...
Thanks for the comment, valid remark, as we are familiar with Dtube and it is nice project, we believe there are fundamental differences between the two projects
Indeed Dtube looks and act like steemit, not much of full cycle economics in place, they do not support the full food chain of users as BuzzShow do.
Simply different approach to the all matter.
Further more BuzzShow function as complete social video network, with many various components already developed and in place.
...
I don't follow. Could you explain in layman's terms what are the fundamental differences and what's the advantage (if any) for users to chose BuzzShow over Dtube? In short term, buzzshow that actually cycle the native token to everyone including viewer unlike Dtube. This is much better because as a viewer, you do want to get something in return as well for spending numerous time there The token can be use to add content from another channel to your own channel as well and when someone watch it you get token in return as well. This is what it meant to be a full cycle of food chain |
|
|
|
So, the main question is why did not you give merits based on activity?
Because being active in the forum doesnt mean that you dont shitpost here. This is pretty much better than the old system Because it will not stop spam posts. Activity can be gained by just making posts daily one on average. Merit is to ensure that people make quality posts.
I do not think 99% of high-quality posts will give Merits. I understand that BCT needs to stop spam. But I think merits is not a good idea. No one will give smerits to Jr or Member. Probably, or those who want to rank up can appeal for merit (?) (Basically like a post checking squad for anyone that wants to rank up would be cool huh  ). If it is good enough to rank, Im sure they will be given merit |
|
|
|
Just a question here, I got 20 smerit as starter . I guess this is the same for every Hero member currently? or probably random ?
No, it isn't. For current members, your initial merit score is equal to the minimum required to your rank. Of that, a certain amount (less than the usual half) is spendable. The spendable amount was calculated based on your current rank and the number of activity points you earned in the last year. A Legendary member who hasn't posted in the last year would still be Legendary, but would not have any spendable merit.
Pretty sure I got more than 20 activity last year but oh well I guess there is no formula for this . Atleast something new to tweak in this old forum  |
|
|
|
So, the main question is why did not you give merits based on activity?
Because being active in the forum doesnt mean that you dont shitpost here. This is pretty much better than the old system
Just a question here, I got 20 smerit as starter . I guess this is the same for every Hero member currently? or probably random ? Edit : is there a link for this? |
|
|
|
The only official account is buzzshow ( Copper Member ). Do not trust people pretending to be any from them, always double check Feel Free to PM me regarding this project |
|
|
|
Don't focus too much in your red trust, focus on how can you improve your field of information so you may say or state your answer in the thread in a right way, expand your your knowledge as they saying says knowledge is power.
Maybe along the way you can enlighten others on some aspects, then they may give you a positive trust to neutralize the red mark.
Or dont do anything at all? The only matter here is not being able to participate in signature campaign, it doesnt limit you in participating any discussion in bitcointalk |
|
|
|
Since buzzshow is decentralized platform, how will you control users that will upload unethical contents and hoax video information on the platform?
is there will be moderators? or this is a curators job?
I have same question about this, if you do not have rules about which videos are authentic or hoaxes, then I can imagine how many people will use this platform just to get benefit by showing for a hoax video, because nowdays is looks like something hoax more get attention than the authentic. It is almost impossible to define which is a fake news or not nowadays. One person cant definitely do everything so the platform is going to have 'report' feature on the site . If there is a numerous amount of report then the content will be taken down for sure |
|
|
|
Since buzzshow is decentralized platform, how will you control users that will upload unethical contents and hoax video information on the platform?
is there will be moderators? or this is a curators job?
Yes, they might be adding moderator because in YouTube we see some video will be deleted with intimation because if they won't satisfy their rules and regulations. User / watcher can report unethical content on the site. Thats the true purpose of a decentralized platform
Come and Join our group in telegram, we have a very lively community @buzzshow |
|
|
|
Why do members of DT not respond quickly to complaints from users who have a red trust like me?
'FRIEND' system, as long as you are friend with any of them then they will prioritize you. Are you serious? feedback positive / green trust or whatever it's called can be played with a friendship relationship? If so I have spoken true. think of himself as god but actually he is a demon.
Im not talking about green trust or red trust. Im just saying that your friends will obviously prioritize you over some other bunch of random guy in bitcointalk Wether you like or not, its the truth |
|
|
|
Why do members of DT not respond quickly to complaints from users who have a red trust like me?
Because there is another system apart from the DT system. 'FRIEND' system, as long as you are friend with any of them then they will prioritize you.
How I missed shorena the lone DT warrior in a time like this |
|
|
|
Just this could show how your blind hatred over for a bunch of shitposters to consider them worst than a scammer.
Everyone hate shitposters btw 
This is pretty much not a big deal . If you only post to get paid, This becomes a big deal because you wont be able to participate in the signature campaign anymore. Getting red tag will not hinder you in participating in any discussion on the forum
Before someone else jump on me and started raging, I am one of those that got tagged as well but it is not a big deal for me though |
|
|
|
Is BCC dead after the lending platform closed? I think the BCCX will be dead soon. Any updates?
Pretty much dead as of now, It doesnt really matter because sooner or later all scams will end. Unless they end their operation, they wont be able to scrap big amount of money |
|
|
|
If you receive neg trust while enrolled you receive no pay and will be removed
Please disregard my payment as I have been tagged 
One free new spot for you guys as well |
|
|
|
If it were any other team above them, I'd still bet on them to win the league. But to count on Barca dropping 17 points just for them to get level?
It will be 19 points if barcelona win their game against Real betis. In the Premier League maybe, but not in this La Liga. This is hilarious, Everyone knows that Premier league is the most competitive league compared with the others. Real madrid is still pretty much better than most team in laliga ( probably every team except barcelona and real madrid ) . They wont be able to win the league though runner up position is expected |
|
|
|
Nobody was posting here, before that shit collapsed, and now this topic is overloaded. I'm more than sure, that if somebody will launch bitcoonect 2.0 banch of greedy idiots will still invest in it.
There are actually bunch of it already. Most of those new scam sites even start directly by offering their 'coin' through ICO and such. Some people cant learn and will keep purchasing this kind of stuff I could probably list one similar scam that ended their presale of 22 btc in 1 second , that just gives you idea of how many people are so desperate to get into this kind of scam Hint : Google thorncoin Disclaimer : I dont have anything to do with it, I just happened to know about this scam site |
|
|
|
It is very normal to see that the total supply is bigger than circulating supply since there are some tokens has been locked, maybe it is locked for dev team or earlier investors.
It is locked for 6 months with 7 % dilution rate . Maximum supply is different then circulating supply and the marketcap is determined with the circulating supply instead They are trying to list SETH on the big exchanges
Something like binance would be good, as of now they are on ED and IDEX ( some kind of exchanger like ED )
Disclaimer : I purchased their tokens and read most chat in their telegram group so yeah I know most stuff related to this |
|
|
|
I wonder if bitconnect is that script.cc guy?  Seems like the exact same MO, just with a blockchain to back it. Probably or not, there are tons of this kind of scams Bitconnect is about $18 again.... I bought another 100 lol
A scam will always be a scam. As I have stated yesterday, you just wont learn do you? . Unless everything fall apart in one piece then you will never realize that this kind of thing is a scam to begin with Nah this is not a textbook ponzi, it is a reverse ponzi. The population should be educated how to spot both schemes. Most people will never learn I'm losing so far but nevermind it was with money I made when it went up last time.
You could have leave with all those profit you made from this scam but you choose not to, Well done |
|
|
|
Not literally true about this . If the bitcoin gambling market is smaller now, that means altcoin gambling market is pretty much the same I'll use comparison from this https://dicesites.com/Is there a source of historical statistics on this? I would hazard a guess that although gambling market is smaller in BTC (or Alts) given the increased value in USD it is actually still growing. It would be nice to find some numbers to prove or disprove my theory. Why dont you check the site that I provided?
Guys, Please stop derailing this thread further because at this point there is no need to discuss this thing here. You guys can just go to the site and chat with Daniel directly regarding this, it will be much more convenient |
|
|
|
Again, the lending wasn't a Ponzi
It was a ponzi. They advertised unrealistic return rates and last bagholders didn't get their money back. Your mental gymnastics can't change that fact. Again another nutty one. So if you're holding bitcoin and all the whales dump it doesn't it make it the same thing? There is nothing that's going to keep the price of bitcoin up if everyone sells it at the same time. Bitconnect didn't dump any coins! I showed that on the coinmarketcap graph. Very small volumes on the exchanges around the time of the dump. They probably did the opposite and bought it back cheap. How could they have been dumping a coin that has 100% yearly inflation and rises from 16 cents (I think the lowest) to close to $500 in a year and is freely traded on lots of exchanges?? You obviously don't understand that the lending system made them less likely to dump any coins (as it would stop the lending being profitable for them - to say the lending was a Ponzi when it was profitable is ludicrous) but nevermind. Bitcoin is obviously more of a Ponzi. Im quotting this for references, bookmarked this and archived it as well. It will be nice to show this back to you once the whole empire ended and check what your reaction will be You obviously don't understand that the lending system made them less likely to dump any coins (as it would stop the lending being profitable for them - to say the lending was a Ponzi when it was profitable is ludicrous) but nevermind. Bitcoin is obviously more of a Ponzi. If Unrealistic return rates isnt considered as ponzi to you then what would it be? a gift? You are probably still young but I can ensure you that suchmoon and I has been here quite some time and has seen alot of these kinds of things dissapearing I know what the scams are. Many lending platforms that have come out recently after bitconnect have been scams but most haven't been. You mention unrealistic returns but they weren't unrealistic, were they? Their own coin grew much more. They never promised any guaranteed returns and some days it was 0%. Some higher levels of lending gave you a guaranteed 0.25% (this was for $10k+) but there was no guarantee for sub-$1000 amounts including reinvestments . The fact it was profitable for them means they weren't a Ponzi. Call it whatever you want, lending / scams / realistic rate of returns but I will call it as a ponzi. Unless the whole empire ended then you will always stick with your opinion . Scams / ponzis are always profitable for their owner, if it is not then there is no point to do it. Nevermind though, I'll just show what you wrote back to you once this whole madness ended |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
