You are a scammer
Being a scammer requires a victim. Who have I scammed, somac.? Name the aggrieved party or STFU. The correct term is would-be scammer.  No but in all seriousness, there was a decent analogy given in one of the many BSV ANN threads about how attempting to recreate Bitcoin 0.1 is like attempting to recreate an early Ford automobile. imagine Henry Ford, coming back from the grave telling Ford company that cars don't need AC/heater because that is not part of the original design..what cars need are bigger windows, actually might as well remove the windshield to let more air in LOL
Craig is claiming his car is a Ford Model T when in actuality under the hood its closer to a Toyota Corolla. If he wanted to recreate the Model T, he would have just cloned the Model T instead of including all the modernizations introduced in generations (builds) afterward.
To complete the analogy, modern Bitcoin (0.19) is more like a Ford Fusion sedan. It makes use of the latest innovations in the industry to deliver an advanced version of the original product, one that couldn't have been fathomable during Henry Ford's time.
If you want to be religious about it and say the Model T is the only true car, well have fun, but don't expect other people to follow.
In short, adhering to BSV because one believes it more closely follows Satoshi's original protocol is much like a religion -- based on belief, and not much more. Its a religion every bit as much as Bitcoin (BTC) Maximalism is a religion. Personally I find Prophet Craig to be a false prophet as his teachings are unpalatable -- pretty much devoid of any sort of morals or ethics. However, if someone else wants to accept him as a True Prophet, well, not much I can do about that. |
|
|
|
^^^ Hilarious how you are responding to the spammers you hired to write cheesy one-liners for your thread and are ignoring an actual forum member asking you questions. Nothing scammy or disingenuous about that whatsoever.  |
|
|
|
 Craig must be a pathological liar in the clinical sense -- nothing metaphorical about it. Pathological liar, as in, he's a sociopath who is missing a chunk in his prefrontal cortex that is responsible for the most human of emotions -- mainly empathy and shame. I'm saying his neurobiology is flawed. Its actually not his fault, either. Anybody here want to make a gentleman's wager than CSW never moves a single satoshi BTC? I'm willing to bet you 1 BSV that Craig doesn't move a single BTC within a year from today. Of course the address I provide you for delivery of my BSV will undoubtedly be an exchange. If I lose then it will be incredibly humiliating for me as I'll actually have to purchase a BSV. Any takers? |
|
|
|
Most San Franciscans are proud of the city; it's a beautiful chunk of real estate, nestled in one of the most beautiful regions of the planet. I think there's just a sentiment that it's such a beautiful place it deserves the use of it's full name. No shortcuts or laziness allowed when invoking it's name. And don't get me wrong, it's more of a light-hearted, humorous debate than it is derisiveness. Almost a way for locals to laugh at themselves for "taking themselves so seriously."
I haven't been there since, well, last century, but when I was there I did have a good time. My first girlfriend ever was from San Anselmo. I stayed in a crackhead part of the city with her for 1 night. We of course went to Haight/Ashbury, because thats the most important thing you should do if you were me. Went to the the Amoeba Records there. It was weird seeing the homeless hippie kids begging for money on the street, trying to save up to buy some ecstasy or whatever. I did go to a rave in Oakland. The original venue was cancelled and in its place you were supposed to call a phone number (this was pre-cell phones mind you) to find out where the new venue was (in this case, Oakland). My girlfriend's parents nearly threw a fit when they found out we were - gasp - going to Oakland for a - double-gasp - RAVE. But we ended up having a good, clean time! The place was still raided by cops a few hours in, but they didn't shut it down. Just checked a few peoples' pupils for dilation - not ours. Not that it mattered because it was an acid drum n bass party and they didn't even have E. So we were sober. LOL. Anyway, probably the most enchanting part of it was driving over the Golden State Bridge... Now that's a trip. Don't even need drugs to enjoy it. Also anyway, go Niners! LOL. |
|
|
|
Received & confirmed with thanks!
Well now we have the specific amount and an approximate timescale. I think we can search your puny transparent ledger and find out lots more about you if he's really privacy centric he will use wassabi or chipmixer which will make all analysis fruitless Because it is the blockchain, where there's a will, there's a way. There's just not a will in this instance. |
|
|
|
Where are all your news, guys? Because I can't see anything during the latest 2 days.
You can check our Telegram channel: https://t.me/cryptoknowmicCan you please clarify if your project tends to keep your ICO going until the hardcap is reached? Since July 2019, this project has sold only 4.2% of the tokens necessary to reach its hard cap... The token sale ends after the hard cap has been reached... So that's roughly 8.4% of the hard cap per year... That means this token sale should be over in about 11 years, or 2031! Also, if your project is supposed to be about crypto media, why would you hire a thread bumping service to create a fake buzz around it? Shouldn't you be stressing the importance of having an organic community? If you don't care about having a genuine community, why would anyone assume you are offering a genuine product? |
|
|
|
You are in denial.
LFC clearly stated who the winners are.
That's fine and all. Like I said, I wasn't even competing. I checked in half an hour after this happened. Still, you don't see anything contradictory about these 2 numbers?  yeah but when he added the price ivomm, then we already touched 9K (let say 9K was the target and not over) .... then ivomm was surely valid cause the post was after 9K touch thats what its all about....
Is touching $9,000 the same thing as being "over $9,000"? I mean thats what Vegeta said, is it not? (without the dollars portion)  LOL. The true winner is this meme. |
|
|
|
It I was running mic’s game there would be ONE winner When it's split of a second then it's hard to decide but I am blown away with your move of making both of them winners. This is next level. Nobody won! - ivomm's original post had no price, and when he added it, the price said $8983.93 - Alcohodl's price reads exactly $9000.00 Nobody actually posted while the price was above $9000. The gun has been jumped IMHO. Edit: I respect LFC's finality of decision, its his game after all. I wasn't even competing, just checked in randomly. |
|
|
|
BSV is to show that segwit - anonymous - anarcho is cancer
If that's its primary function, it sure is doing a piss poor job of it. Would probably help if your dev wasn't a shyster con artist. We've already been over this -- satoshi (the real satoshi) was pro-anonymity. He did everything he could to protect the anonymity of bitcoin users by doing things like developing bitcoin to not log IP addresses and be Tor-friendly. Your fraudulent dev is the antithesis of this. No way Craig will ever move a single satoshi coin. Mainly because he isn't satoshi. He hasn't before, he won't in the future. How much do you want to bet on it? |
|
|
|
This project is developing very quickly in my opinion if you really want to make money buy this cryptocurrency, it is not a financial recommendation. https://coinsbit.io/ru/trade/FREE_BTCdo you think someone will gain from buying this coin where no one wants to buy it anymore even at 1 sat?  how can you say that this is developing very quickly? really not a good financial reco!!! i would suggest stay away from this coin. The actual price of this coin is: 0.00000000001367 BTC. That's far, far less than 1 sat. The guy recommending people buy it for 1 sat has absolutely no morals. This is just another Ponzi Ethereum token. It has absolutely no utility and the only reason people dabble in it is to convince greater fools to buy it from them at a higher price (as witnessed above). |
|
|
|
|
Observable-Instances-of-Irrefutable-Proof™
|
|
|
|
korner's alt - Alert! banned This idiot is setting himself up, and nobody pays attention to him in the Russian locale. What hasn't the KOPHEP account been banned yet? It literally spells "korner" in cyrillic, does it not? I guess its because he's only created 4 bullshit flags, so far... |
|
|
|
I mean it was official, it just hadn't been sent to the Senate yet. To be honest I had no idea that they had to vote to send them over to the Senate, was pretty sure that the only reason they hadn't been sent yet was because of Pelosi.
But then again, that's government for you. Bureaucracy and a ton of rules is a hell of a thing. Transmission to The Senate is a constitutional requirement for impeachment is it not? It was not legally completed until it was transmitted to The Senate. Please point out the provision in the constitution that says this. Don't just say, "One guy said it does in an opinion piece once." As usual, you're the last to get on board the reality train. At least you got on this time. |
|
|
|
|
NEW POLL
Same premise as the old poll...
Damn, its been a lot of upsets so far this post season. My guess is as good as anybody's, but the Titans have me hooked so I'm gonna go with them this week (to beat the spread).
The bookies would tell us we are having a SF vs. KC Super Bowl this year. But as we've seen, any g.d. thing can happen! I would not at all be surprised if we ended up having a Green Bay vs. Tennessee Super Bowl.
What do you guys think?
|
|
|
|
The saddest part is theymos never even took him "of" ignore...  Don't worry. He'll be back. Good trolls never die. They just get their internet privileges revoked at the psychiatric hospital from time to time. |
|
|
|
BitcoinSV price pumped by 100% in 1 day :O All because of the possibility that Craig Wright has access to 1 million BTC and will dump them for BSV. I don't think its a possibility. Just going by his track record of being a compulsive liar, he is certainly lying about having the keys to the famed Satoshi Stash. If you're wondering about how the price could rise to such a degree given the fact that their dev was basically called a fraud by a federal judge, I found this explanation to be accurate and concise: BSV shills aren't exactly the most intelligent people. They've had CSW lie to their faces for years and yet they still swallow whatever word salad he serves them next.
|
|
|
|
Since July 2019, this project has sold only 4.2% of the tokens necessary to reach its hard cap... The token sale ends after the hard cap has been reached... So that's roughly 8.4% of the hard cap per year... That means this token sale should be over in about 11 years, or 2031! You aren't the first here who is talking this bullshit. The fact is they are going to make an IEO in Q2 and distribution (and listing) soon after that. Who are you and how do you know this? Why don't they update their website to reflect this newfound and highly pertinent information? The whole thing reeks of scam, especially since they hired a thread bumping service to spam on their behalf. If they were a genuine project they wouldn't be so lazy. |
|
|
|
|
He's right though.
90% of that thread is signature spam shitposts, just regurgitating the same ideas and not presenting anything new or insightful.
I already had 1/4 of the accounts in that thread on ignore.
His attitude could definitely use an improvement. I guess he didn't know any better, but that's why for the most part I stay out of Bitcoin Discussion. However unfortunately, its been overrun by spammers.
|
|
|
|
Just practicing... LOL.
Aw man my computers so slow there's no way I'm gonna win.
Staying online for the next 8 hours LOL *image redacted* You think you have a chance against me? 😉  |
|
|
|
  Just practicing... LOL. Aw man my computers so slow there's no way I'm gonna win. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
