I'll see what I can do about the stales later. Right now I'm seeing A: 2454 R: 10 on my miner at home. Have you tried using minebbq2 as your primary to see if it makes a difference?
a lot of <unknown-work> rejectes
|
|
|
bZRTBVPZDgZqjCig5vQizDuQRadc98JD4H
|
|
|
I just joined your pool, very good alot of shares.
This is unfortunately not my pool, just found link somewhere on forum
|
|
|
На колу мочало,начинай сначала.
не совпадает
Ну у людей вообще по очень многим вопросам мнения не совпадают. Но просто ситуация такая, что если бы Авалоны были на 100% тем, за что их выдают продавцы, то их обладатели могли бы на 100% безапеляционно доказать это, разбив все подозрения в пух и прах, потратив всего 30 минут своего времени (+1000$ бонуса). А вот если появляется хотя бы одна нестыковка, то возникают подозрения, а нестыковок тут уже не одна, а на ~40 страниц обсуждения. Что уж поделать, народ у нас такой в ex-СССР, привыкший к лохотронам, поэтому во всем сомневаются. P.S. Я сам верил в Авалоны, до того как почитал "отзывы" их владельцев, теперь вот есть сомнения. Слишком уж быстро и упорно они оправдываются, при этом сутками просиживая на форуме, а вот найти время и выполнить то что просят они не могут Опять таки, ничего не утверждаю, но подозрения есть, как тут уже выше писали.
|
|
|
Скинули чье-то мнение в троллбоксе BTC-E, не знаю было ли тут (38 страниц перечитывать тяжело), вроде совпадает с мнением большинства, просто процитирую: И получишь ты пустую нерабочую коробку, записку на твоем языке (хоть за это спасибо) + доступ к чему-то типа аккаунта в "ботнете" (= GPUMAX), где тебе выделят от 60 до 70 гигахеш. Текст записки прост и понятен - молчи в тряпочку, а то доступ к аккаунту обрубим нафиг. Вот и вся система... А остальные пусть дальше гадают
|
|
|
This order will fill within 18 months from today. Can't wait to bump this post! Why do you think so? Today it looks like dying.
|
|
|
Are you going to add CNC?
|
|
|
UPDATE: Pool is temp down for now, DDoS... not much I can do, attack was pretty massive - 8.4 gbit worth. I'll update when/if it comes back.
Wow. Someone really wants to obtain this coins. But why? They are don't unique, and price dropping. They want the price to drop so they can buy cheap while farming on a pool they can connect to. Such massive ddos is very expensive...
|
|
|
UPDATE: Pool is temp down for now, DDoS... not much I can do, attack was pretty massive - 8.4 gbit worth. I'll update when/if it comes back.
Wow. Someone really wants to obtain this coins. But why? They are don't unique, and price dropping.
|
|
|
Why is this convenient?
Bitcoin is bitcoin - just like Berkshire-Hathaway-A is itself: at $140k per share. Nobody has any difficulty thinking that 1BTC = $115. Do we change the forex rate for Yuan to US pennies? Or the standard, quoted price of corn to ounces of gold per cubic rod?
WTF? Just stop.
I see nothing but ego in all these posts about changing how bitcoin is quoted.
/ rant
No ego. Just opinions that each of us has, just Bitcoin discussion.
|
|
|
Each coin there are some people don't like. When Litecoin came out, I did not like it. I was wrong. I could have grab a bundle there. Now I think it's the same thing. JKC, CNC, others. Maybe they are all junks, maybe not. Let's not judge and predict. I think some may have good future, some may be forgotten. Does it matter? Let's have fun here. I used to play games, each game forum is like this too. True. Haters gonna hate.
|
|
|
Because i think, that when bitcoin was created, no one expected that it will be cost ~100$.
Yeah, the 8 decimal digits were a huge troll from Satoshi. I doubt we will ever know all aspects of bitcoin inventing. Anyway, microBTC transactions nowaday causes some problems + I guess, there still will be long way to make bitcoin more convenient and clear for casuals. (Despite the fact, that some oldfags think Bitcoin is perfect.)
|
|
|
I think what the OP means is to change the nominal amounts of BTC. Basically to move the decimal place, so that the price will not seem so high.
I agree with this (although it would require a hard fork and never happen). It would work for all the same reasons that companies who split their stocks work, to make the price more attractive to buyers. Even though in theory there should be no difference.
That's exactly what I meant. As i know (maybe wrong) hard fork is not nessesary, because protocol works with satoshis, without decimal at all, so I think that it's the only question of some simple changes in client software? And it will reduce transactions size (maybe wrong again) + more convenient (user-friendly for new adopters) because 1 bitcoin cost will be ~similar to 1 USD/EURO cost. At the same time I understood, that it would require incredible changes in all old/current bitcoin users's mind.
|
|
|
Noob question : Can we just move comma 2 steps right? For example turn 0.05297585 into 5.297585 So, 5.297585 will be equal ~5$ its very convenient. Block rewald will be 2500 BTC Its like turn BTC to centiBTC. Because i think, that when bitcoin was created, no one expected that it will be cost ~100$. And now we have some problems with useless micro BTC transactions dusting blockchain, and diffirent opinions about upcoming 0.8.2 client.
|
|
|
Noob question : Can we just move comma 2 steps right? For example turn 0.05297585 into 5.297585 So, 5.297585 will be equal ~5$ its very convenient. Block rewald will be 2500 BTC Its like turn BTC to centiBTC. Because i think, that when bitcoin was created, no one expected that it will be cost ~100$. And now we have some problems with useless micro BTC transactions dusting blockchain, and diffirent opinions about upcoming 0.8.2 client.
|
|
|
Pff... I'll sell 100CNC for 1BTC
|
|
|
r3BVw2iCpjxXLjVrnmti6nvBjcoepG5mD1
|
|
|
Litecoin is not trendy nowadays
|
|
|
|