I'll grab 2
PM sent and 2 set aside for you. |
|
|
|
Hello Everyone!Up for sale I have the 1 toz 999 Fine Silver Commemorative Monero Rounds shown below. > 10 available. Black foam ring capsule included and is a really sharp look.  Price: 23 usd each in XMR, BTC or LTC plus cost of shipping. Shipping: Ships from East Coast USA at actual cost. Payment address will be supplied via PM. Make sure you are communicating with me, profile ID 206143, legendary rank, and dark green trust.Let me know if you have any questions.
|
|
|
|
LC - Don't forget all those Titan silver dimes you are always auctioning, love those coins!  I am actually pretty close, if not there, to where I only have personal long term stash left of the Titan 0.1s |
|
|
|
If you are worried about $100 in btc, maybe you have more pressing matters in life.....
This is not the place for you.
Not correct at all. I was happy to send the bars out to escrow but it seems the terms of it are being dictated to me by the buyer. I have send out 2 of the bars today to escrow also I am not happy sending the 3rd one via regular post where no signature would be required on delivery. Where is the protection for me as the seller here? To be honest forum rep means very little ive seen people with 100's of trust fall from grace here so that is not even a valid argument. If escrow was collecting both the item and the funds I have no issues. Sending direct to the buyer without sign on delivery is a NO NO as if something goes wrong or he claims he didn't get it there no proof of delivery. None of what I am saying is un-reasonable, unless you have more pressing concerns about a new silver business in "your" space. I look forward to reviews from the other members who have been more accommodating and helpful in this matter. MJ you also said in your PM you could accept the bar and verify it if requested now that's not an option why so? If you’re going to be a little bitch about a sig then just pay $3 and move on, like is the courier holding a gun to your head saying you can’t pay for sig? Please tell us which members you’ve so thoroughly observed fall from the ranks as you can’t even observe auction rules that occur daily. Also accommodate this: my first deal with MJ and two other forum members required me to send 2.4 BTC to MJ and I didn’t even ask him once where anything was let alone insult his reputation like you have. Let me make this as clear as possible for you, if you don’t trust MJ then you won’t trust anyone on this forum so either do as you’re told by MJ or fuck right off to Etsy like a good lad as it has already been appropriately suggested. The BUYER has asked me NOT to use a signed for service like UPS or FED-EX... and I was offered Verification by MJ in PM... Both convos are here for you to look over if you can't understand what I am telling you...   I agreed to sending it to MJ I have no issues but I WON'T send via standard post.... MJ also offered the verification then they both backtracked to saying no direct send. So I was offered to send it to the escrow and now that option is no longer available for what ever reason and I have been asked to send it by "standard" post directly to the buyer. its not Escrow in any sense of the word Being in escrow is a contractual arrangement in which a third party (the stakeholder or escrow agent) receives and disburses money or property for the primary transacting parties, Tecshare most likely does not want Fed Ex or UPS if they use a post office box. I do the same. You can still send via postal service TRACKED so you can prove it arrived. If you send Tecshare the bar you will get paid. I know this I have I have done many successful trades with Tecshare and there is never any drama. Look at their feedback for verification of their trustworthiness. If you cannot trust the systems which have worked on this forum for years then you should not be trading here. |
|
|
|
As per the terms of the auction, all bids (as well as future bids) from the user acemax (UID 2760726) are not accepted. For each and every auction I hold/will held, ever. This auction is still unopened.  Happy bidding to everyone ! It is your auction. Absolutely fine with me. Your satisfaction is my priority. I have found no greater satisfaction than achieving success through honest dealing and strict adherence to the view that, for you to gain, those you deal with should gain as well.- acemax That is a direct quote by Alan Greenspan which you have wrongfully attributed to yourself. https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/alan_greenspan_169879 |
|
|
|
Have conversed with OP and have sorted the situation for 2 of the bars. I will be acting as escrow for last of the v8s and will be paying for my bar upfront based on our valid bids.
OP has taken advice on board and I am confident that he isnt untrustworthy. Mistakes were made on this auction which we all saw but he is making it right as best as he can.
Thank you for the advice and I am happy to use Corrosive as the escrow agent for the sale. I have spoken with Corrosive on the phone and am happy to proceed with the agreed transaction for 2 bar's. As it stands now Corrosive will make payment for his bar to the OP address above and will take delivery of both his bar and Last of the V8's bar. Once delivery has taken place my payment for bar 2 will be released. @Techshare would you be willing to use Corrosive as the escrow agent on the transaction? The reason I ask is he has been kind enough to offer escrow for free rather than the 1% escrow you suggested and 2 he is handling escrow for Last of the V8's. Please let me know if this is suitable and we can progress towards a resolution for this matter. And again I am sorry for the confusion over how this was supposed to operate if it was outside the normal process on the board notes have been taken and I will make sure the next auction I conduct will have clearer rules on bidding. Thanks Magic No. Sorry you and your choices give me zero confidence at this point (nothing personal Corrosive). I want to use Minerjones as escrow. After that we likely won't be doing any future exchanges. The fact that you didn't just fix this immediately and set up escrow and instead waited to try to see if you could get Jimjam123 to pay in spite of everyone's advice tells me you have learned nothing from your mistakes here. Please arrange escrow with Minerjones as I originally requested. Your now just talking rubbish.. I have not waited for anyone to pay. Your making claims here that are nothing more than your own speculation. Jimjam could you confirm to techshare please that there was NO attempt to gain payment from you at any point. Also I took the time to explain to him how the bidding was working like I did with you and the other party's. Your also making threats to me over pm and trying to use your reputation to bully my and my service your saying you have no confidence then retract your bid and be done with it.. Your attitude has been very off putting for wanting to deal on this forum ever again no wonder new users feel off-put if this is the way you act over something that I have explained. Just because you can't understand something dose not mean I am wrong.. You also clearly bid twice on them then said that you didn't understand the bids.. you waited until after the sale to not only push me to use some paid escrow of miner joan's at my expense but made threats about reputation and some comments that really show your true colors. I'm not being held over the coals by anyone on this forum. Especially not you.. I have been more than accommodating but when I come on and read you post's they are without grounds. I am no happy paying more out to use some escrow I know nothing about and who has posted already it's got nothing to do with them in the topic if you look back. If your not happy with my efforts then I am sorry you have the option to retract you bid if you like or come to an agreement we both see eye to eye on and not demanded by you with threats. Regards. Magic The escrow fee you are complaining about is the equivalent of 0.75 GBP. You made the mistakes and you are not willing to pay 0.75 GBP to keep your customer happy? Seems incredibly shortsighted. |
|
|
|
Bump. Will close if not filled in 24 hours.
Hi Lesbian Cow, What will happen to the joiner who already paid their entries if this raffle is not filled in 24 hours? I will refund any entries that have paid if it does not fill. Cheers! |
|
|
|
Congrats Basorexia for what you have achieved ! Your cards come out well and I'm sure they're even better in person. It's a lot of work indeed, and you managed to shape your idea into a real project. Well done ! I wish you all the best. Great stuff! |
|
|
|
1 .013
2 .035
3 .01
4 .015
Winning bids, thanks everyone! |
|
|
|
Auction Ends Today! Current high bids quoted below. 1 @ 0.01BTC
Lot 2 - 0.023BTC
Lot 4: .011
|
|
|
|
Thanks I do not think it was clear how the bidding was expected.
The open price shown is 0.01BTC
Bids should have been 0.002 BTC
these incremental bids were to add to the open price.
So if someone opens the price at 0.01 BTC then you can add in 0.002 lot sizes.
So for example
I open the bidding at 0.01 BTC.
Someone then comes and can bid 0.002 to the price.
So price calculation is going up from 0.01 open with 0.002 bid size after open
Meaning when I saw the bids there all having an opener at 0.01 and bids at 0.002.
So far from the descussions to the party's jimjam did not understand the terms of the bidding which I take responsibility.
Also before anything else happens techshare already replied stateing an escrow user minerjones he wanted to use at my expense. I have never had dealing with it also is this normal practice for the escrow service who he is asking to use be the same person that is deciding the outcome of the auction in there last post?
If the example on page one says start bid 0.01 and 0.002 increments what did you think you were bidding on if the start price is 0.01 and it says increments of 0.002?
Because if someone has a bid of 0.01 to start it and prices moves up 0.002 per bid then how are is the above explanation being interpreted?
Again if the terms weren't fully clear it was my fault.
Magic
Normally if starting bid is .01 and bid increments are 0.002, once someone bids .01 the next valid bid would be 0.012 (not 0.0002), and the next valid bid would be 0.014 and so on. The way you have it worded is different than any auction I have seen on this forum since 2013, or anywhere for that matter, and no one should be expected to understand what you proposed as a bidding method. |
|
|
|
.12 i want all your funded titan coins lol
Winner. PM Coming |
|
|
|
Who made the 0.012 BTC bid on bar 3?
Jimjim123 there was a open bid of 0.1 of bars 1 and 3 already he bid 0.002 on bars 1 and 3 his bar 2 bid was rejected No they did not. I bid:
0.002 on 1
0.002 on 2
0.002 on 3
All their bids are invalid. |
|
|
|
.12 i want all your funded titan coins lol
Current high bid quoted above. Auction ends today! |
|
|
|
|
55 please and congratulations on being voted Rookie of the Year!
|
|
|
|
All spots noted to this point. |
|
|
|
no silver finger, Im going to have to require escrow with TransvestiteLamb
Lot 4 @ .01BTC
Proof of Finger:  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
