Hahaha. Tebi su svi osim krampusa očaj  U biti je u pravu, jer ove nove kampanje koje ne vode dva glavna managera uglavnom traju par tjedana maksimalno, a za to se ne isplati riskirati prelazak. Ja bi u njihove kampanje išao jedino iz Bitvesta i sličnih. Meni se svejedno sviđa kampanja, a pogotovo mi se sviđa što plaćaju u "čistom" BTC, a ne BTC u protuvrijednosti USD-a. Jedino što (naravno) ne prihvaćaju local boardove.
Da taj dio sa fiksnom cifrom u BTC je privlačan a što se tiče prihvaćanja postova u lokalnom boardu, pogledaj još jednom, baš zato sam i kopirao gdje se sve ne broje postovi. Ako nisam skroz ocoravio ne vidim lokalne boardove spomenute. Edit: sad vidim da se lokalni boardovi ne broje, bio si u pravu. Mogao je to dodati tamo gdje ih je sve nabrojao a ne staviti to kao poseban uvjet. |
|
|
|
Jos jedan mjesec je iza nas, sto znaci da je vrijeme za pregled aktivnosti u prethodnom razdoblju. Podaci su standardno preuzeti sa @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboarda. Tko hoce ici u detalje nek tamo baci oko.
Broj postova u periodu 1.10-31.10Prosli mjesec napisano je 946 postova, sto je rast od otprilike 25% uodnosu na prethodno razdoblje, te je najbolji rezultat jos od 3/2020. Ne bi me zacudilo da ovaj mjesec bue jos bolji s obzirom kako se krece cijena BTCa koja bi mogla privući neke nove clanove a mozda i reaktivirati one koji su uzeli pauzu od foruma.  A ovako se kretao broj psotova kroz mjesece, iz kojih je vidljiva konstantnost naseg boarda. U zadnje vrijeme nemamo nekih velikih amplituda koje imaju skoro svi ostali lokalni boardovi  Ovaj chart sam neki dan objavio u onoj temi u meti u kojoj se traze dodatni boardovi za nas board a evo ga i ovdje, da se usporedi nas board i svi ostali koji imaju i moderatora i hrpu sub boardova. Unatoc svemu tome mi smo prosli mjesec bili cetvrti najaktivniji board sto je odlicno i mislim nas najbolji rezultat od kad ja radim ove preglede. Sa par dodatnih boardova ovaj broj moze samo rasti a sto je jos bitnije board ce biti pregledniji i laksi za pracenje. Kad vidim tko sve ima moderatora, cini mi se da smo mi u biti kaznjeni zato sto imamo board prilicno cist od svakojakog smeca. 
Analiza merita za period 1.10-31.10Povecan broj postova rezulirao je i blagim rastom podijeljenih merita, sa 167 na 181. Naravno dosta je to daleko od rezultata od prije 2 mjeseca, ali i ovo je ok u biti, ocekivao sam i jaci pad ali u zadnje vrijeme par nasih clanova se aktiviralo sa dobrim prijevodima/temama sto je svakako pomoglo. Sto se tice merit/post odnosa, ovaj mjesec je bio na 0.19, znaci tu negdje kao i u 9 mjesecu kad je bio 0.22. Iako je to u biti ok, i dalje tu ima prostora za napredak a to ce se nadam se promjeniti kad @dkbit98 aplikacija za merit sourca bude prihvacena.  A evo i kretanja podijeljenog merita po mjesecima 
One ostale chartove sa usporedbama nas i ostalih lokalnih boardova cu dodati ovih dana |
|
|
|
Ma da, al da ste ovoje bili bannani u slicno vrijeme, i unbannani u slicno vrijeme, onda bi posumnjao.
Ali ovako, nis cusno
Istina, sigurno bi pobudilo sumnju kod nekih, pogotovo s obzirom da smo obojica aktivni u uglavnom istim boardovima. Uostalom, ne treba puno ovdje da se pocnu kruziti price, bitcointalk je ko neko selo.
Nove kampanje nicu na sve strane, evo dvije nove koje isplatu racunaju fixno u BTC Kampanja: Bitsburg Potreban broj postova:30 tjedno Boardovi na kojima se ne broje postovi:Politics & Society, Off-topic, Serious discussion, Archival, Games & Rounds, Investor-based games, Lending, Auctions, Goods, Press, and Micro Earnings. 10x Hero/Legendary = 0.006 BTC/week.
10x Sr. Member = 0.004 BTC/week I jos jedna koja dosta slabije placa od ove prethodne. Kampanja: Unicap Potreban broj postova: 25 tjedno Boardovi na kojima se ne broje postovi: Politics & Society, Off-topic, Serious discussion, Archival, Games & Rounds, Investor-based games, Lending, Auctions, Goods, Press, and Micro Earnings. 10x Hero/Legendary = 0.0026 BTC/week. |
|
|
|
In the screenshot of the TG conversation in the first post, Richard Heart is asked if he is running any Bitcointalk bounty and he says "no." He might be specifically referring to the "fake" one, but if I was getting paid for wearing his sig I'd want to know if it was legit or not instead of just assuming that it is.
Yeah in that case he referred to that fake previous signature campaign, in which OP didn't appear since the day he started that fake campaign. That ended up exactly as everyone expected and hopefully some of those that applied learned the lesson. Regarding this 2nd one, I checked a bit to see what I can find on their Telegram group and it looks like this one is legit and endorsed by Richard Heart. Some member asked whether campaign is scam or not, and this is what he replied and as you can see, they are advertising it via bot.  |
|
|
|
I was scammed of 2 eth on May 15th!
First of all, sorry to hear that you were scammed by Folgory out of 2 ETH. Why is no one in the space raising the issue? This deserves attention. Fuck these criminals
As a matter of fact, here on bitcointalk we warned about Folgory few times already, but people are not doing proper due diligence and keep getting scammed by them. Back in February I opened topic [WARNING] Folgory exchange offering high return+hiring thread bumping services where I explained why everyone should stay away form them if they don't want to loose money and I both tag their account and raised the flag. Few other topics were opened, from people that were scammed by Folgory. As I said, I'm sorry that you lost money but if you spent few minutes on bitcointalk checking about Folgory that wouldn't happen. |
|
|
|
Now I am agreed with this point. If they all have come through this way then it's really good. I did not try to search or think in this way for why I thought a band new account bump it again and again. So it also makes a little confusion. Thank you Rikafip for pointing out this.
No problem. That's why it is not a bad idea to report even those scams that are not yet here on bitcointalk as thread here might save someone who i doing a research before investing. Even if it's one person saved, it is worth the effort. No not the same guy. I have money there and they are telling me to pay taxes to withdraw.
I don't know if this is the Chinese way of doing things or if it's just a scam.
Do not pay them anything additional as you will loose that too. Sorry to say but you got scammed, I just hope you didn't invest much. |
|
|
|
Afaik, TomoDex is TomoChain exchange, they have ANN here since 2017 and it seems still alive. Have you tried contacting them through Telegram maybe as I can see both TomoChain and TomoDex groups are active and assist those who have issues withdrawing their funds. In any case, here is the link to TomoDex telegram group, from what i can see they are active there and answer to questions so hopefully they can help you https://t.me/TomoDEX_Official |
|
|
|
You all are the same guy here? why you guys are creating a new account and posted here? Your motive is only bumping this thread or know it legit or fake? Just read above the first and second comments then you will get the answer. I am not so sure that they are all same guy bumping this thread as I'm not sure what exactly would they gain from bumping accusation topic. More likely hey googled about this CP+ scam and one of the results was this thread. Tt has happened before, people coming here because bitcointalk scam accusation threads popping up on the first few pages. Just keep in mind that an unknown person offering huge profit projects, and to get profit users to have to deposit first means scam. So be aware of them.
That's really all you have to know. Someone conatacts you with an "investment offer you just can't miss", and you can be 101% sure that it is a scam. But people heard stories about getting rich quick via crypto, so they are still falling for this. |
|
|
|
Being serious now, I think sometimes it takes a while until a good report (flagged as good) gets action done towards it (either it means a post gets deleted or a topic gets locked). Might be the case here too, that's true. Anyway, it was kinda interesting how that thread keeps dodging certain death. Sometimes nothing happens towards the good reports, but other things happen toward the author. I remember I had a few hundreds of good reports made for a guy (I hope I remember this well as I can't verify in my report history anymore, as more than 30 days passed and the reports are gone) but they were never deleted. However, the author got banned. So maybe MeowCoinCommunity got banned?
That could have happened because hundreds of posts of the same author were deleted, so mods decided it's time for retirement. From my experience in similar cases, OP of such threads are usually not banned. Just to be sure I checked some previous cases and none of them are banned, but maybe that wouldn't be such a bad idea. Hmmmmm I can't really tell how SMF works, but back when I used to do some mod work in another forum, the system would only let you mark the reports as good after you had taken any action. But again, I have never worked with SMF
I honestly just assumed that as it happened more times to me and others, and kinda made sense that it was all manual and that there was no such mechanism that prevents you marking good if post was not deleted. |
|
|
|
I was going to say that same thing, and I can't really understand it. It's simple really, and it happens occasionally; mod marked it good and forgot to delete. It happens, as everything is done manually, and if you are mod and deleting hundreds of posts/topics in a row, "mistake" is bound to happen. Apart from reporting the OP, maybe we could also individually report each address-only post and see if we get lucky
Thought about it too, but then again there's 5 pages of that crap, and topic will be nuked sooner or later so it would just make more work for us and mods, so i gave up on that idea. |
|
|
|
|
Just a suggestion: no need to react to every application while campaign is closed for new participants. Simply let manager deal with those, no need to get 10 replies each time someone does that as we are just clogging the thread.
|
|
|
|
Thanks @GazetaBitcoin, but it seems like Meow survived both of our reports. Since it's Meow coin, I guess it makes sense that it has nine lives Report marked as "Good" but it's still there and still being spammed. I'm gonna report it again, let's see what happens this time.  |
|
|
|
I realise that I should probably be grateful that they haven't as the price would have already rocketed but at the same time it concerns me that they haven't
Why do you think that they haven't? To me, current 14,000+ is proof that big players are amassing BTC. Price has so much room to grow of course and this is just a beginning, but somehow I doubt we would come even close to these levels if people just used BTC for paying some stuff and without investment funds joining the party. With all this said, BTC is still quite volatile so it's still a risk, and you gotta be careful when you are in charge of multi billion dollar conglomerates, things can go south pretty fast. |
|
|
|
Vidim nitko ne spominje da smo korak blize ETH 2.0, ugovor o depozitu releasan jucer, cirkus bi trebao krenuti 1.12 ako tjedan dana prije toga najmanje 16.384 validatora depozita 32 ETH. A ako ne, onda tjedan dana nakon sto se taj requirement odradi. Otud valjda i taj rast cijene, odmah otisao preko 400 USD. Ugovor o depozitu omogućuje slanje ETH-a između Ethereuma i ETH 2.0, a sadrži jedno od rijetkih preostalih ažuriranja potrebnih za olakšavanje uvođenja ETH 2.0 “faze 0”. Očekuje se da će se ETH 2.0 nadogradnja zvana Beacon chain biti pokrenuta u roku od nekoliko tjedana nakon lansiranja ugovora o depozitu. Ova nadogradnja postavit će temelje za Proof of Stake konsenzus. Korisnicima je potrebno 32 ETH da bi založili i postali validatori, a za pokretanje Beacon chaina potrebno je 16.384 validatora. IzvorU ovom clanku se spominje i mogucnost da je sve ovo fejk jer je takvih stvari bilo i prije, ali sudeci po objavi sa Vitalikovog twittera, stvar je legit.  https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1324018999458295809A evo i objave sa Ethereum bloga https://blog.ethereum.org/2020/11/04/eth2-quick-update-no-19/ |
|
|
|
|
Hey @Coin-1, first time seeing myself on DT1 list and I noticed that you marked me as 'Legendary" (33rd on the list) but unfortunately I am still quite far from that. Same thing goes for a few other members that I know are still not Legendary (Ratimov and dkbit98).
edit: disregard that previous comment, I just saw few other names that are also not yet Legendary and I realized that you marked the same all those with 1000+ merit earned. My bad.
|
|
|
|
For some reason MEOW COIN thread is still there, and still being spammed by TRX adresses while my report is unhandled. Obvious cases like this are usually sorted very fast, but maybe I'm missing something here. Anyway, this is how all 5 pages of that thread look like. Nothing but spam  Can someone else report that thread please for organizing giveaway in exchange for comments? Maybe then mods will notice and thread will be nuked. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5285225.0 |
|
|
|
I am doing an early called. This reminded me of that famous tweet   |
|
|
|
the funny thing is that when the shitcoin shitshow starts up again (which i think it will between 6 to 12 months from now) we will see a lot of newbies come in who get scammed by those altcoins and these obvious scammers alike.
Unfortunately it already started few months ago, fueled by DeFi and greed. Funny thing, bunch of those that lost money during ICO craze are investing again in similarly risky things like they didn't learn anything, and that brought even more newbies who probably read stories about x1000 returns in couple of month. For them slowly acquiring BTC is too conservative, they want profit now. After all, there is an endless supply of naive people, like in that old saying "there's a sucker born every minute". |
|
|
|
If we can't get our local moderator right now, these changes are an absolute and necessary minimum that must be made as soon as possible..
Exactly this, new boards are necessity as our local board is very much alive and kicking, pretty much drama free and with quality discussions. Since we don't have sub-boards our main one is completely cluttered with bunch of different threads ranging from politics to bitcoin wallet consolidations and various guides and tutorials. Getting new boards will also boost our activity (which is high nevertheless) as I am probably not the only one hesitant to open some new threads that interest me but I don't want to clog main board even further. Hopefully we get at least one or two sub-boards soon if not all that were mentioned in @dkbit98 post, for start. Just to show how active our local board is and that additional sub-boards are absolutely needed, here is chart with October 2020 local board activity in which Croatian is yet again very high, this time at the 4th spot so mods effort to open new sub-boards and move all threads in the appropriate place won't be wasted on semi-dead local board but on the one that will benefit from it greatly. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
