|
"AND WILL RECEIVE 2000 BITS EACH AND THE TOP 1 WILL RECEIVE +5% ADDITIONAL OF THE AMOUNT AS A REWARD! "
So, is it the person who wagered the most, or the person who got the highest profit? And if it was a loss, is there then 5% cashback?
|
|
|
|
Yeah i think this also, it's easy to cheat in chess game, so If your not professional player in chess it's better to stay away in that. But if your pro you can match those people who use bot to win the game.
How do we know that the OP is not going to do exactly the same? On the other hand, someone like Vladimir Kramnik or Vishy Anand could easily make fools of these bots and people behind them, if he ever wanted to, of course. Let's face it. People with professional Chess background represent maybe 0.0001% of population probably less. 99.999% of other people would be easily crushed by good chess program. You can't create service where only top of the tops pro prayers could play and win with Chess bots. When money is on the line people will cheat for sure. So this is a reason we don't have now, and won't have in the future any pvp chess platform where you can win money. Not even the best players would be able to win against the top chess algorithms. Stockfish (the newest one) has an estimated elo of 3447. Do you know what the world champion's elo is? 2857. Plus, the computers will analyze everything faster and more perfectly than any player (apart from memorization patterns) This is just not realistic. |
|
|
|
How many winners you need I want to try is it too late? I think it is still active promo. OP will announce it here if promo is over. 77.77 is very hard to hit :/ Last 0.01btc to try again. Hahaha Whoa, how'd you manage to reply with the wrong title AFTER OP edited it? You don't hit 77.77 now, rather you hit 66.66 with the 100 bit prize as your reward (instead of 20x your bet, which would probably break OP) |
|
|
|
LOW HOUSE EDGE - 1.0000% That statement is a misleading and possibly false statement. One would think that it would be a 1% edge per game, but in reality, you would be paying a 25% house edge if you clear the board with 1 bit on 1 mine. Change it to LOW HOUSE EDGE - 1.0000% each tile Well, here's the thing: if you are playing with a constant house edge, it's multiplicative. Say you're betting 2x and. You have a 50.50% chance of loss. 1% house edge. Then you double down. You again have a 50.50% chance of loss. 1% house edge. 0.9801 - The total chance of loss is thus 0.754975%, which is 1.99% house edge to get 4x. Where did the .01% go? Oooh... If my calculations are correct, the total house edge for the GAME is 21.43%
Anyway, yes. The house edge is pretty crazy against you. Unless my math is completely wrong. I'm tired, forgive me  |
|
|
|
Too bad you are just an ass kisser for such websites, I will let people know the truth of such scamming websites
I will listen to you when you properly refute my points instead of merely using ad hominem, without really supporting yourself. Show proper proof of scam accusations, real evidence, and I will believe it. |
|
|
|
I was examining all of his plays where I wasn't playing him and it was very suspicious. I left for 30 mins I come back to see what he was doing and he's the chip leader with over 121 mbtc and he started with almost nothing. If he was just a random reckless newb he would end up blowing his stack not constantly winning almost all hands with no logic or reason in his gameplay Im pretty sure youre wrong here. Im not defending fortunejack by no means but just because you may have had 2 better starting cards in a hand and called an all in preflop it doesnt mean you should win the hand. Most likely you both have live cards and that player just hit his. Its like a 60/40 game preflop if this is the case.
Just my opinion but no reason to call scam because you lost. If youre gonna get butturt you prob shouldnt play poker at all.
Theres a possibility youre telling the truth and its rigged sure, but the odds are pretty low
Variance exists, and you have to think of it that way: Even with AA, there's a chance to be sucked out by 72o (around 12% or something). It's possible to win a lot of times by shoving with nothing. There's always a non-zero chance for a maniac to win, even to the point of being the chipleader. However, in the long run, eventually their ROI will drop down due to math. Right now, cash games are off with FortuneJack. You'll see this kind of stupid play a lot in freerolls obviously because people don't care - they aren't committed. |
|
|
|
You're saying they're using their own seed (whatever that means) without actually proving anything. That's only a theory with no proof, dude.
If I get that wrong please put a subtitle there.
Try to verify the seed that appears when you click re-randomize on past bets you will figure out it's the one that being played with. 100% proved rigged Err... Nope, I got different result with different client seed. Edit: Also the seed that appears when you click re-randomize get randomized every time you refresh the page so it could be anything. Their rigged seed is changed everytime to a seed working with their server seed, test each seed and you will find out it's proved. If your normally betting low, then bet high. Since they 100% rigged it against you, you will have a 100% win rate on the other option. Genius! I don't actually believe that they are rigged, and I'm simply pointing out why it would be a bad idea to do thatHere is the part where you tell me that they will predict you will bet against what you normally bet on, so it is still rigged. In that case, keep staying on your normal option. You have a 100% win rate again! Congrats! It's proved rigged, check the video. I can't understand the video, I don't adapt your accent, my English is not mother tongue, sorry, could you post it? They don't use the client seed that you choose, they use one of their choice so they have control over rolls. You didn't even change the seed in the video. All you did was go to the client seed change window and then close it. You also didn't show the verification process for any bet to show us that primedice gave a different result. Your accusations are based on the fact that you don't know how the website works. I saw your newer bitsler video as well - a minimum bet of 0.00001 means a minimum bet of 0.00001, not a balance of that. I think perhaps it's your incompetence that needs to be checked, not the authenticity of the websites. |
|
|
|
Doesn't have to be a hacked account, the account could have also voluntarily changed hands (ie account selling)
Lately there has been a lot of selling of accounts in the auctions or digital goods section. When I browse those section I see that the majority are low UID which means old accounts from 2011-2013. I too believe the account may have changed hand. Why would the hacker bother hacking an account with only 32 post and Jr.Member ? Why? Because those are the only targets left, really. The data leak preceded a warning by theymos to change passwords and thus all the current accounts would have new passwords (at least they should) and thus the older and more inactive accounts which haven't seen the message are most susceptible to the leak |
|
|
|
Going to be really hard to make a 50k BTC bet from one bookmaker, as most don't have really large limits. I'd suggest you spread it out on multiple bookmakers. 50k is 81 BTC, which is a lot to risk (40 BTC payout) I'd suggest NitrogenSports, but they don't seem to offer the event. Currently, you can bet 5.5 BTC on fairlay.comA few coins at BitcoinRush.io (they don't show their limits) Probably 10+ BTC on Cloudbet.com, when they offer it (probably still too far away) and possibly up to 81 BTC. Probably 3 BTC on Directbet.eu when they offer it. Probably 1+ BTC on Coinbet24 when they offer it. Total ~20 BTC/81 BTCMight want to consider bookmaker.eu, a fiat sportsbook that also allows bitcoin deposits/withdraws and bodog.eu. Probably will require KYC though. This seems to be good idea, spread your bets between many sport books. You will minimize the risk of not being paid if you win. I don't think it's a good idea... You have 5x more risk to be unpaid... Maybe OP can send a e-mail to a site owner to talk about this bet... Choose for the best payment ratio  What are you saying? You mean to say that the ratio of the likelihood of one site running away with ALL your funds vs 5 sites all running with your funds is 1:5? Where's the logic in that? You have more security with spreading your bets. |
|
|
|
Someone needs to make a poker staking site asap, similar to Chipmeup and Pokermarket but only uses Bitcoin. Allot of people on here play poker and theirs allot of opportunity for staking players. Anyone interested in making a site like this?
BetcoinPoker is good one if you want online poker that accepting bitcoin. I used it since last two months and i never encounter any issue. The graphics design is cool and many other online players to play with, I think there will a contest in their site now. You may on my signature to know what i'm talking about. Do you know what staking means? No, you don't. You simply read "poker" and recalled that Betcoin.ag has poker, and found an opportunity. Stop it. You need to actually know what you're discussing before you do it, please. correct me if i am wrong. but i'm just referring to this kind of poker staking: https://www.betcoin.ag/poker-staking. thanks Correct me if I'm wrong, but is that link not just simply a search for poker staking? And the only result is an article on the basics of staking. There is no "staking" opportunity directly proposed by the site, just an article. And, "BetcoinPoker is good one if you want online poker that accepting bitcoin." does not refer to staking whatsoever - rather, it refers to the game of poker itself |
|
|
|
Someone needs to make a poker staking site asap, similar to Chipmeup and Pokermarket but only uses Bitcoin. Allot of people on here play poker and theirs allot of opportunity for staking players. Anyone interested in making a site like this?
BetcoinPoker is good one if you want online poker that accepting bitcoin. I used it since last two months and i never encounter any issue. The graphics design is cool and many other online players to play with, I think there will a contest in their site now. You may on my signature to know what i'm talking about. Do you know what staking means? No, you don't. You simply read "poker" and recalled that Betcoin.ag has poker, and found an opportunity. Stop it. You need to actually know what you're discussing before you do it, please. |
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't there be a botting problem due to the nature of the games? You can use programs to cheat at both Go and Chess (there are some that have higher rating than the world champion for Chess). I'm unsure about the basketball one, but once that game is figured out I can assume that that will also be botted.
|
|
|
|
Exactly, I'm not sure I've ever seen such a big fail. Especially with all the credit he's trying to take. He bumps this thread everyday with whois reports (?) and says "#offline". When, in fact, every single time I've tried to follow up to see if he's actually done anything, the game is online and working as normal.
In the end, he's probably helping DT with this:
1) People can see that DDOS protection is working fine
2) He keeps bumping the DT thread where people can observe (1).
Lol.
Shhh! Don't let the wannabe script kiddy see that he's failing in his DDoS attempts (however effective they aren't) You'll stop the free marketing! Don't you want Dragon's Tale to get someone bumping their thread for free? Maybe now he's going to get it through his head that his attempts weren't working... |
|
|
|
As the Pocketdice Can you explain the fact that appear 5 or 6 times the same number followed?  Variance exists. It's just a bad run (assuming you lost). Don't think that they rig it if you can verify its authenticity. The probability of rolling the same number 5 or 6 times in a row is a non-zero chance. |
|
|
|
Someone needs to make a poker staking site asap, similar to Chipmeup and Pokermarket but only uses Bitcoin. Allot of people on here play poker and theirs allot of opportunity for staking players. Anyone interested in making a site like this?
Checking out PokerMarket, it already accepts Bitcoin via bitpay. Hence, what's the problem? Most likely if you have a bitcoin-only poker site, it would be filled with more fish than not, and potential scammers. Not to stereotype, but this would be how it is. Just use the pre-existing site. |
|
|
|
You are correct! But don't celebrate, we got some serious challenge for you.
Here is story like puzzle. In order to find out the truth you can ask any questions, and we will answer them as "Yes", "No" or "Doesn't matter". Here we go: one guy came to the saloon and asked the bartender for a glass of water. After drinking the water he asked bartender for another glass of water. The bartender didn't give the second one, instead he pulled out the revolver and shot at the ceiling. The guy left the saloon, seemed to be satisfied.
QUESTION: What happened?
I've heard of this puzzle before. It's the hiccups one, right? (The man has hiccups and thus ordered water, and the bartender helped by scaring him) |
|
|
|
Hmm. seems suspicious. Also, asking for loan and creating threads regarding selling if the account makes feel that it is compromised. Will leave a negative for now and alert DT guys about this.
Lol, says the guy with this rep: Bought account. Do not rely on the age or Trust on this account to be accurate. also ur pw waS recently changed And im happy to sign an old message from any addresses ive used in the past. Alright, sign a message with this address please. 1NSb3j6jnnyx6sssuXKvux9jjwMXszYrqc Source: https://archive.is/lSRgT | blockchain tx |
|
|
|
This seems suspicious. Not to say that OP is not dilatedPixel, but I would be surprised to see that the owner suddenly decided to come onto BCT now as news about the hacked accounts came recently. I'm not sure that if I was offline for 3 years, that I'd be omniscient and come on less than a day after the password was changed. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=192331.0 - if the trade was in BTC, the only way you would be able to prove you are dilatedPixel is to sign the address that you used for it, though I doubt that's in the records. |
|
|
|
Hey guys...sorry of this has been answered. How can I start a signature campaign for my traders spreadsheet uads.io?
Check out some of the pre-existing signature campaigns for ideas. Then, set the pricing for the signature campaign members. You probably want a sig designer to create something in bbcode for you, as well as a campaign manager (or if not, an escrow to hold the funds though going through everyone's posts takes quite a while). And of course, make sure you can afford it |
|
|
|
Unfortunately, this actually is helping him with marketing purposes. I would cease communication with him entirely. (Hopefully nobody tries to contact him because they're interested, ugh.) I'm glad that the topic was deleted. Thank god. I negged him (not that it would really help  ) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
