I am not using Bitcoin ATMs because of the fees, a personal feeling on unsafety and being afraid of malfunctioning, but I think that they should exist if Bitcoin is to stay for a while. Op, I hope you're aware that such websites sort of exist already, right? CoinATMRadar is a good example, and I can see that it's been mentioned by other people already. Moreover, your website shows that there aren't any ATMs in my country, for instance, whereas there actually are a couple in my city. There are also quite a few in Hungary, whereas your map doesn't show them either. Good luck with the project, just remember about competitors!

Thanks! I received something and tried to play with it. The minimum bet is 250 (of whatever token that represents the amount of BTC, it would be useful to see it specified), and I could bet 3 or 4 times on the welcome bonus. I've never had such an unlucky few bets because during these 3-4 bets it did not go above not a single time. Moreover, it crashed literally at 1.00 once and at around 1.13 or something another time. I know that it's possible but how likely is it?
Anyway, I think it would be useful to see the balance displayed on the playing page all the time somewhere in the corner and updated instantly when money is taken for the bets or returned when a person wins. Edit: oh, now I see the '0 bits' sign, so I guess I was just inattentive when I could not find it during the game.
I'm wondering whether the game is provably fair and, if not, whether you are considering making it provably fair.

Technically, I believe it's usually not 50% but something close to it because there's around 1% house edge. And it might seem like a minor thing, but if we're talking about 50/50 dice it means that instead of being around zero probabilistically (if you always get the same amount), you're actually losing in the long run.
As for odds, I think it's a tricky topic. If the game is simulated, we know that the odds are pure. If, however, it's something like sports betting, it seems to me that eventually the customer bets define the odds, so they are based on the bets people make, rather than on pure mathematical calculations. Actually, I believe that when betting on real events, it's impossible to know the odds of winning the same way you know them in a simulated dice game.

So it's been months but you're still working, right? I don't leave and Thailand and tend to use public transport, but I think it's good that you allow people to pay with Bitcoin. Could you share your experience with us? How many of your cars rides occur per day or month? Are your prices typical market prices in the area or are they higher? Has anyone used the crypto option yet? If paying in crypto worth the same as fiat, less than in fiat or more than in fiat?
It's just really interesting how crypto adoption works or doesn't work for local businesses.
And if you haven't done it yet, try sharing your service in Local Boards on this forum.

I think it's cool that you decided to make a poker website because there aren't many good places to play it. Unfortunately, I couldn't access the website, so I don't know whether it's fine or not. You said in a post that it's optimized for smartphones, but it didn't open on mine. The webpage had exclamation point at the end, end the only thing I could see in the screen is a rotated smartphone. I tried rotating mine but it didn't help no matter in which position I put it.. I think you should fix that, and adding an option to gamble directly with BTC seems like a must to me, so it's good that you're at least testing instant exchange stuff.

The easiest way would be to leave a Bitcoin address for people to send you money, and to send money to particular addresses. But yeah, it means no payment gateway, and it would look sort of unprofessional and untrustworthy.
The cheapest transactions come with the Lighting Network. If the amounts of money will usually be below $50, you should consider implementing it. It can be tricky, but not impossible, since Lightning pizza managed to do that. Maybe you can find useful info in their website. Other than that, Bitpay seems the most popular option to accept Bitcoin.

I did two if these. I've made some memes and talked to my friends and relatives about Bitcoin. I don't know about the first one since Bitcoin memes don't strike me as something universal which people who aren't already into cryptos would get or even notice. As for talking, I managed to introduce Bitcoin to about five people that actually started using it because of me, but they are most likely not into that anymore...
I think that personal promotion cannot do much but the presence of Bitcoin in TV shows can make wide audience somewhat curious about it.

I am a fan of Bitcoin, and I think that it did achieve a lot, but that doesn't mean it's doing fine in terms of the spending culture or adoption. Only around 2% of the population use Bitcoin at all. At the current adoption rate, Bitcoin will take a couple if decades to catch up with top payment methods, if I am not mistaken. Moreover, I really don't think that most users of Bitcoin but goods/services with it. They gamble, trade or hold, but there options if spending Bitcoin as money are too limited. Not to mention that it's largely unrecognised, so any time one needs a proof of funds, BTC doesn't count.

Like tbterryboy, I am not sure I understand which market you mean. It could be about the percentage of people who use cryptos primarily for gambling, or the profits on the gambling industry in the world compared with some world economy figures... And is contribution about profits, prices, users or something else? I've found some data on gambling (including online gambling, although it's obviously not necessarily and probably mainly not crypto gambling) on this website but perhaps you meant something very different. Then I've seen articles on how cryptos have changed gambling, but, interestingly, not vice versa... I do believe, however, that crypto gambling is one of the main use cases of cryptocurrencies nowadays.

The only friends into gambling I have are into online gambling already, so they're familiar with the concept and don't require an explanation. I think that online gambling is a much safer space than the traditional one, and only one of the reasons for that is provably fair gambling that means that unlike in physical casinos no cheating is possible here. Another reason is that you don't get to people who lose or win money (in person), so it allows avoiding face-to-face conflicts between the winner and the loser. Moreover, casinos are traditionally considered a place full of influential criminals, and mingling with those also doesn't sound like a good idea. I feel alright trying out various online casinos, but I would never even walk into a real one.

So it's another classical crash game website, isn't it? I like the game, but if you want to compete with solid casinos, you should offer more than a bonus and a typical game. Why would people choose your website rather than a reputable, famous and original bustabit that offered the game for the first time as far as I know? Anyway, I tried to sign up, I entered a username, email, and password, but then there was this 'thank-you.php' webpage or something without anything actually saying 'thank you or logging me in'. I tried to log in then, and it turns out that apparently it did memorize my entered data, but it's still buggy. And there 'index.php', 'thank-you.php' things don't look too professional, to be honest. I wrote 'bitcointalk' in the chat, so in case I receive the bonus, I'll try to play.

I don't think that the main problems with Bitcoin are that people cannot get started easily or have a low risk. Bitcoin is quite user-friendly, IMO, there's nothing that hard in using it. Plus, there're multiple tutorials, safety tips, and stuff. As for the risk, it's not that high IMO, since Bitcoin has proved to grow over time. Plus, it's not like a crash game where something gets busted within a second and is worth zero. If people feel uncomfortable, they can sell anytime and not lose much. The main challenges I see are scalability, lack of trust from the authorities and the giant and powerful banking system.

Apparently, it's not totally safe for a variety of reasons. Honestly, I thought that it was a great method to protect my funds, but these days I am starting to rethink it. This malware is one thing, but there's also the infamous SIM Swapping of which you've probably heard, and it also compromises the 2FA. I guess we can never be completely safe, every method has its risks. For instance, in the case of super safety from the outer world, there's a danger of losing the essential info to open a wallet which to me seems even more realistic than getting hacked, to be honest.

I like the idea of cryptocurrency, and I like having some of it. If there were truly an option to pay for stuff with Bitcoin and not overpay with the fees or anything, I would prefer Bitcoin over fiat. For now, however, Bitcoin is way behind fiat in terms of adoption, it has scalability and recognition issues. For example, I am going to need to apply for a visa in a few months, and I'll need to prove that I have some money to live abroad. For that, I need a bank statement. I have enough money in Bitcoin, but for it to count I have to sell it for fiat, I cannot provide a signed message to the Embassy. Such things are serious obstacles for me.

1. I've never lost BTC. I've always used a trusted wallet, and I've never encountered any problems with it. I did lose 0.5 Ethereum, though, which back then cost $150, and it was quite a significant amount of money. I lost it to Ethereumwallet.net or something like that (I wasn't good with 'not your keys not your coins thing' back then, and the website was pretty popular).
2. Zero, since I haven't lost any.
3. I regret buying Ripple when it cost $3 per coin  I did not spend much on that investment, though.

I somewhat agree with you. But thousands of black people does not prove that they're fine with using it. To make a statement such as the op's making, however, we need some nice representative professionally done polls. It might turn out that on average black people in the US ('cause we have to remember that cryptos have gained quite some success in African countries) are more prejudiced against Bitcoin and the reason for that might be that they received a more negative impact from the financial system (on average). These things need solid proofs to be taken seriously. But in any case, Bitcoin promotion to any groups of people is something to support, right?

Esports has gained huge popularity, while they are not such a strong part when it comes to sports betting. Some websites offer some options when some major tournaments are around, though. For instance, a reputable crypto sports betting website Sportsbet.io offers to bet on World of Warcraft, Counterstrike, and MTG. I am sure that if the demand grows, there'll be more offers. Some other websites also allow betting on such tournaments. I am not a fan of computer games, though, so I don't get these matches. I think it's good that gamers get an opportunity to gain something financially from all those hours they've spent to master their skills in these games.

Wow, I think it's a pretty cool interview. I like the responses in the blog. I've been using Coinmarketcap for years and switched to Coingecko very recently due to some recommendations I got when CMC was down for some hours. But in any case, Coinmarketcap is a big deal and a pretty useful website. What's bad is the issue of manipulating trading volumes that has been spotted to affect the list of top crypto exchanges on Coinmarketcap. Perhaps, this is a universal problem with such websites, and it's not their fault, but I am wondering if there are some strategies being implemented to cope with such fake volume cases and make sure they don't change the big picture of which exchanges are the top ones.

How significant is the coverage decrease? Where does it occur and for how long? The answers to these questions are crucial to determining what's going on here. If, say, the coverage drops in a country where Bitcoin is barely used, no wonder it does not affect Bitcoin. If these are minor and temporary coverage issues, it is also unlikely to affect Bitcoin. In any case, I believe that Bitcoin depends on the Internet a lot nowadays. Bitcoin would not be that valuable if it was not convenient to exchange it. I am not saying it's impossible to exchange BTC without the Internet but the vast majority of users would not know how to do that and would not really be interested in doing that.

Donating money is good, of course, but I'm sure he could donate way more from his own money. If he truly gave away his money, it was probably a gesture. I think it was rather disrespectful, considering that Justin spent a lot of money and effort on this guy. This means that he doesn't even want to try appreciate these efforts... I hope that one day he'll have to admit he was very wrong about Bitcoin.