Bitcoin Forum
June 26, 2024, 07:41:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 [273] 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 ... 988 »
5441  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Identity of Satoshi Nakamoto on: February 13, 2020, 05:11:05 AM
He is not Satoshi Nakamoto, why? Here is one clue.

Look at the very first transaction that took place, basically Satoshi sent Hal 10 BTC to this address

1Q2TWHE3GMdB6BZKafqwxXtWAWgFt5Jvm3

Now that address belongs to Hal. It had a transaction in 2017, years after his death, it sent 0.0343BTC somewhere, probably some exchange. Most likely its his family member who made the transaction. That amount is only $300 or so.

If he really was Satoshi, his family would have access to 1 million BTC and most likely from time to time be selling 50 BTC blocks worth half a million instead of only $300. If you had over $10 billion, would you go thru the hassle to claim $300?

This doesn't make sense. He is not Satoshi. This is only one reason of many.
5442  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Google Searches of Bitcoin on: February 13, 2020, 04:55:31 AM
I think that the only time when Bitcoin search interest exceeds the one in late 2017 is if we hit another ATH again and never before. We had a big rally back in 2019, however most people weren't interest in bitcoin anymore. The bitcoin halving search term doesn't mean much, it could be regular users like me googling it to check what day it will occur on. Doesn't mean the price will rise since the amount of searches for halving is rising.

I asked a few people in 2019 after the rally to $13.8K and see if they were still in the game. Most just went to trade stocks and weren't interest. We need Bitcoin to break $20K, and head to $50K and be on every news and newspaper everyday and that will result in a new higher interest over time on Google trends.
5443  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Best mid-range GPU for mining? on: February 13, 2020, 04:48:19 AM
Mid-range I would say RX 470/480/570/580 8GB for $100 second hand on Criagslist. If ETH keeps pumping you better buy those GPUs fast before the miners stop selling them and start mining with them again.

From what I can tell the most profitable coin right now is ETH as it has been since Q1 2018. Coins like XMR are more CPU based and the rest all got ASICs running on their networks. Not too much you can mine with GPUs anymore these days.
5444  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Number 9! Ninth altcoin thread. Back to the moon Baby! on: February 13, 2020, 04:45:54 AM
Yes I also like where the market is headed and I am glad I didn't sell all my GPUs yet. Seems like the profits right now with 10c power are "ok", not the greatest but if you got tons of GPUs then it might be worth while.

I was actually rebuilding my rigs back in June 2019 when the alt markets were rallying again and basically less than 1 month later the profits were shot down and been pretty bad since then. Would be nice if we could stay at least >$350 for the next few months or so. Because the difficulty obviously will keep rising and people will keep scouping up cheap RX gpus on Craigslist to mine and the difficulty will keep rising every day until the profits vanish.

If we get >$1000 ETH or ProgPOW then obviously the profits will be great once again however I am not sure we can reach that number. Hopefully we break the 2019 high for ETH this time around and head into the +$500 area for ETH and other alts like XMR.

Yup... we are in similar boats.  My power is 11 cents so just recently got in the ballpark of an acceptable "profitability-to-effort" ratio.  I also turned back on all my rigs last June... and also for just over a month lol... until prices dropped again.  Really hoping for a sustained action this time.  Not sure we will see ATH any time soon but if it could even fluctuate between $500-$600 for a while it would be well worth it.

As you point out, anything over $300 range will start to bring more and more people back into mining, which in turn bumps up the difficulty. I'm curious as to how many people like us actually help onto all/most of our gear through this 2nd downswing. Can't imagine there were that many but who knows.  I almost started selling mine off multiple times but just never did it lol.

One thing I might do this time, if we ever hit some crazy number like $500 ETH or $1000 ETH is I will just short hedge it with a margin broker like Bitfinex or Bitmex and just protect myself against any price crashes to ensure I can mine for the foreseeable future.

Can you imagine if your shorted a few hundred's of ETH at $1400 in January 2018 and just closing the position little by little as you mined it bit by bit. Instead of making $0.29/per day/per GPU you would still be making $2.75/day/gpu irregardless of the price.

Only issue with this is if it goes actually POS and you can't mine it or it reduces the issuance again. So the price you can control but not the difficulty or the miner supply.
5445  Economy / Gambling / Re: MegaDice.com - Bitcoin Dice - Invest in Bankroll - Happy hour 0.5% House edge on: February 13, 2020, 04:39:45 AM
Hej! I came here from old satoshidice thread - nobody is looking at that anymore??? Satoshidice and megadice not the same management or same but different site (ethereum and bitcoin ?!)
thanks

Can't you see the big red warning flag at the top of the thread?

That means this site is almost certainly either suspicious or a proven scam—in this case the latter!

Take a look at OPs trust;

"Scammed newalias out of 19 BTC winnings. Do not play here." see reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5204156.0

Does this seem like a platform you want to play at?

right i see yes. i still like to play cause i like satoshidice..  Grin my money my risk i know..

When did you play last on Satoshidice? Are you an early adopter from like 2012? Because Satoshidice was originally created by Erik Voorhees. It was sold sometime in 2013 for around $11 million or so.

Since then it has changed owners at least once and this is why its having issues. I think most of the issues with the new owners are mostly due to poor support, especially in this forum. Sometimes months would go by before some mod chimed in with an update.

Its pretty sad because Satoshidice is what made dice bitcoin gambling so popular, without Satoshidice there might be no such thing as "dice" betting in crypto. Instead we would play other games like "The lottery" or "Head or Tail", etc.
5446  Economy / Gambling / Re: New DuckDice review is live - We need your help.. on: February 13, 2020, 04:31:17 AM
You need to stop creating a new thread for every single bitcoin casino that you review on your site and instead just create one thread with your review website which would include the reviews to all the casinos.

So far I noticed you created a thread for DuckDice, Legends of Cleopatra, and Betchain. Since there are 100's of Bitcoin Casinos are you going to thread 100's of threads? Eventually all of them will get locked or deleted.

Regarding your writing skills, I've read your DuckDice review and didn't find any errors and could understand it no problem. No idea why the above posters said it was poor.
5447  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Number 9! Ninth altcoin thread. Back to the moon Baby! on: February 13, 2020, 01:49:15 AM
Yes I also like where the market is headed and I am glad I didn't sell all my GPUs yet. Seems like the profits right now with 10c power are "ok", not the greatest but if you got tons of GPUs then it might be worth while.

I was actually rebuilding my rigs back in June 2019 when the alt markets were rallying again and basically less than 1 month later the profits were shot down and been pretty bad since then. Would be nice if we could stay at least >$350 for the next few months or so. Because the difficulty obviously will keep rising and people will keep scouping up cheap RX gpus on Craigslist to mine and the difficulty will keep rising every day until the profits vanish.

If we get >$1000 ETH or ProgPOW then obviously the profits will be great once again however I am not sure we can reach that number. Hopefully we break the 2019 high for ETH this time around and head into the +$500 area for ETH and other alts like XMR.
5448  Economy / Gambling / Re: New casino on: February 12, 2020, 04:46:05 AM
Seems like the OP was actually active on 8th of Feb but didn't bother to even post a single reply. So I am assuming he just posted his website address and hyperlinked it to get some organic google traffic to his site.

Its been maybe 10-15 years since I did SEO (search engine optimization) but from what I remember the more websites that have a link to your site, google thinks its "important" and moves your link higher in the search results. So if there are like thousands of pages which seems to mention "luckydragon.us" then google will think "The site is great" and keep bumping it higher and higher. If a university or government domain links to it, then its even of higher rating.

So he most likely joined 1000's of forums and posted this one sentence on all of them and is just waiting a few months until he gets some retail traffic from a google search.
5449  Economy / Gambling / Re: IDEA - new concept for strategy game on: February 12, 2020, 04:37:41 AM
Either I am having dejavu or this website was already launched on the ETH network a few months back and everybody said it unfair and not gambling since it wouldn't be based on luck but instead size of bankroll. I am too lazy to search but it was posted sometime in the last 6 months or so. From what I remember it had like 2 rounds before the thread was forgotten about, never really took off.

One of the main reasons was that it was unfair to the small gamblers and it would promote cheating since a large whale can just use a bot to send his BTC until he wins. And others said it wasn't a "lottery" or "gambling" since it wasn't based on luck or strategy like dice or poker but instead it was based on bankroll. If a whale has 1000 BTC and he is challenged against a few people with 0.01 BTC, obviously the whale would win.
5450  Economy / Gambling / Re: lightning-roulette.com on: February 12, 2020, 04:31:14 AM
I had to check the date twice to make sure my eyes weren't playing tricks on me but I am amazed that this casino actually was based on the LN back in 2018. From what I can see how many other LN casinos has there been? I can't think of any that are active till this day. And pretty sad that there is almost no adoption to LN in the gambling community.

Like I said in another thread, I think unless there is a major reason to use a LN to send transctions most will just send BTC transactions using 1sat/byte. Currently there is little to no need since the fees are relatively low and people don't want to take the time to learn how LN works or start a channel.

I think if lightning roulette was launched sometime in the future it might of been more active then it was for the last 2 years.
5451  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Buying bitcoin in margin on: February 12, 2020, 04:23:56 AM
I want to buy bitcoin with margin, but I am not sure which is the best way to do it considering commissions.
Practically there is 2 ways
To buy bitcoin futures or lending USDT and buying BTC
Which is the cheapest way to buy it?

The cheapest way to buy it on leverage would be by a futures/derivatives exchange such as Bitmex. Currently their fees are only 0.075% if you are a taker or they pay you 0.025% if you use a limit order and provide liquidity. So basically you are getting paid to buy it as long as your order fills.

Now there are 2 types of contracts. One is called a perpetual contract and it has funding rates every 8 hours and the other is a futures contract.

The Perpetual contract is currently priced slightly above the spot rate due to huge demand for BTC however only by $10 or so. While the futures contract for March 2020 has a $300 premium and June 2020 contract has a $550 premium. Why is the premium so high? Due to high demand mostly. But with the futures you don't pay funding fees every 8 hours which currently only favor shorts.

You can use up to 100x leverage which I wouldn't recommend, use maybe max 5x or so. Anything higher and you can easily get liquidated.
5452  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Can GPU Mining be proffitable in 2020? on: February 10, 2020, 05:43:28 AM
I have an idea to start mining altcoins (Zcash, Monero or something like that). At the same time I'm not going to spend my money on ASIC equipment.
Can I make any profit on GPU money? Or is it an idiotic idea now?

Profit is a relative term. If I told you that you can make $0.20 per day of profit per GPU would that be enough for you? For some maybe, for most not so much.

Zcash actually has ASICs already so that is out. ETH is half ASIC and half GPU. XMR is more geered towards higher end CPUs.

So your best bet is to mine ETH. Currently with a RX 580 8GB which you can buy second hand for like $100 will net you $0.20 per day per card. Your choice if you think its worth it.

Keep in mind if ETH goes down in value you make even less. This is assuming you have $0.10 kwh power.
5453  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: PSU requirement for 2 MSI RTX 2070 in SLI configuration on: February 10, 2020, 05:39:30 AM
Here is the issue with most <600 Watt power supplies when it comes to more than 1 GPU per rig. Its actually not the amount of power that they can put out, its that they usually only have 2 PCIe connectors either 1x6 pin/1x8pin or 2x6pin or 2x8pin.

Looking at the specs for the RTX 2070, its thermal power is somewhere >225 Watts so I am assuming it requires 2 PCIe connections hence with 2 cards you would need actually 4 PCIe. And if you look at most PSUs that are less than 600 Watts they usually have 2 or less of these connections.

So even if the power requirement is enough, you will run out of connectors.
5454  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com | Crypto Powered Sportsbook and Casino | 🎰 🏀 ⚾ 🏈 🎾 🥊 🎲 on: February 10, 2020, 05:32:17 AM
Hello, what is threshold at which stake decides to ask the customer for KYC. The way I see it, the small fish do not get asked for KYC?

Also, who at stake gets to see the documents sent in, the support team or someone else?

Thanks

Hello,

We generally never ask users for KYC unless we are almost 100% sure he is abusing or cheating in some way.

It rly does not depend on your profit or amount you are withdrawing.

If we ask for KYC in rare occasions we did documents will be handled by myself and only myself. I cant remember last time we asked for KYC it was very long time ago.

We do have storage for KYC information up to all standards required.

But again we won't ask you for KYC depending on your profit or withdrawals.

Hopefully this answers your question.

Cheers.

Always good to hear stuff like this. Many in the industry attempt to use this to bully people out of their winnings if they're unwilling or unable to provide the documentation requested. That's in addition to me not wanting to send my ID to some random bookie in the middle of nowhere.

Smiley Stake.Com is Great and so is PD

In my opinion I think the entire way that the crypto exchanges and services do KYC is wrong and should be actually done by a 3rd party instead. Look at how many exchanges in the past did shady things and imagine how the KYC'd customers feel about their info being out there?

What bitcoin exchanges and services should do is something where the actual verification is taken by a trusted company and that company actually keeps all the private info and the actual site like Stake.com in this matter wouldn't actually see these documents unless deemed necessary. This would eliminate alot of the liability reasons and fear of getting personal information leaked online somewhere.

I think if BTC price keeps rising and adoption keeps rising then we will eventually maybe one day see this happen. Then people wouldn't be so scared of KYC as much.
5455  Economy / Gambling / Re: MintDice – Bitcoin Casino With Online Slots, Bitcoin Crash & Bitcoin Investment on: February 10, 2020, 05:23:57 AM
creating account for what . to farm faucet ? that still useless imo because the amount that they can claim is not going to be worth it to gamble . they will only loose this before making it big .  increasing the wd threshold can also be a fix to these so that abusers will having a hard time to grind using free money  . besides if they really want to go here just to use the faucet , why not try the actual faucet  . actual faucets dont have restrictions  . they can claim unlimitedly aswell   .
You need to complete faucet task for 1000+ times to reach minimum withdrawal time even if you do there won't be anything left out after the transaction fee got paid but in gambling they can directly gamble with that claimed amount so they can have chances of multiplying and can withdraw it with no restrictions.So which is simple for the abusers?
The will to try and take advantages are always inside the minds of abusers, to whatever extent they are trying to compensate if the chance
is there for sure they will do the best that they can. It's tough since the site have restrictions but taking chances and finding some luck gives
gamblers desire to take the risk and efforts.
Most of multi account abusers will get caught at the time of withdrawals and in mintdice transactions are approved manually so chances ae less here for abusers.

As per my experience, all my withdrawals were processed instantly as I got it almost in less than a minute. How could you say that all withdrawals are approved manually? Afaik it was, but it is not approved manually since some time ago. Abusers do not care about how the withdrawal will be processed, they will only care about the chance of making money without spending any money then they will always try.

Generally the way most casinos who had faucets in the past or who still have faucets now, they usually don't lock faucet abuser accounts UNLESS they attempt a withdraw. This is why a year back when many sites started to do this, many "newbie" accounts on Bitcointalk started to complain that they gambled for "hours or days" then tried to attempt a withdraw and the withdraw was declined.

I think this is a strategy that they do, so people don't even try and abuse the faucet because it takes "hours or days" to generate enough BTC to make min. withdraw which might actually never be transacted. Since they started to do this many of the faucet abuse actually declined.

Yes I know its not nice to "waste faucet abusers time" but if they automatically banned faucet abusers accounts at the beginning then they might actually ban someone who actually was legitimately using the faucet and would later do a real deposit.
5456  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: ETH going ETH2.0, any news for ETC? on: February 09, 2020, 11:23:57 PM
We don't know for sure If they will actually launch ETH 2 in the middle of the year which is pretty much only 4 months away now. The ETH foundation is always late for many of its releases and I wouldn't be surprised if it's delayed yet again.

And even if it comes on time, it won't be full POS, it will most likely be a hybrid type of mining where it's part POS and part POW, so the miner rewards will still be there but maybe a reward reduction like we had in the past.

If they actually do go full POS in the summer then, obviously mining will be completely dead for all miners since the market cap of ETC and XMR is just too small with the amount of ETH daily miner reward. If this is actually confirmed, most will start to sell their GPUs before the fork actually takes place to go full POS.

Right now I wouldn't worry, ETH was suppose to go POS in Summer of 2016 actually.
5457  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: What will be your biggest fears and risks to setup mining farm. on: February 09, 2020, 11:14:11 PM
There are more risks to mining at home as to say some dedicated warehouse. One of the issues that I was always worried about was burning the house down. It never happened but the amount of exploded capacitors, melted PCIe cables, melted SATA cables and exploding PSU made me very cautious.

Another issue I had was security, especially during late 2017 and early 2018. Back then most ETH mineable GPUs were going for maybe $500 each, and if someone saw that you got 100 of these in your place you could easily get robbed. Hence you had to do it stealth and with the huge heat and loud noise, it wasn't always easy.

The last was obviously the fear of massive difficulty jumps and massive price crashes, however even farms have to deal with this issue. And most GPUs will always hold some value so you won't lose everything, just will be a pain in the butt to sell like right now where there is a lack of demand for GPUs and gamers nickel and dime you constantely.
5458  Economy / Speculation / Re: Buy only bitcoin or take chances in altcoin casino? on: February 09, 2020, 11:04:47 PM
Basically it all boils down to what risk and reward you are willing to take. Basically Bitcoin is a much safer and higher probability trade because it has the highest chances of being around in a few years and going up in value however keep in mind that the gains won't be exponential. We probably won't get a 100x move unlike some coins like Ripple which had a 140x in over a year.

However with those alts keep in mind that many right now are at over 90% losses from all time high while Bitcoin is only 50% from all time high. I think the best approach is to own a portion of each, some Bitcoin and some alts in case they go big. One issue is that many alts right now, especially the large caps like BCH or LTC aren't really cheap to begin with. They were best to buy in a bear market and not now.
5459  Economy / Speculation / Re: Pomp 100,000$ Prediction on: February 09, 2020, 10:56:14 PM
It's too early to say in my opinion, first we need to break the 2019 hit of $14K and then we need to break the all time high of $20K and depending what happens after we can make a prediction if it will hit $100K in less than 2 year time.

The best play for this would be to buy some long term options but even on Deritbit they don't go that far and the call value is not that high. Would provide a very good R/R because right now at $10K a $100K call option would be pretty much near free. Similar to how people became millionaires with the >$500 call options on tesla if they bought them earlier this year. There was a thread on Wallstreetbets were someone made like $1.4 million when Tesla hit $900 a few days back.

5460  Economy / Speculation / Re: Is 12K USD is the next target? on: February 09, 2020, 10:16:44 PM
Before we hit the $12K we need some type of correction first. The open interest and funding rates for futures are starting to get really over extended. I know we all want Bitcoin to get 20% days but keep in mind that usually means it's a blow off top and will reverse into bear market territory.

Best is to get a healthy correction, lower the open interest and reset the funding rates while people take profits and new people start to buy the dips. Because if we start getting massive $1000 red candles people will be scared to buy the dips and we will fall further.

See what happens at the CME open, since there will be a gap and see if it gets filled before resuming up trend.
Pages: « 1 ... 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 [273] 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 ... 988 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!