|
There is a reason minebig hash majority now... when everyone else has given up hashing FRY... the miners here have stayed on throughout since launch and aren't going anywhere.
Solid pool, zero issues and steady pay.
|
|
|
|
If that worked for you and both match hashrate now... try my 7950 bat file... setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool:port -u xxxx -p xxxx -I 20 --thread-concurrency 21712 -g 1 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-fan 90 --temp-cutoff 85 --scan-time 1 --queue 4 --no-submit-stale I changed my values to match what you have above for your clocks. 640 and 600 kh/s ty man! That makes me wonder where you got your 280X... it behaves like an old Tahiti chip and not the newer Tahiti XL2 or XLT in these recent R9s. You sure someone didn't sell you a 7950 in a 280X box? What temps you got now... if you aren't at 75 C yet then try changing the clock to 1100 and the mem up to 1700. If it takes those and can hang around 75-78 C, then I think you may somehow have gotten a 7950 and NOT an R9 280X... Here is my EXACT bat file for my 7950 @ 660+ KH/s... I CAN and HAVE pushed it to 700KH/s with 1200 clock 1800 mem 1200 vddc and +20 powertune but i dont push it like that any more now that it is a year old. setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer.exe -d 0 --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://fry.minebig.com:3341 -u xxx -p xxx -I 20 --thread-concurrency 21712 -g 1 --gpu-engine 1125 --gpu-memclock 1800 --gpu-vddc 1150 --gpu-fan 90 --temp-cutoff 85 --scan-time 1 --queue 4 --no-submit-stale |
|
|
|
I know its an older card, but better than a kick in the head! Can you tell me the optimal settings for a 5770? I want to get every last hash outta this sucka!! If you don't know, perhaps point me in the right direction? Anybody?
https://litecoin.info/Mining_hardware_comparison |
|
|
|
|
Just looking at middlecoin miners... if this scrypt ASIC can indeed push near 90 MH/s when it arrives, that matches the fourth fastest miner currently on that pool.
Last 3 days he has averaged almost 1 BTC per day. Easy calc 7 BTC per week divided by 160 shares is BTC0.04375 per share. If that rate can hold constant (oh to dream) then this is a 90 day payout for ROI roughly... by payout week 12 we should have more than what we put in.
|
|
|
|
Why with this bat i have only 400kh/s whit my r9 280x?
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer.exe --verbose --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://fry.minebig.com:3341 -u xxxxx -p xxxx --thread-concurrency 11200 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256 --gpu-engine 1080 --gpu-memclock 1500
What i must change?
Try removing after your password and add this: --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 -I 13 --auto-fan --gpu-fan 30-75 --temp-cutoff 90 --temp-overheat 85 --temp-target 75 --gpu-memclock 1500 --gpu-engine 0-1050 --gpu-powertune -20 --no-submit-stale Thats what I use on my 280x Asus Matrix and I get about 750-780 khs I've tried, one gpu @500 kh/s one @400 Kh\s  try --thread-concurrency 24000 -g 1 or it may be low ram that's only good for 7950. Wont work for 280x -g 2 --thread-concurrency 8193 -I 13 is the best you can do with 280x I see one 280X on the scrypt comp page using this... -I 20 -g 1 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 20992 its worth trying as your half rates match what happens to a 7950 at I 13 vs I 20 With this both at 450 kh/s... i dont understand! If that worked for you and both match hashrate now... try my 7950 bat file... setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool:port -u xxxx -p xxxx -I 20 --thread-concurrency 21712 -g 1 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-fan 90 --temp-cutoff 85 --scan-time 1 --queue 4 --no-submit-stale I changed my values to match what you have above for your clocks. |
|
|
|
We're working on bringing up the Scrypt rig. Let's just say its being a royal pain in the ass (1x to 16x risers not playing nice), and it's now sporting 2 motherboards. We should have it operational in the next day from our staging area and get installed next week.  I see Scrypt Hashrate: 5.5365 MH/s up on the GB#4 page... is that only 6/7 cards or all 7 now? If we are still awaiting to add #7... then good god you got some sweet spot 290X cards getting over 900KH/s each! That would mean a possible 6.45+ MH/s which definitely beat my estimates. Crossing fingers this is only 6 cards right now lol! https://litecoin.info/Mining_hardware_comparisonOnly shows 2 above 900 and the 990KH/s one is full of shit at those clocks. If you got ~915KH/s each you are doing something right. |
|
|
|
Why with this bat i have only 400kh/s whit my r9 280x?
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer.exe --verbose --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://fry.minebig.com:3341 -u xxxxx -p xxxx --thread-concurrency 11200 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256 --gpu-engine 1080 --gpu-memclock 1500
What i must change?
Try removing after your password and add this: --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 -I 13 --auto-fan --gpu-fan 30-75 --temp-cutoff 90 --temp-overheat 85 --temp-target 75 --gpu-memclock 1500 --gpu-engine 0-1050 --gpu-powertune -20 --no-submit-stale Thats what I use on my 280x Asus Matrix and I get about 750-780 khs I've tried, one gpu @500 kh/s one @400 Kh\s try --thread-concurrency 24000 -g 1 or it may be low ram that's only good for 7950. Wont work for 280x -g 2 --thread-concurrency 8193 -I 13 is the best you can do with 280x I see one 280X on the scrypt comp page using this... -I 20 -g 1 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 20992 its worth trying as your half rates match what happens to a 7950 at I 13 vs I 20 |
|
|
|
Would be nice to get some actual endorsements from George.
And just how quickly would the scramble be to capitalize on list this coin if it does turn out to be backed by George? |
|
|
|
|
With these possibly being much higher hash than originally advertised... are we expecting to see 1/160th total hashrate per share or still locked at 300KH/s?
|
|
|
|
i can't unzip ur shit wallet with ur shit password
:k~&38%{[k3F-48 |
|
|
|
If xhash sent me coins, thank you, matter settled for me (PM me, so I can get back and mine with you). If DEV sent me coins, you're just Great!  It is the dev... I posted my addy just talking about Mine Big and got some sent to me. XHash has likely ran off with them... but who knows... this is why you DO NOT give source to a pool earlier than any other... you never know who is the ripoff artist. With MineBig.com I have had not a single issue other than jealous people trying to use known usernames and email addresses to hack accounts and locking them. You get an email that alerts you when that happens and I have not lost anything to date with them. The pools there just work, right off the bat, no issues. Two days in a row on two brand new coins... and MineBig has the most stable pools. Why more launches don't just go straight to them for a launch pool is beyond me... they survived a DDoS today at launch and are still ticking away. FRY.MINEBIG.COM |
|
|
|
|
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT: NO MATTER HOW MUCH HASH YOU GOT YOU WOULDNT HAVE MINED ANY MORE THAN PROBABLY 2X WHAT YOU CAN NOW. DIFF WAS AT 4+ BEFORE ALL THE POOLS GOT SOURCE. PLEASE STOP INSINUATING OTHERWISE. KGW SAYS F U INSTAMINERS! That is all.
|
|
|
|
|
Mine was too but I let the admins know and it wasn't long before it was unlocked again.
As long as you aren't using the same pass as some other site that may not be secure, you are OK on MineBig... but as others have posted... take care and change to anonymous for stat display.
|
|
|
|
|
Still zero issues on fry.minebig.com since source was released.
DDoS gave up too... couldn't take the pool down.
I have only about 650 KH/s but managed 60 FRY so far... not a ton but zero headache.
FK4coZ2bQBsvpycZqqPC68cA23ki1NATpn if people are being kindly with FRY.
|
|
|
|
|
Mine Big back online already... jealous people throwing DDoS around to take pools offline.
|
|
|
|
|
OP post unpassworded wallets now... launch is done... no need for people this far into launch to be complaining about a damn password.
|
|
|
|
MINEBIG IS LIVE AND MY hash IS ROlling!!
Ehm, no it's not? Uh yeah it is lol... mining away with over a dozen users already... got coins confirming. |
|
|
|
this is a fail coin.
difficulty has kimoto gravity well. so why not lunch it at 0.000024 like any typical coin. Early addapter are the one that make the coin.
instead you started with dificulty at 0.8.. 0.8!!!!!!!!!!!!! with KGW this dificulty went to 1,2,3 ,4 with in 50 blocks. this means that eveyone that mines will come out a loser. with only few coins mined because of this hard difficulty. mean while OP has 7kblocks *300 coins..... hahahahahaha
wow.... thought i seen it all recently. but this is an all time low.
who is going to mine this coin when it will reach difficulty 10,13 and it will pay out 100 coins t a day worth of mining?
If you understand KGW so well... then how can you cry cuz the first public mined blocks werent at .000024 diff... we would have had the same result no matter what the start diff was... by 10 blocks in... so you wanna cry cuz you couldnt be a part of the first couple of easy blocks? GTFO... hmm no. it owuld have taken at least 400-500 blocks.. and still i would not let it go smoothly, that premine is still high for its block rewards + KGW .. do some math Wow so you have no clue what you are talking about? 400-500 blocks for KGW to adjust... yet we just watched it go from 4+ diff to under 2? You do some math... and reading... and stop spouting off about KGW... you have no clue... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
