|
Have tagged the alt account and main account with neutral and negative respectively.
See you back in the Known Alts thread when it is sorted.
|
|
|
|
creepy how he's stalking me from one thread to the next
Have you followed me here to say that I am stalking you? No, moron. I posted three posts prior to you. |
|
|
|
Website: https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/114250403/cryptopia-boss-blames-former-shareholder-for-company-problemsTitle: Cryptopia boss blames former shareholder for company problems Byline and Date: Susan Edmunds 13:16, Jul 17 2019 Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718154642/https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/114250403/cryptopia-boss-blames-former-shareholder-for-company-problemsWebsite: https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/113357667/investors-with-tens-of-thousands-in-cryptopia-waiting-for-information?rm=aTitle: Investors with tens of thousands in Cryptopia waiting for information Byline and Date: Susan Edmunds 14:06, Jun 10 2019 Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718154831/https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/113357667/investors-with-tens-of-thousands-in-cryptopia-waiting-for-information?rm=aWebsite: https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/113210309/cryptopia-liquidator-knocksback-international-buyer?rm=aTitle: Cryptopia liquidator knocks-back international buyer Byline and Date: REBECCA STEVENSON 09:23, Jun 05 2019 Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718154946/https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/113210309/cryptopia-liquidator-knocksback-international-buyer?rm=aWebsite: https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/113171936/cryptopia-first-liquidators-report-shows-it-owes-more-than-42m?rm=aTitle: Cryptopia first liquidators report shows it owes more than $4.2m Byline and Date: Rebecca Stevenson 20:07, May 31 2019 Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718155219/https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/113171936/cryptopia-first-liquidators-report-shows-it-owes-more-than-42m?rm=a
Website: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/391039/cryptopia-liquidators-seek-advice-from-courts-as-to-how-to-pay-back-customersTitle: Cryptopia liquidators seek advice from courts as to how to pay back customers Byline and Date: 5:18 pm on 1 June 2019 Matthew Theunissen, Reporter Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718155522/https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/391039/cryptopia-liquidators-seek-advice-from-courts-as-to-how-to-pay-back-customers...
Liquidators for hacked cryptocurrency exchange Cryptopia need legal advice from the courts as to how to repay out-of-pocket customers as there is no legal precedent anywhere in the world. Website: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/389273/liquidators-called-in-to-hacked-cryptocurrency-businessTitle: Liquidators called in to hacked cryptocurrency business Byline and Date: 5:27 pm on 15 May 2019 Madison Reidy, Business reporter Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718155655/https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/389273/liquidators-called-in-to-hacked-cryptocurrency-business
Website: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1904/S00114/hacked-cryptopia-investors-in-the-dark-over-rebate.htmTitle: Hacked Cryptopia investors in the dark over "rebate" Byline and Date: Wednesday, 3 April 2019, 4:20 pm Article: BusinessDesk By Nikki Mandow Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718160646/http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1904/S00114/hacked-cryptopia-investors-in-the-dark-over-rebate.htmWebsite: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1901/S00392/cryptopia-investors-worried-by-lack-of-information.htmTitle: Cryptopia investors worried by lack of information Byline and Date: Friday, 25 January 2019, 3:37 pm Article: BusinessDesk By Nikki Mandow Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718160824/http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1901/S00392/cryptopia-investors-worried-by-lack-of-information.htmWebsite: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1901/S00339/police-working-with-digital-forensic-experts-on-crypto-hack.htmTitle: Police working with digital forensic experts on Crypto Hack Byline and Date: Wednesday, 23 January 2019, 8:26 pm Article: BusinessDesk Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718160927/http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1901/S00339/police-working-with-digital-forensic-experts-on-crypto-hack.htmWebsite: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK1901/S00287/police-making-progress-in-crypto-currency-investigation.htmTitle: Police making progress in crypto-currency investigation Byline and Date: Tuesday, 22 January 2019, 5:31 pm Press Release: New Zealand Police Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718161113/http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK1901/S00287/police-making-progress-in-crypto-currency-investigation.htmWebsite: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1901/S00239/currency-frozen-in-multi-million-dollar-cryptopia-theft.htmTitle: Currency frozen in multi-million dollar Cryptopia theft Byline and Date: Friday, 18 January 2019, 3:47 pm Article: BusinessDesk By Nikki Mandow Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718161221/http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1901/S00239/currency-frozen-in-multi-million-dollar-cryptopia-theft.htm
Website: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12236487Title: Cryptopia files petition in US Bankruptcy Court Byline and Date: 1 Jun, 2019 9:10am Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190718161501/https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12236487
|
|
|
|
[ Archive] I am trying to have some nice ad hominem conversation with timelord here and he said " yes, yes, you are wrong, I am right" and then I said " no no no, you are wrong and I am right" and timelord said someone should contact theymos to look thread and I don't think this system will work if we will call theymos for every single flag so I am using this opportunity to invite other valuable members to join discussion and share opinions about flags Punctuation marks soon.User timelord https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=62044 hasn't been online in seven years and four days...
marlboroza's attacks aside: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43685.0 [ Archive] creepy how he's stalking me from one thread to the next to try to bully me into changing my opposition to his duplicate Flag ... [ Archive] |
|
|
|
Yeap that is us.... We did it to prevent any malicious attempts  All good - as an extra layer of security perhaps you should check out the Stake your Bitcoin address here thread. (but I wasn't joking when I said that I am unable to verify myself with your KYC program) |
|
|
|
You have been sleeping all those days? 🤪
Probably - Normally I only frequent the Scam Accusation and Reputation threads (and occasionally the Currency Exchange section). Pleased to meet you. |
|
|
|
marlboroza is using reverse-enginering to make the flag fit the accusation... [quote author=marlboroza link=topic=5165940.msg51855060#msg51855060 date=1563369648] I don't see it the way OP see it. I'll pick one random flag (Plutonium): Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic Ponzies are mentioned in that topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1046791.0. [/quote] The only two times the word Ponzi are mentioned in the Opening Post by Quickseller is in this first paragraph: [quote author=Quickseller link=topic=1046791.msg11275421#msg11275421 date=1430686502] TheGambler has run many HYIP/ ponzi sites over the years. Research into his identity has caused me to believe that he has been running scam sites since at least 2012, however I think they probably go back to ~2010. He is known by some as moreia, by others as Spoodermen, he seems to think his "main" account is TheGambler. He has scammed at least 15 BTC on bitcointalk, however the amount is likely at least 4 times (by my guesstimate) as much considering it is difficult to know the exact amount he scammed on most of his HYIP/ ponzis. He has been described by some as the plague to the community, he is a serial scammer. [/quote] Quickseller lists Plutonium as an alt, but makes no connection between the accused (TheGambler) and Plutonium. (and he's already "guestimating" ... not offering facts) What Quickseller actually said was: The "he" being the subject of the op - TheGambler. There is no breakdown of which user allegedly did what much less offer proof of connections. and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so Indeed, guests and everyone, because Plutonium is ponzi scammer, as it is visible in thread linked above. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions. Connection between other accounts might or might not be true (I did not check everything yet) but this is irrelevant for this flag. Relevant factor is that they are ponzi scammer which is, again, mentioned in QS's thread. Evidence of scamming exist. I actually see flags that should be supported, not bashed. Again, marlbaroza is using reverse-enginering logic to make the flag fit the accusation. Quickseller hasn't proven the connection between the subject of the thread and those he claims are alts, so the flag was ... " If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed." Given marboroza has already started a thread asking us to distrust him it's little surprise he has only now gone back and supported the flag all these weeks later. He doesn't have anything to loose by supporting a flag that was created incorrectly.  by my guesstimate Quickseller, trigger happy to be seen to have mended his ways has created a flurry of Flags, then has read the fine print and has stopped creating flags in the hope no one would notice the thread supporting the flags does not hold up to scrutiny.
Somebody feel free to PM @theymos to come have a look at this thread... and feel free to audit my own Flags (if you-know-who) hasn't already tried it. |
|
|
|
Pamoldar (who?) and then Quickseller both flag ky94PjDw - Pamoldar as a Type 1, Quickseller as a type 3 Flag.All three of these flags reference @theymos' thread Trust flags as "proof" of their flags. Only trouble is ky94PjDw is not mentioned in either the OP or the first page (TL;DR the rest) so in this instance, all three, Pamoldar (type one), Steamtyme (type two) and Quickseller (type three) flags are fake. Thanks for the information - As I said in the quote, I had endeavoured to find the name ky94PjDw in that thread, but it wasn't mentioned, hence the observation in the OP.
There is blockchain evidence...it is also widely acknowledged that those referenced in that thread are in fact of James Volpe. This includes the assistance of vetting the information by one or more admins.
ky94PjDw was a test account created by theymos to allow users to get a feel of how the flag system works.
Post three of Your thread you are told that the person used a mixing service which is a dubious response in itself, however your OP does not cite any references as to where you've come to the conclusion the names listed are alts. The thread was created over three years and two months ago: Last edited post five disgraced koshgel is massaging your ego to which in post seven you are wanting others to press charges then from then on it's down to your alts such as ACCTseller to help kick an empty tin can around the playground at lunch time.
the enemy of your enemy is your friend,i thought you two are friends because you are fighting abusive Dt members? just focus in one goal.
Quickseller isn't anyone's friend except his sock-puppets. His thread is stale having come to life this year after he created his twenty flags with this as his first post since the flags were created. Well hopefully you will get arrested soon. How much bitcoin did you end up with after gambling most of what you stole away? I was thinking about planning a trip to Australia somewhat soon, perhaps I could pay a visit to the local PD and try to push you to get investigated and arrested for your crimes.
No doubt because the "PD" in your own area have heard it all before? 
After kicking the tin can around for 36 hours this is the last post: Oh James, you are absolutely correct. You have conducted yourself with complete integrity and have never mislead anyone dealing with you in any way whatsoever. /s
I would say integral as most other topic owners in the gambling section Would have never thought I'd have seen the day you were left with nothing but sarcasm.
100% of Quickseller's Flags are false. |
|
|
|
It's not looking too good for Quickseller [ Trust] [ BPIP] having Flagged (21 type one + 1 type 3) Flags that offer no proof. 100% of Quicksellers Flags are false.http://loyce.club/trust/flags/50.html
These twenty-one flags cite the one thread: [dox'ed]James Volpe TheGamber aka moreia aka many others is an alt of dzeros (there's no actual doxing, just BTC TX from one wallet to another wallet as proof that is quickly rebuffed) 7 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged TheGambler (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 8 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged dzeros (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 10 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged moreia (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 11 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Spodermen (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 12 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Plutonium (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 13 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged silvercane (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 14 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Gambler_appeal (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller, killyou72. Opposed by nobody. 15 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged NextPonzi (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 16 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged NextPonziV2 (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 17 Active. Quickseller flagged fastponzi (type 1, see why). Supported by pandukelana2712, Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 18 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged bit-dividends (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 19 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Bit-Dividends.com (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 20 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Crypterest (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 21 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged CryptoSplit (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 22 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged dmugetsu (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 23 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Fiiasco (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 24 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged InvestCryptos (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 25 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged BtcGains (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 26 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged kerimk2 (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 27 Active. Quickseller flagged BitcoinPonzi.io (type 1, see why). Supported by pandukelana2712, Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 28 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged sergiom Banned! (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. Quickseller in his OP claims there are Known alts:
(snip) <--- details removed due to thread being in the "investigation" section
(total of 20a lot of known alts) But as some-one who knows a thing or two about alts, I can't find any references linking any of the UID's listed to anyone else.
Pamoldar (who?) and then Quickseller both flag ky94PjDw - Pamoldar as a Type 1, Quickseller as a type 3 Flag.32 Active. Pamoldar flagged ky94PjDw (type 1, see why). Supported by nutildah, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, Quickseller, asu. Opposed by DarkStar_, Steamtyme, Hueristic, bill gator, ky94PjDw. 33 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged ky94PjDw (type 3, see why). Supported by dbshck, Steamtyme, Quickseller, ky94PjDw. Opposed by Hueristic[/size]. Not to be outdone Steamtyme starts a type two flag against ky94PjDw I haven't encountered a flag that "expires" already, but here is one... All three of these flags reference @theymos' thread Trust flags as "proof" of their flags. Only trouble is ky94PjDw is not mentioned in either the OP or the first page (TL;DR the rest) so in this instance, all three, Pamoldar (type one), Steamtyme (type two) and Quickseller (type three) flags are fake.
Quickseller's type 3 flag against ky94PjDw is interesting in that he would have been directly affected financially ... (what ever the correct wording is) from his trade with ky94PjDw - but the thread "proof" isn't there.
100% of Quicksellers Flags are false. I know people such as @Vod and @Suchmoon (and a whole lot more) are going to want to sink the boot in, however, I just ask that you don't indulge that person with lengthy responces. It's Flag abuse in the most blatant kind that @theymos needs to stamp out. |
|
|
|
Shame about jamalaezaz - went off the deep end... Some well known names and some more obscure ones make for an interesting trip down scammer's lane... |
|
|
|
The server is under high load and high disk usage though. Any recommendations for a cheap, reliable webhost that accepts Bitcoin?
I can help you with the BTC ... Do you take PP? |
|
|
|
Hope this clarified the issues, but if you have further questions, do not hesitate to ask us, however keep in mind that we will not and can not disclose personal data online, so any questions that you have for your personal account (what is the status of the verification for example), you must send an email to our support team.
That's all good in theory, but out here in the real world I am unable to get your verification program to work. |
|
|
|
Bump
Just a quick heads-up, your Flag page is offline... |
|
|
|
@ CucakRowoMany thanks for your recent submissions; please use the Submission Form contained in the OP when submitting your investigations. How are the first two and the second two connected to each other? |
|
|
|
Website: https://steemit.com/palnet/@vcdragon/version-of-the-story-of-cryptopia-from-developer-him-self-how-it-start-and-end?fbclid=iwar2rvp-3fyfpuxhpe8lwfdxwb7vxmrpjzo2k2uwslqyc0clwetna2fo-s34Title: Version of the story of cryptopia from developer him self how it start & end. Byline and Date: vcdragon (58) in palnet • 4 days ago (edited) Archive link: https://web.archive.org/save/https://steemit.com/palnet/@vcdragon/version-of-the-story-of-cryptopia-from-developer-him-self-how-it-start-and-end?fbclid=iwar2rvp-3fyfpuxhpe8lwfdxwb7vxmrpjzo2k2uwslqyc0clwetna2fo-s34 (has already been removed) here is in a version of the story of cryptopia from deve him self hex. I do belive him very much ty to his exchange i know all abuot crypto, i lost alot that crytopia die, that ok. but is not ok that bad guys win they take every thing from us now all we can do is let the world know this story, and hope for better. so guys plz read this story. ** is long but is real
Around January 2014 Adam and I started working on a project as a hobby called Cryptopia which was a website for Crypto enthusiasts including an exchange, mining pools, forums and other features. After the project started to materialize into something starting to resemble a finished product we incorporated the company Cryptopia in July 2014. In December 2014 when we thought we were ready we launched the website live into production. For the next few years we spent all of our free time working on Cryptopia and in 2015 I resigned from my full time job to keep working on Cryptopia while Adam continued at his job and working on Cryptopia in his spare time.
After I had burned through all my savings I needed to look at finding another job, Adam was currently working as a Developer for Intranel. Adam got me an interview at his work, but the day of the interview I instead went to see my parents and told them that I didn't know what I was asking them for but I felt like if I had to go back to working a regular job it was going to kill me. My parents took out $45,000 from their retirement fund to buy shares in the company so that Adam and I could use it to continue to work on Cryptopia.
Adam resigned from Intranel, but they said they didn't want to lose him and wanted to keep an eye on us so they offered a room in their office for rent, which we would pay for by Adam doing sprint code work for Intranel, and when they didn't have work for them they charged us cash. Intranel showed an interest very early on but Adam and I felt that we were handling things just fine on our own for the size we were and the work we were doing and didn't see any need to get them involved.
Intranel continued to show an interest in us, and after the beginning of 2017 when things really started to kick off and we started experiencing exponential growth at a scary pace we started to take Intranel's offers more seriously as neither of us identified ourselves as business men and only wanted to continue doing the development and innovation work we were already doing.
Intranel made us an offer that for 20% the company they would handle all of the business management and development, things like helping hiring and managing staff, paying tax, lobbying for regulator guidance, all the "boring business stuff" and that they would contract us out 4 of their FTEs at a discounted rate while they helped us find and hire staff of our own.
Instead of hiring staff for us they hired staff for themselves and continued to contract them out to us at exorbitant rates even including the agreed upon 30% discount, and put their staff in key managerial positions to allow themselves degrees of autonomy without seeking shareholder or director consent. If and when shareholder and or director consent was ever sought for anything, if the response they got was "No" they would just ignore it anyway.
They immediately set to playing games of divide and conquer and playing he said she said trying to pit us against each other and split us up. They would come to one for a request, get a no, go to the other for a yes, and then play us off against each other. Once we were reliant on the work they were doing for us and the staff they were providing for us they turned around and said they wanted an extra 5% of the shares or they would leave us high and dry with our engagements. To further divide us they insisted that I make up the extra 5% because they thought Adam was worth more to the company than I was.
Adam reached a point of frustration where they were trying to manage him and the work he was doing and how he should do it that he got fed up and resigned. They told me I should take a holiday so I don't get burned out like Adam, while I was away they simply stopped paying me. Not formally dismissed, no change of contract, no nothing. Just stopped paying me, and when I came back they told me they had given away my desk and there physically wasn't room for me in the building anymore, and wouldn't let me back.
After being a shareholder for 1 month, without shareholder or director approval or consent they issued a dividend. Adam and I never received this dividend. They also gave to themselves the same amount proportionately they claimed to have given Adam and I even though we'd been there for years and they had been a shareholder for a month. Again, Adam and I never actually received the dividend they say they issued.
The reason they forced the extra 5% was because they needed the extra shares to be able to block any major transaction the company tried to undertake so that we could not achieve a 75% threshold. They also used their position to veto listing policies in place to maintain the companies integrity in order to list and trade on coins their friends had made.
They sought director consent to create a company in the UK to act as our support desk, which we told them we didn't want them to do. They did it anyway, created it under their own names personally, and then again without director or shareholder consent issued themselves a loan for approximately $300,000 from the company to them personally for "startup costs".
They took on clients using our name for projects we said we weren't interested in or capable of, they assured us they were handling that work for themselves and they were just using our name as partners, they then billed us for that work. They issued invoices from Cryptopia for themselves, approved and paid them. They bled money everywhere they could, we paid for tax on their staff's flu shots? We paid for taxes on christmas gifts to their staff and our company bought the gifts. Everything they were unable to take for themselves they pissed into the wind on needless expenses and luxuries the company could not afford and engagements that ultimately buried us.
They made deals to list coins for a fee in Bitcoin instead of in the exchanges native coin DOT, this had negative impacts on the DOT markets and the ecosystem built around DOT as well as deprived CEFS holders of the DOT they would have received from those listings had they gone through the normal listing process.
They also stripped out all of the functionality from the site that wasn't purely an "exchange", dismantling the eco system that had been built and cultivated around our original slogan of "Your one stop Crypto shop" and aims to be a blockchain services platform and turned it into something completely foreign to the site that had been the initial draw for users.
They tried to sell the company out from under us 3 separate times.
If they had not been removed in November the company would have been bankrupt in December, but we didn't find this out until after we removed them forcibly, no one had any idea the dire situation they had gotten the company into, or that it would not have been able to afford their own next invoice.
I believe the Hack was orchestrated to bury everything they have done, and was planned to happen before we removed them so that it could tidily explain the state they had gotten the company into. And then rushed after their plan was interrupted when they were forcibly removed from the company.
They are now partnered with ANZ a bank that refused Cryptopia banking services, and PWC a firm that was supposed to be providing Cryptopia counsel on various legal matters, working on projects Cryptopia was gearing up to work on.
|
|
|
|
Can you remove the nova personal phone and identity verification ? It is ridiculous to verify these.
Best to get used to KYC/AML policies if you want to use a legitimate exchange. Nearly all legit exchanges now, or will soon, require verification. Nova has them, they just don't work properly. |
|
|
|
Hey Timelord2067, finally you are doing some good job for the forum. The DT is being reigned by assholes and if you remove all of them, you deserve the title which your name has, The lord of Time  i agreed,this mafia leader seems to be out of town or maybe hes dead for good or just hiding until his position come back,lets hope that the other mafia members will be outcasted from their positions so this forum would be back to normal like the old days which these abusive people doesnt exist.. I wouldn't exactly go poking Lauda's carcase just yet; he's only been offline barely 72 hours so I wouldn't read too much into it. If it were three weeks, or even three months then it might be a different matter. Now that you've had your laugh, please be respectful that this thread is intended to track Lauda's ~85% false flags, it's not intended as an open forum to discuss him. But thank you for your words of encouragement. |
|
|
|
I've just noticed there's a Name: novaexchange u=820701
Posts: 115
Activity: 115
Merit: 11
Position: Member
Date Registered: 09 April 2016, 03:25:00
Last Active: 13 July 2019, 20:58:34 then there's a Name: Nova Exchange u=2626818
Posts: 6
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 12 June 2019, 13:54:19
Last Active: Today at 01:26:54 |
|
|
|
This is quite an interesting scenario.
It is indeed and one I hadn't really considered before. There are plenty of projects that effectively don't exist outside a tiny number of exchanges. That's the only reason they were created in the first place anyway. Actually cutting those coins out of existence sums up the entire ethos of most alts - fully centralised dollar grabs. How do they return coins to those who had Cryptopia balances? That's going to be the vast majority of users in most cases. The sale of the Cryptsy wallets was done via auctions and quite a few of the wallets were sold "as-is" without any guarantee of their contents. The major ones (BTC/LTC etc) attracted attention while the lesser traded alts were snapped up - some were then dumped on the markets, others were on-sold or even given back to the devs in some cases. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
