I guess that's the result of a paraphrasing bot. Maybe even Google-translated content inserted into a paraphrasing bot.

He has other posts similar to that crap. Here is one example:


I wanted to see how these bots work so I found a random one, took a paragraph out of some article about Bitcoin investments, and paraphrased it.
Here are the results:


It still kind of looks like a human wrote it. That's why there might be multiple bots at work and a foreign language.

I kad je Anchor Protokol počeo da smanjuje kamatne stope pokazalo se da projekt nema nikakav use case i lošu zajednicu hodlera koji su počeli da ga masovno prodaju i burn-aju u zamjenu za Lunu. Preveliko mintanje Lune je onda uticalo i na njenu cijenu i sve je krenulo nizbrdo. Čitao sam jedan članak kako trejderi na Curve Finance nisu željeli da iskoriste razliku u cijeni kad je UST počeo da gubi vezu sa USD. Jednostavno nisu više željeli da ga imaju i izgubljeno je povjerenje.     

That makes sense. Whether I pay you in cash, Bitcoin, herbs and spices, or precious stones, I am paying for a service that you rendered. On the other hand, if you were to purchase and invest in Bitcoin with the intention to sell it in the future and double your money, that would probably not be acceptable.

Are you sure about that? I don't think interest is allowed in Islam. Googling it finds plenty of sources saying it isn't.

Then there is Islamic Banking.

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2013/oct/29/islamic-finance-sharia-compliant-money-interest

Banks do make money though (obviously) but in some other means as described in the article.

I am quite sure that the noticeable drop in activity and general interest of new members for the forum is the reason the admins are somewhat more careful with issuing permanent bans. I visited the bounty section the other day just to see how it was doing and it seems the activity has somewhat dropped there as well. Taking all that into consideration, being extra strict with bans is probably not in the best interest of the forum right now. Having users plagiarize all over the place is also not something we want to see, so a middle ground needs to be found.   

I don't know about Egypt, but I remember reading that the government of Pakistan was considering banning all Bitcoin and crypto-related transactions at the beginning of 2022. I am not sure how all that ended. Besides that, Pakistan is an Islamic nation that respects Sharia law. And according to Sharia law, crypto is forbidden. Anything that involves interest, gambling, and speculating is against the law. I am certainly not an expert on the subject, but I would be interested to hear what someone who is says about it. Muslim nations have a very traditionalist viewpoint and they don't deviate from what they consider to be values that must be maintained. 

Dybala wasn't sold. His contract expires at the end of the season and after that he becomes a free agent. He is free to go wherever he wants. The contract couldn't have been extended because Dybala requested too high of a salary. Someone might say that the club could have given him the wages he requested and then sell him. But that creates other problems. He isn't playing at his best and it would be difficult to find a club willing to offer him the same (or better) financial terms. And Juventus would be stuck paying too high wages. Something similar is happening with Alex Sandro, for example. The guy is basically retarded, but not even weaker clubs want him because he earns too much.

There are no more Play-off rounds for those finishing 4th in the Italian Serie A. All 4 clubs are automatically qualified for the Champions League. The rules were the same last season as well.

I heard about that during the weekend. When UST started losing it's peg to the USD, the Luna Foundation Guard started selling off their reserve assets in an attempt to stop the breakdown and try to salvage the situation. As you can see from this photo in one of the comments on that tweet you linked to, LFG confirmed earlier in May that they owned 80.394 BTC. 

When I type in English with my phone, I like to use the swype feature and just slide my finger from letter to letter. I find it to be quicker and with less errors than with normal typing of letter by letter. So in terms of typing, I don't mind either option. I don't like the overall experience of using Bitcointalk with my phone, but that's a different thing.

The split quote feature could (if introduced) be used by anyone and considering that many people prefer mobile phones these days or don't have a laptop/PC at all, it would make things easier. 

No, not really. Bitcoins don't grow on trees and they wont simply become available to the population the day after they adopt it as legal tender. Sure, you can make an airdrop similarly to what was done in El Salvador. But Bitcoin won't land you a job at that auto dealership across the road if there are no jobs available, or no auto dealership at all due to the overall state of the country.

One might argue that Bitcoin offers opportunities of remote work. Sure, that's true, but so does PayPal, WU, Skrill, freelancing sites, and many other ways to get paid in fiat. There is potential for Bitcoin in areas where people are unbanked, but not if they sleep in the dirt, use a rock for a pillow, and don't even have drinking water. Those poor souls have more important things to care about than a decentralized economy.

All those are poor nations from Africa, Central, and South America. With or without Bitcoin, that won't change. The effects would be similar to when the Central African Republic adopted Bitcoin. It didn't do anything good. It is just a different payment method that people without electricity, internet, computers, and phones should now be using somehow. Nothing good can come out of forcing people to use Bitcoin. That transition should come natural and that's the only healthy way.

Both the name and the functionality of the site is important. I personally prefer more attention be given to site functionality. You can easily forgive the casino for having an unusual or even a bad name, but you will never forget a negative experience you had playing there.

It's difficult to get a good domain these days. There are numerous casinos out there already, but there are even more taken domain names. Just try to create a meaningful combination using "bet" as a domain and see for yourself. Almost everything you can think of has already been taken. 

I already explained that receiving address 1 has to be funded before Ledger Live will generate and display receiving address 2. It's logical that if you generate a new address, close the software, generate an address again, LL will display the same address in both cases. The first address never received any coins, you will be seeing it until some BTC is transferred to it. It's normal.

---

I can't concentrate on your unnecessary walls of text. I will only answer what I remember reading it the first time.
When you click on any transaction you received in LL, you will see the transaction history. No idea why you have problems understanding the information shown there. But there is also a link taking you to a blockchain explorer where you can see the addresses involved in the transaction. Click on it. Alternatively, connect, and open your wallet in Electrum and check the addresses tab. It will show you all funded addresses and the balances.

To check your portfolio in Ledger Live, click on the "Accounts" tab. All your Bitcoin and altcoin accounts will be displayed there and the balances will be clearly shown for all of them.   

The shipping is quite expensive. I remember checking it back when n0nce created his review and it was $40 no matter where you ship it to. I randomly tried with different EU, non-EU, and South American countries, but the rates never changed.

Their reseller network is not bad.

• They have the UK covered with BTC Direct.
• Cryptomaan is for costumers from the Netherlands and Belgium.
• Other European countries include Slovenia, Russia, and Ukraine.
• Asia has only one reseller located in Malaysia.

https://foundationdevices.com/resellers/

Imagine all those signature campaign participants who receive their payments directly in their casino accounts on a weekly basis. There are such campaigns. I remember when I was in the old FJ campaign. The weekly rates were always paid out to your casino account. According to Gemini or Binance.US, those coins are tainted, dirty, and worthless, and will probably by frozen or confiscated if I try to deposit them on those sites. Yet, I did nothing wrong. I provided a service and was paid for it.

I think I get it now.

So, If I say:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

LoyceV wants an easy way to do:

Reply here
Reply here
Reply here
That's very useful, especially for those posting from a phone. It's not that difficult to split the quotes with a few additional clicks and copy/pastes on a computer, but the experience is much worse when using a phone.

Yeah, do that. Share it here. I am sure many would be interested in what's out there.  

No, you are human. We are a species with flaws of all kinds. Anyone active in these technical boards feel dumb at times when they see the levels of knowledge those top posters possess. No harm in that. Btw, I am not counting myself in that group just so we are clear.     

Thanks for the contribution. Since those gift cards are not proper hardware wallets, I will not add them to the table. 


No, you didn't. I did back in December when I created this discussion, so everything is OK. But thanks for the laugh and for freaking out a little bit.

Of course it makes no sense. Even a direct transaction between a gambling platform and a centralized exchange can involve two different people and doesn't mean that the same person owns both addresses. It's quite possible that person A has sold Bitcoin to person B, and person A made that transaction from a casino they use. Person B received the coins in their exchange account on a CEX. Accusing person B of illegal activities or having tainted coins is out of order.

Those Terms and Conditions are written in such a way that gives them the right to freeze or block your accounts for whatever reasons they think are necessary. After that, they can request from you whatever proof they deem necessary, including KYC. You have a choice to play ball and do what they say, or give them your coins. A third choice is never depositing there in the first place.    

But there isn't one in LoyceV's example. One quote tag is closed, he opens a new one, but where is the closing one? Besides, multiple quotes require multiple closing quote tags. What am I missing here?

Have you ever considered the following: All these altcoins and shitcoins that are created are all being advertised as the best thing you will ever come across in your life. But then you have bounty campaigns and signature campaigns where they are giving away tons of it. If it was that good, and those tokens were so much better than crappy old Bitcoin, wouldn't you want to keep most of them for yourself and "trick" the gullible investors and campaign participants into accepting Bitcoin? Paying them in worthless coins, and gladly taking their Bitcoin shows the real intentions.