The only hassle today is that there is currently no way to transfer ownership of such an address.
I had thought about this, but didn't want to post twice in a row  . What I had in mind was that if I own 1linux123 and other person were more interested in "1linux", he/she could generate an address such as 1linux456 and pay me some money, then I would use half (?) of that money to pay firstbits for having 1linux123 deleted from the database. Then, I tell the other person that he/she can enter 1linux456 into the site and get the "1linux" firstbits. |
|
|
|
the T&S and the order book dont work for me today, while it was working perfectly before on chrome.
Anyone observing the same?
No, they're both working here, chrome 13. |
|
|
|
Hey, that was fast!  This trade grabbed my attention: it hasn't the same color as the one above it (despite having the same timestamp), but most notably it has zero volume. |
|
|
|
|
Idea: make the background color/brightness of each line depend on the time from the last trade. This way, we'll be able to see big trades at a glance, instead of paying attention to the timestamps.
|
|
|
|
Ah, well, Abe tends to return "500 Server Error" rather than an incomplete page. This, too, fixes itself in a bit if you reload. Not sure which failure mode I prefer.
500 + handler explaining the most probable cause? |
|
|
|
Wow. Just wow  . Keep up the good work! I will update this chart periodically, it will be interesting to see how it changes over time.
A daily snapshot can become a neat animation after 2 or 3 months... |
|
|
|
|
Oh my goodness, and I thought my 45 vanity addresses were far too many...
|
|
|
|
|
I've successfully compiled the bitcoin client with the patch that implements the 'importprivkey' command. Would anyone trust me enough to try running it? It's for linux 64 bits (but I can compile it for 32 bits if requested).
|
|
|
|
Well, let's post something here, so that it works . I have a transfer with 22 confirmations, involving an address that is still unknown to firstbits.com. It appears in the block explorer. What do I do? |
|
|
|
If you have a sec, give some details. Are you using prefixes? How many cores, how fast, and how fast with a single thread?
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz (8 cores): $ ./vg-0.6 -it1 1Loaners & sleep 10; kill $!
[1] 30177
Difficulty: 28173812690
[28363 K/s][total 280000][Prob 0.0%][50% in 8.0d]
$ ./vg-0.6 -i 1Loaners & sleep 10; kill $!
[1] 30179
Difficulty: 28173812690
[174878 K/s][total 1520000][Prob 0.0%][50% in 1.3d]
$ ./vg-0.10 -it1 1Loaners & sleep 10; kill $!
[1] 30188
Difficulty: 28173812690
[164485 K/s][total 1605696][Prob 0.0%][50% in 1.4d]
$ ./vg-0.10 -i 1Loaners & sleep 10; kill $!
[1] 30190
Difficulty: 28173812690
[884067 K/s][total 8430080][Prob 0.0%][50% in 6.1h] v0.6 single thread to v0.6 8 threads: 174878/28363 = 6.1657x (expect 8x) v0.6 single thread to v0.10 single thread: 164485/28363 = 5.7992x (expect 6x as announced) v0.6 8 threads to v0.10 8 threads: 884067/174878 = 5.0553x (expect 6x as announced) Oops, my fault, it's not 4x but 5x. I stopped vanitygen v0.6 8 hours ago and started v0.10 some minutes ago. I judged the improvement not by the rate but by the time remaining, and I suspect I didn't take into account the fact that when I stopped v0.6 this morning, it had been running for some hours and the time remaining was, of course, less than at the start . |
|
|
|
I'm seeing 4x increase. I don't care not getting 6x, 4x is an amazing improvement in any case . |
|
|
|
|
En mi humilde opinión, amp... tiene razón.
|
|
|
|
Quotes collected by Bruce Eckel:
Any (preferably recent) opinion from yours? Obviously you haven't seen much Perl code. In any case, I'm not following this argument. Just gave my opinion and that's all. |
|
|
|
1 person asking for $1000 in cash isn't going to make a dent in a bank. 1000 people withdrawing $1000 might be a problem. I have personally taken $5k out of my bank in cash upon asking for it without a problem and I'm positive I could do it anytime. You vastly underestimate the holdings of a bank, they are required to keep a a certain amount of cash on hand just in case. That's why big banks have big safes, and small banks don't.
I know of two banks in my country, the largest two, who will most likely tell you you have to notify them atleast one day before you wish to have your money in cash. They will also ask you what you intend to do with such large sums of cash (might avoid this question of youre a native and wear a suit and tie). Although I have been in a bank where it was no problem taking out $2000. I guess this depends on banks. Not long ago, while at the queue, I could take a glance to a paper describing the monthly movements in that branch's vault. At no moment the balance was lower than 70k€. Since I know nothing about the banking world, I'm leaving open the question about it being "enough" (for what?) or not. I usually withdraw 1200€-1900€ (at least once a month) and I've never had any problem with that. Oh, this is Spain BTW. |
|
|
|
|
I'd go for Perl. 90% of what you want to do has already been done and is available from CPAN.
|
|
|
|
Huh, still not released and will cost money. Protovis is real and open source. |
|
|
|
Here are a couple of features/changes that come to mind. I'm only sharing them so they don't die inside my head. - Option to not show all the Add/Rem Bid/Ask in the console. Personally I'm not interested in those.
- Ability to click on a row to highlight it, like "I have an order at this point" (e.g. with a brighter background). Auto-remove the highlight only when that row has completely been fulfilled. My particular order may be long gone by then, but there's no way that can be detected.
- Don't highlight round numbers, but big (≥2000Ⓑ?) orders instead.
|
|
|
|
Nice catch  . |
|
|
|
|
Does Sierrachart allow for the hand-drawing of trend/support lines? I've looked to some screenshots in google images and found only one, which could easily be shopped.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
