It's been many days, I sent .004 BTC to one of the lucky number addresses and never got a response. Using Bitcoin-qt. The transaction is confirmed. What's the issue?
Thanks
Min bet is 0.01. |
|
|
|
I decided to ask for a refund for a jalapeno (I wanted to give bfl the benefit of the doubt) and see if they delivered before March. As the deadline date wad close to paypals 45 day refund policy i decided to open a dispute. I got the refund immediately, but I noticed that there was an adjustment fee of 5 dollars. Has anyone noticed this?
Screenshot? I know previously on eBay some scammy buyers would "adjust" the payment costs and get away with a $10 or $20 discount. Maybe BFL is doing the same thing, except they make off with $5? |
|
|
|
|
Happy to buy the coins off you at 98%, paid via PPUSD.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry but I think you might have lost the coins.
Next time, use clients where you can control the private keys to. Blockchain.info or Electrum are both light.
|
|
|
|
|
Can't you still deposit and trade with an unverified account on gox?
|
|
|
|
|
How long did you take before you submitted it?
|
|
|
|
Are there any actual reasons to think that davout, who provided a service that, unlike pirateat40's obvious scam, made sense and didn't have money coming from nowhere, is scamming instawallet users?
How much has actually been stolen? I was under the impression that the story was simply that a security flaw had been discovered that was such that the service could not be reopened with the same wallets without risking theft.
Presumably all that money has been moved to a different wallet to avoid possible theft from wallets that attackers stored the private keys from, but have not yet transferred the money from.
Is there any actual reason to think that there are any current problems other than uncertainty about determining and fulfilling legitimate claims?
Everything I've seen so far seems to be just as it should be. A vulnerability was discovered that meant that any wallet could have had the private key stored. As a result, any wallet could be vulnerable, even after all service was shut down. So, davout shut down the service and transferred all the coins that hadn't been stolen yet to a different wallet.
What is the problem here so far, other than the obvious problem of the security flaw? Aside from that, everything seems to be handled as it should be.
Yes, balances over 50 BTC may not be fully reclaimed. IF davout pays out anything at all. |
|
|
|
Anyone knows; How long does a manual withdraw take?
Pretty much how long until burnside comes online  My manual withdraws have always being timely. Obviously not as good as instant. |
|
|
|
|
That's at the current rates. You should look at future expansion too.
|
|
|
|
|
Bounty address: 8auxBNWtns9wEKQGgqhmF3u3BixHFKuAFG
The coins will be sent to the first exchange that supports at least BTCBTE trading and claims the bounty. No fees are taken. This is a project to try and get BTE listed on an exchange.
|
|
|
|
Any updates?  Concerned too. |
|
|
|
|
The code isn't worth much, it's about the site and brand.
|
|
|
|
Nice dividend, Thank you!
After I saw how you were handling what happened with Bakewell, I decided you must be my kinda guy: one who takes the knocks and stands behind what he does anyway. I'm glad to see my trust rewarded.
Just a question:
Bitfunder shows 4831 shares issued, but you claim 3750 outstanding in your latest report. Is the difference a set of shares that you use to defend your 0.095 - 0.10 share price range?
Yes, shares in btcinvest's account does not count because they haven't being sold yet. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
Love how you crossposted this to the gambling section.
Also, please learn the difference between copyright and trademark first.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you understand the difference between a trademark, registered trademark, or copyright.
|
|
|
|
|
Report:
Dividends were lower this time because of ASICMINER's reduced dividends for expansion, and bad luck on S.DICE, so I decided to pay out some btcjam principal as dividends.
Revenue
BTCJAM loan: 3.21 BTC
ESECURITYSABTC: 0.01 BTC
ASICMINER dividends: 0.88 BTC
ATC777 loan: 0.215 BTC
scrybe line of credit interest: 0.1969 BTC
G.SDICE dividends: 0.09 BTC
TOTAL: 4.6019 BTC
Paid as dividends: 4.1417 BTC
Dividends per share: 0.0011 / share
Assets
Not traded on an exchange:
253 ASICMINER (directly) - 199.11 BTC
BitFunder
11,134 G.SDICE shares: 33.37 BTC
41 G.ASICMINER-PT shares: 32.27 BTC
64,600 btcQuick: 5.01 BTC
Coins: 10.02 btc
Bitfunder total value: 80.67 BTC
btct.co
3 ESECURITYSABTC: 1.15 BTC
Coins: 2.2 btc
btct.co total value: 3.35 BTC
ATC777 loan (remaining): 28.73 BTC
scrybe line of credit: 35 BTC
Btcjam secured loan (remaining): 3 BTC
CoinLenders 20 BTC loan: 20 BTC
Total loans / lines of credit: 86.73 BTC
Coins: 5.22 BTC
Total: 375.08 BTC
Shares outstanding: 3750
NAV/share: 0.1 BTC / share
|
|
|
|
|
You clicked on Choose File and then Change Profile?
|
|
|
|
|
The way PoS and PoW works is different to PPCoin.
There are only proof of stake blocks. There are no PoW blocks.
PoW coin creation is transactions. A block can include multiple coinbase transactions.
PoW becomes an initial currency seeding mechanism - should be all gone in maybe a year or so.
No inflation.
|
|
|
|
TF: Difficulty is a value in the blocks themselves, only a new block and set the difficulty for the next block. By definition nothing in the block-chain can change without a block being made. The only way to do what your describing would be to patch the client to make it intentionally over-ride the block-chain and accept that over-ride as valid.
ah. Okay. Other suggestions? Besides BFL shipping ASICS and me finally getting one? No, testnet does it already, it just assumes the difficulty is 1 if there has being no new blocks found in the past 24 hours or so (iirc) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
