Anyone?

Whats also interesting is that they claim "fair play" yet they sometimes delay payouts up to 48 hours which then gives them the option of bruteforcing different secret phrases for the maximum profit to the house. Also one could easily launder money if one was inclined enough.

Yes but the idea that as time goes by the total amount of funds won would get closer and closer to 98% of the total amount of funds bet.

Yes it is, but if you take the sum of bets 3557272/4447462=0.7998 then 0.7998*100=80% so wouldn't it become closer to 98% on a long enough period?

How come the satoshidice house edge is currently 80% even though they have been around for so long?

I already did this before and I am a 2011 member, very humble person, I can give you a gentlemens word that I will not reverse the payment, plus I am looking for a fast method to purchase 50 bucks worth of BTC at the moment, so it's not crazy amounts.

Hello I would like to purchase BTC with PP, first amount first, registered 2011 and a humble gentlemen that has brought using PP previously.

You can encode your private key in a vial containing a message printed in DNA using Craig Vener's ASCII->DNA for about 5 hundred bucks. Seems a lot cooler.

How can I sign an existing transaction with zero confirmations with a different input easily?

I would rather not I think the inputs were already spent and it will never confirm, thanks for your help guys.

Says "an outpoint is already spent" when I try to push the other one, I don't understand why they keep showing up on the client though, shouldn't -rescan eliminate all the transactions with spent inputs?

I have launched the client with -rescan and now I am able to grab the raw transaction, when I push it with https://blockchain.info/pushtx I get "unable to find all tx inputs" yet it still appear in the client for some reason.

Already did...

I have a txid that I can get with gettransaction but get an "No information available about transaction (code -5)" if I use getrawtransaction, also the transaction has zero fees and doesn't show up on blockchain.info even though it was sent 4 days ago.

I had already spent it and have multiple stuck transaction on zero conf, I figured it's a little weird since I would at least have the key the transaction got signed with.

That's one minor issue 20 becomes 2, 10 becomes 1 and 30 becomes 3 as well as 0 not sending a transaction back at all.

What I don't understand is why couldn't S. Dice simply broadcast the transaction without including it in a block? The player would have the zero conf transaction popping up notifying him whether he won or lost and there is no "dust"

Multiple Dr. Evil type of characters including Gavin Andresen (Notice Mr.Anderson) have been tinkering in their underground facility thinking of new ways to destroy the free economy along with their CIA friends as the camera zooms out of the darkness you can only hear their evil laughing as they summon this patch from the deepest dungeons of hell to completely censor any micro transactions or "dust" in hopes of probing the masses for compliance before further arbitrary, dictatorship-style changes take place.

Not to mention that Bitcoin becomes closer and closer to what we are all trying to rebel against and the patch is completely against the bible:
Oh Satoshi, where are you when we need you

Wouldn't they still be able to notify players whether they lost or won simply by broadcasting the transactions without it actually being included in a block? (zero conf style)

What is the problem with the bitcoin community that everyone is obsessed with making established "outsider" businesses adopt BTC instead of promoting businesses that work solely with BTC within the community.

In This Thread