How does everyone feel about the estimation? Is it too high, too low, or kinda accurate?
A little bit too high atm, I'd say. But I don't keep that thight tabs on auctions/sales. |
|
|
|
All your affiliate system says is: Details will be available for discussion on BCT once we have launched Wanna give me some details? Wanna discuss a bit? |
|
|
|
Because it is a standalone bot It has no house edge like the dice sites automated bots.
Bullshit. The house edge is managed on the server side for EVERY site, you cant do anything about that. Obvious bullshit is obvious. So as well as the house edge you are contending with the bot probability edge which are both against you. With our bot you don't have the probability edge to contend with.
Oehm, I don't even... This person is dumb, quite stupid and gets involved without understanding situations, very inarticulate. Real lack of brain. Love your feedback, thanks. |
|
|
|
Is it better now ? Master Mexxer?  Now the lower text is not centred anymore (comparing to the upper text) Master Mexxer won't approve. Edit: Now it's nice, I'm sure mexxer approves. |
|
|
|
Am I right that the provably fair system isn't finished/working yet? So, this site is ATM not provably fair, right? Ei, Can you fix your site first before launching it without properly testing it?
|
|
|
|
Considering there has been similar scam attempts by BTCroll, dicebitco.in ,nearly coinut and some other sites, I'd highly advise you to use an escrow who will pay the participants for a payment period in case there is a late payment or etc.
Yes, I do get your point, which is valid but some might vouch for fastdice.com (soon) that other's do trust in the community and the funds proof is posted in the lower part of official post and my own reputation is on the line as well (in case if it matters)  So you will pay out participants in case the other accounts involved are on the run? Will the people vouching for fastdice do it? Proof of funds is one thing, but an escrow is there to actually deliver those funds in case something goes down the line. Ofc its every campaigns own decission whether or not to use escrow, but I would support mexxer's proproal. *cough* Signature doesn't seem to fit, try decreasing the size by one pt.
*cough* you know one or two bits about that problem, don't you?  |
|
|
|
Sorry for double-posting. New campaign opened - FastDice | PNYC | | | FastDice | | | post/weekly | | | 0.0015 | | | 0.0013 | | | 0.0011 | | | 0.0009 | | | x | | | x | | | x | | | 10/w | | | 50/w | | | N | | |
FastDice ( Thread) Payment period: Weekly. Payment method: Will be paid to your website account. Minimum posts: 10 posts. Maximum posts: 50 posts. Payments: F: 0.0009 BTC per post, S: 0.0011 BTC per post, H: 0.0013 BTC per post, L: 0.0015 BTC per post. Escrow: N Miscellaneous: Posts in Off-topic, local, Politics & Society, Beginners & Help, Archival, Games and rounds and Investor-based games are not counted. No negative trust. Posts in any signature/avatar campaign thread dont count. Minimum of 5 posts have to be in Gambling section (excluding Investor-based games and Games and rounds) per week. -> http://pastebin.com/JWHtvmJ5-> http://pastebin.com/AmSCCj9y |
|
|
|
Assisted Sofia with the signing and it has verified successfully with the address above. Asked him/her to send a message to Theymos already.
Wanna provide the signed message here? There's still someone running around with a hacked 20: -0 / +2 account, give us the signed message, so we can pin some negs on it until this is resolved, ok? |
|
|
|
- "Unwatch" button doesn't work for topics you've posted and want to unwatch
- People giving negative trust to people who they haven't done any trades with (see my profile for ref). Trust abuse as well
- There's too much spam in all topics, but mods are doing great work removing it. I assume community helps too, by reporting.
Unwatch button works. Those threads are removed from your "Watchlist". But they stay in your "Show new replies to your posts." list. if you read closely, you might find the reason why. Trust can't be abused, that was discussed several times. And giving trust without trades is not a problem. For the trust you got (I asume you talk about your neg), no one willing to trade will care about that. No one will mind it. For the spamming problem, we probably have to wait until the spampaigns realize the changes they promised to make. |
|
|
|
Disqualified Users:
Name: tair85 - posts in russian. Broke rule #7.
Posts: 209
Position: Full Member
Bitcoin address 16VGi3yjK8T5myRykahR7Ur4wd39eQU44A
Name: klepa - posts in russian. Broke rule #7.
Posts: 203
Position: Full Member
Bitcoin address: 1FG64Q8sSRXtaTeBJ63uK2aL6ZZXthaqrq
Name: elyas772 - spam and posts not in english. Broke rule #1 & #7
Posts: 151
Position: Full Member
Bitcoin address: 1ELyME99LCzGz4yB3ECSYfq1oMtq3R9JGy
Rule #7 didn't exist when they joined. It's one thing removing them now, but not paying them for what they signed up for? Thats another thing. |
|
|
|
Re-Apply
Username: FifaCoinsSupplier
Current Post Count: 170
Current Rank: Full Member
Bitcoin Address: 1P8j3sPG7TAAsVzhuqG2J6YmYMrGe4ykot
Theres still something odd with your signature. |
|
|
|
 Anyone noticed something strange in our sheet lately? |
|
|
|
I analyzed the email headers that I posted earlier and it looks like the scammer was using godaddy for email, so he probably used it for domain registering as well. Do you think it will be possible to contact godaddy and ask them if they can provide information about that guy?
IIRC most domains affiliated with this have been registred with namespace, and they have been already contacted. You can take a shot on godaddy though, if you want to. |
|
|
|
go to police faster as you can! because they can make more powerful search and maybe you can find the scammer. another namecheap domain, again whois protected. They have already been contacted regarding the issue by JonHolmquist IIRC. |
|
|
|
current post =650+
current activity=280+
potential activity=14 maybe 280+
Potential activity wont be lower than current activity (it only is if you deleted a shitload of posts recently), but you probably think its current activity+14. However if you got that much more posts than activity, its safe to say current activity == potential activity. |
|
|
|
Sent PM to 48 signature campaign users and theymos. Sorry to PM spam, I just really hate scams.
Just send a PM to all participants as well. Did you PM the guys from their social campaign aswell? So these are the addresses:
1Fgtsy33W7W9LBU7SnQNQvTeisfy9VMkmt
1L4ovA5WCkaegnREVkJABRqmgWWhTA8paP
First one is already known/provided by shorena. Second one was also already posted. EDIT: Theymos has done this perfectly in my opinion.
Agreed. |
|
|
|
This is my btc address: 15RPtGjWdoXC3krcVAHZ8M37PP2zQMxTT7 You used this address in the past. Can you sign a message from that one? Or to put it in other words: Is this another exchange address or an address from one of your wallets? |
|
|
|
You're probably refering to this. For a victim count: primedice fake has 0, bitmain fake has probably 4 or 5, gyft fake might also be 5, other fake site victims are unknown. Or, if we're speaking in total BTC6.43370775+2.941+2.941+2.941+2.33645 +1.16822+1.16822+1.07196+0.23364 = total 21.23
Potentially more with CoinPayments.
|
|
|
|
There are too many scammers around. Will the forum operator/moderator compensate the loss for its users? They got paid by the advertisers.
And under every advertisement, there is a warning displayed Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. They paid little , and win a lot
They've spent roughly 4 BTC (forum ad + sig camp + social media campaign, and thats only on here). And they scammed 20 BTC+ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
