People think they can stop wearing masks just because they were vaccinated as if they were already immune to the virus. I see people everywhere behaving like this, including the elderlies and it's not their fault since the currently restrictions are really softer not only for physical casinos, but for stores and businesses in general too.
Although the masks also don't guarantee any immunity against the virus, I think people should keep using them in public places, because the vaccine is only going to decrease the chance of being hospitalized and having complications in case of infection. The vaccine also doesn't guarantee an individual isn't going to die from coronavirus. So every caution worths.

The efficiency of the vaccines will be proved on practice only if we don't see a next infection wave on the next weeks and months. By there, land based casinos should be more careful with their customers.

In a digital world like the one we live nowadays, I think there is no way to escape this risk, because sooner or later you will have to upload your documents to one of those data online collectors for different purposes that go beyond gambling kYC sign ups. I've already lost the count of how many times I had to sent my documents virtually. And each new day it becomes more frequently, as new services and opportunities don't stop popping on the internet, and in order to join them you have to show yourself.

If KYC data goes in wrong hands and our image is used maliciously by third party, the authorities must understand the situation, because as I said, we live right now in a digital world and everyone's data is on the internet, even if under government's possession, in the virtual clouds.

Many religious representatives are against gambling, because in countries where gambling is legal people may launder money through gambling instead of laundering money donating to their churches and organizations. It makes the religious' income decrease.

On the other hand, the anti-gambling agenda isn't exclusivity of religious segments, because the liberal media is also totally against it. In fact, many conservatives and leftists are against gambling.

There are many speculators in this market, as you said, more individuals like Elon Musk. They are selling bitcoins right now because they predict the market is going to crash to deeper levels, so they can start investing again when btc reaches to the bottom. These people aren't leaving crypto market, they are just taking a break.

The real issue is that the small and new investors get too disappointed in times like this, so many of them may think about quitting bitcoin definitively. On long run, whales get stronger, because they never give up crypto market and know how to play with prices, while mass adoption doesn't happen, as people from this second group are well know for their weak hands and for being impatient.

If I keep holding there is nothing to lose, besides seeing my funds negative for a while, otherwise if I sell, I may be losing the opportunity to see bitcoin hitting a new ATH and giving this opportunity to the institutional investors, who already rule the world through their financial power. It means if I sell bitcoin I'm giving more power to these people enslave me.
Comparing the disadvantages and advantages of selling bitcoin right now or not, I definitely reach to the conclusion I shouldn't sell anything, except the amount needed to pay for daily expenses, as usual, that must be converted to fiat first.

It's because in crypto universe you are responsible for your money and nobody else. There are no middlemen or authorities taking care your money and guaranting insurance. It's the price to pay for decentralization. At same time, if you are a responsible person, store your passwords safely, care for your personal devices and are cautious about where you access your wallet you will be safe.
I believe in the near future there will be alternative options to give investors more safety when keeping their coins, like third party services offering storage for crypto currency with the same guarantees you have when storing fiat at bank. However, nothing is more guaranteed than storing your money in your own hands.

Well, that is how a decentralized market full of idolaters works, sooner or later it becomes centralized around a disgusting figure anyway. The issue isn't a big player trying to manipulate people (if we can really call this manipulation), but people letting themselves to be so easily manipulated by a selfish joker. I think first of all the sheep should be blamed for being fool.
Opinions, half truth and tweets will always exist and people behing them have their own personal reasons and interests to spread them on the internet. Those who receive these informations are the ones who need to absorb what is worthful, while ignoring or throwing away what is biased.

That is what institutional investors want to make you think lol. It's called bluff, right?
If bitcoin were going to die, Elon Musk wouldn't have put 1.5$ billion of dollars into btc, Paypal wouldn't have adopted it as payment method and Mark Zuckerberg wouldn't be farming likes and attention on the internet exhibiting his goat named bitcoin. The biggest whales of the world are addicted to bitcoin, they just can't admit it in public, or there will be even less coins disponible for them.

That is something I don't understand. How can China be so hostile towards bitcoin since most mining bitcoin power is concentrated in that country? Theoretically they would be more benefited if China were friendly to crypto currency, especially bitcoin. Or are they just trying to avoid common citizens from adopting btc, while the government and some vip citizens are incentivized doing so?
Anyway I think it's not so impacting for the market, because these news coming from China always follow the same pattern, and as said above, they are the main bitcoin miners in the world, so it makes no sense for them to prejudice bitcoin.

Crashes in price are the worse trap for new investors. I believe their impact is even worse than scam offers for investors who lack experience in the market, as they cause a more severe damage on investors' psychological and for many it's the end of their investments in crypto, losing the long run profitability of bitcoin, as we have already seen in past years investors acting like this.

Yesterday the news said fearful and scared new investors were already selling all their bitcoins due to the crash in bitcoin price, while older investors were already buying these bitcoins, because they know it's a great opportunity to collect more bitcoins for a good price. So, don't panic, never.

Oh yes, thank you all for pointing it out. I have forgotten by wagering at dice you can also increase your free roll earnings progressively.

I think the no captcha feature isn't for old or new users, but for users who are also investors. You can be a new user and invest in FUN, so you will also have the captcha removed.
But about the 20-30 satoshis per roll it's something new for me, because as far as I know without temporary boosts from rewards tab, everyone gets the base 3-5 satoshis minimum. Where did you see this information or who did tell you that?

Why are rewards for old users different from rewards for new users? I have never hearded this before.
It's hard to find referrals because our ref links get usually exposed to people looking for ways to make extra income from zero, what is really hard at Freebitco.in, and from my experience most referrals give up claiming on faucet because they would like 200$ jackpot prize happened more often. The most worthful referrals are the gamblers and investors ones. These are hard to find, but once you do it, they will generate a nice passive income.

I think it's a really curious situation. If the government is doing this giveaway it's because a considerable parcel of the local population avoid being vaccinated.
Before saying if the lottery idea is good or not, I would like to know why Ohio's citizens don't want the vaccine. If they have a point on the discussion, the lottery might be a bad idea, because it's a kind of bribery to make people change their minds. And opinions can't be bought. Opinions can only change through the logical debate of the facts and truth.

I don't think so. This guy may pretend towards his community and fans he has sold Tesla's bitcoins to lure another investors to sell their coins and dump the market, but in fact Elon keeps his bitcoins intact on the wallet waiting for a new ATH.

He plays with words all the time, constantly changing his statements every few days.
Today he says bitcoin isn't good for the environment, but tomorrow he can say the issue is already being fixed, so bitcoin is not going to be harmful anymore. I hope sooner or later investors get tired of these jokes and stop taking him seriously when investing in crypto market.

My friend, I think nothing changed. Bitcoin isn't the most profitable currency these days in terms of percentage gains, but it is still the most trustful and safest crypto currency investment. I suspect many alt developers and big investors want people to really think bitcoin is slowly losing its status and fading out from the market, so their personal projects can be boosted, but meanwhile they are the ones going to buy the bitcoins dropped for sell.
Look at Elon Musk: he dumped bitcoin and keeps shilling for dogecoin, but don't forget 90% of his btc investment is still intact. He is surely holding for the future, while another investors sell their coins desperately. And who do you think is going to buy these coins soon?

You have answered you own question:

I think we have only to thanks mr. Elon Musk and his *cattle herd* (insane followers) for a new opportunity to buy cheaper bitcoins they gave us. And I hope more of those institutional investors come in to play with crypto market's prices again, because in the end there will be always less coins on their hands and more cheap bitcoins for everyone else.

Depending who is the creator of bitcoin it could discourage investors to keep their money in bitcoin, because it's known Satoshi Nakamoto holds a considerable portion of coins, and if the person behind the nickname is found, there are some chances this person is connected to important corporations, businesses and institutions, what would centralize bitcoin around the elements the creator is involved with, in a kind of conflict of interest.
On the other hand, Satoshi Nakamoto might not be connected to any company or financial world's personalities, not impacting bitcoin negatively like said before, or he might be even dead at this point.

Actually most gamblers aren't problem gamblers. I've found a study saying about 3%-4% of the United States adults have issues or potential issues with gambling addiction, while around 60% of the country's population have gambled in the recent years. In another countries I believe it must be similar. Sometimes we have the impression most gamblers can't control themselves because the news spread stories about this category of players often, while they completely ignore normal gamblers who don't put their hobby in detriment of their personal lives and welfare. News want clicks and views, so they have to focus in problem gamblers only, that is understandable.

Always a whale or institutional investor drops a lot of coins on the market, they give us the opportunity to acquire more bitcoins for a cheaper price, so it doesn't have a total negative impact for bitcoin adopters. While some are here just to play with the prices on short run, there are many others who are interested in bitcoin thinking on long run and as a safe way to protect their funds against inflation and government's abuses.
Thanks to the long run investors bitcoin can survive and hit higher resistance levels each new season, while there are less coins disponible for short run speculators each new day.