Hm, when i checked that link from ninjastic.space, this is what I got, posi application for Sudoku Wallet signature campaign. But you are right, that redirect link leads to Brain Space airdrop topic.

We all know that there is nothing wrong with having an alt account, as long as you don't break bounty campaign rules and exchange the trust or merit between your alts, but those two accounts did the latter. It will be interesting to hear an explanation for this.

As it can be seen from hulla bpip screenshot below, they exchanged quite a few merit between themselves. Hulla sent 25 merit to posi, and posi sent 12 merit back.


https://bpip.org/Profile?p=hulla

And once again all this is fault of a sloppy designer (who also has a fake photo)...



Team members section is laughable and looking like its been written by a 14 year old. Just look at this description of their developers Thomas Jane and Angel Mihu. Who wouldn't be confident in success of the project that has such an experienced developers who "complete their work very quickly and completely". Rest of the team members description ain't any better.





Yep, one of the oldest tricks in the book. Smarter ones are using AI generated images, which are sometimes much harder to detect while these nincompoops think that using basic filter will hide the real source.


NFT might lead the next bubble, so no surprise that scammers are already adapting to that using it as a buzzword to attract the investors. One thing we know about scammers that they keep adapting to new market condition.

3 accounts connected:

1.julanbex
2.bangghali_part2
3.lalala0402

First connection is through ETH address 0x28541DD0F544d7B038509b851B1516B1782dc395 which both julanbex and lalala0402 used

https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5464/54642995.html

https://loyce.club/archive/oldposts/440/440579xx.html#msg44057910


And then there is a connection between julanbex and bangghali_part2 via ETH address 0x677BC3d068d8f6680b21CCAA55ff5d34450AE308

https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5249/52498694.html

https://loyce.club/archive/oldposts/431/431448xx.html#msg43144893

Just look at this case from yesterday, Newbie copying votes from another member. Now, some might say that this was pure coincidence, that two members voted for exactly the same people in all 13 categories and I guess that could happen, but  this guy even included the two typos of the person he copied from, making it an obvious and mindless c/p. Before this he never posted outside bounty section in his bitcointalk career, but he decided to seize the opportunity.

First user Kojektea voted and while doing so, he made a few typos.

And then few hours later Newbie account appeared with exactly the same votes, including the typos which I put in bold. Mission accomplished, he got what he came for.


Edit: Newbie in question (now Jr Member) is ban evading, as he has 2 banned accounts already. Here is the proof.

One more project that is puting the blame on the designer. Those fake photos are both in your whitepaper and website. Did he designed your whitepaper too?

If betting is forbidden in your country, how will your CEO properly develop the project if he has to hide all the time?I don't see how this can work. Also, you claim that CEO worked in Casino, but yet again is betting is somehow forbidden. That doesn't make much sense either. On top of that, if you really wanted to stay anonymous you could just say so, and not use another people's photos and then trying to hide the source by applying filters.

What about other three team members? Are their photos and identities real, as you said only two had to hide their identity?


Yeah I think so too. They want people to invest in their project, and people are more inclined to do so when they see team member photos. As simple as that.

As far as I am concerned, both tag and flag stays as I can't trust someone who does such thing.

Hi tapstoken.

Care to explain why you used another people's photos for at least two of your team members? Not that I know any legit explanation for this but I would still like to hear it.

As explained in the link below, photos of your CEO Christian Propst and Graphic Designer Jim Hopper. I see no reason why honest and legit company would do something unethical like this.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5296583.0

What happened: Tapsgame Casino is using fake team member photo for their CEO and Founder "Christian Propst" and Graphic Designer "Jim Hopper". Beside that huge red flag, they didn't provide any social media links for any team members, just some ridiculous few words explanations about them.

Flag Type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2504

Ann https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5296287.0
Archive https://archive.fo/pkBoP

Website https://tapsgame.com/
Archive https://archive.fo/z3Wz7

Whitepaper https://tapsgame.com/whitepaper.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20201204160211/https://tapsgame.com/whitepaper.pdf



According to Tapsgame website, this is picture of Christian Props, their CEO and Founder and he is as they put it "manager who knows". As you can see, photo is put through some sort of filter, probably to hide the real source.




A little bit of reverse image search and what you get is the original picture without filters. Thing is, real person behind this picture is not called Christian Props, but Jordan Kamcev, North Macedonian businessman and according to his wiki page and Forbes, richest person in North Macedonia.




Then there is another fake team member photo. According to Tapsgame, this is Jim Hopper, graphic designer



And this is the real picture they used. Person on the photo is Ammar Ahmad, CEO of AMR Hair & Beauty, Australian company.  





tl;dr Two out of five team members with fake team members photo means that most likely rest is fake too, therefore this is nothing but a scam made for getting people's money and then disappearing without the trace. Please tag the OP and support the flag!

Znam da neki nisu mogli spavati od brige i uzjebanosti, ali evo napokon je tu, zeljno iscekivana mjesecna analiza naseg boarda

Kao i uvijek do sada, podaci su  preuzeti sa @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboarda. Detalje mozete naci tamo.

---

Broj postova u periodu 1.11-30.11

Iako sam nekako ocekivao da budemo jos bolji nego u 10/2020 kad je napisano 946 postova, prosli mjesec smo ipak bili  malo slabiji. 800 napisanih postova je otprilike 15% pad, tako da nije neki razlog za uzbunu. Samim time smo i malo pali kad se uspredjujemo sa ostalim boardovima, ali vjerujem da cemo ovaj mjesec biti jos bolji jer smo napokon dobili dodatne podforume, te se vratio bitan clan HR dijela foruma.

Sto se tice ovog pie charta dolje, on izgleda malo cudno jer su neki boardovi otisli u minus kod prebacivanja, ali to ce se sve srediti kad migracija tema zavrsi.




Aktivnost boarda po mjesecima, cisto da se dobije cjelovitija slika




A ovako izgleda chart kad se uspredimo sa ostalim lokalnim boardovima. Prosli mjesec smo bili cetvrti najaktivniji board a ovaj mjesec smo malo pali, ali i dalje je to prilicno dobro. Najvece iznenadjenje su Rusi i Turci koji su zamjenili mjesta. Mozda su Rusi napokon smanjili kolicinu shitpostanja i spama koji se tamo odvija.

Jedna novost je i to da sam odlucio dodati i par threadova iz  Other Languages/Locations koji nemaju svoje lokalne boardove (Bangladesh, pakistan, Nigerija i Srbija) te su oznaceni sa *.

---

Analiza merita za period 1.11-30.11

Unatoc padu broja postova, broj podijeljenih merita nastavlja rasti zadnjih par mjeseci. U odnosu na prethodno razdoblje se  povecao sa 181 na 210, sto je 5. najbolji rezultat uopce. Osim naravno nasih membera i merit sourceva, za ovakav fin broj je zaluzno  i par clanova izvan naseg boarda tako da mislim da bi se trebalo cesce koristit onu temu Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source. Ja sam u zadnjih par tjedana prijavio nasa 3 clana kojima su ti "vanjski" pomogli sa par merita koje im je falilo za rankanje tako da mislim da ne bi bilo lose da  nastavimo sa time dok dkbit98 ne postane merit source.

Evo i liste onih koji su dijelili i dobijali merite




Ovako to izgleda po mjesecima, vidi se fina uzlazna putanja zadnja 3 mjeseca te se nadam da ce se tako i nastaviti.

---

Ostale chartove sa usporedbama nas i ostalih boardova cu napraviti za par dana jer su tek danas izasli podaci za merit.

Istu stvar radi i u onom community vote topicu, daje sakom i kapom svima koji glsaju za njega, i naravno da glasovi idu kad ekipa vidi nacin da se dobije lagani merit. Vec sam mu planirao to reci, ali ovo za intervju je jos gore, jer je njegov fakat bez veze kad usporedis sa ostalima, ali fakat mu nisam vise mogao presutit pa sam ga prozvao https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5294958.msg55748709#msg55748709

@CryptopreneurBrainboss Is it really necessary to award everyone that votes for your interview with merit? I fully understand that you can do with your merit whatever you want, but imho that's not the best use of merit you got as a merit source. Rest assured, there will be people who will vote for you only based on that, as that's what people do when they see chance for an easy merit.

As a matter of fact you are doing the same thing in that Community awards thing, and also ain't cool at all.

I am pretty sure that he had an honest intention to pay you back, but this sudden increase in BTC price competely messed his plans and what was once 4 USD loan now it's 8 USD so it's no surprise that he has issues repaying it.

Joke aside, this has to be one of the most ridiculous cases of loan default. To basically ruin reputation over 4 USD is just insane. Zero fucks given from that guy.

Imas vremena do 17.12 da promjenis glas, tako da sansa za  merit jos nije izgubljena . Ali smijesno mi je vidit kako su odmah low level accounti to skuzili pa glasaju za njega.


Pa mozemo i ovdje obrazlagati  svoje glasove. Ja sam glasao za DeFi kao Fail Of The Year prvenstveno zbog kolicine scama koji se nakacio na to i snizavanja kriterija za ulaganje i listanje na mjenjacnice. Vise ti ne treba ni whitepaper ni team, dovoljan je hype i velik volumen da se nakon dan-dva pojavis na Binance (npr SushiSwap). Naravno nitko nije nikome kriv sto ulozi u takve dubiozne projekte, ali eto ne mislim da je to zdravo za kripto trziste. Hrpa ljudi ce popusiti lovu pa ce reci da je sav crypo scam, kao sto smo vidjeli 2017/2018.

Da se razumijemo, ne mislim da je sav DeFi scam, ima tu i zanimljivih projekata i primjena a bit ce ih i jos, ali trenutno mi velika vecina lici na get rich quick scheme.

Bas naprotiv, on je specifican po tome sto njegove kampanje nude malu lovu a redovno imaju velike zahtjeve (bar ove nove koje donosi). Serem mu se u carapu za ono da ne moze staviti sve boardove koji se ne broje pod istu stavku, nego je sve razbacano. Ali tako to ide kad ce c/p pravila od nekog drugog bez puno razmisljanja.


@RegulusHr Iako je Bitvest s razlogom omrazena kampanja (mislim da smo kao board po prvi put od kad sam ja ovdje totalno Bitvest free) mislim da nije lose za pocetak prijaviti se tamo. Postovi se broje skoro svuda, a tih 15 postova lako odradis i u nasem dijelu. Jebiga od negdje se treba krenuti. Doduse mislim da ces ipak morati biti aktivan jedno vrijeme prije nego te prihvate.

I just checked Croatian local board, and at least one thread's reply count is off (by 1 ). At first I thought that only threads with deleted posts might be affected, but then I found few threads that have correct reply count while also having bunch of posts deleted, so I guess that cant be the reason for discrepancy.


Will you start reading the posts properly before shitposting in order to fill the signature quota? You keep doing the same thing, littering the forum. I honestly can't believe that you are paid 40 USD per week to write that kind of garbage.

Once again I am asking for help. User @cryptofrka is an active member and  valuable part of Croatian local board that's been on the forum for some time and is a few merits short to reach Hero rank. He is also our TA guy, sharing regularly his opinion on the current market movements. So, if you have some merit to spare and don't know where to spend, check him out please.

User: cryptofrka
Activity: 1008
Merit: 491

Few representative posts:
1. Re: Bitcoin TA (Analiza)
2. Re: [Interviews] with Bitcointalk members
3. Re: Bitcoin TA (Analiza) (trading sources and tutorials)

Thanks in advance and cheers!

Edit: goal reached, thanks @Halab and @LoyceV!

Prije malo vise od mjesec dana @icopress je pokrenuo glasanje za "najbolje" membere u 13 razlicitih kategorija, cisto kao neki nacin da se podsjetimo na najistaknutije clanove foruma. Posto sam skuzio da je jako mali odaziv clanova sa naseg dijela jer znam da dosta njih izbjegava metu, cisto mali podsjetnik na to.

Glasanje i nagrade su revijalnog karaktera znaci nema nikakvih custom titula ili novcane nagrade. Nominacije traju do 17.12 nakon kojeg krece glasanje, te napomena da je Full Member minimalan rank ciji ce se glas brojati.

Tema za glasanje: 🏆 Bitcointalk Community Awards [Voting 2020]
Tema za raspravu 🏆 Bitcointalk Community Awards [Discussion]


Popis kategorija:

---

Jedna zanimljivost: pogodite tko dijeli merite svima koji predloze njega u jednoj od kategorija (hint: najpopularniji manager na nasem dijelu )

I think that @icopress mentioned somewhere that we are free to change the votes as we like until the deadline so I guess counting starts after that. Speaking of that, it wasn't easy at all to narrow it down in some categories (for me hardest was scambusting&spambusting and Discovery of the Year) so I am still reconsidering some votes. Then again, I tend to overthink everything, that's why it took me so long to finally vote. The only no brainer for me was Lauda as antihero.

In regard to lower rank members showing up, if there is some merit sharing going on, you can be sure that some will try to get some in an easy way.

This is not how mod system works, you can't just say "I am willing to work for free, make me a mod", and you get one. I highly doubt this is a matter of payment, but whether admins think we need local mod or not, based on certain criteria like number of spam posts and possibly overall board activity. We have another topic in meta about the same subject and another one in Croatian local board so rest assured we are doing what we can.

Regarding your previous suggestion that you mentioned, iirc that post was deleted so you should see it as hint not to talk about stuff you don't know much about just in order to fill signature quota and yet again you come with the same thing.

Since majority of account sales happen outside of the forum, I don't think that ban would change much. Account buyers and sellers on forum get tagged anyway so thats almost as good as a ban.

Regarding the proposal to reset airdropped merit partially, this seems like a bit too drastic of a measure in order to stop something as account sale ( maybe I'm naive/ignorant on the matter but I don't think that's happening on a mass scale) and might affect those that don't have anything to do with shady business but just decided to take longer hiatus from forum.