Just thought this was relevant to the conversation: I prefer to have an actual debate if my opponent is capable, but often they are not and resort to all kinds of illogical semantic games and personal attacks. At this point, yes I will absolutely troll them for my own amusement as well as to demonstrate their motivation of arguing from a position of lack of emotional control rather than logic. If you come at me with anything other than solid logic, one way or another I get my pound of flesh.
Of course, he is the arbiter of what constitutes "illogical semantic games and personal attacks," so he gets to decide when his trolling is justified and when it isn't. |
|
|
|
WARNINGThere is a scam accusation against this project. They have plagiarized large portions of their white paper, which means it is likely to be a scam project. It is recommended that everyone stay away from this.
|
|
|
|
OTOH, the _technology_ which BSV embodies is much closer to what satoshi bequeathed unto us as compared to the technology which BTC embodies. As such, it is BTC which is arguably the 'rival technology'.
"Bequeathed unto us?" Do you believe Satoshi's last build to be some kind of religious instruction? A Ten Commandments-esque fixture never to be broken for fear of incurring his wrath? The fact is nobody said Bitcoin isn't allowed to evolve. Since Satoshi isn't around, we don't know whether he would approve or disapprove of implementations that could not have been conceived during his time. BSV isn't even a rival technology so much as a cash grab led by a pathologically-lying egomaniac. Its success is solely reliant on the farce that CSW is Satoshi. It doesn't threaten BTC in the slightest, though I know your cult leader prefers the narrative that it does. Espousing a belief that BSV is at all similar to Bitcoin 0.1 is also a farcical talking point. The fact is the BSV code still contains changes made by Peter Wuille, Greg Maxwell and even Amaury Sechet. That idea is just religiously-held dogma not dissimilar to the Calvinist sect of Christianity representing a purer form of what Christ intended. You wield your supposed razor as would a religious zealot.
Said without the slightest trace of irony... |
|
|
|
He definitely has some kind of mental illness. Combined with a history of threatening violence upon people, its a particularly worrisome combination. My guess is eventually he will go off the deep end and spend the rest of his days in prison, or a psychiatric hospital if he's lucky. |
|
|
|
Hate to break it to you but Jeff (Big Lebowski) Bridges was born in 1949, totally Boomer. Perhaps you should replace him with a picture of Kim Kardashian, born in 1980, totally Generation X.  I don't know if this is the exact definition but I consider Gen X to be people born to parents before the boomers. If someone is the child of a boomer, they are technically a Millenial. Generation X (or Gen X for short) is the demographic cohort following the baby boomers and preceding the Millennials. Researchers and popular media typically use birth years around 1965 to 1980 to define Generation Xers, although some sources use birth years beginning as early as 1960 and ending somewhere from 1977 to 1984. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X |
|
|
|
Congrats on the cessation of the whoring out of your reputation for a few miserable shekels.
Thanks, coming from you, that means... well, it means you typed some words on a keyboard. I just don't have to wear the avatar anymore, which makes it the same as not being a whore at all, for WO purposes. |
|
|
|
Bernie isn't bitcoin-hostile. He's fed-hostile. Joe is fed-happy, but if he wins the nomination, this is likely the man who will be in the white house for 4 more years:  IMO, a vote for Joe is a vote for this. |
|
|
|
Nutildah puts his dog hat back on... Bullish!
The hat is really well done and detailed, the finer points of which are lost on the avatar-size version. so I'm posting the original, full-size image here in all its glory.
You can bring out some more detail by adjusting the resizing parameters. I suggest pre-sharpening (strong) before reducing size with dithering set to "preserve details"-like settings (presets in photoshop and the likes will do fine). The current version is f*cking blurry. OK thanks, I'll try that. Do you see the transparent version or the white background version? I just changed it. I tried to make the background transparent and may have mucked it up in the process. |
|
|
|
Nutildah puts his dog hat back on... Bullish! The hat is really well done and detailed, the finer points of which are lost on the avatar-size version. so I'm posting the original, full-size image here in all its glory. |
|
|
|
Remind me, when did I claim this subpoena even existed? Oh right never. That was Twittyseal that brought it up.
This is a weird way around answering my question. You said "the court" ruled the Laura Cooper subpoena was invalid. Can you provide a source for that? Is that what I said? Please quote. The court ruled the only subpoena you could even produce invalid.
The only subpoena I could produce was for Laura Cooper, because that's the only one that was made available as part of the public record. So, which court are you talking about, and where is that court's ruling? Unlike congressional subpoena files, court rulings are all made public, so it should be easy for you to find. If you're not talking about Laura Cooper, then what were you talking about? |
|
|
|
This forum needs objective evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreements, or violation of applicable laws before negative rating or flagging in order to prevent abuse of the trust system that it self can be used to extort people into removing valid negative ratings or flags. Without this, it is a simple task to simply abuse the system to cover up crimes and abuses.
Last week you added this user to your trust list, I don't see how these negative ratings are valid according to your standards: Troll, lied many time, called other russian DT members "corrupted", insulting and lying about trusted members of russian local board (as chimk). Consider crypto community as sectarians and bitcoin as a ponzie. Don't trust him. 2nd part of this one is Google translated from Russian: A liar, a troll, is not responsible for his words, constantly translates arrows. Calls the crypto community sectarians. You can’t trust I collected every proof in one post (the only reason for second feedback). Liar, bitcoin hater. Don't have with him any deal without escrow! 2nd part also translated: A slanderer is a rotten creature by definition. With him there is nothing to talk or argue about, on any topic, only you should not be smeared in feces. Brown, sticky and sticky. And it stinks. (c) Balthazar Also translated: The problem is not that you still had accounts, but that you brazenly lied in the face to those who respected you. "It was not the fact that you lied to me that shocked me, but the fact that I no longer believe you ..." Friedrich Nietzsche Doesn't seem to be any objective evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreements, or violation of applicable laws there. Seems like you want to be the beneficiary of Objective Standards but you don't want to enforce them yourself -- especially when it gets in the way of your DT farming. Of course, you're free to accuse me of digging through your shit, etc., or you could just explain why you included this user when they don't adhere to the standards you have presented. |
|
|
|
Remind me, when did I claim this subpoena even existed? Oh right never. That was Twittyseal that brought it up.
This is a weird way around answering my question. You said "the court" ruled the Laura Cooper subpoena was invalid. Can you provide a source for that? |
|
|
|
Biden's about only chance is to act as the "sane" guy.
That's a very tall order. They could make each other look not sane, senile, and gross, and they would both be right. Or America is really that stupid, then it's "good night", like in Mike Judge's "Idiocracy"  The Idiocracy effect has been slowly underway for the past couple decades.  The bright side is, according to the movie, we still have a few hundred years to go before people are really that level of dumb. |
|
|
|
|
Poor Bernie. The tide has turned against him today. America get ready for another round of your favorite presidential election game: Giant Douche vs. Turd Sandwich.
I don't see Biden as being "sharp" enough to beat Trump. Which is quite a sad testament to the state of things. Basically, politics as usual...
|
|
|
|
Looks like Warren staying in cost Bernie MA and MN. Biden didn't even campaign in either state and it looks like he's going to win both by 5+%
Warren definitely stifled Sanders in MA; most of the delegates still need to vote in MN. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/democratic_delegate_count.htmlMuch like Bloomberg, I think after today she'll definitely have "no path forward." Not that it matters, but watch what is going to happen in Hawaii on April 4th: the people will overwhelmingly vote for Sanders and the delegates will overwhelmingly vote for Biden. Happened last time around except switch Biden with Clinton. Bunch of bullshit. After the California delegates roll in, I definitely expect to see Sanders come much closer to Biden, if not overtake him. I bet Tulsi wins Hawaii (yeah, she's still running) Funny thing about Tulsi: most people in Hawaii don't like her anymore. Hawaii politicians are very politician-y. They tend not to give a shit about how the people they represent voted, doing whatever it takes to get in the good graces of D.C. Tulsi was one of Bernie's biggest supporters last time around, but I don't see her getting any delegates there. Not that Hawaii has ever mattered in any national election, ever. Actually, reviewing the final totals for HI in 2016, delegates gave 19 votes to Sanders and 15 to Hillary, so they indeed favored Sanders, as they should -- he received over 70% of the vote there. I just remember being pissed at my local "representatives" for casting their vote for Hillary when their districts overwhelmingly votes for Bernie. Oh, yeah, looking at the popular vote tally, it sure would seem that way. I just wonder which way delegates will go. Bernie's gonna need all the help he can get. |
|
|
|
Bro but the coronavirus only infects some people.. it just got confirmed from a doctor in another thread..   |
|
|
|
If they are satisfied with him hiring proven racist dishonest cheaters and trust abusers, these are dangerous and destroy huge trust system and can destroy our free speech. then that could be something people should be aware wheb using their service.
If I will be the campaign manager I will not have proven racists like HugeBlackWoman ThePharmacist or any one abusing the trust system or anyone supporting scammers. Post value will not spoil chipmixer like this ones but of course I will not want all from one group in meta who posts the same thing and fighting all times. Many are posting no valuable points of their own and a lot in meta. Chipmixer must be stupid to waste payment on chipmixer in meta on this rabble
Just want to point out this is definitely cryptohunter's alt (as well as truth or dare). He felt he wasn't getting enough of a reaction when trying to be "mild-mannered" under truth or dare, so he's invented yet another persona to attack the same group of people on the forum. The only thing different is he is using two alts concurrently instead of sticking to just the one. How do I know? There's only 5 instances on the forum of someone using the term "proven racist." One belongs to CryptoSparks, two belong to cryptohunter, and two belong to bonesjonesreturns. The Pharmacist- proven racist trolling sock puppet sig spammer
I would love to see how this proven racist financially motivated sock puppet troll voted.
They are also similarly obsessed with the same topics: ChipMixer, trust abuse, merit, and DT. As well as the same users: The Pharmacist, Lauda, JollyGood, mosprognoz Also, nobody brings up HugeBlackWoman except for him. Probably because nobody cares. The fact that they are pretending to now be a non-native English speaker is kind of amusing. But this is definitely cryptohunter, upping his trolling game by running 2 alts at the same time. To get to the topic, ChipMixer does have 1 Turkish member: Kalemder. So are they not racist now, or just less racist? |
|
|
|
What is the relationship between you and truth or dare?
First it was strictly business, then platonic, and its now advanced to romantic. The real question is, will we be invited to the wedding? I heard Thule is going to be best man and game-protect is going to be the bridesmaid. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
