Seems like OP Author is trying to withdraw from an Exchange to Bunq(?) via wire transfer.
By checking his post history: hashtag, thirteen of the post were questions about transferring funds from an Exchange to Bunq, N26 or TransferWise.

It's either it's a publicity stunt or a genuine research due to a red flag.

@hashtag Unfortunately, nobody in their right mind will transfer their Cryptos into a token-fueled "Bank".
I will use my own bank (Bitcoin) instead.

That's what I also got based from OP's statement: "Bunq hat coin"

*From Electrum wallet? Means you've sent it to the wrong wallet that you own?
If it is spendable/standard, just send it again to the correct recipient or sweep the private key to the right wallet; if it is watch-only, it's gone.

(next time, open a new thread and provide more info as described in the sticky: Tech Support Help Request Format)

This is only true if the thread is "self-moderated" like GhostProject from your link.
A message like this will be displayed on top of the thread if it is self-moderated:
If you see an [ANN] or thread from Services Forum that is self-moderated without a proper reason, raise a red flag.
BTW, scams aren't moderated, the DT handles those.

If those were Android Tablets or Phones, you could have used Electroneum Mobile Miner to "pseudo-mine" ETN which rewards more than actual mining. I'm not sure if they still tolerate multi-clients from the same user though (KYC required).
[some laptops have "Dual-boot" function which enables them to boot as Android OS].

As for using laptop batteries, this will likely waste more power than using DC since batteries tend to convert some energy into heat in the process.
Best choice: just sell them in bulk and buy the proper hardware for the Altcoin of your choice.

Use "pay to many" option in your existing Bitcoin client/wallet if it has one.

If you're using Electrum, there's a "Pay to Many" option in "Tools" menu which expands the "Pay to" input box on the "Send" tab. You will have to type/paste one address per line (address->enter->address).

Seems like I got an issue with cloudflare, I'm always getting this error in every visit: Guess I need to use my mobile to visit later.

By the way, what are the other Bitcoin payment options other than bitpay, P2P?

Well, that's news to me.
But still, the hacker can use the same message with a link displayed as "electrum.org" pointed to a new fake electrum URL.
If the user is still using a vulnerable version, better ignore any error message and just directly browse and download from the official site to be safe.

-edit- Or edit the context into something like: "Ignore any error messages like this and download from the usual place: electrum.org" or "Ignore any direct link from error messages (like this) and download from the usual place: electrum.org"

If you think you have a better idea(s) to help ThomasV and the developers, just open a pull request or bug report on Github to discuss your proposals.

Don't know if this is trap or a stupid suggestion.

If this will solve these problems, tell me:
How can you trust something that you don't know if you can trust to verify itself if you can really trust it?

The problem is: the famous phishing attack uses and displayed the original site on the error message too but you will be redirected to the fake electrum github page.
It's the same hacker, apparently, he must have been informed about the latest news here in the electrum board and just enabled broadcasting of txs and reconstructed his fake error message to be like "that" (you're using a vulnerable version...) since it will not be displayed as intended in the latest version.
(A clever guy, I'll give him that)

To Mods, I request a pinned message regarding an "Urgent or Mandatory" update to electrum 3.3.3.

Please do not delete the opening quote tag [quote author=###] and the closing tag [/quote], you've turned most of your replies into a misleading mess.

---

Anyways, if day trading is what you meant by "Enter the market", any time is good as long as the Exchange of your choice has enough liquidity. The base price isn't the main profit generator here, it's the volatility, unless your starting budget is pretty low.

If it is Hodling.... uhm, yeah you should wait for a lower price, ready your fiat and be updated to the latest news in case of a possible hype.

What is your goal on checking the contents of the blocks?

There are couple of sites with already parsed data:
If it was the ASCII texts embedded in the blockchain, all of them were already parsed here: https://bitcoinstrings.com/
If it was the block headers and/or transaction data (in hex or readable format), you can check them out here: https://webbtc.com/ <- however, the site isn't updated to the latest height (till 443888 only) but can be converted to HEX: ex. https://webbtc.com/block/0000000000000000000cdc0d2a9b33c2d4b34b4d4fa8920f074338d0dc1164dc.hex

Most of those parser won't work with blocks from 477,120 (inaccurate, somewhere around blk00950.dat) to the latest.
Those are the blocks containing SegWit data.

That's all?
I thought it was based from the increasing number of users that also increases the number of "free tickets" (from free rolls and referrals).
If it was based from bots, the overall prizes amount shouldn't be affected, they will be banned anyways; IMO, it's not related to the prizes at all.

Okay, so the prizes were based from the number of "sold" tickets, not from the total number of tickets. Right?

Is there a reason why the Lottery Winners' prizes amount became less than what it was a year ago? In contrary, the lottery ticket price was doubled (because of the current BTC price).
If I'm not mistaken, last 2017, winners number 1 & 2's prizes were at least 1.5BTC and 1.0BTC respectively; even #1 can't barely reach 1BTC even though Bitcoin's price is still at ~3k range.

Without the password or a hint (do not post any info regarding it), this will be like finding a needle in a haystack.

The (.txt?) file where the passphrase was however, can be recovered depending on "how you've lost it".

• Did it get deleted? If so, you might need to use any file recovery software that can restore deleted files or formatted Disks. Some works on Flash drives as well.
• Did the flash drive or disk where it was stored got corrupted or damaged? As long as you've created the file on a PC and moved it there, you can just try to recover the deleted copy of it from the PC where it was created with again, any recovery software. If it was directly created to the flash drive, that's a bad news.

Based on the screenshots, if qrfs0vwk2lpykenq8t0aqgxahewdpq42myeywu9q0v is correct (double-check your Bcash Deposit address in Coinpot), then 1LEpo7Utkh8SeAUck5WrwKioVEBcQ86ET8 is the correct legacy format and the Tx that went through should be credited to your Coinpot account since they've already received it.

There's one problem though, the fact that Faucethub doesn't support "q" addresses might be a hint that they support and use BitcoinTrash SV fork rather than BitcoinTrash ABC which was supported by Coinpot.

I'm not completely sure but the only thing you can do is to contact Coinpot regarding the issue and hope for a reply (fingers crossed).
However, the chance to recover the funds is slim given that it was sent by faucethub (another micro-wallet) not from your "own" wallet.
By the way, looks like coinpot's BCH deposit is still disabled ATM.

What is the Operating System that you're using?
It's usually 30~ish Mkey/sec for me on a 1060 (Windows7 SP2 updated with drivers).

@martinadoulet The question is how long you're willing to wait for the result; talking about processing power, even a Core2Duo™ is enough to make a personalized 4-1st-characters vanitygen address within an hour or less if you're lucky. And that's way below the power consumption of an AC.

[Didn't watched the Video]
I got a feeling that he's talking about "Brain Wallet", if it is, there's a huge risk in security here.
If it's not, he might just wanted to know more about what's blockchain under the hood.

In addition to what others said, in simple words:
[a] You can receive funds in any address anytime as long as you have its Private key pair even without a wallet or internet. All you need is a piece of paper and a pen.
Addresses which are based from Pub keys aren't "initiated" in order to be valid. Even if it is not yet used, every address is valid as long as it was correctly derived from a valid Public key which is derived from the Private key (wallets do this automatically but it's possible to compute manually).

More info: Bitcoin Wiki

[2] The best partner for product-selling sites like yours are Payment-processor Wallets like Coins Asia, Coinpayment or Bitpay (More: Google search results). It's up to you to research which is the best and legitimate among them.
Reason is: there are probably more mainstream consumers who use such service to buy things online, mostly all regular users have an account in those payment processors too (we use different type of wallets for different needs), that said, you wouldn't wanna miss the opportunity to reach that Market.

Examples of advantages of payment processors are instant payment (on the consumer's side), low to zero fees (again, on the consumer's side) and fool-proof apps which is why the mainstream prefer them over "real wallets".
Of course, P2P payment is still a-must in your payment options.

[3] Having 50+ available options IMO, is an overkill... Just pick the most legitimate coins and as much as possible, do not include tokens.

Have you updated the wallet? The year 2017 version was too outdated and might be the cause of the network issue. Updating the wallet will not delete your data/wallet from it.
However, do not uninstall it unless you still got the Mnemonic seed that it told you to write at the wallet creation process.

This only applies to full nodes or some old wallets like Bitcoin Core and Armory.
Bither is a SPV wallet which relies on a third-party server (full node) as the "validator".

There are multiple inconsistencies here, it'll just state the issue with Coinpot's micro-wallet:

• As far as I know, their BCH deposit address starts with "q" not "1".
  
• For some reason, it always says "failed to generate address" everytime I try to make one; additionally, it will make a different address after a few weeks or days so it is not advisable to use it as a withdrawal address from another faucet wallet.
  
• The links and images you've provided shows that the input was already spent and sent to another wallet.

.
It doesn't look like the address belongs to coinpot

*This will be moved to Service Discussion.