A nice ATH in bids.

Why are you offering escrow services for projects when someone managed to fool you with something like that? Disclaimer: I am not yet aware of what exactly happened other than you lost (or never had the safety of) the funds.

Self moderated thread + refusal to use escrow can pretty much be considered proof. I've told OP to update this thread appropriately though.

Could be accidental.

Not really a necessary thing to do, and I didn't do it in the last campaign that I've started managing either.

Quite the waste of electricity and your own time.

They aren't on sale yet, well not the remaining batches apparently:

This functionality exists, theymos could trivially display it somewhere with some standard code should have wish to. Maybe not as easily for the individual, but a reporter ranking definitely would be.

This will cause issues for moderators, especially if it were to state which moderator did what. I think that's one of the reasons for which this doesn't exist already.

Pending could be labeled as 'unhandled', as some reports might never get handled to begin with.

I've already requested the rank 'Banned' a while back, but unfortunately no such change has been made.

Every time I look at the Moon bars, I'm impressed by how well they are made. Kialara definitely is far above the manufacturers that just rehash the same thing inside a different package. Your asking price is more than reasonable.

There are; you should look around or maybe ask one of the resellers.

That isn't suspicious at all. e.g. a potential reason would be general quitting from trading.

Open a thread here: https://gunthy.org/index.php/board,4.0.html. You will need: a) Gunthar to verify the licence for a buyer. 2) An escrow.

I thought this was locked?

You might need some of these:

You applied 4 days after the round begun, that's why.

Sigh. You're almost just as unstable and as unpredictable as defcon was. Why are you changing your mind this frequently? I thought you were supposed to be a *grown up*.

There was something wrong with the formula for your row, which you could have easily checked yourself instead of being confused. I've fixed it now.

Check the spreadsheet.

Alright, thanks. I'll keep an eye out for the full release.

It is my list, and I can do whatever I want with it. I have no intention of wasting time on hundreds/thousands of illiterate spammers like that (Note: Not all of the people placed on the list are like that).

I have no idea how you got there and have no intention of checking as that is just a waste of time. Quick look at your post history confirms your spot on the list.

I'm too lenient, again.

I will instantly reject anyone on my SMAS list as well as consider their attempt at applying to any campaigns that I manage (where the SMAS list is explicitly mentioned) as an attempt at cheating.

Nobody will send you a message that you are placed on SMAS.

I don't see why not. That's also something that I plan on doing.

Then you're likely out of luck. You have to provide sufficient proof that you are the original owner of the account kiffner.

A one-liner signature spammer wants to manage signature campaigns?

Find an BTC address posted by the account. Sign a message to confirm ownership. To do so, read this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0. Optionally post it here and I will neg. rate the account until recovered.