This is completely normal in pump and dump scams, Ponzi schemes, and pyramid schemes.  If people like you did not exist, the aforementioned scams would never work and we would have no word to describe their existence. 

Mexicans praying they don't die while mining silver in a mine.  When's the last time you saw anyone praying they don't die before attempting to try and mine Bitcoin?  And yet there are retards on this forum who claim "space mining" at 1000x higher cost and danger is somehow going to make metals not function as money and make Bitcoin better.  If the Mexicans are already praying they don't die at work on earth, the space mining workforce would need to be composed completely of Muslim suicide bombers.

I would not want to be one of the several hundred trannies on those things going to die for international Jewish banking to Iran and Russia.  Just look at them.  These are primitive contraptions called "ironsides" used in things like...THE CIVIL WAR.  There's little change in functionality or movement speed since.  Meanwhile, weapon and air systems have evolved 4 billion percent, so you just show up and say "hello, please kill me now".

Since the nature of reality dictates that women are only interested in men they deem to be superior in social status, wealth, intelligence, and everything else, it would have to be a compliment.  A non-misogynist would be someone who irrationally puts women up on a pedestal even though women ideologically reject said activity and have zero respect for anyone doing so.  In that context, saying someone is not a misogynist would basically be the same thing as calling them a retard.

Why do you scammers try to push completely laughable lies obvious to virtually anyone as truth?  Any energy used in Bitcoin is purely sunk cost fallacy.  There is no 'storage' of energy being done anywhere.  Not even caveman IQ Micgoossens and JayJuanGee probably believe this.

If you dig uranium ore or oil out of the ground, there's a thermodynamic relationship at play here where the amount of energy you're spending is generally always far less than what you're receiving.  You have harnessed a resource. Bitcoin is not a resource.  Claiming Bitcoin is a metastable energy source that can then be agitated to release energy is the biggest fucking joke I've ever heard in my life.  Any energy spent on Bitcoin is gone with no future payoff. That's called sunk cost fallacy.  You should be insta-banned for even typing such stupid lies to try and deceive people.

I don't know what this Engrish is supposed to mean, but the altcoin manias of the past seem to be pretty much over never to be seen again.  One reason being the pump and dumps ran out of greater fools, and another being that GPU mining seems to be getting pushed out by specialized (aka centralized) hardware.  Some people think altcoins dying is a positive thing for Bitcoin but it's not.  Bitcoin is completely centralized and the act of being able to GPU mine an altcoin was one of the only things that allowed the ecosystem to onboard new people.  Get rid of general purpose, GPU hardware mining and it's a dead, closed entropy system.

With that quote I think we can officially anoint September 20th, 2019 as peak digital shitcoin scam.

Straight to $100k they said.  Stock to flow model works on Ponzi schemes they said.  Ponzi schemes are the future of international (interstellar? interdimensional?) finance they said.

Here comes the JayJuanGee post
All in your face
The Bitcoin propaganda is live in effect and he don't waste time
Typing up a single coherent line
Jump to the JayJuanGee Post
Jump jump to the JayJuanGee Post Jump

It says Jews at Goldman Sachs have purchased lots of imaginary, centralized, digital shitcoins that have no value whatsoever and are looking for someone to dump them on but there's a global liquidity crisis and peak debt so no greater fool exists.  We will then attempt to waive regulatory requirements in order to dump them on you.

People always ask me some derivative of this question, so let's set the record straight.  Bitcoin was never the future or a sure thing to me.  I always saw it for exactly what it was, a sort of experimental contraption with extremely questionable "decentralization" and poor options for scalability due to the inherent extreme overhead of anything using a blockchain.  Nevertheless, the so called value prospect of Bitcoin was NEVER what it currently is *right now*, it's value proposition was always what it could possibly be some other day in the future.

Where the problem with this arises is, although digital shitcoins are composed of completely arbitrary variables, the number of ways you can create a digital shitcoin are actually very finite; finite enough where anyone with sufficient economic, technical, and even physics knowledge already knows all the possibilities at this point for variables such as 'focal points'.  Once you know all these possibilities, you know it was never even possible to create a decentralized digital currency in the first place - not now, not in the future.

The summary of these focal point systems is that they're mostly just a rehash of governance systems that have already existed for thousands of years.  Hence the existence of things like the 51% attack - it's not an 'attack', it's just a stupid form of democracy.  Why would anyone ever submit their personal finances to be governed by some unaccountable, faceless bureaucracy when you don't even know who the owners are.  And yes, they all turn into a centralized, unelected slum lord govt because proof of work isn't actually 'work'.  No 'work' is being done, all you're doing is putting an ASIC on cruise control and collecting interest then parlaying the profits into more interest generating ASICs, so it's just like any exponential interest system - complete centralization.

If you wanted digital shitcoins to actually be valid and not a retarded exponential interest system that completely centralizes, you would need to create a digital shitcoin that requires humans to physically solve some sort of captcha in a race for blocks.  In that manner you're not generating work-free interest because you can't parallelize your brain to solve thousands of captchas at the same time.  It's inherently restricted to one man, one vote such as the Bitcoin whitepaper fraudulently claims but fails to deliver.

Such a system would just be gamed by weak AI, so it's also completely useless.  Not to mention the fact there's STILL no point whatsoever in submitting your personal finances to an outside governance system by using imaginary, valueless, digital shitcoins with built-in rent seeking middlemen when you don't have to and can just use physical metals instead.

You are...a leftist shitlib that lives in California and tries to submit neo-Marxist propaganda articles to the Huffington Post while also believing JayJuanGee is a genius.  I don't even have words for this.  You have completely failed natural selection and are probably too stupid to live.

Seriously, how did you get to be so fucking stupid?  Yang is a globalist, international Jewry banking plant.  They know it's impossible to force the population into a blockchain-based, cashless society slavery system, so they plan to try and bootstrap said system by literally giving it away in the form of UBI.  

If people are given their blockchain slavery tokens for free, they will then be much more inclined to use it.  Then a few months later there will come 'terms' in order to receive your UBI, such as no 1st amendment, no 2nd amendment, no any amendment.  Then they'll decree the UBI blockchain is the only legal form of money and all others such as physical cash, gold, silver, etc are illegal.

It was supposedly from taking multi-vitamins and even though the vitamin B12 or whatever was supposed to be water soluble, they put in more than you can piss out per day or something and so you eventually poison yourself by taking them.  He claimed it was Vitamin B12, I think, but who knows.  Maybe he was mistaken and poisoned himself by taking vitamins with iron in it.

Can't find the original posts right now, but there's a rehash of my and Tera's calls in a April 2018 post (that we both originally made in 2017):


Tera was an okay bear, but didn't really talk about anything relevant besides guessing where the price of various pump and dump scams would go.  The only other person I've seen make any relevant posts in this thread instead of just standard retard pump and dump scammer posts was the guy who created a doppleganger account of me:

Don't worry.  Lambie Slayer is on the scene to tell everyone that the US is not a Jewish occupied country and everything is perfectly fine.

Bitcoin is doomed no matter what choice it makes between inflation or no inflation.  If Bitcoin doesn't go inflationary, as the static block reward plummets, everyone will just jump ship to another digital shitcoin that still has a block reward running in order to subsidize their transaction fees for lower cost transactions.  Or they would all jump ship to a proof of stake coin with less overhead even though proof of stake is even less decentralized (not that it's even possible to create a decentralized digital currency in the first place).

If Bitcoin does go inflationary to subsidize transaction fees to try and prevent people from jumping ship, then some other digital shitcoins will just do the opposite and keep a finite coin count to try and lure people in, then people flee Bitcoin anyway seeking a more Austrian experience.  Adding inflation to Bitcoin would also make it a joke since that was the main draw of the Ponzi that "coin count can't go over 21 million".  As you can see, since both options are a no win situation, Bitcoin would likely be forced to fork to proof of stake to minimize damage from the other two options even though PoS is an even more centralized joke.

The entire framework of this problem all falls back onto the fact digital shitcoins have no valid Schelling point due to being imaginary, artificial constructs that require no overhead to create a new one.  There's no such thing as a "finite 21 million limit" because human choice is allowed and the amount of chains that can be created is infinite, unlike in physical metals where choice is not allowed since nobody can create a new fork of physical silver or gold in their basement.  The number of inert, scarce, non-perishable, physical commodities suitable as money are also very low, mostly falling in the noble metals group.

Staged event by the Jewish Occupied States of America and Saudi Jew shills because I don't think oil exploration is even globally viable for less than $100 a barrel (assuming there's any oil to find somewhere).  Also to help prop up the shale oil ponzi + try to start a war with Iran as usual.  If no new oil discoveries are being financed because it's not financially viable, it creates a problematic Seneca cliff (as I said, assuming there is some oil to find somewhere). Why would Iran stage an attack that the US benefits from?

Why must I be surrounded by retarded, digital shitcoin scammers.  I miss the Aryan plains of Rhodesia.

This is another Lightning shitcoin fallacy.  Even if you for some reason don't care it's a completely centralized, permissioned ledger, the structure of LN assumes:

1)  Everyone on the planet is unfathomably rich and can afford to toss a million here and a million there into dozens of different channels that can't be combined to facilitate larger purchases.  Since most people live paycheck to paycheck, all or most of the money would generally always be in a single channel to maximize spending power for large purchases.  I.E. the hub and spoke model with every user having a single channel open to a bank.

2)  The structure of LN also assumes money has no time opportunity cost and instead of people investing their money in things, they're just going to mindlessly lock it all up in useless channels that make them no money when they could put their money to work elsewhere.  LN is a dystopian, permissioned ledger, but even if that doesn't bother you, it's still useless due to too many other drawbacks.