my brother died recently.and i got all his old files and information for his different accounts, i know he used this forum a lot, is it okay with the rules here if i start using his forum account here myself?
Any clues on who your brother was? Personally, I am of the opinion that the account had changed hands and others would not be doing transactions with who the think they are transacting with.
|
|
|
Hello Timelord2067,
That would be interesting for sure. I have to read more about the tech specs for sexcoin and circle back around.
We're looking forward to welcoming you when you get back.
|
|
|
Sasa9 & Angela22, Hi I see you here on sexcoin you should check out https://www.dporn.co we are looking for a few girls to join! Let me know if interested and we'll get you an account. Thanks. Welcome dporn, Is there any way we can partner with you to get sexcoin inserted integrated on your site?
|
|
|
It's funny to say that what really got me into Crypto big time was selling Sexcoin on Cryptsy all those years ago. I was clicking the Sexcoin faucet for like a few weeks then I took the coins onto cryptsy exchange to sell and madE like 200 bucks in the pump. That was like a big eye-opener for me and I have never looked back ever since.I really miss those days where coins got pumped to oblivion and we all used to make quite easy money and it was fun. I am too old to post sexy pics of me to earn Sexcoins but if there is another way to earn them, I would love to know how to get hold of a little bag. I should maybe buy some just to hold for posterity, as it was the first coin that actually made me decide to be in Crypto for the long term. It made me more excited even than Bitcoin at the time because it was like a huge win for me to make 200 bucks from clicking faucets, such an easy job at the time!
The thread isn't about posting sexy pics as much about promoting the coin. This info should help you get restarted (don't forget the android wallet for you mobile device) SexCoin (SXC) 60 Second Block Time Target Scrypt Algorithm / KGW enabled / Merge-minable @ block 3080000 250,000,000 total coin maximum Sexcoin was activated in May 2013, providing a mechanism for people in the Adult industry to provide goods and services via our purpose built crypto currency. SXC aims to provide adult content consumers, performers and producers a fast, stable and secure method of accepting micro transactions, protecting their customers privacy and progressing adult retail services into the crypto age. Wallets:Sexcoin's Slack channel: JoinDiscord: https://discord.gg/3cEFKpsExchanges:*Exchanges are listed for convenience not as endorsements, trade at your own risk(do your homework!)Regards,
|
|
|
Hey. I am in need 200-400usd loan. I will be paying it soon as i can! We can discuss more in telegram if you pm ur nickname to me. pm me with ur contact details and i will be in touch!
And your collateral is what exactly?
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Today is 2019-09-15. I am mm2543363580 from bitcointalk.org -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1BL7Ab3tenocfoAxZBhwYDbzhas9dfhDLA IDDgvFDFLvrDj5CH3dfMipg/3iWhdOoFTH5RIt2VFgbfTdXPjERVs/7Z4bdHe+YPlPjHdIO/oczceTIEHSxNHV8= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Quoted and archived for future reference.
|
|
|
i haven't read much about sexcoin earlier and now i am finished with OP , but is there any thing related to the name except nice pictures with beautiful lady's promoting it?
any way nice price to jump in a little
With an Android version of the wallet, merge mining in place (along with healthy mining to process transactions) and multiple exchanges ensuring price stability, now is the time to start using sexcoin for more private transactions that you wouldn't want showing up in other places such as credit card transactions.
|
|
|
Hodl, sell or other???
That seems to be the decision most altcoins are facing at the moment - what's your long term plan for SexCoin?
|
|
|
Hey @theymos - might want to factor in detecting the same IP for daily bumps if you know what I'm getting at.
|
|
|
Reserved #3 for miscellaneous
|
|
|
Reserved #2 for UNsuccessful trades
|
|
|
Timelord2067's Timely Test and Main-neT LighTning Loans to a "T" Tally-room. Reserved #1 for successful tradesUpdated 24/11/2019
|
|
|
Update: Will be back in operation around about June 01, 2020, 02:00:00 AM (your local time) for main-net and test-net lightning network loans up to seven days duration after having managed to finally get all my funds out of the old Éclair wallet and install a new Éclair wallet with healthy inbound and outbound capacity. Main-net: (Inbound BTC 0.02 and outbound BTC 0.005 - Test-net is similar)
Other updates are in progress. My Lightning Node Lending is now ON_LINE for 2020!
Timelord2067's Timely Test & Main-neT LighTning Loans to a "T" (last modified 26th November, 2019 dot point seven) Updated terms:- Lending amount changed to BTC 0.00002 and I no longer lend testnet coins (but will do a test exchange where you send first)
- 24/Nov/2019 Loan terms updated in dot point 12. 24 hours = zero %. Up-to seven days = 1%. Over seven days = not available at this time.
26/Nov/2019 added dotpoint 14 - list of other lenders (not exhaustive). Added to dot-point 7a - will deny if you make multiple loan applications simultaneously. - 16 Oct 2019 Dot point 9iii If we have been communicating in open forum then I will take this into consideration Dot point 12 now becomes 11b.
- 28/Sep/2019 Dot point 7a - I may decline loan if you have other outstanding loans.
- 22/Sep/2019 Clarified dot points 10 (prefer no split payments) and 13 (right to start a spam accusation)
Daily bump.
Am around for next couple of hours if people want to submit lightning loan applications.CLOSED!
I am starting a Lightning Loan thread with near identical conditions to the one that LoyceV recently locked. Locked: LoyceV's Legendary Little Lightning LoansLoanNo collateral required. Amount: 0.1 mBTC (0.0001 BTC, or 10,000 satoshi). Duration: one week. Interest: 1% (0.001 mBTC (=0.000001 BTC or 100 satoshi)). Conditions: Members (and higher) without red trust on DT2 all account ranks can apply.To apply1. Make sure you have inbound capacity. 2. Post a Bitcoin Lightning Network payment request for 0.1 mBTC. Make sure it doesn't expire too soon (in case I'm not online). Repayment 3. When you want to pay back, let me know and I'll post a payment request. DisclaimerSelf-moderated to stop spam from users who don't read and ask for a on-chain Bitcoin loan. I reserve the right to reject or accept users as I please. This topic is experimental, if it works out I might add Larger Lightning Loans later. Don't take a small loan to get positive feedback, join to try the Lightning Network ChallengeHelp me add more sensible words (starting with a T) to the title ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
As well as the above conditions, the following are to be noted:
|
|
|
NZ regulated blockchain biz goes bananas WRU motherfucking Star Lord?
Were it a regulated company, then there would have been overseeing checks and balances to ensure the theft would have been far less than it was (cold wallets, and locking out hackers to name two mind bendingly obvious examples) - feel free to give yourself the finger too...
|
|
|
... The judge ruled that Grant Thornton knowingly sold Mr. Yung a bogus and abusive tax shelter. Too funny for words (when you get to that point you laugh at how absurd this has become)
|
|
|
...
Oh WOW! Muchly argument solved with a Gif! *Case Closed* ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
My understanding is that the more merits you have the stronger your DT votes are in groups of 250 merits.
|
|
|
I won't go so far as to say this makes him a "scammer," but its pretty dishonest behavior. Its obvious what TS has been doing over the past few months, and its evidenced best by him adding 6 Turkish local board DT1s to his trust list weeks or days after they were added to DT1.
There should really be an open discussion as to whether or not this type of behavior is an acceptable practice for a DT1 member, and as shown by the fact that TECSHARE is now back at -1, its safe to say that the community agrees that its not.
Let's take a look at his include/exclude history according to BPIP:
7/23/2019 9:34:59 PM TECSHARE (0) trusts by rallier (2) 7/28/2019 3:18:28 AM TECSHARE (0) no longer trusts by rallier
7/23/2019 9:45:04 PM TECSHARE (0) trusts PHI1618 (1)
8/2/2019 5:33:52 PM Matthias9515* (2) trusts TECSHARE 8/2/2019 8:25:25 PM TECSHARE (0) trusts Matthias9515 (2)
8/4/2019 10:00:19 PM TECSHARE (0) trusts bobita (2) 8/5/2019 10:07:57 AM bobita (2) trusts TECSHARE (0)
9/4/2019 4:43:55 PM TECSHARE (0) trusts Kalemder (1) 9/6/2019 5:32:09 AM TECSHARE (0) no longer trusts Kalemder (1) 9/6/2019 5:24:47 PM TECSHARE (0) trusts Kalemder (1) 9/7/2019 2:29:57 AM Kalemder (1) trusts TECSHARE (0)
9/7/2019 3:50:44 AM TECSHARE (0) trusts mhanbostanci (2) 9/7/2019 10:13:59 AM mhanbostanci (2) trusts TECSHARE (0)
*became DT1 at this time
As you can see, Matthias9515 was the only member to trust TECSHARE first, and TS didn't get a reciprocal trust from by rallier or PHI1618. He also added Vispilio to his list, who recently fell off DT1 for not having the minimum requirements. He also did the same thing with WhiteManWhite:
(sometime between 3/31 and 4/6) TECSHARE trusts WhiteManWhite 5/30/2019 2:39:17 PM WhiteManWhite (2) trusts TECSHARE (0)
Would you trust somebody who goes around adding new DT1s to his trust list despite having no previous interaction with them whatsoever, and who doesn't speak their native tongue? I wouldn't.
I can forgive the new DTs for not really having a respect for or knowledge of how the trust system works, but as TECSHARE is one of the more veteran members of the forum, he should really know better than this by now.
You are supposed to be adding members to your trust list who you _trust_, and who you think do a good job of leaving feedback, not out of hopes that they will reciprocate by adding you to their lists.
Allowing this kind of thing to happen without calling it out sets a dangerous precedent going forward. These are just some of the people who conspired to create a fake flag against me here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181723.0 after I exposed their collaboration in this flag thread here: [Flag] DT ring creation discussion / merit abuse / collusion to harm BCT https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181603.0Most of the people in the thread overlooked the fact that their ringleader obtained merits by deception. Then, instead of handing them out to who was promised, handed them out in a criss-cross pattern to bump a select few into DT1/2. From what I can see mhanbostanci is the only one to make it to DT1 and has given me negative trust wall feedback.
TECSHARE has made a very thinly veiled threat to stalk me unless I remove my *neutral* trust/feedback post (last paragraph and his "PS") in this now archived post: https://web.archive.org/web/20190908033629/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181723.msg52379325It would seem that Tecshare is making good on his thread by throwing his hat into the ring with these collaborators.
|
|
|
Inbound channel is 0.01 so should be good... 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
|
|
|
|