The version that you're using was already outdated, in fact, the site (www.bitcoinarmory.com) has a link to the new official website.
Try to upgrade Armory then your coins should show up. Just make sure that you have the backup SEED or wallet.dat just in case.
*This thread might be moved to Armory sub-forum.

---

An alternative (req. a full-node) client like Armory isn't the best choice then, just extract the address' Private key and Import it to Electrum (Electrum.org).

Hey, there's a guy who's using your miner's name and thread contents to distribute a virus. Link to his thread
Probably another Russian hacker or the same guy who've done the same thing last year.

I've already reported him but it would be best if you can immediately reply an allegation to minimize the possible victims.
Time's ticking.

Mining Board? Yeah, that's the top 1 most moderated places in the forum, expect rule-breaking posts to be deleted ASAP.
If you ever saw a thread with multiple replies from a single user, that doesn't mean that it's allowed. Moderators of the particular board may be inactive or didn't received any reports.

Why don't you just edit the post and add a horizontal line spacer ([hr]) followed by -edit- or -update- to mark where the edited parts are?

---

-update-

Like this.

Whoa, a keen eye for edits. Side effect of OCD I guess...

Going digital or decentralized can't actually stop the Government and their regulations.

It seems like that the Original name of the Exchange was "Bitwin Exchange" since the site displays the logo (footer) as Bitwin.
If it was Bitwin, then this must be the ANN thread of the ICO where it originated and Yikes!~ Take a look at the Author's Trust History (links say it all).

Beats me, but I got good guesses:

• They found the Ad from Faucet sites which has 80% Ponzi ScamsAds, 10% Fake ICOs, 5% Fake Exchanges & 5% Referral links.
  
• Newbies who received Airdropped Token/ShitCoin & finding a way to sell them only to find that it's only listed on these type of Exchange.
• Some are posting the url of the site on the thread title as a silly publicity stunt.
  

The said Transaction is clearly visible in blockexplorers and the output was already spent which means that he already received it.

If you're sure that the other's receiving address is: 132vDEYg3gAsA86eMxRcwsaQpfeUWZn7Le, there are couple of reasons why he didn't receive the bitcoins: [1] his wallet isn't synced or offline, [2] he is lying or [3] he's expecting a different coin [4] You might be a victim of a clipboard-hijacking malware/virus.

[1] Some users experience trouble connecting their Electrum client to any Server; if the Circle indicator on the Lower-left side of Electrum is Red, the client is offline.
[2] .......... just a possibility.
[3] There are couple of Bitcoin forks out there that share the same name and there's one in particular that is known for misleading newbies to believe that it is the real Bitcoin. The "person on the other side" might be using an old BCH wallet version that still uses "1" address.
[4] It's a well-known malware that changes the BTC address from your clipboard (Copy) into the hacker's address (Paste) to reroute that particular transaction. (Scan your PC using a reputable AV)

35.5kWh ∙ 30Days = 1065kwH per Month for a single T1 Miner, where did 10,700kWh came from?

Perhaps, this? (1,480):
Some members are using comma (,) instead of dots (.) in decimals which is confusing, IMO.
Or he just mistyped (kW) instead of (W).

Typical... you know that those bitcoins are in an Exchange because users want/need to trade right? (Apparently, obviously, surely, most of them got their "own" wallet)
You can't easily use a Cold wallet that was buried 20-feet under a random area guided with a "X" on a map to buy a HYPEd shitcoin before it get pumped.

I'm afraid that keeping most of the coins in a hot/cold wallet not possible for someone who's day trading. Personally, I prefer keeping higher exchange balance than in cold wallet since highly-priced orders yield higher profit.
Specially now that the price is on its (*typo edit) best buy, predictable low-liqudity and mostly everyone is expecting a rise.

Usually, it goes like this:
Source (ex.Mining)---→(HotWallet)--→EXCHANGE---(Mixer)---→Cold Wallet (Savings)
Other Sources-------⤴---------------⤴                 ↪-----→Hot Wallet  (Expenses)

Fortunately, legitimate exchanges today are heavily regulated and problems such as missing funds can be legally resolved.

Does your friend often exchanges files with you? Do you have an antivirus installed? AFAIK, that virus was known to immediately infect every .exe files in the system.

There's a chance that you and your friend's PC are both already compromised before, and that detection/infection didn't originated from the downloaded Electrum executable.
Try to upload to VT a file (any .exe file in your system), if it's positive, your system was compromised through other means.

Where did you get that version of Electrum?
Make sure that the URL has the correct domain and extension; it should be electrum.org, not (dot)com or (dot)cf or anything.

I'm currently downloading the latest version from the official site to check this myself. I'll edit this later.

---

-edit-
My AV can't seem to find any Viruses in the Latest Version, it should be safe as long as it came from the official site (at least for Windows version).
If you've downloaded this version from a link on an error message, move your funds to a safe newly created wallet in a different PC installed with the original Electrum immediately!

VirusTotal's scan result: VirusTotalURL=https://download.electrum.org/3.3.3/electrum-3.3.3-setup.exe

(lol) Sry, I was lost in thoughts by the post of the other guy that assumed localbitcoins as the P2P Exchange that you're talking about.
But anyways, you still got the point.

---

I don't know what you're trying to share or ask but, the image isn't displayed but requested to be downloaded as a screensaver (which is very suspicious).
Reported for a possible malware. Just reupload it in any reputable image hosting site like imgur.com

@joniboini
LBC is a regulated third-party platform (and later implemented KYC), thus, I cannot totally consider it as a P2P exchange.

---

@jrrsparkles
Bitcoin as a commodity doesn't mean that it can't be directly traded with fiat. Actually, it's the exact opposite, it can be legally traded through any legal means.
What's being banned is purchasing goods, paying your bills or services using bitcoins, but that can be easily covered by third-party payment processors by indirectly converting Bitcoins into fiat to pay their listed payment options.

Seriously?! Like Binance or Kraken, tho I won't be surprised if it was Bitfinex.
It would be great if you can show us some proof or even a constructively written assumptions regarding fake volume manipulations by large exchanges.
Because if they do, they're doing and hiding a serious legal issue.

If I can recall correctly, FinerBox doesn't require KYC to withdraw and obviously, easy Wash and Dry smells good for others.
You know what I mean.

Actually, Bitcoin Full Node (Bitcoin Cli, now Bitcoin Core) at that time (2011-12) is the best way to store bitcoins since the Blockchain isn't that huge to be a problem for most (geek, technical or fan-base) users.
But mostly all late-comers (including me) were using bitcoins in online "game/gambling" that offers free bitcoins via faucets and didn't even cared about its value at that time, it's something like this: you can play games for free/low-cost using a new/unknown digital cash.
Most bitcoins were stored (or forgotten) in those High/Lo & Faucet sites.[/2011]

About other available clients, I'm not qualified to answer since I started trading Crypto a year before I joined BCT (not too late before the big HYPE).

Not sure but, Electrum's security today isn't really that reliable since it requires a third-party host/node.
That's why they've added the newbie-friendly 2FA option with additional cost in exchange for security in 2015(?), or anyone can set-up his own 99% safe cold-storage wallet.

Another big possibility is: it could be an investigation attempt (by police or private) to find the culprit.
I've seen multiple thread reports regarding that Electrum hacking incident and been contacted via PM with replies to my post(s). One particular person said that police had successfully uncover some leads using the info.
Apparently, doing such thing can possibly uncover most of the hacker's addresses and check where the funds are stored.

An attack or not, I'm pretty sure that it was a deanonymizing dust attack.

Don't know if these will help:

• electrumdev@gmail.com (displayed in Github so I guess that there's no problem pasting this here) based from ThomasV's GitHub Profile.
  
• Bitcointalk Account: ThomasV
  
• Electrum Twitter page.
  
• Electrum Page's registration address:

[/list]

Easy, you just need to know the xpub key of all the cosigners to create a watch-only multisig wallet.
XPUB or Master Public Key starts with "xpub";
example: xpub661MyMwAqRbcGuKyz9sJMYEKaJfkL9izJkh7jHakA9ZEEwYgmXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX.

Here are the steps:

• 1. New/Restore->Select "Multi-signature Wallet"
• 2. Pick the number of cosigners and required signature(s) based on the main wallet (must be the same)
• 3. Select "use Master Key"
• 4. Paste Cosigner1's xpub key (Master Public Key) click next, then next again.
• 5. Select "Enter Cosigner key" and paste the xpub of the the second cosigner.

Continue steps depending on the number of consignees.

Just test it with one card installed in that problematic PCI-e slot.
If it didn't work either, chances that it isn't the BIOS nor the OS is high, one busted/defective PCI-e slot isn't really news.

BTW, you'll only needing the SLI bridge if you're using the board for Gaming and other Graphic-intensive Applications.

Hey, look at this thread from the Meta Board (by theymos himself): grin is now accepted for forum payments

If you read the post, you'll understand that our admin endorses it and apparently, there's a really high chance that it will be successful after a few months of liquidity (since there's only a few exchange had listed Grin).
As far as I know, there's one (can't say successful) coin that was endorsed by him that was pumped a lot and made some millionaires.
This will surely be the case to Grin on the first few months/year of release, but will not reach as high as Bitcoin's price due to its design (flaws?).

Personally, it's worth the time and money to mine a few before everyone join the inevitable bandwagon hype.

Right, and if you're into trading.... you know that "overhyped" is a very good sign.