I agree with this and it seems logical, but I want to point out that I don't possess enough technical know-how to actually know if your interpretation is correct.
BIP39 seeds are a much more user-friendly representation of a long string that can easily be read by humans. Usually, when you add user-friendliness and simplicity to something, you also compromise security to some degree. How much and if any security at all was compromised with the introduction of the BIP39 standard is something for the more technically-gifted to comment on.

Jambler could organize raffles that include real physical items for those users willing to accept them and have them shipped either to their home address, their place of work, a PO box, etc. But if the winner doesn't want to give away their personal information, which some don't want to do, the alternative could be to offer the same value of the physical item in BTC. Both types of winners can get a prize that way.

No. I have never seen a similar system before.

All of us have a responsibility to teach our heirs and loved-ones how to access and what to do with backups. That doesn't change now with the introduction of a glyphs backup system. Someone who has never seen a 12/24 seed recovery word would have no idea what they are looking at, let alone glyphs.

You shouldn't lose any of the elements (the lines). You need the correct structure to decode the word. You should already have at least one paper backup somewhere. It's from that backup that you set up the glyphs recovery system.

I know. I mention that in my pros and cons section. You can use the glyphs to make backups on other materials.

We have heard of storing seeds on paper and metal and now there is a new method to do it on soda cans.
The company BitCan has released its solution for a DIY Bitcoin Seed Storage.

What's interesting here isn't the material used to store the seed but the type of encoding using glyphs.

What you need to create your seed

• A soda can
• A flat-head screwdriver
• A pen
• A piece of paper
• A printer to print out the template

BitCan has created a template that anyone can print, and it looks like this:



After you print the template, you can translate your seed words into glyphs. You should already have a securely generated seed. Each word from the wordlist has its unique pattern, which you can see on the website. Here is an example:



Setup Process

• Using the table with the glyphs, draw your seed words on the printed template.
• Stick the filled-out template on a flattened soda can.
• Take a screwdriver and etch the glyphs into the can. Use a light hammer if necessary.
• Double-check if everything is correct, and find a place to store the metal backup.

Here are a few pictures of how it could look:


Decoding Instructions

• BitCan recommends writing down all glyphs on a piece of paper. Better yet, use the provided template.
• Look at the bottom square of each glyph first to identify which starting letter the symbol belongs to.
• After that, identify the upper square to find the correct word.
• An alternative is using binary search to go through the word list.

Pros

1. It's inconspicuous. You wouldn't know what it is even if you saw it somewhere. Even those familiar with seed phrases wouldn't know what they are looking at unless they know about this seed storage method.
2. It's cheap/free. It requires zero investment, assuming you own an aluminum can, a pen, a screwdriver, a piece of paper, and a printer.
3. Easy to hide because it's thin and small.
4. Can be hidden in plain sight. If you are interested in ancient civilizations and have items or artifacts in your home, you could hide the plate there and make it seem like they are symbols from ancient history.
5. It provides protection against water and moisture.
6. You can use the glyphs system to make seed backups on better-quality materials than aluminum soda cans!

Cons 

1. It won't protect you against heat from a house fire.
2. Aluminum is more prone to corrosion than other more durable metals.
3. The encoding and especially the decoding process is time-consuming.
4. The possibility of making a mistake is greater than when backing up common seed words.   


Source:
https://bitcan.world/

I would say that falls in the 'not want to' category for the reason of the implementation not being safe enough.

Why do they consider it weak from a security standpoint? In other words, how much less secure is it, and are we talking about a worrying threat to a user's coins? A threat that is significant enough to not want to touch it. 

Electrum's seed system came before BIP39. I think they are two years apart. But the older versions of Electrum used something else for seed generation. The seed versioning system we have today came after BIP39 if I am not wrong. At what point did Electrum use BIP39?

You missed the word "don't" in your post above.

Ista stvar i kod mene. Preusmjeri me automatski na početnu stranicu. Ali onda u pregledniku sa desne strane možeš kliknuti na BTSE Card i tad je ok.

Nije u linku prisutan referral kod ali ne znam da li je i ovako dozvoljeno. Možda zavisi od moderatora do moderatora. Jedan će možda reć može, drugi ne može. Kako god, nema ovdje toliko ljudi koji mu mogu svojom registracijom preko njegovog linka donjeti neki značajniji benefit i mislim da bi bila šteta da moderatori temu izbrišu ako je vide zbog nećeg kao što je ref. kod.

It could turn out to be groundbreaking technology for many reasons and use cases, but it's not going to revolutionize Bitcoin mining. ASICs are hundreds and probably thousands of times faster than GPUs. A speed increase of 2x thanks to SHMT won't make much of a difference. I am familiar with the idea of merged mining, but nothing more than that to comment on that part.

It's also going to be interesting to see if SHMT could have a negative impact on the lifespan of computer hardware. Perhaps the increase in speed also shortens the life of the chips.

I don't use Bitcoin Core so I don't know the answer to your question. However, you should download the IanColeman tool and use it offline on an airgapped setup. That's the safest and most recommended way to work with it. If you use the tool on an airgapped computer, nothing can leak from it, which isn't the case when you use it on an internet-connected PC.

The price of both SSDs and HDDs is decreasing each year. So while it's true that you are going to need more and more storage long-term, historical records show that you can purchase said storage for less money.

There are two interesting charts here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/17sljc1/as_requested_an_improved_chart_of_ssd_vs_hdd/
https://howmuch.one/product/average-ssd-1tb-nvme/price-history

The consensus is the law. This law applies equally to one node as well a hundred/a thousand of them.

That's assuming that's what they want. 'They' being the creators of Bitcoin blockchain bloat and spam. I don't think they are interested in moving their activities off-chain. I am ready to be proven wrong, though. I think making the Bitcoin blockchain congested is one of the goals, aside from tricking a big enough crowd that the inscriptions have a value. They are trying to prove a point by saying, you didn't want a bigger block size, so enjoy our Ordinals on your low-throughput network.   

But if that is the reason, why aren't you worried about using Bitcoin Core? It's open-source, like many other software, but it means very little to you personally if you have no understanding of how it works under the hood. I don't see why you would be paranoid about Electrum and at the same time not be paranoid about Bitcoin Core.

It's more user-friendly than Bitcoin Core. It's a light client with a native seed format, but also supports BIP39 seeds. It's not hard to learn the basics.

You would be backing up a long string of letters and numbers that make no sense to the human brain. It's not user-friendly, and it's easier to make a mistake with a random character than it is when backing up a set of 12 or 24 English words. Don't forget, there are no seeds in Bitcoin Core.

Some people may hate me after I say this, but Bitcoin Core isn't a very newbie-friendly bitcoin wallet. BIP39 has been around for a decade, and they could have added support for it. The developers either don't want to, don't see a great need for it, or there aren't enough requests to add it. Sure, you can use the master private key instead, but it's even easier with a seed. Bitcoin Core's biggest plus is the full-node feature and being able to use a locally verified copy of the blockchain. Bitcoin Core as a wallet is of secondary importance and isn't for everyone.

U manjim gradovima i na selu je situacija drugačija nego u većim gradovima u Njemačkoj. U Štutgartu i Minhenu su stanovi i kirije skupi i velika je potražnja. Mislim da je Minhen najskuplji njemački grad za život a Štutgart je na drugom mjestu. Puno toga ide preko maklera i ljudi su spremni da plate dodatnu premiju sa strane da dobiju informaciju prije vremena. Nije neobično da stan recimo u ponedeljak bude ponuđen na tržištu za iznajmljivanje, ti ujutru odmah nazoveš a već neko uselio.

I would add the Blockstream Jade to that group. It can be used as a normal hardware wallet (not-airgapped) or as a stateless signer, as it uses SeedQRs just like the Seedsigner. The one thing that is questionable is that it requires Bluetooth or USB connection with the Blockstream Green software wallet during the initial setup to download the firmware. After that, everything can be done with QR code scanning. The official shop is in the US, but they have a bunch of resellers all over the place.

I have never heard of such an attack or read about someone suffering from it. I remember seeing mentions of maliciously altered fees, but that's all. I don't know how it's possible to modify a transaction that was already signed by a private key that only you have access to. Wouldn't such a modification require access to the signing keys because it's different transaction data @nc50lc? In that case, you would need to ask yourself who has got your private keys?

Ima smisla, naravno. Ako baš moraš trgovati tokenima na Ethereum mreži, pokušaj da to radiš u jutarnjim i prijepodnevnim satima po evopskom vremenu. Radnim danima sam primjetio da su tad dosta niže naknade i može se napraviti transakcija između 40-50 gwei-a. To će te koštati kod ERC-20 tokena $10-$15. Iza 3 i 4 po našem vremenu to već ide na iznad 70 ili 80 gwei a ni +100 nije rijetka pojava. 

Ethereum has never been user-centric. Their philosophy is worlds apart from that of Bitcoin. It has always been a network where a selected few who belong to the Ethereum Foundation has the say on the future. Just remember the big DAO hack of many years ago when these 'big' players lost. What did they do? They simply clicked the restart button, and it never happened. That same button would never have been hit if you and me lost that money or anyone else of less importance to them. 

Interesting slogan. I mean the #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin from your subject.
It's true to some degree. You get cashback when you lose, retrieving a part of your lost wagers. Is the cashback applicable only for lost wagers or all bets in a specific time frame? Most casinos give cashback only for losses, but occasionally, you can find one that considers all bets.

A tip. Perhaps you shouldn't call the supported altcoins shitcoins. They are, but still. Maybe some of your players will take offence.

Čuo sam za taj slučaj. Nisu ni u pitanju mali iznosi jer korisnici su primjetili da im fali nekoliko desetina tisuća USD. Čak su i uništavali dokaze onima koji su javno progovorili o tome. Izbrisali bi im povijest transakcija. Ako nisu prethodno preuzeli te podatke, ne bi više mogli. To onda za sobom povlači i druge probleme kao što je tačno prijavljivanje poreza, prikazivanje kapitalne dobiti, itd.    

Teoretski, kripto ti mogu blokirati u roku od par minuta poslje depozita ako ne prođe određene kontrole i historijat pokaže da potiče iz sumnjivih izvora. To ide automatski a onda se ti pravdaj i objašnjavaj. Centralizovane mjenačnice su odlično oružje za borbu protiv svega onoga što Bitcoin predstavlja.

Britanski sud je donio odluku povodom Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) tužbe protiv prevaranta Craig Wrighta koji je tvrdio da je Satoshi i da je napisao orginalni Bitcoin Whitepaper. Sudija je zaključio da Wright nije Satoshi, nije napisao Bitcoin Whitepaper, i nije programirao početne verzije Bitcoin softvera.

Ovo je odlična stvar i još jedna u nizu poraza ovog prevaranta.
Ne znam kako će ova odluka uticati na buduće tužbe i one već presuđene. Npr, zbog nepojavljivanja na sudu suprotne stranke (Cobra) koja je željela ostati anonimna, Wright je uspio ostvariti pobjedu na sudu i Bitcoin.org ne smije dozvoliti preuzimanje whitepapera u Velikoj Britaniji. Možda se uskoro i ta greška ispravi.

https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/03/14/craig-wright-not-satoshi-didnt-author-bitcoin-whitepaper-judge-rules/