meh

I just got finished reading the entire thread (good job, I thoroughly enjoyed it) and I don't think I saw anybody ask this question:

Is there any one sport/league that you find to be particular easy in terms of spotting a bargain?

And going in the opposite direction, which sport/league do you find the most difficult to make a correct pick?

This article is unsurprisingly a bunch of rubbish. The quoted studies in the article say nothing about "HIV insertions", rather that it contained protein structures similar to those found in HIV. While an uncommon occurrence in nature, in no way does it mean HIV proteins had been "spliced" into the virus. Have you looked at the story recently? They have included this tweet and are doing some backtracking, probably after having been called out repeatedly for being full of shit:



And this is you misinterpreting what the article you posted says. It doesn't say anybody will go to prison. It says provincial villagers are being ordered to cull their pets in some places, and keep them indoors in others, at the risk of them being culled by the police or officials if they are found outdoors. Its not "trauma based mind control" so much as local officials being pressured to implement solutions even at the risk of them being poor or ineffective. Its an unfortunate byproduct of panic and nothing more.

No, its not too late, and the prize is 5 merits from me (and whatever else anyone feels like contributing). "Too late" will be about 14 hours from now after I've gone to sleep with the intention of waking up at 7:40 AM to watch the big game. I added you and also morvillz7z.

nutildah: SF 24 - KC 22
Hueristic: SF 37 - KC 34
tyKiwanuka: SF 25 - KC 51
wheelz1200: SF 31 - KC 35
DireWolfM14: SF 49 - KC 3
willy2streams: SF 34 - KC 28
kingcolex: SF 28 - KC 24
South Park: SF 34 - KC 27
bbc.reporter: SF 37 - KC 24
morvillz7z: SF 28 - KC 24


Yeah, agreed! We'll find out what kind of a football town Vegas really is.

I was watching this predictions show yesterday on YouTube and found it to be quite comprehensive. I don't know much about the people on the show, other than Le Martin (the girl) does a pretty decent job of calling games. She's also rather pleasant to look at. In any case, it was an informative take and I recommend giving it a gander.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydg4nHrEow0

Unfortunately I have found this to be true as well. My neighbor in Pampanga got hooked in the Trade Coin Club, thinking that his deposit was going toward some kind of trading investment when really it was just a basic MLM / Ponzi scheme. Probably the most devious part about it was that he was referred to the scam by a fellow church member, whom he trusted and thought was a stand-up guy.

When I first moved in to my apartment, I struck up a conversation with the guy, and we got to talking about our jobs. I told him I wrote about bitcoin, and then he showed me his Trade Coin Club app. I took a look at it -- he showed me his easy profits and how it worked, and then thought, oh yeah, that's a scam. So I tried to explain to him why he needed to be careful...

Sure enough, you couldn't withdraw the funds until after a contract expired, and withdrawing beforehand would incur massive penalties. Basically there was no way to profit other than through recruiting others. So after our conversation the guy tried to get his "friend" on the phone (the one who got him into it), and I think he pretty much realized he had been scammed at that point (out of what was about 400,000 pesos at that time).

So how did the guy thank me? By buying a German Shepard that would bark every day (and every night) the next day. 

He said it. He's against it in multiple ways, and is one of the most fervent and vocal bitcoin haters out there. Let me ask you this: when's the last time he said something positive about bitcoin?


Zero? Schiff just said he just "lost all the bitcoin (he) ever owned," remember? So if he's lying, its on you to prove it. Regardless, no media sensationalist words ever move the market by a noticeable degree. He's just a clueless hater.

Like most people get their extraordinary wealth: he "earned" it from his parents. Schiff Sr. was a really interesting guy -- far so more than his son. For one, he died in prison protesting the federal income tax. He stopped paying taxes in 1974 and encouraged his followers to do so, who of course ended up owing the IRS a combined $56 million. Irwin himself was on the hook for somewhere between $2 and $8 million, depending on what time span you go by.

I first heard of Peter Schiff in 2008 when he was credited for more or less calling the recession. I followed him for about two years, but then I realized he was just another talking head cult of personality that depended on sensationalism. He's been wrong about pretty much everything (his financial forecasts, sans his gold obsession at times) for the last ten years.

In your OP it says that the list is filtered to contain users the "fit all criteria" minus having the total # of required inclusions -- does this mean they also have custom trust lists as well? If so, the number of eligible accounts is now up to 160  . Ought to make things pretty interesting this go around.

Of the 5 big oddsmakers I usually consult before coming up with an average line for something, 3 of them have moved in favor of KC since opening:

Bookmaker: 0 to -1
Sportsbook: -1 to -1.5
MyBookie: 0 to -1.5

This obviously means that extra money has been coming in for KC in a lopsided fashion. However, I'm still favoring SF to win, and will probably put in a wager on them moments before the game. One thing's for sure: it ought to be a really good game, and not a runaway or stale one.

For a somewhat morbid prop bet I would put up total combined score versus number of recorded Coronavirus deaths on that day, lol.

Was this account hacked and you bought it from the hacker or did you buy it from the real kodtycoon? The former seems far more likely. I have to know -- since you're not in a signature campaign, what compels you to post on the forum? It honestly doesn't seem like you enjoy it, and I'm not sure you've ever once gambled in a crypto casino. You're certainly not the original kodtycoon.

We may be an oligarchy but at least we don't believe in queens, barons, and knights. Do you also believe in dragons?

OK korner, I'll indulge you with a response here, even though nothing I have to say can help you because you've already been banned (several times). Let's see what we have here:


OK, having left more flags than anyone on the forum (by a large magnitude), and having left 9 of them on my account (all of which are inactive and overwhelmingly opposed), you're not in any position to be reminding people of how flags should be used.

Anything else?

I don't know. None of us do, because hell will have frozen over long before then.


How is that "obvious"? Lets take a look at the facts:

Avg. Transaction Fee   0.0000038 BSV ($0.0011)
Transactions avg. per hour   21,087, or 3,515 per block
Reward Per Block   12.50+0.0158 BSV ($3,695.91 USD)
Fee in Reward (Average Fee Percentage in Total Block Reward)   0.15%

At its current price, the average number of transactions would have to increase by 666.67x in order for their fees to equal the block reward. That's assuming that transaction fees doesn't increase proportional to the price of BSV. That would mean 2.343 million transactions per block. Since BSV has an average tx size of 0.48kb, that would mean each block would have to be 1.124 GB. We're talking about a 570-fold increase from where things currently stand. That just ain't happening. Not in our lifetimes.

Feel free to bet on BSV's blockchain growing by 162 GB a day if you want (4.8 terabytes a month) -- that does not sound like "scaling" to me. It sounds like a pipe dream.

What's far more likely to happen is BSV will buckle under the weight of Craig's ego and it will implode into obscure shitcoindom where it belongs.

Do they really though? We've been through this already. The miners make a tiny sliver of what BTC miners make in transaction fees. They have very little incentive to process every transaction because 99.95% of their revenue depends on the block reward.

All metrics are left out of a "global ledger" (in your case, you're referring to a fork of a fork of bitcoin), because a ledger doesn't care about statistics.


I actually never said I "had bet" against BSV, however after BSV reached its new high on what was obviously fake news I opened a short position on it and am doing quite well, thanks. Just because its the "best performing crypto of the top 10" during your arbitrarily and ill-defined time period doesn't mean its not an outright scam.

Guys, can we please keep the conversation on topic???


I need to know if we are currently forming a BART (Bart) and headed back down to <9100. I'm trying to short BSV right now and want to know when to put in my next order. I found a place that lets you short BSV futures at 100:1 leverage and am currently practicing. I'm studying for an entry point.

So please, let's stick to hardcore TA only out of respect for our WO forefathers, who must be turning in their dormant accounts right now.

LOL

If you think mixing up a meme with Morpheus and a Star Trek captain (they're all the same to me as I don't watch the show) is a criminal offense, open a flag against me about it. It will fit in nicely with my 13 other inactive flags. Like me, you can't seem to find an interaction previous to this one, so yes, let's just declare it our first.

None of this is relevant to the topic of this thread. I know you could do this all night, but I don't really care to, so I'll let you have the last word.

I don't really remember what you're talking about, and even though it does sound funny, its not relevant here.


Perhaps I confused Captain Kirk with Morpheus. I coulda sworn I asked you specifically about why you didn't like the trust system earlier, but I may be mistaken, as I can't seem to find the post.

Incorrect. The first interaction I ever had with you was in Meta (feel free to prove me wrong if you'd like). I think our first disagreement (and one of the reasons I decided to add you to my distrust list) was because of your overall approach to the trust system. Then a few replies later you posted a lengthy meme about what the trust system meant to you. That may be the one I was thinking of; regardless, I felt your reply was overly pompous while simultaneously unclear, and it was then that I knew I didn't agree with your judgment.

Only after a couple of months of interacting with you did I realize you were always displeased and arrogant about everything, and in our first interaction you were only exhibiting your natural demeanor.

Well, I think ~ 1/10th the price of BCH is fair. Sans Craig, there has been a decent amount of effort put into it compared to most other altcoins. Not that we don't already have several pre-existing data storage coins that are probably much more efficient in that aspect because that's what they were specifically built to do.


SV being based on "the original protocol" is just another one of the many fallacious selling points preached by Craig. As I've brought up and detailed elsewhere, its code contains several changes made by Bitcoin Core and ABC developers (Maxwell, Wuille, Sechet, etc). These changes aren't being taken out because they are integral to a properly-functioning bitcoin. Of course, Craig would rather all his followers just remain ignorant about the details.

But their Telegram has 69,000 members!! 

Surely they wouldn't let a community of this size down, would they??

I'm pretty sure this was the worst AMA ever, and that includes the time Woody Harrelson got torn to shreds on Reddit because he only wanted to answer questions about the movie he was currently promoting.

This was Onewdmoney on January 5th:



Well, he's only got 2 days to go.

Guess OP doesn't know how to lock the thread or else he would attempt to extinguish this slowly burning trash fire.