Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 09:57:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
541  Economy / Speculation / Re: 100 cracked...time to buy?!!? on: June 09, 2013, 06:04:10 PM
If there is one thing I learned the past 2 years it is this: Don't bet against bitcoin.
542  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: What if the devs are ordered by a US judge to include a government backdoor? on: June 06, 2013, 11:51:59 PM
I would worry more about backdoors in ASIC mining hardware.

If we end up in a situation where most of the ASIC miners needed to be competitive in the mining business come from a few suppliers in China that might reason to worry. Especially in the light of the recent allegations of government installed backdoors in telecoms equipment from Huawei and ZTE.

See: http://www.zdnet.com/former-pentagon-analyst-china-has-backdoors-to-80-of-telecoms-7000000908/

The bitcoin software is easy to audit. The mining hardware? not so much.
543  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL creates new charity project to donate 1000 BTC to [ROFL!] on: June 05, 2013, 11:09:27 PM
All this is just noise to me. Bets, Charities, Funds... Who Cares?

Just develop and ship great products on time. Full stop.
544  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Peter Vessenes: Take a step back and F*** YOUR OWN FACE!!! on: June 04, 2013, 10:21:48 PM
I'm sorry, but I still believe this Peter Vesseness is the type of guy that won't hesitate to use the state and its regulation to rule out competitors. He looks too suspicious to me. I don't trust him. I'd love to be proved wrong, but for now, that's how I see it.

That is my view also. It appears that Coinlab wants to own the US Bitcoin Space.

They way they are doing it by capturing the media channels through the Bitcoin Foundation. Capturing the development team also through the Foundation. And clearing the playing field of competitors by digging up dirt and setting the regulators on their scent (speculation)

Just look at the Gox/Dwolla shutdown, the Liberty Reserve shutdown, the OKPay issues, the Tangible Cryptography shutdown, etc.

And then look at his statements:

Quote
"The U.S. put out guidance recently through the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, and we've been following up on that guidance and crushing bad actors," he said in an interview with CNBC Asia. "We're seeing a bit of a sweep right now," he said.

"There's nothing to indicate that good players who are working hard to stay regulated have anything to worry about."

Coinlab has not produced any valuable service to the bitcoin community that I am aware of. It is easy for them to play 'safe'. In this light I also understand the action of Satoshi Dice not to serve US customers for the time being and Peter selling http://app.bitlaundry.com/ while this crackdown is going on.

I could be wrong, I could be paranoid. But this entire things smells fishy to me and Peter is smack in the middle of it.
545  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Peter Vessenes: Take a step back and F*** YOUR OWN FACE!!! on: June 04, 2013, 03:01:29 AM
Peter Vessenes appears to be the Limited Partner behind Bitcoinica.

Tihan has worked hard to keep the identity of the LP secret (There is a shell company in Barbados called the Wendon group) most likely to avoid any liability leaving Bitcoinica customers who had funds there royally screwed. One year later not a single customer has seen their coins returned. And we are talking many tens of thousands of BTC and USD here.

I will avoid anything that has his name attached to it like the plague. And yes, that includes the Bitcoin Foundation.

Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=196150
546  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Butterfly Labs Announces Bulk Chip Sales on: June 02, 2013, 04:01:56 AM
BFL stop selling and start delivering.
547  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: May 26, 2013, 06:45:51 PM
...
What if friedcat distributes his hashing power into multiple mining pools? In that case, he can go over 50%.

No.
My guess is something would be done to bitcoin to block asicminer.
Would be the most reasonable step to take to avoid the risks.

If friedcat has a surplus of ASIC hardware that can not be deployed for bitcoin mining, then why not mine another sha256 altcoin (that can not be merge mined) like PPC?

The PPC proceeds can easily be converted into BTC on exchanges like BTC-e.
548  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [UPDATE] BFL ASIC Status (May 23 2013) on: May 23, 2013, 04:14:15 PM
Sounds like a horde of locusts will descent upon us soon.

Or crickets... Hard to tell the difference with BFL these days.
549  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Announcement] Block Erupter USB Ready to Hash Everywhere in the World on: May 21, 2013, 10:11:30 PM
Make these available on bitcoinstore.com and I'll buy one.
550  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] The Nibble - Crypto Currency - RELEASED on: May 21, 2013, 12:41:09 AM
W...Why does this coin have a twitter bird?  *confused*
551  Economy / Economics / Re: Is it true that the Fed is privately owned on: May 15, 2013, 05:20:03 AM
It's a hybrid setup. It is a cartel of private banks in partnership with the gov so that it has the force of law protecting their monopoly to create the base money for the nation's money supply.

G. Edward Griffin agrees. http://youtu.be/lu_VqX6J93k?t=26m45s
552  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL ASIC Production Updates 2013 (Updated May 13) on: May 14, 2013, 05:00:28 AM
Good to see that BFL is significantly ramping up chip production. With 100 chips they should have no issues cranking out 400 units per day. Delays are sure to be a thing of the past from now on!
553  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL May 12th Update on: May 13, 2013, 11:21:50 PM
I have been pretty critical of BFL, but I believe they will eventually deliver something

Yes, there will be cookies.  The cake, however, is still a lie.  A BFL.
554  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Who all has received Jalapenos? on: May 07, 2013, 03:36:28 AM
Wow, this thread has really taken off since BFL started shipping on April 1st...  


*tumbleweed*  


*crickets*
555  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Coinlab are sneaky bastards, investors behind Bitcoinica on: May 06, 2013, 12:04:40 AM
would the second 'hack' of occurred if the source code had not of been released ?

The theft of frunds from the MtGox account was not the result of the source code being leaked.

From what I understand it was.

Bitcoinica Source leak > MtGox API key > Lastpass pwd > MtGox account credentials > MtGox theft (40K BTC/ 40K USD).

If the leak did not cause the MtGox theft, then what did?
556  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Coinlab are sneaky bastards, investors behind Bitcoinica on: May 05, 2013, 10:45:08 PM
I was against this strongly which is why I released the code. After an employee used this as an excuse to steal more funds (the evidence is definitive)

Quote
These are facts, and every point can be proven.

This is probably true. However where is this 'definitive' evidence you speak of?
557  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm back! on: April 24, 2013, 06:55:43 AM
EDIT: Trace the coins all you can. Aside from the 100 BTC donated by hacker I'm pretty sure the rest are legitimate coins once stored in either Mt. Gox or Bitcoinica.

The fact that Zhou accepted 100 BTC of the stolen coins as a donation to his personal fund distribution represented a clear conflict of interest. He should have sent that directly back to Bitcoinica. I did receive some compensation from Zhou's donation fund and decided to send 100 BTC from that back to the Bitcoinica Recovery Fund managed by Patrick Murk to compensate for the hacker donation. So that should be covered now.

Transaction ID: http://blockchain.info/tx-index/14361561/bb91cd10d615ffa39a092100708168567a440e3f2adb171a550de91ad990e1e9

Also note that the recovery fund only received ~15.000 BTC back from Chen Jianhai through Zhou. Although Zhou claimed that he could recover 20.000 BTC from Chen. I wonder if he is counting his 5000 BTC compensation as part of the recovery funds... And if not, why is there 5000 BTC is missing from the reclaimed funds? (It might be explained somewhere, in which case I missed it)

Recovery address: http://blockchain.info/address/1N99P8Z5AQXWEYZiS6ddov9Fyc4kuGPpwJ (15,006 BTC)

I have gathered some data to estimate the amount that can be recovered from Chen Jianhai:

USD: about $140,000 + $5000 frozen at AurumXchange (under SJ account)
BTC: about 20,000 BTC

There's an unknown amount of funds left in Chris Heaslip's account and I have no way of knowing the exact balance.

Chen Jianhai was only able to offer the above-mentioned amount due to the cost of his laundering activities and also the significantly lower Bitcoin price when he cashed out. If Bitcoinica or the community wants him to cover the full amount at today's prices, I'm willing to co-operate with any police investigation. But either case, my previous donation should have pretty much covered the difference.
558  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm back! on: April 24, 2013, 05:24:31 AM
Sorry ninjarobot. I was really annoyed and depressed at that time so I didn't give a response to you. However, I have replied your email with his bank account and address information that I currently have. Hope it'll be helpful to whatever you plan to do.

Thanks Zhou. I have received it and will pass it on to the Bitcoinica Liquidator.

Quote
I'm a little disturbed by the fact that you posted my email reply publicly without my permission.

My apologies. I realize it was a bit of a d*ck move. However I do feel it is important that the whole truth is revealed and there were no disclaimers on the email. I should have asked for your permission though.
559  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: SmallChange [research-only] [Litecoin based] [15 seconds blocks] [scrypt] on: April 24, 2013, 05:12:26 AM
Did the pool just die?
560  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm back! on: April 24, 2013, 03:29:59 AM
This Chen Jianhai story is the biggest load of poppycock I've ever heard.

All one needs to do is to read this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95795.msg1055627#msg1055627

And this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.msg1054890#msg1054890

Lets review the facts:
  • Chen Jianhai is a multi-millionaire relic collector with a family living in the cold and remote Heilongjiang Province in China who owns an online 'Taobao' store.
  • Chen Jianhai is not technical and his English is poor
  • Chen Jianhai is Zhou's former business associate, but not his friend
  • Chen Jianhai is likely a long-time criminal quite active in financial black markets with an active presence in stolen credit cards and possibly other hacks. (according to Zhou's observations)
  • Chen Jianhai has a technical co-worker that is "in-to-bitcoin" and discovers that the source-code has been leaked.
  • Chen Jianhai inspects the code and discovers that the MtGox API key is also the master password for Tihan's lastpass account containing the passwords to both Bitcoinica's and Christopher Heaslip's MtGox account. The lastpass account (originally set up by Zhou) was not protected by 2factor. And both MtGox accounts were also not protected with a yubikey.
  • Chen Jianhai logs in to the MtGox account and withdraws the maximum number of Coins (40.000 BTC & 40.000 USD). For the USD he creates a MtGox code that he claims on Heaslip's account and uses the USD to buy more BTC.
  • Chen Jianhai then withdraws all the coins to Zhou's blockchain.info account. From where he sends them to his servers in America.
  • Chen Jianhai decides to frame Zhou stating "it would be impossible to discover the hacker" and "it would be much easier to deny if the suspect account is an insider because you (Zhou Tong) can always distract people from investigating"
  • Chen Jianhai knows Zhou's secret sockpuppet identity (stevejobs807@gmail.com) and also his password since Zhou has used Chen's webshop once and re-used that password.
  • Chen Jianhai exchanges MtGox coupons worth 40.000 USD to Liberty Reserve through the instant exchange facility at AurumXchange using Zhou's secret identity.
  • Coincidentally Zhou also has an order with AurumXchange to sell Liberty Reserve to us for the amount of USD 40,000, requesting a wire to his bank account in Singapore. (for a friend)
  • Chen Jianhai then feels the need to create an email account <bitcoinicasucks@hotmail.com> and email verify@bitcoinica.com with the text "THANK YOU FOR YOU SOURCE CODE. BITCONICA IS NOW OFFICALY DONE! LASTPAS PASWORD: c02e1a27-5524-449f-ba65-aff9581ddedc" Despite being able to write perfect english in the subject line, somehow in the body text his CAPS key got stuck and he lost the ability to spell.
  • Chen Jianhai is confronted by Zhou who figured it all out after being accused himself only a few hours earlier.
  • Chen Jianhai admits everything to Zhou
  • Chen Jianhai (despite being a multi-millionaire) was only able to return 20.000 BTC and 140,000 USD  due to the cost of his laundering activities and also the significantly lower Bitcoin price when he cashed out.
  • Chen Jianhai (before he was outed) discovers that Zhou is giving 5000 BTC out of his own pocket to Bitcoinica customers and decides to donate 100 BTC of the hacked funds to Zhou's community donation pool
  • Chen Jianhai's identity is only known by Zhou, but unfortunately Chen Jianhai is now gone (phone: powered off, QQ: offline, email: no response) and the Alipay account got its password changed

Of course before Chen mysteriously disappeared Zhou stated that "Currently I'm very willing to co-operate with any investigation because this is the only way I can completely prove my innocence." and "I have repeatedly said that I have zero tolerance in this matter and I will report all his information, including his real bank account number and address to the police once the official investigation has started."

However when I wanted to file a police report with my local authorities and asked Zhou to provide me the address details for Chen, I received the following reply:

Quote
If you insist on filing a police report on this matter, any lack of co-operation from my side can of course be used against me in the uncertain future.

I'm not protecting his identity. I just deem it to be unnecessary at this point. He is not running away (AFAIK he doesn't even have a passport), and the fund return is pending Bitcoinica's liquidation.

I want to go back to my own business and focus on something productive. Any information I provide now will necessarily be a burden in the near future.

I strongly advise you not to involve the police before the liquidation process has any significant development. You are not obliged to report this. (But when you do, I'm obliged to provide information to either you, or the police, and obviously I would prefer the former.)

My point is, there is very little benefit to this, yet the risk and potential expense are too high. I don't want to hire a lawyer or waste my time on gathering evidence or whatever. I contributed 5,000 BTC and talked to the creditors regularly exactly because I wanted to avoid any lawsuits against me. I'm all for justice, but I have already given up on Bitcoin and justice in this matter seems worthless to me.

Considering the suspicion raised by community members, the questions from trusted business partners and threats of violence, I don't have any energy to fight back any more.   I just want the fiasco to be over. Yet people are giving me more and more troubles. It's okay if you can't feel the pain, please just try to sympathize.

I have plans to immigrate to Australia and I need an absolutely clean record. Even a criminal accusation (without conviction) is intolerable in the character check. I really deeply regret the creation of Bitcoinica. If you can forget about me, please do.

I'm returning to Melbourne on October 6, 2012. Hopefully something will happen at Bitcoinica side, and you have plenty time to re-consider your decision before then.

I agreed and waited for Zhou to return to Melbourne. However upon his return Zhou ignored all my follow up emails. I have never been able to obtains any details about Chen from Zhou nor have I been able to file an actionable report. In the mean time Bitcoinica creditors are still smack in the middle of what must be the largest clusterf*ck in bitcoin history with the MtGox account orphaned and frozen. The AurumXchange funds still missing and an ongoing lawsuit against the Bitcoin Consultancy by the largest creditors. Considering that Bitcoinica had around 1M USD in deposits when it got hacked, and conservatively estimating 50% of that to be in BTC, at current valuations we are talking in excess of 15,000,000 USD still pending liquidation. Or what is left of it.

Now, Zhou returns 1 year later, hoping the dust has settled with his "Hero member" tag still in tact. Well played sir!

I suggest that at the very least Zhou receives an "Untrustworthy" tag. Although I do realize that might be an insult to MNW whom I regard much more highly.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!