In my understanding, what OP's talking about "mining" is the Block Reward against the Max 21m Bitcoin cap that's nearly catching up.

Based on that, what they said was true
but as an addition, mining won't reach the point where transaction fees are the only reward during our generation or the next.
The block reward is designed to reduce by half in every 210,000 blocks, you do the math.

Even so, based on useability, transaction fees and satoshi as a reward can still motivate the hardcore or loyal miners of the network if Bitcoin still exist 120 years from now.

How much is the devfee?

SSE4, so this can potentially make (E7+) Core2Duo's hashrate competent enough to earn a profit?
I'd love to try this with my scrap machines.

<Edit>
Waiting for a legit test response or a code review.

Can you provide the link to Github of the list in the OP and include the quoted parts of the shared list of forks by others?
Because this could be a good reference for users who're looking for 3rd-party wallets that support Bitcoin Forks and Altcoins.

People fancy a nicely formatted thread  

You can keep the current copy including the blocks up to current height, the question is syncing it after 10 years.
1TB is fine, here's the elementary math that may clear things up.

Given this:
Say 1GB(/week) * 52.14(weeks/year)= 52.14GB per year
200GB (current size) + 52.14GB * 10 (years) = 721.4GB Required to fully sync after 10 years.

I second the motion, even a 1TB disk is still future proof up to 15 years given that the Disk survives the Apocalypse and the future systems still supports sATA.

I second this.

@FaourZ From the net,


Some powersupplies have "shared" +12v Rail to the regular +12v for other components making the max power label inaccurate for computing the power consumption of the videocards alone.
Most major producers however, separate the rails and using only the max power of the +12v for PCI-e power as the Rating Label.

What are the brand(s) and model(s) of your PSUs?

Unless you can't underclock like the post above me stated, plug out one of the GTX1070ti to test the miner for stability.

From the looks of it, the transaction was carried out and the date was 2017-02-03, which is roughly 16months ago, so this must be the right transaction and regarding the funds:
Yes 1.3985 BTC was sent to 1BwLSXGWxow8hBYmYPLhN2FnvWudQ2MuKK and still unspent which is a good sign.

The reason must be on your client's side unless, that bitcoin address isn't yours.

If you are able to synchronize your wallet to the network, that "unconfirmed transaction" will be updated to "confirmed" and your balance will show.
You can also do this spend it (but make a backup of your wallet.dat/wallet file): Sweep or Import the private key of the address 1BwLSXGWxow8hBYmYPLhN2FnvWudQ2MuKK to other wallet that has a import feature like Electrum.

However, refer to other threads here on how to extract private keys from MultibitHD wallet.

---

<edit>
I saw that you've already moved your funds, congrats.

I noticed that you can press Enter multiple times to change the site's "opinion" to the coin, some coins have one.
There seems to be a list where known coins got its individual description and some shitcoins have non-generic multiple response,
total shitcoins have multiple responses.
Perhaps, it's the developers' personal picks or a sarcastic trading signal.

Conclusion: doiownashitcoin is a fun~er version of our Speculation Board (minus the Memes).

First, you should move this to Development & Technical Discussion > Alternative clients > MultiBit to be noticed by the wallet's users and developers.

Now, are you sure that the output address from blockhain.info is the correct address from your Multibit Wallet?
Because an unconfirmed transaction can't stay in a mempool for that long, could it be that your wallet isn't synchronized to the server or the tx/history is just a "receive request" that you've saved before.
Without further information, I can't help you with this.

Can you provide us the link to blockchain.info of the transaction id?

There's a move button below (bottom-left hand) this thread.

Depends, if the wallet isn't HD (Hierarchical Deterministic) (Ex. Bitcoin Core Wallet), the answers are:
[1] Yes
[2] Yes
[3] No
Encryption won't affect the new address (private key) generation of the wallet, any new generated addresses after the separation are randomized which will produce different new addresses for wallet A & B.

If the wallet is an HD wallet with a SEED (Ex. Electrum), it's:
[1] Yes
[2] No
[3] Yes
Any new Private keys are based on the wallet's seed so, if you generate more addresses, both A & B wallet will produce the same.

Last time I checked, you can request in the UI of blockchain(dot)info for the private key of any of your addresses.
Doing this will remove that address to the list, but it's still best to send all the funds to a new address to be safe.
Given that, the logical solution when shifting to a different wallet is to just send all of your funds to the new wallet (ex. Electrum) via transaction.

<I'll verify this later> Edit
Nah, Export private key is only available for their Ethereum Addresses.

Also, this should be moved to Service Discussion > Web Wallets.

---

As for the thread question:
For newbies, it is safe in the sense that you don't have to take care of the backups and private key managements and the fees to use bitcoin, all you need is the backup seed or your key+passphrase and your email address.
But not safe in sense of security, on that website, your bitcoins aren't totally under your control.

There isn't much difference between brutforcing private keys and the mnemonic seed in terms of the total number of combination.
But yes, an HD wallet's seed has lower security but still, collision is impossible.
Here's an old thread to clear things up: How HD wallet works for back ups? Reply by achrow101

Here's a short answer: There are total of 5,444,517,870,735,015,415,413,993,718,908,291,383,296 possible combinations which makes any random combination unique.
Using that, it's easy to compute the chance to get a collision using a calculator that can enter 40+ characters.

Actually, he didn't have any investments, he's looking (seemingly begging) for investors.

Investors aren't helping developers, teams, corporations or businesses, they are investing.

This could help you at least:
If you're confident that your script is working and useful, make a demonstration or a whitepaper to encourage potential investors to "help" your project, this thread wont do.
Or sell the script alongside with the demonstration or documentation on how it works.

Hope this helps.

P.S: Yep overthinking does hurt heads, pulsating physically.

You can't spend using that "watch only" imported wallet.
If that's possible, anybody else can just steal someone else's funds just by importing addresses with huge balance.

The only options you have to restore a spendable wallet are:

• The Seed that you've instructed to write down during the first wallet creation process.
• Each of the Addresses' private keys.

The addresses are always visible to the public, example: blockexplorers.
By the way, if you're not sure: Addresses starts with 1, 3 or bc1 ; Private Keys Starts with 5, K or L ; and the SEED consist of words like dog sheep life science geek maid...etc.

Drag and drop it to a new tab or window to view full screen, (after checking) that image has 1920x1200 dimensions which is pretty big to blur.
Here's a link of the full screen version: Right Click->Open Link New Tab

You can try using Vanitygen or Oclavanitygen to waste your electricity, time and dignity; but the chance to bruteforce a loaded address is almost impossible.

Yes, of course. Anyone can pick a random number manually even without a computer.

Regarding Electrum, since it's a HD wallet, private keys generated by it were based on the SEED, it's using 12 words as default (docs.electrum.org).
With that, hitting a collision isn't possible, there are more possible combinations of Electrum's 2048-word Dictionary (with different language variations) than the total population of the world.

No that's too few, add more Zeroes.

Have you tried -rescan as aleksej996 said?

Otherwise, it means that the address didn't belongs to the wallet, I think you know this.
The first paragraph from the OP strongly suggests that it is an old backup.
Most likely, you've unintentionally overwritten the most recent wallet.dat by an outdated backup during your copy-paste procedure.

I'd say, stop looking at charts, not until exchanges become free of manipulation (more even, based from stock exchange).
Even if anyone can polish his chart "technical analysis" skill to "convincing" level, current Cryptomarket is still a different field.
When the whales do their jobs, every prediction could fail to deliver its promises.

And a triple bottom happening in Bitcoin market is far fetched idea.

Yes it may, as long as you've send the second transaction using the same inputs right after the first with larger fees.
The first transaction must still be unconfirmed to do that.

In addition, a typo will make the final address invalid (to the checksum) that will disable the send button.
You can produce a valid address through typo if you're the world's most unlucky fellow.

Even thousands of private keys wont make a wallet.dat file size grow to 1.5Gb, that's insane.
Are you sure that it is a wallet file? The file name is just wallet.dat or renamed? You're certain that it was your backup, or it was salvaged?

Because you see, there are other files that ends with ".dat" extension, if you just recovered it from a formatted disk or old hard disk, the chance that it's not a wallet.dat is high.
Loose Files from windows applications sometimes named with .dat extension, and a Gigabyte of generic file must be a part of an app.

I do not know the set up of your Altcoin but,
"0/offline" error can be caused by a non-synced node and the user tried to make a transaction if the client enables him to do so.
How much premine did your Altcoin has? And was the client that you're testing 100% synced?