Afaik, Alice's chip would be split into other chips (if she deposits 1.024 for example) then she migh have that deposit split into 1mbtc chips and then those chips merged or something similar. Those strategies work, I've watched a lot of videos from universities who explain it as a splitting technique. ChipMixer might do something else too but just splitting the chips removes the obviousness...
|
|
|
My Google data is 20GB. I'm worried.... Also, I'm one of 3 billion, how do they have access to it so easily?
@pugman, so brave is like chromium? Also I couldnt install it it had a fatal error...
Is mcafee still on a boat in the sea or has he docked yet? The IRS wanted him to pay tax or sonething last year. Anyway, if you're reading this mcafee, lmk.
|
|
|
Honestly brave is so fucking better, it even has an option that allows you to browse privately with Tor. Really cool! And there is an inbuilt ad blocker and block any scripts you want to. And like English Jesus said, I mean Jet Cash said, you can earn BAT tokens while using it.
I don't understand the thing behind brave. How do you know they're not tracking you? Also, are they based off firefox or chromium? Opera have an inbuilt vpn also, they just need to make firefox the same.. How about Opera instead of Chrome? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
Chrome is pretty much spyware at this point. I think all Google users should use their data download to see a fraction of how much data Google has on them. (because of course you're not going to be given *all* of it) I so definitely want to download my data download, but I'm a little too scared to see the result, cause I'm subconsciously aware of how bad it is going to be. :/ I wonder how much data they have on me actually. I've changed my default search engine on everything to duckduck but I have an android phone and a lot of the sites have google trackers inbuilt in them anyeay now...
We need to make a bitcoin fund to set aside to buy Google.
|
|
|
The Internet is fundamentally broken. We need DDoS protection at the network layer, or else you're going to continue seeing 99% of the Internet hiding behind a few centralized third-parties. It's absolutely ridiculous. Realize also that Cloudflare can see all traffic unencrypted. They're almost certainly an NSA honeypot already, but even if not, their many screwups make them unworthy of this kind of trust. (Their Argo tunnel doesn't fix this trust issue at all, BTW.) However, since the Internet is broken fundamentally, mitigating it is too difficult for it to be a good idea for me to devote resources to it at this time.
Is there never a thing about making a new domain that certain trusted users are able to access? I'd be able to buy a domain name easy enough to remember if you could give a bypass to me and a couple of others (other trusted legendaries that I consider trustworthy and the legendaries they consider trustworthy)
Remind me in a year about the decentralised forwarding thing, I'd need something for a disseration probably if I don't look into it before then. I plan on fiddling a lot with networking at some point so I'll try and take a look but it might be difficult since youc an spoof IP and MAC addresses as much as you like...
|
|
|
~
You're replacing Microsoft trackers with google ones? That seems a bit counterproductive... I remember how much we celebrated when microsoft stopped supporting IE. I will only accept Chromium and Firefox as good but since Chrome and Chromium both have a load of security holes and chrome has trackers then firefox is better imo. Yes.
When pressing the logout button, the server invalidates all active sessions for this user. Invalidating sessions basically means all session id's are removed from the database. It'll be one session ID? I think it just pulls your id from the server and if you don't have one it assigns one. Then deletes it on logout for security (could be completely wrong though, haven't done much fiddling recently).
|
|
|
What about 4 years ago when you could get it for $220?
I remember thinking it was overpriced then and was just going to remain stable or sink. Naive little me, I also had a coinbase account but wasn't able to KYC yet so I was stuck watching the price rally up...
If I'd have bought 10 btc and sold when I did in the spike in 2017, I'd have $140,000 now... But then again, I might have sold when we got up to $280...
|
|
|
Ethereum once flash crashed from $300 down to 10 cents on one exchange. A flash crash like that could happen for bitcoin but it would be an isolated event on only one exchagne depending on what kind of previous orders were set.
Waves also have a flash crash in an exchange. It goes down to 10 satoshi when a bot malfunctioned selling hundreds of thousand of waves. I think Bitcoin also had a flash crash on kraken exchange losing 99% of its value. . There are a lot of people with really weird listings in order to take advantage of these flash crashes. On larger exchanges they're often not a problem and just force the price to go down a bit but on the smaller ones, they can really cause some havok - especially with bots). I doubt there were many bitcoins avaliable for that price though..
|
|
|
I specifically tell my family and friends not to invest in bitcoin because they're likely to get scammed or store large amounts of money on exchanges (which is very insecure), but there might be people buying it without me noticing, certainly one or two of my friends would be clever enough to work out how to do it if they wanted to...
|
|
|
You've not given us enough information.
Presumably you're trying to do something with file permissions on the file system?
What operating system are you running and why are the files made with a file permission that the daemon can't access? 700 i know as rwx------, why is it doing this - surely if it can make something with that permission then it already has enough permissions to edit and read the data?
|
|
|
I managed to lose £1000 yesterday while trading on bitmex. The first £500 went because I managed to cancel a trade that had gone through (somehow) and the second went because it kept saying the queue was full and then executed all of the trades regardless, I was at £100 profit and then it couldn't close the order and shot up so I'm now speculating their server is buggy and slow because they want you to make a loss and them to make a gain... My trading account will be limited to £20 on there until I can work out why it's so buggy (if it's something I'm doing). Stop losses finally work though on there. I've gone off 1 hour ema. I've still got a buy at £7.885, and I might just leave that there to try to catch a liquidation wick. I'll probably move another couple of hundred into my account, as I expect a bit of volatility over the next few days.
I normally don't go lower than the daily. I think the 4 hour can sometimes be useful for some TA but most people use it in conjunction with the daily ema to try to work stuff out...
|
|
|
I'm seeing 3 posts, 3 activity points and 10 merit.
|
|
|
Theymos speculated satoshi's email address was probably hacked when it expired.
Was it Craig Wright? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Did they have whois privacy guard in 2013?
If they did I doubt personal emails came to him. Dear Craig Wright, I got your birthday present can you send me your address Love Betty (your grandma).... I dont think that happened.
People ought to register domains for 10 years also when they can...
|
|
|
I haven't used grammarly but I imagine it suggests alternative vocabulary for you to use and also suggests improvements in grammar and spellings. If it has UK English then the spelling improvements might be good.
Sometimes, something that makes sense gramatically does not really make sense in this language anymore as lanaguage evolves. Using more interesting vocabulary is the issue with teaching English in schools and universities at the moment. It's a bit like art where they prefer you to use a certain style for something rather than making an original piece and it makes people cogs in a machine rather than being their own free speakers...
This might also make the size of OPs inflate quite a bit if we get a lot of guides like this if people are aiming to write to fit all of the titles you.
|
|
|
Are emails really expiring? ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Yes? They expire with domain names. Everyone really ought to sort this out when that domain expires. You can publicly view some users' email addresses directly on this site anyway, some might be coming from their profiles.
|
|
|
Can you show a link to the operating system?
Do you have python installed?
|
|
|
So your strategy is the one where you buy the largest daily % gain coin and sell it on for a hopeful profit the day after.
I was never sure how well that strategy goes as I've never used it (it doesn't seem to work too well but it's good enough to start on to learn a bit).
|
|
|
It's fiddling with bet sizes instead of card counting...
There aren't many sites that will offer thst and I bet they'll switch out the deck every now and then...
Try a low ish weekly ema too like the 15 or something. A lot of the TA guys think well go down to 21 so the 20 ema should be crossed... But they do have "moving" in the name.
|
|
|
I'm too lazy to walk into a casino and also don't want to be seen doing it - I used to work with kids so it just looks weird as I see them and their parents around the area.
For now I'm using online bitcoin based games and it's great because you can resize the chips well and work out when youre most likely to make something on it (I've read this can't be done at brick and mortar ones).
|
|
|
8. The bitcoin price can move in different directions on different exchanges (this happens pretty regularly especially when. We're quite volatile). 9. Check your profits in btc and fiat. If one is higher than when you started, you're still in profit. If you're down £30 but up 0.01BTC then it's still a profit (or I tell myself that at least) .
My gambling strategy seems to yeild 25% profit on blackjack somehow (repeatedly)... I don't put much into it but its quite nice when I put a small amount on it.
|
|
|
In both cases, could be profitable IF Bitcoin changes prices and on the second case, if you are trading it well. I don't really know the right decision between the two I guess it depends on the person. Maybe a risk taker or not?
I go a bit differently with my trading strategy than most: I have some funds in cold storage and hardware (proabably about 33%). I have another 60% in now risk investments (mining, and altcoin holdings). And the final 7% is set aside for riskier trades (often with leverage).
|
|
|
|