the line gets crossed. Only when is the question.

In theory i should be able to simply wait and it will grow over time. What i wonder is if the past now doesnt work against me since the random pressure to break the line again is there and is rising with each bet.

That mathematics really isnt easy to understand. Thats probably why still so many people believe in martingale.

Thats what i would think too... but then... stochastics say that a 1% house advantage should lead to having the profits going along a 1% line. It happened in the past too. So shouldnt it go around the 1% line all the time? If it does then it might not go below 1% in the next week but at some point it will again.

It wont change if bitcoiners life after the motto of "not throwing good money after bad money". Pirate was catched... labcoin scammer will be catched too. And it looks like bitcoiners changed mind. They will go after them.

Im not a pro in stochastics so i ask myself if it makes sense to divest when the profit is so high above the 1% profit and invest once its below the 1%. Normalle the profit chart should flow around that line. So it might be possible to raise the profit that way.
On the other hand... random doesnt have a past. It could be seen as now starting so it should move on from the same amount with 1% profit. But with the past values it shouldnt... it should go way down now.
What view is correct on this?

Thats why i think its important to catch the scammers. For example i work with others to find the labcoin scammer. When these guys see they land in jail for messing with bitcoin community then scams will become less likely. Of course some groundrules still have to apply.

Max bet means a better can maximum bet a half percent of the house bitcoins in one game? But the house advantage is still 1%? Then this only means the player would play twice and it would be a bit less variance... not really less bitcoins played...

Always use a trusted escrow when trading. Of course he must be known as a trusted one. You shouldnt simply use some other noob account who claims to be an escrow because the other mght suggest him. The escrow might be another account of the scammer. But if a real escrow is involved your money is safe until the trade is done. Thats how you trade securely.

I found that my investment was split but i would prefer to play with my investment in all percents. I mean the full investment plays in all bets. It looks like at the moment i only can chose to spread them about all percents or put them directly to a percent. But this way i always lose games or a big part of my investment isnt playing.

Could you give the possibility to play with the full amount at all percents?

Is localbitcoins broken? I tried to find traders for cash transfers. When i want to contact him i have to set up values. BTC or EUR in order to proceed. But when i do this i get told i dont have bitcoins at localbitcoins address. Even though i want to exchange cash...

I would more tend to raise the 1% than lowering. Though im not so sure anymore since i read that 1% is the optimum for some reason.

Regarding the 1%... since i saw the charts i believe its seeable: http://bitcoinproject.net/just-dice-casino/just-dice-charts/profit-chart
See the second chart... it has the house advantage attached. So im pretty sure the profit is relatively consistent.

Yes, its a bit confusing who is helping ukyo. I guess first he wanted to promote NEOBEE by setting it behind the thing and planned to come out as the hero who saved all... in order to promote NEOBEE. When he found that it wont work this way and people started to ask if NEOBEE will be damaged from it he claimed NEOBEE isnt involved. Its only him privately helping.

Regardless of that... there is no legal reason you can put your hands in Danny's or NEOBEE's pockets to take bitcoins out. There is simply no legal responsibility they have against ukyo and that way to each weexchange user. They never announced there is such liability.

I think they might helped too because NEOBEE has some Bitcoins in weexchange wallet. Another reason most probably is that NEOBEE is the company that will take over weexchange. The big buyer ukyo spoke about. All together led to the point that NEOBEE jumped in to help. Though i cant explain why someone should buy weexchange. The more when you see its damaged.

If the trade was done already then youre right. But NEOBEE would be stupid if it would have bought weexchange when problems occur. If they didnt buy it then there is simply no legal way to take their bitcoins. I think we are restricted to ukyo as of now. And im really interested to hear the explaination...

Comeon... i invested a week ago and since then i only saw my investment crawling below my invested amount. Now i saw the chart and it looks like the advantage is there seeing the actual investment. I doubted that before for obvious reasons. It was hard to imagine that all the games happening in the last week didnt show the house advantage. But it was that way.

*lol* Such sites, where players are scammed, exist and investors can invest? Hard to imagine that investors wont be scammed at some point too then. Not to say about players that should stop playing there if they find out. Again hard to imagine that such site remains alive.

I read many posts of dooglus now but still i dont know if he is an anonymous entity in the forum or if he is known.

And i found a debate about allowing investors to chose the risk of 1% to be changed. This settings wasnt implemented at the end?

Someone knows how save investments on that website are? The owner is trustworthy and known in person, website is security checked and so on? I mean the revenue looks a bit like ponzi's look though it might be explainable because of the players. On the other hand its hard for me imagine there are so many users believing they could win something there...
I would like to invest more but im not yet confident about it.

When will version 1.9.6 portable come out? And will the save settings problem be fixed then?

Ok... its hypothetical. But Microsoft wouldnt be guilty the same way NEOBEE wouldnt be. NEOBEE never claimed they will cover it all up. In fact they always claimed they arent involved financially and that they only try helping to fix it. Nothing more. Might be you wish they are bound somehow but for that being true they would have to state they will be liable and pay for ukyos debts. And why should they do such stupid thing?
They only wrote about helping.

---

Ok... ill keep that in mind... though i hope it should cost way more than that. I might be wrong since i never worked with that lawyer before.

*lol* Youre right... finally something that looks like a house advantage... couldnt believe it till now since i always was crawling below my investment.

Thats how it goes in here. Noobs and fiery people try to beat in all directions in the hope to get a hit.

---

I hope i never forget never to help you. Helping you sounds very dangerous.

Anyway... you can claim what you want. If Danny claims he tried to help no judge will bring him into jail. Its completely nonsense trying to sue him because he tried to help. No one is getting legally liable only by wanting to help. I wonder what laws you know. If any.
You can claim that ukyo is a scammer but following your logic... if ukyo would have asked microsoft to repair his wallet because he cant access the bitcoins anymore then microsoft has to be sued because in fact ukyo had stolen the coins. Thats some twisted logic you follow.

---

Let me guess... you deposited coins after the accident?
Always interesting how people try to claim why they and their funds are more important than others.

---

So it really will be the hacker-story? You know... the hacker already know what he did. He wont be alarmed that you search for him. But i really doubt there is a hacker at all.

---

Maybe we should start collecting deposit addresses for weexchange. Might be that we find a pattern what happened with the bitcoins?

By the way... i now contacted Marco Santori asking him what he wants for asking ukyo what happened and giving the info to me or more clients if more then myself are paying for that info.

I thought about banding together and hire one lawyer. Maybe the one from this forum. He can have multiple customers. So everyone has to pay less, he gets the info and all participants can get the info from him. That makes more sense than everyone paying much for his own lawyer while in fact everyone only wants to know whats going on.

Makes sense of course only when the lawyer really would get the info.


Check: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=337523
Edit: Or do you mean the "remaining" coins in the wallet? I guess we wont get that info until payment.